By John Brindley
Former flight attendant Rebekah Roth’s brilliant unravelling of the 9/11 false flag has taken the Internet by storm.
Her interview with Coast to Coast AM presenter George Noory has received well in access of three million views as she elaborates on the findings from her fascinating book Methodical Illusion.
Roth uses her 30 years of experience as an international flight attendant to analyse the way the alleged hijackings were handled and the content of phone calls reportedly made by passengers and flight attendants.
And her conclusion that the original planes were deliberately landed and replaced by drones has chilling parallels with thwarted plans that have come to public light to demonise controversial Cuban leader Fidel Castro in the 1960s.
But first a little meat on the bones of Roth’s theory.
She claims that well established protocols to delay the hijackers getting into the cockpit were not followed, according to evidence from the flight attendants’ phone calls.
Two flight attendants made calls lasting 27 minutes at the same time in the lead up to the attack on the Twin Towers, containing some contradictory information.
According to Roth, staff would never have drawn attention to themselves and the very existence and nature of the calls themselves is at least open to question.
Cell phones do not operate at such altitudes and air phones had been decommissioned.
There is also no evidence of panic on board the aircraft even in the last few minutes before the incidents.
On one call, the flight attendant claimed passengers in business class were suffering from the effects of being pepper sprayed when it was recognised in a pressured environment, this would have caused distress to all on board including the hijackers.
This helped lead Roth to her dramatic conclusion that the phone calls were made from hangers on the ground and not from stricken airborne flights.
She concludes that the passengers believed they were taking part in ‘war games drills’. The planes then landed, where the doors were locked and the gas took effect. She claims all the passengers were killed, but not in the way suggested by the American government’s official version of events.
Of the 19 alleged Saudi hijackers highlighted by the FBI, ten are still alive and nine had fake identities, she said.
She adds that President George W Bush knew about the operation and could have stopped it.
This is in total contrast to how President John Kennedy reacted when asked to sign off a false flag incident that in many ways mirrors Roth’s findings.
Scanned copies of declassified Operation Northlands documents are now available online and make incredible revealing.
ABC reported that America’s top military leaders drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in US cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
The plans included the hijacking of planes – ringing any alarm bells yet? – blowing up a US ship and even orchestrating violent terrorism in US cities.
The idea was a double bluff on both the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba’s new leader, the communist Fidel Castro.
Here is a direct quote from the documents: ‘We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba, casualty lists in US newspapers would create a helpful wave of national indignation.’
The plans received the written approval of all the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy’s defence secretary Robert McNamara in March 1962.
But they were rejected by the leadership and then went undisclosed for nearly 40 years.
The next section is quoted word for word because it provides real insight into how the subsequent 9/11 hoax, designed to promote the War against Terror and multiple regime change in the Middle East, could be achieved.
‘It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela.
‘The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba.
‘The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.
‘An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organisation in the Miami area.
‘At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases.
‘The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
‘Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point, the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin SFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.
‘The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan.
‘When over Cuba, the drone will be transmitting the international distress frequency a ‘MAY DAY’ message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft.
‘The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal.
‘This will allow the ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to ‘sell’ the incident.’
Just co-incidence that one President was assassinated and the other remains alive?
Did you like this article?
Thank you for your vote!
From our advertisers
1 hour ago
Pentagon claims Iran’s Revolutionary Guards behind ship ‘sabotage’ off UAE coast as Abu Dhabi mum
NBE Are Rejoined By Astrologist Krasi Attasio To Talk About Brexit & Predictions Of US/Iran Conflict
From our advertisers