Hey, Tweeters Galore … You Are Not Going To Let This Arrogant Man’s Intimidation Turn You To Jelly Are You?Monday 19 November 2012
Come on, backbone and scrotum, if you please. Who the fuck is he?
You can either capitulate or run and hide, or millions worldwide can tweet and re-tweet the same thing and what could they do? I am just pointing out the obvious choices – capitulate, hide or have some self-respect.
Do you want Twitter to have any balls and freedom or see them both cut off and the whole thing become impotent and irrelevant like the BBC?
You don’t believe the poor, nice old man victim crap, do you? Anyone who can write this is no ‘poor, nice old man victim’ of anything … click here …
There is a lot of water to flow under a lot of bridges yet. This is just the start. Now, backbone and balls at the ready and stop bloody trembling. Come on … let’s go. Let’s meet this together so they cannot divide and rule and I mean come together worldwide.
Who is going to start?
The tweet is: ‘I hear that Lord McAlpine is the man that Steve Messham named in an unbroadcast part of his interview with the BBC.’
It has the benefit that not a single word of this statement is not true or can be challenged as not being true or is libellous in any way because it is all in the public arena.
And you can stick it in a dark place as well, mate …
This is McAlpine’s ‘lawyer’, Andrew Reid. He apparently wants everyone on Twitter who mentioned McAlpine to ‘come forward’ to ‘apologise’ and ‘agree a settlement’, according to media reports. You must be bloody joking, darlin’. I’ll see you in court first with a lot of big names from the Thatcher era and a LOT of information to present to a jury, much more than I have written so far.
Seriously rich man McAlpine has ‘already got more in compensation than the majority of victims of the unspeakable North Wales children’s home abuse have ever got’: I hope Lord McAlpine is not going to sue me for saying this, but then I don’t give a shit if he does
‘Lord McAlpine has so far received more money in compensation than the majority of the children who were actually raped and abused got. Most of them got nothing at all because UK courts decided the children’s homes’ insurers were not liable.
That’s a fact which needs repeating. Lord McAlpine has so far received £185,000 payout from
the BBC taxpayers – whereas the child abuse victims either got next to nothing or nothing at all. But why has this fact not been reported by the mainstream media?’
Because most are fully-paid-up members of Masterbaters Anonymous, mate.
McAlpine sues ITV for £500,000 when his named wasn’t even mentioned
‘The more I find out, the less I trust Sally Bercow’
Or, she could just be a monumental tosser. The trait does appear to run in the family, right, Mr Speaker?