A MEMBER of the House of Lords has claimed that The Queen may be forced to abdicate unless the controversial Lisbon Treaty is wiped away on October 31.
Lord James of Blackheath, speaking in the House of Lords on Friday, warned there was far more at stake in the current Brexit crisis than the general public was aware of.
He claims that the acceptance of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU’s constitution, means that solemn oaths taken by key members of The Crown including Queen Elizabeth have been compromised.
He said: “If the Lisbon Treaty is allowed to stand is not wiped away at midnight on 31 October, we are all, every single man jack of us, in breach of our oath in joining this House because we have allowed the omniscience of Parliament to be reduced by the elimination of the veto which was standing in our benefit until the Lisbon Treaty.
“That has far-reaching consequences which go way beyond us and reach into the Palace and the Crown itself……
“What I am going to say is that I think the basis on which we are going forward from here is wrong because we have a situation in which we are facing a choice between remain, the no-go solution and, as came very much into focus in the latter stages of yesterday, the possible resurrection of the May deal. The May deal and remain both carry the same consequence that they would still leave us in breach of our oath. We need to have our oaths restored to us, which would happen if at midnight on 31 October if the Lisbon Treaty was wiped away.
“The first person we need to be concerned about in that respect is Her Majesty because we have the power of government placed in our hands by the coronation oath which she swore never to diminish, but we have diminished it for her.
“In those circumstances, do the British public realise they are being asked to consider a situation which might create a position in which Her Majesty would consider it was essential for her to abdicate?
“If that occurred, would it ever be possible to resurrect the monarch because nobody else could swear the same coronation oath? Let us be realistic about this. My whole criticism of the situation of opposition to no-go at the moment is that we simply have not informed the British public of what is at stake. It goes way beyond this.”
Lord James continued: “We have this wonderful paper called Yellowhammer, which tells us all the dreadful things that will happen if we do go no-go. My secretary has an alternative list that I have complied called the Black Vulture, which is my list of the things that people do not know about which will happen if we do not go no deal.
“The first is the hazard it creates for the Crown. The second is: will somebody please tell us the truth about the European defence union? This is by far the biggest issue facing the British public and they know nothing about it officially. Can we please have a proper account of what it entails?
“Is it really true that the Government have entered into private agreements with the European Community that they will, on completion of remain or whatever it is to be, transfer to the European Union in Brussels the entire control of our entire fighting forces, including all their equipment? [Laughter.]
“Noble Lords may jest, but it has been done and they should check it out. It is too important to ignore. We must know the truth of this. We must have it clear for the whole public to know. I believe it is true, and I think we should be told. I understand that it is intended that the oath of every serving member of our forces will be cancelled and they will be required to undertake a new oath of loyalty to Brussels.
“I understand that in recent months, we have had a series of people sent from our Armed Forces to create and install the command and control centres to be used for the control of our troops once we have ceased to have any control over their use, application or deployment. It goes beyond this. They are to take control of our intelligence services, the whole core of Five Eyes. They will have MI6 and the Cheltenham monitoring centre, and we will be completely excluded from it under the new arrangements…. “
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
8 January 2019
Disappearing peers: Lord Sugar and Baroness Brady are among the high-profile 'passengers' who attend fewer than one in five House of Lords sittings
2 January 2019
House of Lords should get rid of peers who 'contribute little to political life' but still get £305-a-day just for turning up, Lord Speaker claims
27 December 2018
Unelected Lords guzzle champagne while hundreds of thousands are forced to turn to foodbanks
From our advertisers
6 December 2019
What Corbyn SHOULD have said to Schofield and Neil - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
19 hours ago
Transgender extremist Liberal Democrats took £300,000 from puberty-blocking company targeting the young
18 hours ago
Israel threatens Iran with ‘own Vietnam in Syria,’ refuses to rule out pre-emptive strike
From our advertisers