'Back in 2015, The New York Times published an article entitled, “Protection Without a Vaccine,” an in-depth look at immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. Described as a “novel approach” to fighting serious diseases like H.I.V., Ebola , malaria, hepatitis and even the common flu, the researchers involved in the development of I.G.T. believe that it could provide long-term protection against diseases which traditional vaccines have failed to control.
While this sounds good on the surface, those who are interested in protecting their health freedoms and those of their offspring should take careful note of what it entails.
The Times explained how I.G.T. works:
[Researchers] developed an artificial antibody that, once in the blood, grabbed hold of the virus and inactivated it. The molecule can eliminate H.I.V. from infected monkeys and protect them from future infections.
But this treatment is not a vaccine, not in any ordinary sense. By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.
And here’s the kicker:
I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.
So, while I.G.T. is different from ordinary vaccinations and therefore doesn’t carry their risks, it could potentially be far worse.'
Read more: GM humans: New vaccines made with synthetic genes will alter your DNA (what David Icke warns about in his absolutely explosive new book)
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
22 hours ago
Four rational reasons to avoid the flu shot and what to do instead to protect your health
7 October 2018
The Supreme Court ruled vaccines are 'unavoidably unsafe' in 2016 – What has changed since? Nothing
From our advertisers
56 minutes ago
US senators cry foul over Riyadh's 'insulting' Khashoggi story, say crown prince involved in death
23 hours ago
No wonder they call him Little Saddam: Michael Burleigh says Saudi Arabia's Mohammed Bin Salman is an unstable despot whose bloodlust threatens the entire Middle East
From our advertisers