By Jamie Busby
“The media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” - Malcolm X said this, in a time when there was very few alternative and independent news sources other than the Mainstream Media (MSM).
Even though we now have a relatively overwhelming choice in where we get our "news", the MSM dominates simply due to the exposure it commands from it's money-men backers. They even organise the "controlled opposition" and apparent clash between certain huge MSM outlets; if they didn't, it would be even more obvious.
Most MSM companies are owned by Zionists, the globalist elite, a collection of psychopaths intent on protecting their interests and meddling in everything; God forbid the masses knew what was truly going on in the annals of power and who is really in control.
Via their domination of the MSM, the deep state has the world's greatest mind-control tool in it's pocket; and they use it for all it's worth. Many people are becoming conscious to the crap they peddle, but not enough yet to reach a tipping point where MSM outlets simply can't get the job done anymore.
Our end-game must be their collapse; the knock-on effects will include revealing the world as it is.
"Fake News" is one thing, literally making things up; bias is another, there will always be bias. But the greatest concern is the constant twisting of the truth that the MSM vomits up, all in the interests of their puppet master's agendas.
We are their target audience, all of us, I take their manipulation and deceit personally.
The MSM rarely covers both sides of any story; the more controversial the subject, the harder they push on the side they are ordered to. If you do a Google (or DuckDuckGo) search of any issue, you will quickly find many sources backing them and just as many in direct contradiction. But the MSM keeps the masses blinkered with it's one-sided reporting, as ordered.
The MSM will use high-profile and emotionally charged examples to push their agenda. In America, school shootings are regularly used as an argument for gun control; this tugs on the nation's heart-strings, regardless of the FACTS that gun violence is in decline. Whatever your stance on guns in America, this is disinformation.
The fact is that if people with bad intentions want guns, they will get them. In the UK, most of the firearms that are used in gun crime have been banned since the Dunblane massacre in 1996. Yet those who want them can certainly acquire them, gun crime would not be a serious issue if this were not true.
Using Google as our example again, take any story and you will find an almost unlimited stream of information to either prove or disprove ANYTHING. But MSM handpicks which information it uses and doesn't care much for it's credibility, that's simply not necessary when your audience is already brainwashed. And that really grinds my gears.
MSM agendas are not only revealed by "how" they cover stories but by which stories they choose to run with. Most MSM outlets are all over anything that discredits Trump for example, their objective to fuel the negativity. And most of the MSM just happens to be liberal, a reflection of their globalist owners.
On the flip side, the same MSM rarely, if ever, ran with stories related to anything remotely scandalous when it came to Obama or Hillary Clinton. Certain info on them came out in leaks as opposed to being splashed all over the front pages.
Going back to the subject of credibility, how often do we see MSM use or quote information they say they have gleaned from anonymous expert sources, or words to that effect? This is a tried and tested method used by "journalists" to either fabricate or distort their story. They cannot be rumbled; as people of such high integrity, they would never reveal a confidential source...
Another related technique used by the MSM is the simple addition of the term "critics say"; this is nothing more than mythical back-up for their lies and deceit. Who are these critics they mention? They're rarely, if ever named. It's almost like they're just making it all up as they go along...
Polls. The MSM loves nothing more than a good poll. As long as the results are in keeping with their narrative. By their very nature, polls are open to abuse. The questions asked, the relevance of the group questioned and deceptive recording of the results make polls misleading at best.
Nowadays, polls are just another tool for molding public opinion; they are rarely a true impression of it. And if an MSM outlet doesn't like a certain poll's results, they just ignore them.
A great example of this were polls regarding the 2016 US election between Trump and Hillary. The vast majority of polls showed that Trump had no chance. The reason? Many speculated that it was to dampen the enthusiasm of Trump supporters to the point where many wouldn't even bother voting seeing as it was a foregone conclusion that he was going to lose.
HOWEVER... I believe these poll results were purposely designed to motivate people to get out there and actually vote for Trump, every vote counts,etc... (See my article "Trump-puppet - Zionists pulling the strings" for a more in-depth look at this)
Trump of course won; the proof is in the pudding with that one.
Due to the nature of all MSM outlets now using the Internet, being first with the big scoop is seen as more important than being entirely factual; they're in such a rush to enlighten us, bless 'em...
The issue here is that an inaccurate or blatantly untrue story can become "fact" before the actual truth ever sees the light of day.
Even if a story is proven false at some point, the damage is done. Retractions and/or apologies come all too late and are all too obscure.
A textbook example of this can be seen in the case of "The Central Park Five", a 2012 documentary about an infamous case from 1989 where 5 young boys aged 14-16 were falsely imprisoned for the beating and gang-rape of a female jogger in Central Park, New York.
They were exonerated after the real perpetrator came forward, but not after serving over 7 years each. At the time of the crime, it was all over the MSM newspapers for months, every other story was secondary.
When they were exonerated, it got one column in most newspapers, and not even on the front pages. It's a great documentary that I recommend to anyone and demonstrates what's been said so far.
The term "October Surprise" relates to the timing of MSM's release of stories. This is done to purposefully influence the results of an election, be it the US presidential election or the upcoming midterms in America. The timing is simply a tactic of releasing "news" when it can do the maximum possible damage to whoever the puppet masters want to destroy.
Although it happened in September, the Kavanaugh v Ford debacle is a case in point of this phenomena, the deliberate wait before releasing information until the most carnage could be inflicted. It didn't stop his confirmation as SCOTUS, but that wasn't really the point; it created a circus that smeared certain people and political groups negatively. However you may feel about how it reflected on the democrats was also not the point.
At this point, the timing of the "caravan" of people from Honduras is starting to look a bit suspect...
The MSM will run with a story based on gossip, rumours and outright lies, as long as it serves their agenda. They then build on that with a mixture of half-truths and rubbish, anything they can get hold of or invent, the only intention being to discredit whoever it is that they are against.
"It's called a wrap-up smear. You make up something. Then you have the press write about it. And then you say 'everybody is writing about this charge'. It's a tool of an authoritarian." - Nancy Pelosi on CNN, March 5th 2017.
These are just some of the dirty tactics the MSM uses at the behest of it's puppet masters. No evidence is ever too flimsy or out-of-context to be wielded against their enemies.
The MSM believes we are all mindless, brainwashed sheep; while that may be partially true right now, times are changing. People are beginning to question official narratives, it's the tentative first steps towards what will be the outright dismissal of the propaganda being constantly forced down our throats.
The Internet, another tool of the New World Order, may well be their undoing. It's not fully controllable by anyone such is it's enormity and those who are becoming conscious are able to find credible alternatives to the MSM.
This can only increase the momentum towards eventual freedom from not only the MSM mind-control but from the Deep State itself.
Contact me by email: [email protected]
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
From our advertisers
8 hours ago
British government invites Saudi Arabia to world's largest arms fair despite court ruling sales are unlawful
From our advertisers