By Jamie Busby - Staff Author
S.A.F.F. stands for "Sub-culture Alternatives Freedom Foundation". They have a website that I'll link at the end, though I must warn you that it's not secure. They also have a Director called Tony Rhodes who can be contacted via email, I will link the email address later too. I expect many who read this to feel compelled to contact them.
TIP - Wear sunglasses when visiting their website, the colour scheme and brightness is horrific, I'd rather look directly at the sun. And it looks like a 5 year old designed it.
They claim to expose the truth behind media mind-control... No, no, no; that's what WE do here. All SAFF do is claim everything you read in either the Mainstream or Independent media, that just so happens to interfere with their agenda, is nothing but lies. And their agenda? To protect paedophiles and SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse) rings that operate in the UK and globally. Makes you wonder what kind of people would do this?...
An example of an article on their website, that you can go and see for yourself, is in defence of Jimmy Savile. They claim that one of the most depraved known paedophile predators of modern times was nothing more than a scapegoat. Scumbag Savile was known to be heavily involved in much more than satisfying his own sick fantasies, much of it to protect himself. SAFF write a lot of waffle and bullshit, but that's what it boils down to.
In fact, they pretty much defend the entirety of the paedophile elite that we KNOW operate worldwide and they do it all very smugly. The arrogance only added to the anger I felt reading the shit they've posted on their tin-pot, cheap-as-chips crappy website.
In 1989, ITV television in the UK ran an episode of the very popular tabloid show "The Cook Report" entitled "The Devil's work". I have referenced this episode before but I found that SAFF use it as what they call a "Training Video"! They call this one No.004; I'm not sure how many they had planned or how many they eventually created.
They basically run the episode with occasional interjections of text on screen rubbishing the preceding material. They don't even properly challenge it, they just dismiss it. So let's begin by going through the episode and a few examples of what they have to say about it; then I will have my say.
The programme begins with a blacked out profile of a woman talking about how her daughter was used and abused by a Satanic child sex abuse ring. She describes how her daughter became pregnant many times and that the Satanist paedophiles would abort the foetus and sacrifice it.
I wrote an article on this very case myself if you're interested in all the horrific details;
SAFF jump all over the mother's "careful use of words". The mother says "What some people call a foetus, as a mother I call them a child." Considering that in this case, the very young girl's pregnancy was allowed to continue so that the foetus would have been more developed, is it not normal for her to refer to it as a child?
SAFF think the following; "This is typical fundamentalist dialogue. Many SRA accusations are simply worst scenario thinking by anti-abortion campaigners who justify any lie or action that 'saves babies lives'".
They're saying that her wording alters the perception of what happened. From something perfectly fine to something bad? These people are fucking serious. This is their argument against the mother's testimony, which was based on what her daughter told her. Her daughter gave birth when she was 10 years old by the way, the result of one of hundreds of forced sexual encounters with an organised Satanic cult that raped and murdered children.
Next up is the introduction of the ghastly Michael Aquino, accompanied by his magnificent eyebrows and his equally lovely wife Lillith, who doubles as his High Priestess... Aquino is the leader of "The Temple of Set", a pseudo religious group formed in 1975 by Aquino himself after he'd left Anton LaVey's Church of Satan. They're basically devil worshippers but instead of Satan, they call him "Set".
Aquino was an Intelligence officer in the US Army, specialising in psychological warfare. He's known to have extensively and enthusiastically used the CIA's MKUltra programme in Vietnam during the 1970's. Some say that he's a despicable piece of shit. I'll reserve judgement...
SAFF's problem with this segment is that the ITV television company paid for Aquino and his wife to fly over for the show. So what? If I was asked to go on an American show I'd expect them to foot the bill.
They also say that the ritual that's filmed later in the programme was just for the cameras. It was not, they were ordaining a new UK High Priest and allowed it to be filmed. Even if the ritual had been for the cameras, what does that change? This is how they operate and a genuine ritual that they perform, their inane argument changes nothing. I'm starting to think they have no argument...
They also claim that the programme uses the film of the ritual as evidence to fuel the belief that Satanic worship and abuse is "rife in the UK". Time has shown that it is indeed rife and those who were woke back then knew it too. Hindsight has come back and bit SAFF right on the arse, not that they accept this.
Roger Cook describes the influence of Satan on popular culture at the time. He lists "The Omen" movies and heavy metal performers, including Ozzy Osbourne, as having been impacted. Ozzy himself confirmed he'd never had any interest in Satanism or devil worship; "It takes me all my time to conjure myself out of bed in the morning, never mind conjure up the Devil..."
Roger Cook references books written by Aleister Crowley, a man labelled "the wickedest man in the world". Cook then goes on to call Crowley "the evil father of British Satanism".
SAFF dive in at this point to make it clear that Crowley was NOT a Satanist. This may actually be true, even though many considered him to be one. Crowley was basically a vile madman who was heavily involved in ritualistic sexual behaviour. He was also a proponent of human sacrifice, suggesting a "male child of perfect innocence" as the most suitable victim. SAFF claim he was referring to animals, though I have never known any creature referred to as a "male child".
If it was anything to do with the occult, Crowley was there. He died a penniless heroin addict. But don't let SAFF hear you call him a Satanist, God forbid...
Moving on, Roger Cook speaks to an ex-Satanist called Carl Hughes. He calls himself Carl Crowley Hughes... He was active in Satanic circles and explained how it changed his personality.
Him and a friend broke into and desecrated a church, including the theft of altar equipment for use at his home-made devil worshipping "church". In his bedroom... Here, he performed his own Satanic rituals. This led to his Mum eventually throwing him out, oh dear. They have kissed and made-up since though...
And how do you think SAFF defend this? They explain that Hughes and his friend were out drinking and couldn't find a public toilet. So they broke into a nearby church and PISSED on the altar. They claim a "hysterical media" is transforming criminal damage and theft into religious desecration, I kid you not. This obviously makes it all okay then eh SAFF?!!
The case of Andrew Newell. He is another young man who seems to have been drawn into the world of Satanism, sometimes sleeping in a tomb in a graveyard no less.
However, this turned very dark when he stabbed his flatmate 5 times in the heart, killing him. The Police believed this was a ritual murder but he somehow got away with 7 years in prison for manslaughter.
SAFF vehemently claim that Newell was NOT a Satanist, their zeal suggests they really don't want you to believe anyone is, I wonder why... They call his murder trial a "travesty of justice"; he'd murdered his flatmate! The only travesty was the manslaughter verdict which had originally been a murder conviction. They defend him by saying he killed his flatmate after a drunken argument and it was self-defence. Again, that's okay then ainnit?!! Nothing to see here...
However, Chief Superintendent David Cole of the investigating Police talked about the crime. In Newell's bedroom they found a record case, Newell had asked them not to open it. Obviously, the Police did open it and found many books on the occult.
They also discovered a document that Newell had hand-written. At the bottom of this literary masterpiece, he had written "Lucifer, Leviathan, Satan and Belial". These just all happen to be alternative names for the Devil. At the very bottom, Newell had drawn an inverted cross, another symbol of Satanism. The cross was drawn in human blood, but Newell wasn't a Satanist was he SAFF!!!
Newell was one of many Satanists who bought books and other Satanic/occult paraphernalia from a bookshop in Leeds, England called "The Sorcerer's Apprentice". And by a strange coincidence, they just happen to be the main sponsor of the SAFF website!
SAFF describe them as follows on their website;
"They tried to firebomb them out of business but they wouldn't be cowed by fundamentalists. 20 years later Britain's first Esoteric Store is still providing trustworthy information and literature for freethinkers. Because they stood fast your ability to pursue your alternative beliefs was kept open."
The owner is called Chris Bray and allegedly admits to having some very dodgy clientele, though SAFF of course deny he ever said this. Bray sells books on the occult and the equipment with which to practice it. On his own website he states the following regarding his store;
"A mine of insider occult information of practical value to beginners and advanced seekers into Qabbalism, Mysticism, Thelema, Paganism, Wicca, Chaos Magick, Satanism Sorcery and the Sinister." - SATANISM is clearly mentioned there. And I'm not sure whether there should be a comma after that word? Maybe Satanism Sorcery is a thing; badly worded but a thing nonetheless.
Roger Cook goes to the shop and immediately realises they are filming HIM from the inside. Chris Bray actually called the Police to keep Cook and his film crew away from him while he emerged from the shop in some sort of Halloween disguise. As did his staff. Cook tried to ask a few questions regardless as Bray fumbled with his car keys, clearly flapping nervously trying to make his escape.
Why did he refuse to defend himself against simple allegations of selling material related to witchcraft and the occult, including Satanism? Because the fact is he DOES sell this stuff! His shop is full of it.
SAFF defends this section by saying that a girl who worked in the shop was on the run from an abusive husband and didn't want to be recognised... Also, Chris Bray had received "fundamentalist" death threats and they'd all decided that "the masks was the best way to proceed". Pull the other one, it's got bells on it!
I think I'm just about done with SAFF here, they consistently take the piss with their excuses against the indefensible. Like I'v said at the beginning, check out their website and see what they believe in and vouch for. I wouldn't trust anyone who has anything to do with SAFF. Satanists, paedophiles and their apologists/defenders are just as bad as each other, if not all one and the same.
I left out a few segments and there was more, but I just wanted to paint an overall picture of a strange little organisation with links to other strange little organisations that seem to be getting up to a lot of very strange things. That are organised.
However, this is no joking matter. This material is all from 1989 and 1990, almost 30 years ago. In that time, with the advent of the Internet age, we've discovered that what SAFF were trying to protect then is a legitimate and openly huge problem now. Though they may be a distinctly amateur group of odd-bods with a clear agenda to protect evil people and acts, how many more SAFFs are out there?
Everyone from politicians and rulers down to toe-rags like Jimmy Savile and random anonymous paedophiles are involved; it's truly GLOBAL. Nowhere is untouched by the phenomena of Satanic Ritual Abuse just like the world is rife with paedophiles. They go hand in hand, they have done for millennia.
The scale of the problem is beyond what many realise due to the VIP status of the people at the very top of the Deep State who control everything. They're pretty good at keeping secrets but plenty of dirt does manage to get out regularly that gives us a glimpse into this disgusting world of theirs. Indeed, are SAFF and the like on the payroll of the Deep State?
The links I'v mentioned are below if you feel like looking at the relevant website(s) or perhaps contacting SAFF's Director, I'm sure he'd be delighted by a deluge of emails asking all sorts of probing questions. They seem to have an answer for everything so I say go for it.
Contact me by email: [email protected]
http://saff.nfshost.com/homepage.htm - SAFF website
[email protected] - SAFF Director's email address
http://www.sorcerers-apprentice.co.uk/homepage.htm - Chris Bray's website
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
1 August 2019
UK ‘up to its neck’ in Russiagate affair, says George Galloway, as secret texts reveal British role
24 July 2019
No foreign military presence is key to Persian Gulf stability – Russia’s security concept
From our advertisers
From our advertisers