By Jamie Busby
The 9/11 Commission Report compiled by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) is a fabrication, nothing more than a sick fairy tale that perpetuates the crap that they have force-fed the public ever since that day.
It's purely a cover story, invented by insiders to fit the government narrative.
There is speculation that military drones and NOT passenger airliners were used that day. Passenger airliners are simply not capable of the high speeds, manoeuvrability and destructive force that was demonstrated.
Based on this assumption, one question that keeps cropping up remains unanswered; what REALLY happened to the passengers on the 4 allegedly "hijacked" planes?
Nobody knows 100% what actually happened but the truth will out one day, bit by bit. One thing we do know is that the CIA has been developing technology since the 1960's whereby an in-flight airliner can be literally swapped with a military drone. This was done with "covert operations" in mind...
Operation Northwoods was one such top secret CIA project. Part of Northwoods was this switching of an airliner with a drone, in mid-air, without alerting air traffic control.
The purpose of Operation Northwoods was to commit false flag attacks on their own citizens in the US to generate support for war against Cuba in the 1960's. These attacks would consist of, among other things, hijacking planes. JFK put a stop to Operation Northwoods, one of several actions he took that upset the Deep State gangsters and banksters. And we all know what happened to him in the end.
Under these plans, after the airliner had been switched for a drone, the passenger plane would be landed at a military base. The drone would continue as if it were the airliner, via remote control, ultimately to it's "target" destination.
Going back to 9/11, we have all heard of the phone calls people made to loved ones or emergency services from the "hijacked" planes. We now know for sure that these calls could not have been made from the planes involved on that day.
In 2001, it was basically impossible to make a mobile/cell phone call from an airplane at typical cruising altitudes. It was known that at altitudes above 10,000 feet, a mobile phone effectively becomes useless. Passenger planes, such as those on 9/11, cruise at 30,000 feet and above.
In 2003, a Japanese television channel called "Asahi TV" conducted an experiment in Canada to try and determine the actual reach of a mobile phone signal from a plane in flight. They used 3 different phones from 3 different companies for the purposes of the experiment.
One phone stopped working when they reached 4000 feet. Another phone stopped working at 6000 feet. By the time the plane reached 8000 feet, the third and final phone gave up the ghost. In a nutshell, at 8000 feet even the pick of the bunch failed.
Another issue with using a mobile phone at cruising altitude is SPEED. An airliner travels at 500mph which makes it impossible for cell towers to keep transferring the call from one tower, to the next, then to the next, then to the next,etc...
What is known as the "Handoff" between towers, the switch of the call from one receiver to another, would mean the call would be constantly lost and disconnected due to the sheer speed of the planes. The systems on the ground would not have enough time to process the necessary triangulation calculations and any calls would fail.
Altitude or Speed on their own make placing a mobile phone call from an airliner almost impossible. When you combine these two issues, the likelihood of a successful call is approximately Zero.
It was not until 2004 that Qualcomm were finally able to use a commercial mobile/cell phone device on a commercial airliner. Yet as recently as 2011, 10 years after the events of 9/11, it was still incredibly difficult if not impossible to use a mobile phone at normal cruising altitude.
As the years passed after 9/11 and people recognised the technical problems regarding all the so-called mobile phone calls that were placed, the official narrative began to change. In 2004 when the "9/11 Commission Report" was published, the only mention of phone calls made was "... passengers and flight crew began a series of calls from AIRPHONES and cellular phones."
An Airphone is a special air-to-ground telephone service for passengers on airline flights. The government's NIST report did not specify which calls had been made with which type of device even though previously, it was clear that mobile devices had been used. They had clearly learnt a bit about the limits of the technology and backtracked...
United Airlines Flight 93
This was the plane that allegedly crashed into a field in Pennsylvania, killing all 44 people on board. It was also the only hijacked plane that didn't hit it's intended target; this one was destined for the White House, how convenient it failed.
The authorities have only admitted that a mobile phone was used in 2 cases. One was that of Edward Felt who called 911 emergency services while locked in the plane's toilet.
The other call was made by air stewardess CeeCee Lyles and cannot be disputed as her husband subsequently spoke of his surprise at receiving a call from her mobile, knowing she was at work at high altitude. He said "...how can she call on her cell phone? They [cell phones] don't work on a plane".
The powers-that-be just had to accept these 2 anomalies, there was no way round it. However, it's one thing to admit to these calls but how many others were actually made by mobile/cell phones that they are denying or suppressing?
The FBI quickly began interviewing people who had received calls from people who were allegedly on the flights. Deena Burnett took several calls from the cell phone of her husband Thomas. She knew this as his caller ID came through.
Thomas Burnett made 3 known calls from his mobile phone. They were placed at 9.30am, 9.38am and 9.44am. Flight records show that at 9.30am, the plane was flying at 32,000 feet. At 9.38am the plane was at 36,000 feet and still climbing. At 9.44am, the final call was made when the plane was at 22,000 feet.
If the flight records are legit, these calls would not have been possible due to the altitude and speed.
Jeremy Glick, another passenger on United 93, supposedly saw hijackers on the plane and called his Stepmother Joann Makely to report it. He then asked to talk to his wife Lyzbeth where he also told her that the plane had been hijacked. The FBI report stated; "Lyzbeth could not hear any unusual sounds in the background of the call, and the connection was extremely clear, 'as if he was calling from the next room'".
Jeremy Glick made that call at 9.37am and it lasted for 18 minutes till 9.55am. During this time, the flight records show that the plane was flying at altitudes from 39,000 feet down to 10,000 feet, averaging speeds of 400mph. Again, this call was clearly not possible due in particular to the length of the call. It would not have maintained connection, no chance.
Other calls were made, in similar circumstances regarding the altitude and length of connection. The callers were Honor Wainio, Linda Gronlund, Marion Britton, Peter Hanson and Brian Sweeney. That makes 9 callers in total, that we know of. All impossible due to the same factors; Altitude, Speed and call length.
Calls from where?
We know one thing for sure and that is that these calls WERE made, that is 100% unequivocally true. The big question remains however; Where were they made from?
This is where the theory of switching planes with drones comes into play, a la the CIA and Operation Northwoods.
Were the passengers coerced to call loved ones? Intimidated by forces unknown, made to pretend they were on the planes when they had actually safely landed somewhere unknown.
One well-documented call made by passenger Todd Beamer to "GTA Airfone" operator Lisa Jefferson adds even more credence to this theory. During the alleged hijack of United 93, Lisa answered his call from the on-board Airphone and Beamer asked someone "Are you ready?". Someone responded to him in the positive and Beamer then said "Ok... Let's roll" and began to talk to Lisa Jefferson.
The official narrative states that the hijacking of United 93 took place at 9.28am. Todd Beamer called Lisa Jefferson at 9.43am, 15 minutes into the actual hijacking.
Lisa Jefferson has testified that "Beamer called to state that the plane was about to be hijacked. He stated that three individuals, two wielding knives, the third with a bomb strapped to his waist with a red belt, were preparing to take control of the flight."
Lisa Jefferson states that she spoke to Beamer for around 7 minutes before "two hijackers armed with knives entered the cockpit." This altered the time of the hijacking to approx. 9.52am, the official narrative claims it was 9.28am. That's around a 24 minute difference, quite the discrepancy....
Also, why was Todd Beamer describing events that were supposed to be happening live during the call when they had apparently occurred at least 15 minutes before? Why were terrorists about to hijack the plane at around 9.45am when they had already accessed the cockpit at 9.28am???
Beamer's call lasted for 1 hour and 5 minutes, till 10.48am. The line was left open after the crash at 10.03am. Lisa Jefferson says that she never lost connection, the line went silent but she remained connected. Airphones are powered by the planes electrical system.
Therefore, when you look at the timeline of events, how on earth did the line remain open for 45 minutes after a crash that we were told resulted in the total disintegration of the airliner?!
Cutting through the Crap
Let's face it, there's too many weird goings on here to accept any "official" narrative about this particular aspect of the 9/11 attacks. Not to mention the rest of the official drivel.
It's clear to me that Todd Beamer was not in the air when he called Lisa Jefferson. He appeared to be reading from a script under duress, probably at some as yet unknown airfield. "Let's roll...." These 2 simple words show a blatant scripted incident. It also suggests a sense of calm, they are not the words of a man who knows death is imminent.
Not buying this theory? Howabout this then.
Air stewardess CeeCee Lyles left a message on her husband's answering machine at 9.47am. She begins with "Hi baby. I'm... Baby, you have to listen to me carefully..."
She continues to describe the supposed situation on board her flight at apparently high altitude. After saying "Goodbye" she pauses, then whispers 3 crucial words; "It's a frame"...
This, together with all the evidence of the supposed mobile/cell phone calls from the planes adds up to a story that stinks to high heaven. Nobody seems to have an explanation, but the calls certainly weren't made in the manner the official Deep State narrative would have us believe.
What's more, if we presume the 4 hijacked planes were safely landed as part of this false flag, I dread to think what actually happened to all the people on board. All we know is that they are all dead.
This is a small, despicable fragment of one of the most shocking cover-ups in history.
I would like to end by honouring those mentioned and everyone else that found themselves drawn into this diabolical hoax. May they and every other innocent person who lost their life on 9/11 rest in peace.
Meanwhile, we must continue in our efforts to uncover the truth and hopefully one day make the evil puppet masters who orchestrated this horrific crime to pay for it; heavily. So heavily that it crushes them.
"September 11 - The new Pearl Harbour" - 2013 US documentary; Massimo Mazzucco
physics911.net/project-achilles - Japanese phone/flight experiment
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
From our advertisers
1 hour ago
Trump says he waits to hear from Riyadh on oil attacks’ culprit, US ‘locked & loaded’ to respond (blame Iran in other words)
From our advertisers