- The Facts: On September 11th of this year, Franklin Square Fire Commissioner and 9/11 first responder Christopher Gioia and others held a press conference urging conference to open up a new 9/11 investigation as there are still many questions unanswered.
- Reflect On: Why has the US government continually ignored the evidence and requests by people to open up a new investigation. Why are people like Gioia constantly ignored and censored from the mainstream?
If 9/11 was a controlled demolition, it would have huge implications. We’ve seen many ‘false flag’ terrorist attacks, especially over the past few decades. The chemical gas attacks in Syria were a great example. Never before in the history of false flag attacks has there been so much evidence to support that conclusion. False flag attacks occur when one group creates, funds and plans an attack, while blaming that attack on another group. It’s used for a number of reasons, mainly to justify the infiltration and invasion of another country in the name of ‘fighting terrorism’ when in reality, it’s for ulterior motives. This is why current presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard introduced the Stop Arming Terrorist Act a few years ago, stating that, “The legislation would prohibit the U.S. government from using American taxpayer dollars to provide funding, weapons, training, and intelligence support to groups like the Levant Front, Fursan al Ha and other allies of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, al-Qaeda and ISIS, or to countries who are providing direct or indirect support to those same groups.” Gabbard was also quoted saying that the “CIA has also been funneling weapons and money through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. This support has allowed al-Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo.” There is a lot of evidence for this as well, which is why she introduced the bill in the first place.
Did we see the same type of false flag terrorism during 9/11? Evidence suggests that we did, and the US government, or those who puppet it, has refused to acknowledge the plethora of evidence suggesting that 9/11 was actually a controlled demolition and that planes alone did not bring down the three towers on that tragic day.
Calls for the preservation of evidence by numerous New York City officials went unheard as officials removed and destroyed nearly all of the debris after the attack. This prevented a proper forensic investigation from ever taking place. As a result, WTC 7 become the first steel framed high rise to collapse solely as a result of a normal office fire.
Some of the latest news comes from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, where professor and Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, released a new study proving “definitively,” according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth founder Richard Gage, that fire did not cause the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11.
On September 3rd, Architects & Engineers released this statement:
Today, we at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are pleased to partner with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of WTC 7’s collapse conducted by researchers in the university’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The UAF WTC 7 report concludes that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fire but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.'
Read more: First Responders Urge Congress to Reopen 9/11 Investigation