By Jamie Busby - Staff Author
This will be my final report of this nature on the separate attacks that occurred on 9/11. Please click the links below if you missed the others in the series and wish to read them to complete the picture from this angle.
The official government narrative concocted by NIST tells us that the plane that hit the Pentagon was American Airlines Flight 77. This plane had supposedly disappeared off the radar over West Virginia nearly 1 hour before it allegedly struck, though no evidence has ever been provided to back this up.
In this case, the flight data recorder was actually recovered. It's serial number could have proved beyond doubt that it was indeed Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon. However, this too has never been released which I find bloody strange to say the least... If what they're saying is true this evidence would be conclusive one way or the other, why keep it hidden away? (We know why eh!)
At the scene immediately after the impact of whatever did hit the Pentagon, there was nothing more than tiny pieces of debris. In fact, many unknown "men in suits" were seen on the front lawn interfering with the crime scene in direct violation of law enforcement rules. Who were they?
An eyewitness present at the time stated "It was DPS (Defense Protective Service - basically Pentagon Police)... they were here right then and there. That's what I don't understand, where did they come from. Maybe they knew something. I don't know."
The Debunkers I have spoken of many times, those from "Popular Mechanics" who share a communal brain cell, speak of how there were many eyewitnesses to an American Airlines jet flying towards the Pentagon. However, most of these witnesses actually describe a much smaller aircraft, something like a private jet. It was also WHITE, not bearing the distinctive colour scheme of a typical American Airlines airplane.
The "crime scene"
Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 weighing 100 tonnes. If that had flown at high speed into a building made of reinforced concrete then you would expect to see absolute carnage, huge pieces of debris of the WHOLE plane all over the place. However, as was the case with Flight 93 in Pennsylvania on that day, there was a distinct absence of wreckage.
Bob Pugh, a cameraman, was one of the first people at the scene. He said the following;
"No-one was in control of the area. I had free rein. There was a lot of debris in the foreground of those videos but very small pieces... a dinner plate or smaller... all the while I'm looking for wreckage and I can't find a piece of anything I recognise.
I can't see the tail... wheels... engines... there's no chairs, there's no luggage..."
What he is referring to is what he SHOULD have seen but was not present. The Debunkers claim that the lack of wreckage outside was due to the entire plane entering the building, much like how they claim that Flight 93 "buried" itself in that field in Shanksville... give me strength...
NIST claim that the plane approached the Pentagon extremely close to the ground and struck the building at a 42 degree angle i.e. It did not hit it head on. Also, it was slightly tilted at impact, the right wing higher that the left. They continue to say that most of the plane proceeded to penetrate the outer E-ring of the building, causing mass destruction as it too was being torn apart.
The exit hole or where the nose came to rest can be seen in the C-ring of the building in the form of a hole about 12 feet wide. (more on this later)
At ground level where they say the plane hit, there is an uninterrupted opening approx. 90 feet wide. This damage affects the 2nd floor in the form of a 15 feet wide "entry hole".
The Debunkers believe this demonstrates how the plane entered the building as it left it's "shape" behind. Methinks they've been watching too many cartoons...
At the rear of the plane are the tail and the stabilisers. The tail is 24 feet high and the stabilisers are 50 feet wide. Where are the impact marks they should have made? They're not there. Plus, there was no sign of debris or wreckage from the wings, tail or stabilisers. There should have been. In fact, there was no damage whatsoever indicative of the wings, tail or stabilisers hitting the facade of the Pentagon. Not a scratch. Where did they go?
The fuselage is the weakest part of any airliner. In the event of a crash, the fuselage is crushed like paper from the nose until it reaches the first relatively strong point; where the wings meet the body. So if the stronger parts of the plane "disintegrated" on contact as NIST and the Debunkers would have us believe, how on earth did the weakest part of the plane fully enter the Pentagon when it would have literally crumpled like a piece of paper?!
Then we get to the engines. Flight 77 was powered by two RB 211 Rolls Royce jet engines. These things are 8 feet tall and weigh 7000lbs each. The internal components of these engines are so robust that they are considered practically indestructible. This fact has been proved many times over in other plane crashes where they survive, often fully intact.
Along with certain parts of the landing gear, at least the core of the 2 engines should have survived the impact. But where were they? Nowhere to be seen, that's where! They should actually have penetrated the Pentagon more than any other part of the plane. They are quite literally huge bullets and they were being "fired" at around 500mph. And they do NOT disintegrate or vanish...
The mystery "exit hole"
The official narrative tells us that it was the fuselage of the plane, that paper-strong nose section, that caused the hole in the inner C-ring of the building...
4 days after the "attack", the Pentagon Renovation manager, Lee Evey, stated the following;
"The plane penetrated through the E-ring, D-ring, C-ring.... The nose of the plane just barely broke through the inside of the C ring, so it was extending into A-E Drive a little bit."
The A-E Drive is an internal alley separating the C-ring from the B-ring. So many rings, makes my head spin...
Remember, this is literally nothing than a huge paper plane we're talking about at this point. They're saying it managed to smash it's way through 3 reinforced concrete building rings; NOT A CHANCE. If, like they say, the fuselage was being "torn into a thousand pieces" on it's way through the Pentagon, how did it keep it's circular shape to create an almost perfectly round hole in the wall at the very end of it's fantastical journey?
We have enough to form a simple conclusion already. The damage to the Pentagon was in no way consistent with what a Boeing 757 could have possibly caused. Something else hit that building on that fateful day.
This mystery could be easily solved, if only the FBI would release the film from scores of surveillance cameras that were focused on where the Pentagon was hit. The FBI confiscated every tape from every camera that would have shown the impact within hours of it happening...
A request to release all the confiscated video was filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FBI agent put in charge with dealing with this replied by saying the following;
"The FBI possessed 85 video tapes that might be potentially responsive to the Plaintiff's FOIA request." However, the FBI agent made a judgement. "I determined that only ONE video tape showed the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001."
The tape he was talking about is the tape that you will have already seen if you have followed this story over the years. The FBI could have simply released all the videos, regardless of what they showed, but they decided to keep them under wraps and just release the one that we've all probably seen.
The film I'm talking about is the one from a Pentagon parking security camera. Initially, only 5 frames were released but in 2006, the whole sequence was made available. Conveniently, this film only runs at 1 frame per second so it's nowhere near fluid and frustratingly misses what we would have liked to have seen.
We see the impact, followed by the huge explosion. But there is no plane. What we DO see, 1 frame before the impact, is what appears to be the tail section of SOMETHING but no body; certainly not of an airliner anyway.
A 2nd camera's footage was released some time after, a camera that was literally about 12 feet away in a bollard and in a direct line between the first camera's line of sight and the impact. Far from helping confirm anything related with the official narrative, analysis has shown it to contain 1 particular frame from each camera that are inconsistent with each other. There is a discrepancy between them which can only be explained by it having been photoshopped to block out exactly WHAT hit the Pentagon. The clearest thing the videos show is a smoke trail, but it is not clear what of...
More to come (DEWs?)
The evidence presented here and in my other articles has convinced me of what I already knew; 9/11 was the biggest and most despicable false-flag attack by America on itself and it's people in history. All to justify going off to fight illegal wars in order to gain control of oil, which of course equals MONEY! Which translates into power.
And all this done at the behest of the Banking Cabal and puppet masters that rule the world, the Deep State.
Though I have now completed this particular line of research, I have also been looking into another intriguing and extremely compelling theory behind all the attacks that took place on 9/11. And that is the use of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEWs). They seem to be all the rage nowadays, were they perhaps used on 9/11?
There is strong evidence that DEWs played some part in New York, Shanksville and the Pentagon that day. It can explain what has alluded most so far, fill in the gaps so to speak and give some answers as opposed to merely dismissing the NIST official narrative government bullshit.
The vapourisation of the Twin Towers for example. Controlled demolition alone would not turn all that concrete and steel into what effectively became dust. There is much, much more to come. Until next time.
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
From our advertisers
12 hours ago
Twitter & Bloomberg campaign accused of censoring tweets with Epstein docs, fueling claims billionaire linked to dead pedophile
12 hours ago
Trilateral Commission Member and Long-Time Google Front-Man Eric Schmidt Leads AI 'Ethics' Board (the poacher working as gamekeeper)
From our advertisers