Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Freeman-On-The-Land
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-12-2009, 09:29 AM   #1
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Talking david merrill's response to Rob Menard

[This thread was set up by a moderator importing my post from Rob's Very Cunning Plan v. 2.0. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93361 ]


I can explain;

The timing is due to Rob being unable to respond on another thread called Think Free Forums. Freeman Pete posted a new video series from Rob: http://thinkfreeforums.org/viewtopic...=10567&start=0

http://worldfreemansociety.org/tiki-...ef_id=938&bl=n

To which I wrote an initial reply to the first segment:

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang
I think this is barking up the wrong tree for the reason that a remittance is itself money by definition so there is no account per se to draw upon. also the Canadian Payments Assoc. rule h6 states,

"(s) "Remittance" means the portion of an Invoice that conforms to Part II of this Rule, or the electronic data, that is submitted to the Payor's FI by the Payor along with payment, and which itself becomes a credit item representing value when subsequently Exchanged by the Payor's FI;

FI = Financial institution

Also, I can't remember where I read it but, the returnable, cut along the dotted line portion on all bills (invoices or statements more likely) whether they say remittance or not are considered to be remittances.

I'll have to dig that up again...if I feel so inclined, I mean I found it so you can too right?

anyways that my 2 pesos

Peace

Exactly. The key is to redeem lawful money. And in Rob's case know how to sanctify the name. That is why he is never actually securing the person. He is the person and has just put a colon and hyphen in his name, which correction is summarily removed by any clerk he requests to process the transaction.

The claim of right should be a simple habeas corpus for if the Crown or Treasury fails to release the contract created by signature endorsement after one demands lawful money.

But I admit, it is a race of sorts. Rob is behind though...

[attachment=2]sl-page1.jpg[/attachment]

[Properly Marked Remittance image inserted here.]

[attachment=1]sl-page2.jpg[/attachment]

[Statement Showing Setoff image inserted here.]

[attachment=0]sl-page3.jpg[/attachment]

Letter from Student Loan Company thanking the graduate about the manner in which he chose to pay off the loan.]


Rob will probably not be getting any consistent results. Mainly because the misguided foundations like he mentioned have already led him to pretending to be a teller for the central bank. He needs to back up and examine the Remittance demand. The wording is older and a bit roundabout. Substitute in:

Redeemed in lawful money pursuant to Title 12 U.S.C. 411.

That is the demand for lawful money. He cannot make the proper claim of right as the person - or in other words he cannot secure the person if he is it. It is a little difficult to explain but the fractional lending that goes on in the Bank of Canada as the central bank of Canada needs to be bonded by signature endorsement. You cannot accept the funds and then renege on the endorsement - you need to non-endorse or as the banks put it - limited endorsement. Rob is trying to solve a problem while still being part of it.

But then I am not familiar with "96" but it sounds a lot like America's 1099-OID Form. That has gotten Refunds but that almost always gets people in a lot of trouble.

But you gotta get a load of the letter I attached. That is a real gas, that letter.



Regards,

David Merrill.
That would seem to bring the worst out in Rob, and I had no way to predict he would bring that here except Rob has chosen to quit logging on there:

Quote:
Let me know what you intend to do. I will not have my name on the same list as his, so close my account or close his.

I will be posting this on the forum, as it does concern all members I am sure you would agree, and I hope that since you are so enamored with SFBFKADMVP and his tried and proven to be failures methodology and little golden nuggets you will be happy when his desired effect is achieved. That intent seems to be the destruction of this board, a denigration of myself, and a division in the movement in general. Hmmm,, who would want that to happen? THINK!

Please remove someone from the roles and close one account. Either mine or SFBFKADMVP. One trick the trolls who work for the government like to do is cause not only division but a waste of time. He has wasted enough of my time, and caused enough division. RVCP v2.0 will be bringing the unity back, and we will keep an eye out for the trolls who want to see us fail.

Look more to the effect to determine the intent. Stop listening to the words and not looking to the effect. His words say one thing, his actions say another. He says he wants to bring good, but never does. Stop being so blind Padre [Admin].

This is my last post here if SFBFKADMVP is not directed to find another forum and his account here closed.

You have allowed enough slander, have you not?

Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity,


Robert-Arthur: Menard
To date; Rob is still active as a member there, just too embarrassed by his childish ultimatum to logon and post. Ergo he launched his attack from here. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93193

I suppose that I might have figured, since Rob began such baseless slander here if you notice the date on that link I posted above, I might have known the reaction to my comment might come from here - and I apologize for prodding him with images suggesting he is failing with his "96" project too. But not only that, I have three document images posted there that pretty well prove that Rob has no successes so far because he is spelling his name incorrectly and endorsing private credit by signature - therefore he is not the man he thinks he is; he is trying to secure the person from being the person and that will only result in a lot of wasted time.

I have been accused of carrying a vendetta here from another thread. You can see for yourself by the link however, and the date Rob started that thread here - that it is Rob who brought it here and I who registered here to carry on a conversation about that attack here, where Rob originally brought it.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Last edited by david merrill; 12-12-2009 at 05:08 PM. Reason: Discussing moderation
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 05:28 PM   #2
zhenshanren
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 239
Default

...please move along, nothing to see here.
__________________
Truthfulness-Benevolence-Forbearance
zhenshanren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 06:41 PM   #3
freemanpete
Senior Member
 
freemanpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aotearoa
Posts: 296
Thumbs down

__________________
Claimed by the Sword and Imortalised by the pen.
freemanpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 06:49 PM   #4
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

Interesting comment by Pete.
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 07:04 PM   #5
yozhik
Senior Member
 
yozhik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Privately
Posts: 11,412
Default

Errr ... shouldn't a 'response' be in the thread being responded to?
Why start [another] pointless, ego driven thread?
__________________
Anarchism stands for liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from shackles and restraint of government. It stands for social order based on the free grouping of individuals.
It [...] maintains that God, the State, and society are non-existent, that their promises are null and void, since they can be fulfilled only through man's subordination.


- Emma Goldman
yozhik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 08:19 PM   #6
merlincove
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28,537
Default

I moved DM's post from Rob's thread earlier, so as to allow the cunning plan thread to move on unabated, as this is a seperate subject, and whereas Rob has also posted his infiltrator thread dealing with this, this specifically is David's response to that.

merlincove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 08:34 PM   #7
pleasuredome
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Home
Posts: 1,525
Default

*yawn*
pleasuredome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 09:44 PM   #8
asky
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,661
Default David Merrill is not alone

Keep it up David
Some people are behind you.

asky
asky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 11:09 PM   #9
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

Thank you. Rob seems to know how frustrating it can be to have somebody attack you, then put you on Ignore.
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 11:13 PM   #10
asky
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,661
Default

Some people seem to think that if they have enough belief in something then it is a reality.

Good Posts David

asky
asky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 06:04 AM   #11
freemanpete
Senior Member
 
freemanpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aotearoa
Posts: 296
Default

http://elfninosmom.blogspot.com/2005...d-of-year.html
David Merrill Van Pelt (who swears his name is just David Merrill), Colorado
This one was the "private banker" who triggered the Montana Freeman standoff against the FBI. He was once arrested for proffering bogus Montana Freeman checks. On the more amusing side, he also claims to have the cure for SARS, and once sued Jesus Christ on behalf of his motor scooter. He is known to some as SFBFKADVP (which is the acronym for "Shit For Brains Formerly Known As David Van Pelt"). He seems to think that he is an expert on something called "advanced-resonance inductive plasma physics". However, when you google that term, the only entries that appear are his, certainly suggesting that it's something he just made up.

David was arrested in 2008 for an outstanding 2004 arrest warrant for assault against an "at-risk" person. In 2008, it would also appear his 79 year old mom got a restraining order against him for domestic abuse.

Count Date Details
1 06/24/2004 Charges: At-risk Assault 3-Know/Reckless injury
Status: Main Charge
Statute: 18-6.5-103(3)(c);18-3-204
Class: F6 (Class 6 Felony)
BAC: 0
Arrest Date: 06/24/2004
Plea Date: 10/06/2008
Plea: Plea Not Guilty

1 n/a Charges: At-risk Adult/Juv/negligent bodily inj
Status: Arrest Only Charge
Statute: 18-6.5-103(2)(c)
Class: F6 (Class 6 Felony)
BAC: 0
Arrest Date: 06/24/2004




David is a trustworthy person and you should believe his every word!
__________________
Claimed by the Sword and Imortalised by the pen.
freemanpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 08:48 AM   #12
yozhik
Senior Member
 
yozhik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Privately
Posts: 11,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asky View Post
Keep it up David
Some people are behind you.

asky
David starts to feel the full weight of carrying Asky the Cheerleader, in the forum ...

__________________
Anarchism stands for liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from shackles and restraint of government. It stands for social order based on the free grouping of individuals.
It [...] maintains that God, the State, and society are non-existent, that their promises are null and void, since they can be fulfilled only through man's subordination.


- Emma Goldman
yozhik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 12:33 PM   #13
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemanpete View Post
http://elfninosmom.blogspot.com/2005...d-of-year.html
David Merrill Van Pelt (who swears his name is just David Merrill), Colorado
This one was the "private banker" who triggered the Montana Freeman standoff against the FBI. He was once arrested for proffering bogus Montana Freeman checks. On the more amusing side, he also claims to have the cure for SARS, and once sued Jesus Christ on behalf of his motor scooter. He is known to some as SFBFKADVP (which is the acronym for "Shit For Brains Formerly Known As David Van Pelt"). He seems to think that he is an expert on something called "advanced-resonance inductive plasma physics". However, when you google that term, the only entries that appear are his, certainly suggesting that it's something he just made up.

David was arrested in 2008 for an outstanding 2004 arrest warrant for assault against an "at-risk" person. In 2008, it would also appear his 79 year old mom got a restraining order against him for domestic abuse.

Count Date Details
1 06/24/2004 Charges: At-risk Assault 3-Know/Reckless injury
Status: Main Charge
Statute: 18-6.5-103(3)(c);18-3-204
Class: F6 (Class 6 Felony)
BAC: 0
Arrest Date: 06/24/2004
Plea Date: 10/06/2008
Plea: Plea Not Guilty

1 n/a Charges: At-risk Adult/Juv/negligent bodily inj
Status: Arrest Only Charge
Statute: 18-6.5-103(2)(c)
Class: F6 (Class 6 Felony)
BAC: 0
Arrest Date: 06/24/2004




David is a trustworthy person and you should believe his every word!
This one is worth quoting as it shows who Freeman Pete is hobnobbing with in order to dig dirt on me. What he is not telling you about is that everything was dropped after six years and severe misuse of judicial discretion that has a $250K law suit pending and a perfected $20M lien published against the state awaiting a writ of enforcement.

You can view the entire evidence repository if you would like. Register on PACER and find the federal district court in Denver; case 08-MC-0066. I apologize for not producing a follow up video but since all the charges and restraining order have been abolished for no evidence or witnesses there just has been too many more interesting things to do. But when the pressure was on, I got busy alright:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...28120951&hl=en

Psychiatric Evaluation as an Arraignment Tool video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...66275521056149

Psychological Evaluation as an Arraignment Tool – Part 2

- Part 1
- Part 2
- Part 3
- Part 4

Pete begs the question - why would they want to use such a feeble cause to put me out of action?

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...er_Stamp_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...er_Stamp_2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Judgment_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Judgment_2.jpg

And the most entertaining rumor recently is from an attorney in New York, who works for the legal department of the IRS there; it was a comment, There is a group of people in Colorado who do not have to pay Income Tax - they are doing it correctly.

Again, let me apologize for using this computer voice in my first video. You can pull up the text file and read it along if you like:

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/convincing.html


http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...06869308133588


>>>>>>

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...04912516&hl=en


All in all for "Freeman" Pete to be joindering his efforts with attorneys who have decided to be enemies mine, is quite telling! Good thing I grabbed his quote on it. If he has any pride in being in opposition to that dichotomy of history - the Treaty of 1213*, he is regretting his source for that post.


Regards,

David Merrill.


* Google it. One thing many people miss in their articles is that both treaties were witnessed by the Knights Templar - the Masons. And this is quite interesting - look on Yale's Avalon Project for the Magna Carta (1215)!

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm

I think maybe open minded readers will see what Pete is doing to the WFS here is far worse than smoking a doobie while advertising for it. There is a dichotomy of history that defaces everything Pete values in the term Freeman - see section 34 of the Magna Carta - and yet he will joinder his voice just to embarrass me? Poor form Pete!

http://www.youtube.com/v/H6GK7rZD938
Freeman Pete while stoned. See 8:00 Minute Mark.

Last edited by david merrill; 13-12-2009 at 12:42 PM.
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 12:53 PM   #14
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

So Pete;


Do you care to link us to where you got that docket information?

C'mon Pete... intruduce us to your new friends!
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 01:12 PM   #15
rob menard
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,863
Default

Doesn't surprise me that such as him would be beating on his old mom in real life.

Karma paying her back for the way she raised him and inflicted him on the world?

I don't know, but it sure is sad to think of a old woman fighting her grown son. I guess we know why he won't show his face. All will wonder where the bruises came from.
rob menard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 02:42 PM   #16
merlincove
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by david merrill View Post
So Pete;


Do you care to link us to where you got that docket information?

C'mon Pete... intruduce us to your new friends!
i googled and found the information given, quite easilly, on quat's: so it is clearly evident that the info is already in the public domain.
merlincove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 03:57 PM   #17
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlincove View Post
i googled and found the information given, quite easilly, on quat's: so it is clearly evident that the info is already in the public domain.
Exactly my point.

I can better explain where Rob and Pete are coming from and especially how they have managed to completely betray any connection with doctrine of Freemen. Quatloos, judging by enemies mine, really explains why you would hear my voice asking questions at the 4:00 Minute Mark in this snippet:

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...y_on_bills.wmv

You should better understand the ideal betrayed here by Rob and Pete making such false accusations. I only touched upon this briefly and a reader could spend three hours easily researching my last post, so:

http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm

Quote:
34. The writ which is called praecipe shall not for the future be issued to anyone, regarding any tenement whereby a freeman may lose his court.
But to understand that better you better look for the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Carta on the Yale Law School's Avalon Project:

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/medmenu.asp

Open up the index and see for yourselves. There is no mention of the Treaty of 1213 and the link to the Magna Carta is broken - unavailable for viewing;

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html

One can find both documents elsewhere but why not at the Yale University's Avalon Project? Now maybe it is beginning to click for the readers and they might be interested in revisiting the videos and links in my previous post. What is it in western law history about these two documents being swept under the rug?

Merlin points out that the Quatlosers are already having a hayday with this terrible emotional and mental tragedy that the elderly nearly always face until they are put on oxygen and pacemakers etc. So I am not going there to make my point. My point is that the Quatloosers got it because it already was in the public domain. Like the Law Society Order against Robert Arthur Menard.

http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/publicat...04-27_upl.html

Quote:
Robert Arthur Menard of North Vancouver has been prohibited by the Supreme Court from appearing as counsel, preparing documents for use in proceedings, and identifying himself in any way that suggests he is a lawyer. He was also ordered to pay costs.
The big difference between us in general and the Quatlosers is that they routinely are attorneys with PACER subscriptions. I have Rob's Order on my disk and it is available to everybody with PACER. I cannot attach it for you on this forum. And the docket is available too. This is my point - Rob would of course not show you the whole picture about the case. So I directed you to the evidence repository I have been keeping collaterally in Denver with my US clerk of court before chief judge DANIEL.

If Rob was any kind of researcher, he would direct you to the case docket so that you would be able to discern that the charges were dropped because the prosecutor never had witnesses or evidence to support the charge. Rob's slur about assault is libel because it is not founded. But my real point here is you just gotta get a load of who Rob has joined his voice with in his blind little tizzy-tantrum about me!

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewforum.php?f=32

Attorneys:

Quote:
ATTORN. To turn. In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals, or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.
Now to really get the effect of my point, you have to go back to that 34 of the Magna Carta to understand in his attacks on me, Rob has alienated himself from the original estate (land) and made himself open season for the Law Society to enforce and collect on thier Order. Rob has betrayed the fundamental doctrine of freemen.

I know what happened between me and Mom. If I could not be arraigned in six years by the court because I would not answer to the charges, what could make Rob and Pete think I would answer to the non-freemen here in cyberspace?

Hopefully the reader is wondering again, what it is about me that upsets attorners like Rob and Pete so much as to attack me so venomously when there is absolutely no basis to do so except that I teach people about replicable remedy?



Regards,

David Merrill.


http://friends-n-family-research.inf...leSociety1.doc




To listen along-http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_CrownTempleSociety1.mp3

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...leSociety2.doc




To listen along-http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_CrownTempleSociety2.mp3

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...leSociety3.doc




To listen along-http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_CrownTempleSociety3.mp3

Last edited by david merrill; 13-12-2009 at 04:31 PM.
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 05:58 PM   #18
girlgye
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a land that needs to wake up
Posts: 5,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yozhik View Post
David starts to feel the full weight of carrying Asky the Cheerleader, in the forum ...

he's JB by no other name.
girlgye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 06:05 PM   #19
girlgye
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a land that needs to wake up
Posts: 5,509
Default

OK David. Kettle calling Pot black time.

Do you deny ever having raised a hand to your 'mom'?
Do you assert that these are false, frivolous, malicious and petty trumped up charges?
Do you or don't you have a bi-polar condition?

If the answer is no (lets face it guys David REALLY IS ONE OF US) as opposed to TPUC's most famous and vicious export who is being paid to track us around sites and cause slander) then this is immensely worrying indeed.

I don't want political rhetoric. Straight answers to the questions.

Of course you can just put me 'ignore' the way Rob did with you if my questions are too close to the mark.
girlgye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2009, 06:22 PM   #20
david merrill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
If I could not be arraigned in six years by the court because I would not answer to the charges, what could make Rob and Pete think I would answer to the non-freemen here in cyberspace?
Don't be silly Girlgye. I would enjoy teaching the members here your little model about arraignment. Do you actually think I am going to bother with questions that the prosecutor, a professional prosecutor and former prosecutor judge could not get any answer for?

You like them get to depend on witnesses and evidence to support any claims against me you might want to pick up for another. Oh, wait! There is another reason I would never answer you. You have no complaint against me.

In case you have not noticed, Girlgye just enjoys a lot of my attention so forgive me if I do not respond to her pestering.



Regards,

David Merrill.

P.S. Actually the question was always framed, Do you understand you have a right to an attorney?

My Answer: No.

If you look closely at my posts above, you might get it.

Last edited by david merrill; 13-12-2009 at 06:56 PM.
david merrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 AM.