'If You Don’t Want Cancer and You Know it, Use Wired Internet.
CBS News recently posted a guide on their website that most viewers – even children – would be able to easily understand: “Cell Phones & Cancer: 8 Dumb Ways to Boost Possible Cancer Risk.”
Harm from exposure to sources of wireless radiation (cell phones, cell towers, utility “smart” meters, WiFi routers, etc.) continues to be debated despite multiple research studies that have actually proven harm over several decades. This includes:
Industry funded research.
Independently funded research.
Government funded research. (U.S. and elsewhere)
Those who debate harm also insist that safety testing is conducted on all sources of wireless radiation to protect us from potential harm from exposure. However, they don’t mention that measurements are based on tests performed on plastic mannequin heads and body parts – not humans, animals, or any living tissue.
Many scientists insist that there is enough scientific evidence that shows that all sources of Wireless Radiation should be reclassified as Carcinogenic – not a “Possible Carcinogen.” Dr. Anthony Miller, longtime World Health Organization advisor stated that
…radiofrequency (RF) radiation from any source – such as the signals emitted by cell phones, other wireless and cordless and sensor devices, and wireless networks – fully meets criteria to be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogenic to humans” agent, based on scientific evidence associating RF exposure to cancer development and cancer promotion.
According to other researchers, as many as 1/3 of the population is “sensitive” to wireless radiation and other sources of electrical pollution (Electrosmog) and 3% is clinically sensitive.'
Read more: Experts Insist All Sources of Wireless Radiation Be Classified Carcinogenic – not 'Possibly Carcinogenic'