By Catherine J. Frompovich
What’s all the fuss about measles when there are definitive scientific mechanisms to ascertain which measles strains are involved, plus from where they originate, e.g., vaccines!
How come the U.S. CDC and FDA are not adverse to using PCR (polymerase chain reaction)identification in order to “cherry pick” specific data regarding propagandized measles infections information, but will not permit PCR, as I understand, to be used by the medical profession to identify prophylactically, those infants and/or individuals who may present certain mitochondrial proclivities for vaccine adverse reactions, which, unequivocally, would disqualify them as vaccine candidates?
Something just doesn’t comport with such illogical thinking!
Back in November 2016, the Journal of Clinical Microbiology published an interesting research paper dealing with identifying measles strains using “real time PCR.”
Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR (Nov. 16, 2016)
The valued information gathered, to my way of thinking, is the data generated regarding various measles strains:
AIK-C, CAM-70, Edmonston-Zagreb, Moraten, and Shanghai-191.
Here’s an example of what that new genotyping protocol can determine:
During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees (3). Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015,73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data). In contrast, only 11 of 542 cases genotyped in the National Reference Center for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella in Germany were associated with the vaccine virus. [CJF emphasis]
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), officials recognize 24 genotypes of the measles virus, and all are vaccine strains in genotype A. That information seems priceless, and strategically points to confirming how “vaccine” measles is spreading in relationship to “wild measles.”
Interestingly, and probably on target, those wild measles data make me wonder who are being blamed for measles outbreaks, i.e., non-vaccinated persons, since according to the above paper,
“Wild-type viruses of genotype A are no longer circulating (11).”
11. Anonymous. 2015. Genetic diversity of wild-type measles viruses and the global measles nucleotide surveillance database (MeaNS). Wkly Epidemiol Rec 90:373–380.
So what kind of “epidemiological” games are being played to effectuate mass vaccinations?
How can the non-vaccinated be spreading measles IF there is no “wild measles” or; are non-vaccinated persons being infected by newly-measles-vaccinated vaccinees during a month-long vaccine shedding process?
Dr. Graham Wilson, former Director of the Public Health and Laboratory Service for England and Wales, warned the public health community of the need to remain ever vigilant when it comes to vaccine safety when a long time ago in 1967 he said,
Over confidence must at all costs be avoided… It is for us, and for those who come after us, to see that the sword which vaccines and antisera have put into our hands is never allowed to tarnish through over-confidence, negligence, carelessness, or want of foresight on our part. 
That, unfortunately, seems to be the apparent ongoing problem with the CDC/FDA, i.e., accepting Big Pharma’s biased and vested-interest study results for vaccine licensure applications, which basically is nothing short of “consensus science,” not valid third-party, independent science. When will that fraudulent practice be stopped?
Wisconsin For Vaccine Choice
Shedding & Vaccines
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.