CHANNELLING or mediumship remains hugely controversial.
I have been on the receiving end of some very good information – and a lot of rubbish.
And that represents my considered view.
I’d put mediums into three categories – outright fakes who know full well they are fabricating contact, usually to make money; The genuinely deluded who believe they have a ‘gift’ but speak from their own intuition and/or through mischievous spirits; a much smaller number who can contact with the ‘dead’ and wish to help humanity.
Our mistake, I feel, is in being too categorical. If you take everything you hear from spiritualists as being true, you are going to be badly misled at times. But, if you dismiss everything from the ‘other side’ as rubbish, you will miss out on confirmation of the most important piece of information of all – all of us continue to live after our physical deaths.
The channelling reported in this video is worth listening to because it confirms a great deal that respected researchers revealed about the murder of Princess Diana in 1997.
Sloan Bella is a Los Angeles-based professional psychic, medium and astrologer.
I know very little more about her than this presentation.
One thing I liked was that her knowledge about the circumstances of Diana’s passing is clearly very sketchy. There are times here where you almost want to say: ‘surely, you knew that? Where have you been these last 20 years?’
But, in this case, it adds a little credibility because, aside from Sloan’s comment that she is no supporter of the Royal Family, there’s nothing to suggest that she is merely regurgitating her own knowledge.
I also liked the idea that Henri Paul contacted her rather than the other way around.
I don’t give much credence to mediums who claim to have a hot line in which they can contact spirits on tap.
You know, the late and departed turn up right on cue at 7.30pm on a Tuesday as the highly paid psychic goes on stage in Manchester. Somehow, I don’t think the spirit world works like that.
Her comments on what Henri’s spirit – if that’s what it was – wished to communicate are interesting.
The main thrust is that he was ‘tricked’ into playing his part in the tragedy that followed.
It’s relevant here to consider what we know already about the driver that fateful night.
The honest answer is almost nothing, unless you happen to have known him of course.
But nearly everyone has a perception of what he was about – and that comes entirely from the media.
He was a hard drinker, quite possibly an alcoholic, who had been on the sauce that night and drove the Mercedes carrying Diana, her boyfriend Dodi Fayed and her bodyguard Trevor Rees Jones into a pillar in the Pont de L’Alma road tunnel in Paris. Right?
But very little of that is beyond dispute.
Researchers have questioned whether we can rely on the sample allegedly taken from Paul which supposedly revealed his alcohol intake.
They point out he was a well-respected driver who had recently passed his pilot’s licence.
They ask you to consider whether the Al Fayeds would have put the destiny of their loved one and one of the most famous people on the planet in the hands of someone who was in no fit condition for the job.
Sloan’s information confirms that the decision to drive the couple to Dodi’s home appears to have been changed at the last moment. This tallies with knowledge that the paparazzi, who were also wrongly scapegoated for this atrocity, were watching their every move.
It is only fair to point out that, although the murder of Diana has been the world’s focus of attention from that night, two other human being lost their physical lives.
And, whilst Diana’s reputation was greatly enhanced by her untimely passing as we now tend to remember the very best of her and make light of her failings, the legacy of both Dodi and Henri Paul has not been as kind.
Dodi is very commonly dismissed as a ‘playboy’ as if dating several beautiful, well known women is some kind of crime.
Worse still, the driver is understandably blamed for the whole incident by people who soak up the mainstream version without asking too many questions.
So it is logical that Paul would want to set the record straight. For his family and friends have suffered greatly through what many now suspect is a calculated and callous misrepresentation of the man.
Sloan also confirms the driver had two bosses. It is well documented that aside from his work with the Al Fayeds, he was a secret agent very possibly working for both French and British intelligence.
This would lead some to conclude he may have been complicit in the crime but Sloan’s version makes more sense.
Being an agent, he could easily be used and abused – the word ‘tricked’ seems apt.
He got into the driver’s seat that night as oblivious to what was about to transpire as 99.99 per cent of us who don’t have direct contact with intelligence services.
Sloan’s comments explain another point raised by researchers.
Why did Paul drive into the tunnel when the most logical route – and one he had used to drive the couple to the same destination earlier in the day – was to avoid it?
The suggestion is that the vehicle was deliberately led into the tunnel and that Paul himself was attacked and slumped at the wheel before it crashed.
Sloan also makes interesting observations about Diana’s tortured state of mind one month before her death and fears that Meghan Markle may one day fall foul of the same people who dealt with the Princess.
And she gives a very credible reason for the murder. Diana’s landmines campaign that, had it continued, would have hugely undermined both The Crown and the Government.
This channelling falls very much into my third, rarer category. Sloan’s information is, in my view, the real deal.
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
29 July 2018
Whitehall is ‘covering up the past’: File on Prince Charles and Princess Diana's marriage, Lockerbie records and MI5 'link' to Belfast lawyer death among documents blocked by government
From our advertisers
Epstein: Gateway to the Global Cesspit - by David Icke who has been exposing elite paedophiles and Satanists for decades
Why they say Epstein is dead - Epstein 'survivor' talks about him and the paedophile/Satanic elite
9 hours ago
‘We are moving into a new, controlled society worse than old totalitarianism’ – Zizek on Google leak
From our advertisers