POLL: How many RH negative blood types here?

[bush doctor]

Do Type O Rh negative Humans Offer Hope To A Dying World?

Interesting Facts Blood Type and Cancer Risk

Type A Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 08% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 18% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 29% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 43% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 52% Risk

Type AB Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 00% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 16% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 21% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 40% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 48% Risk

Type B Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 04% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 06% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 08% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 14% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 22% Risk
Age 80 – 89: 26% Risk
Age 90 – 99: 28% Risk

Type O Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 00% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 01% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 03% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 04% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 09% Risk
Age 80 – 89: 19% Risk
Age 90 – 99: 20% Risk


BLOOD GROUPS AND THE HUMAN SPECIES

While you won't find many of the following sentiments reflected within the "scientific" community, it is interesting to note three possibilities exist to explain the Rh negative blood type (known as the universal donor type). These are: 1) re-emergence of a primary gene; 2) Exobiology manipulation; 3) chance mutation within the last 20-35k years.

1. First, it is important to understand sentient life on our planet can be traced back over 2-million years. Many advanced civilizations have risen and fallen. We have no direct way of knowing what were the conditions effecting the rise and decline of these civilizations, nor their physiology. A good primer is "Forbidden Archaeology" by Richard Cremo. Given this longevity, it is conceivable that extinct races could pass on certain of their genetic traits.

For example, let's consider there were two sentient branches of the human race in existence at the time: Cro-Magnons from which gave us modern humans, and Neanderthals, of tall stature who became extinct. If you follow this line of succession, It is highly likely that sometime after Cro-Magnons became dominant, there was some degree of cohabitation with Neanderthals. Rh negative may have been found within this extinct race, or may even have predominated - allowing it to cross over into Cro-Magnons decedents.

2. Exobiology is the search for life elsewhere in the universe. There is a very high probability that sentient life on this planet has interacted with visitors from elsewhere in this universe, or perhaps more likely, Interdimensional. Whether through laboratory research (cloning or invitro fertilization), offspring were produced having traits (RH O- neg.) received from their off world, or out-of-phase visitors.

O-neg would be the ideal blood type for space travelers. During extended voyages, the tending and treatment of wounds, Minor operations, and other conditions involving blood loss would present significant problems. During long space voyages, without possibility of returning to their homeward, it would be convenient if all members - or a significant proportion - of a crew were O-neg. These are most likely be specially engineered crew members . . . living blood storage banks, so-to-speak.

3. The possibility exists this is a true mutation, arising - given its relatively low distribution - within the past 20k - 35k years. My studies have not extended into how precisely this would occur.

Personally, I consider all variations of Rh negative as derived from an original O- neg. donor, which factor has recently and selectively mutated through the human race to give the low incidence within other blood groups, but maintaining the alien (non monkey) factors.

As a matter of interest, all O-negs are highly monitored and studied.




BLOOD GROUPS - General Overview

Nearly 85% of all human beings have RH positive blood. Which merely indicates that their red blood cells contain a substance called the RHesus (rhesus) blood factor. Simply put, their positive blood contains a protein that can be linked to the Rhesus monkey. It is acknowledged that blood factors are transmitted with more exactitude than any other human or animal characteristic. It is not generally known from where the negative RH factor derived, although tantalizing evidence exists that it is incidental to human evolution, and that it is some manner of survival mechanism. A factor that expresses when mankind nears epochal change. The current onset began approximately 35,000 years ago near the end of the last ice age.

The highest concentration of RH negative blood occurs in the Basque people of Northern Spain and Southern France, and in the Eastern/Oriental Jews. Only 15% of the entire world's population is known to have the RH negative blood factor. While it is known that RH negative blood - (type 'O') is the purest blood known to mankind, it is not known from where the negative factor originates, as it is generally theorized by evolutionists that there is an unbroken bloodline from early human prototypes (pre humans) to present day human beings.

As previously mentioned, 'Rh negative' blood indicates no protein connections exist to the Rhesus monkey, whereas 'RH positive' blood does carry protein linked to the Rhesus monkey - hence the 'RH' designation, i.e.. rhesus. All other earthly primates have this RH factor. Thus if all humans evolved from that line, all would have the RH factor. Obviously, that is not the case. Therefore, there must have been some manner of intervention giving rise to Rh negative blood groups.

Blood type 'O' is the most common of the blood groups. When we separate the 'O' types into 'negative' and 'positive' we find that 'O' negative (the universal donor blood) constitutes less than 7% of the world’s population. Science at this very time is attempting to create a synthetic RH negative 'O' blood, but without success. For while the protein in positive blood can be cloned, that of negative blood cannot - which is quite interesting, and may be indicative of an alien origin, or more probable, from early genetic experimentation during previous advanced human civilization(s). There was apparent need for a stable blood factor that would not mutate, nor could it be cloned.

If the RH negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link (apparently outside of the theorized evolutionary process) - from where did it originate? Geneticists generally claim the Rh negative factor is a mutation of unknown origin which apparently happened only a few thousand years ago. These ?negative? blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and Australia. Basque peoples contain the largest concentration of known 'O' negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined themselves to one area, whereas contemporary Celtic, who also carried the Rh negative factor, peoples branched out among all of the new world.

Interesting facts:

A RH negative pregnant mother's body will reject her positive blooded baby in the womb. Her body fights the RHesus factor as a foreign element. Alternatively, and most interestingly, a positive mother's body does not reject the negative baby she is carrying.

Most do not know that as Rh Oneg individuals, they are tracked throughout their whole lives by world-wide governmental agencies interested in understanding the genesis of this group, and for other more complex societal purposes.

http://www.anomalog.com/

[firetown]

Originally Posted by bush doctor

Do Type O Rh negative Humans Offer Hope To A Dying World?

I challenge you to find me one 0 negative with AIDS.

[blue2]

Rh D Neg anyone?

[drakul]

Originally Posted by firetown

I challenge you to find me one 0 negative with AIDS.

Interesting - but how can anyone do this? Bloodtypes of AIDS victims are NOT in the public domain.

[amethyst2009]

AB neg here, as is my mother and one of my children.

[drakul]

Originally Posted by bush doctor

Do Type O Rh negative Humans Offer Hope To A Dying World?

Interesting Facts Blood Type and Cancer Risk

Type A Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 08% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 18% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 29% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 43% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 52% Risk

Type AB Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 00% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 16% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 21% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 40% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 48% Risk

Type B Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 04% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 06% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 08% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 14% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 22% Risk
Age 80 – 89: 26% Risk
Age 90 – 99: 28% Risk

Type O Blood:

Age 00 – 39: 00% Risk
Age 40 – 49: 01% Risk
Age 50 – 59: 03% Risk
Age 60 – 69: 04% Risk
Age 70 – 79: 09% Risk
Age 80 – 89: 19% Risk
Age 90 – 99: 20% Risk

The above statistics prove nothing because they are not RH Negative.

BLOOD GROUPS AND THE HUMAN SPECIES

1. First, it is important to understand sentient life on our planet can be traced back over 2-million years. Many advanced civilizations have risen and fallen. We have no direct way of knowing what were the conditions effecting the rise and decline of these civilizations, nor their physiology. A good primer is "Forbidden Archaeology" by Richard Cremo. Given this longevity, it is conceivable that extinct races could pass on certain of their genetic traits.

For example, let's consider there were two sentient branches of the human race in existence at the time: Cro-Magnons from which gave us modern humans, and Neanderthals, of tall stature who became extinct. If you follow this line of succession, It is highly likely that sometime after Cro-Magnons became dominant, there was some degree of cohabitation with Neanderthals. Rh negative may have been found within this extinct race, or may even have predominated - allowing it to cross over into Cro-Magnons decedents.

Yes. RH Neg could have come from NEANDERTHAL breeding with Homo Sapien. Neanderthals died out 35,000 years ago. Their last hold out was the Basque country, exactly the place in Europe where RH Neg is most prolific.

2. Exobiology is the search for life elsewhere in the universe. There is a very high probability that sentient life on this planet has interacted with visitors from elsewhere in this universe, or perhaps more likely, Interdimensional. Whether through laboratory research (cloning or invitro fertilization), offspring were produced having traits (RH O- neg.) received from their off world, or out-of-phase visitors.

Possible but this does not explain why RH-O is the Universal Donor. If it was added to the blood later, it would not be `Universal'

3. The possibility exists this is a true mutation, arising - given its relatively low distribution - within the past 20k - 35k years. My studies have not extended into how precisely this would occur.

Personally, I consider all variations of Rh negative as derived from an original O- neg. donor, which factor has recently and selectively mutated through the human race to give the low incidence within other blood groups, but maintaining the alien (non monkey) factors.

Research statistics say that approx 50% of all Europids carry RECESSIVE RH Neg genes. This does not meet evolutionary criteria for successful mutation to have evolved so fast. Why? Because a successful mutation must BENEFIT the SURVIVAL of the species. In fact, RH Neg have had the opposite effect because RH Neg women have great difficulty producing children with RH Pos men. Usually only one child could be born, if that. Sometimes the mother would die from complications. No one knew why. This is why RHOGAM which was not developed until WWII has been called a Medical Miracle.

As a matter of interest, all O-negs are highly monitored and studied.

O-negs can provide blood to any bloodtype during times of war and crisis - this makes them vital.

The highest concentration of RH negative blood occurs in the Basque people of Northern Spain and Southern France, and in the Eastern/Oriental Jews. Only 15% of the entire world's population is known to have the RH negative blood factor. While it is known that RH negative blood - (type 'O') is the purest blood known to mankind, it is not known from where the negative factor originates, as it is generally theorized by evolutionists that there is an unbroken bloodline from early human prototypes (pre humans) to present day human beings.

Not true. Only about 3-5% of the WORLD'S population is RH Neg. Read carefully other source docs. Only 15% of the EUROPID population is RH Neg. Asians and Africans are 99% RH +

As previously mentioned, 'Rh negative' blood indicates no protein connections exist to the Rhesus monkey, whereas 'RH positive' blood does carry protein linked to the Rhesus monkey - hence the 'RH' designation, i.e.. rhesus. All other earthly primates have this RH factor. Thus if all humans evolved from that line, all would have the RH factor. Obviously, that is not the case. Therefore, there must have been some manner of intervention giving rise to Rh negative blood groups.

Good point.

If the RH negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link (apparently outside of the theorized evolutionary process) - from where did it originate? Geneticists generally claim the Rh negative factor is a mutation of unknown origin which apparently happened only a few thousand years ago. These ?negative? blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and Australia. Basque peoples contain the largest concentration of known 'O' negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined themselves to one area, whereas contemporary Celtic, who also carried the Rh negative factor, peoples branched out among all of the new world.

They always say the above - that the Celts and Basques have the highest RH Neg blood in Europe. I doubt this. Balkans also has a high level of RH neg although these statistics are not available - for some strange reason.

Slavic people in general may have higher level of RH Neg but again no English language statistics.

My sense is that the closer to the Black Sea area, the higher the level of RH Neg bloodtype.

[skyline]

I am A Rh neg,mother is A Neg father is O neg family name is one of the listed illuminati names and if the theory is correct the name is part of the commitee of 300 below the 13 bloodlines which is mentioned in the biggest secret I think

I have read that Rh blood has a higher copper content and wondered if anyone else has info on this? Would this higher copper content mean that people with this type of blood are better conductors of electricity which may mean certain abilities?

[cantata]

I'm of Irish descent (both parents are Dubliners who have lived most of their lives in England, where I was born ) and I'm rhesus O negative, as is my daughter.

[anput]

I am disturbed at how much this myth that O neg people are immune to AIDS has spread through the Internet. It is born from the CCR5 32 Delta findings- that a person who has the CCR5 deletion (DNA) from both parents is resistant to AIDS. See, about 10-15% of people have the CCR5 deletions. About 15% of people are RH neg. One has nothing to do with the other. Blood type is a different chromosome than the CCR5 gene. Since the 15% is a common percentage she postulated that RH negs have the CCR5 deletion and therefore are immune to AIDS. A person with the initials REW (not sure if I can name names- she is American BTW) has spread this around in Yahoo groups and various boards as well as web sites just for RH negs.

Well, who wants to volunteer to sleep with a bunch of HIV positives to see if this is true? Only O negs need apply. I'm RH neg (but not O), and I have read all of these memes myself when searching health issues, and I have found a lot of misinformation that can harm people. There is a lot of "cut and paste" out there, and no one knows where the original information came from.

ETA: I have never had flu, even when I didn't get the vaccines (I was forced in the military, but not before or after that period), but I am not sure that is to do with blood types. I would never assume I was immune to anything except for chicken pox (already had them as a kid)

[ziegenfarm]

i am A neg.

[firetown]

Originally Posted by drakul

Interesting - but how can anyone do this? Bloodtypes of AIDS victims are NOT in the public domain.

Cash rewards have been offered for years of up to 10,000 USD for one case and nobody has come forward yet.

[rydia]

i have O negative blood. Both my parents are O positive. My mother is of european decent(not sure exactly where ) with brown hair and brown eyes. My father is iranian and has black hair and dark brown eyes. I have dark brown hair and eyes and olive skin.

[mrunhappy]

HIV causes AIDS = another myth most likely

[firetown]

Originally Posted by rydia

i have O negative blood. Both my parents are O positive. My mother is of european decent(not sure exactly where ) with brown hair and brown eyes. My father is iranian and has black hair and dark brown eyes. I have dark brown hair and eyes and olive skin.

Any idea on the frequency of rh negative blood amongst Iranians?

Originally Posted by mrunhappy

HIV causes AIDS = another myth most likely

Totally agreed!

[drakul]

Originally Posted by anput

I am disturbed at how much this myth that O neg people are immune to AIDS has spread through the Internet. It is born from the CCR5 32 Delta findings- that a person who has the CCR5 deletion (DNA) from both parents is resistant to AIDS. See, about 10-15% of people have the CCR5 deletions. About 15% of people are RH neg. One has nothing to do with the other. Blood type is a different chromosome than the CCR5 gene. Since the 15% is a common percentage she postulated that RH negs have the CCR5 deletion and therefore are immune to AIDS. A person with the initials REW (not sure if I can name names- she is American BTW) has spread this around in Yahoo groups and various boards as well as web sites just for RH negs.

Well, who wants to volunteer to sleep with a bunch of HIV positives to see if this is true? Only O negs need apply. I'm RH neg (but not O), and I have read all of these memes myself when searching health issues, and I have found a lot of misinformation that can harm people. There is a lot of "cut and paste" out there, and no one knows where the original information came from.

ETA: I have never had flu, even when I didn't get the vaccines (I was forced in the military, but not before or after that period), but I am not sure that is to do with blood types. I would never assume I was immune to anything except for chicken pox (already had them as a kid)

Thank you for mentioning all the mis information being pushed onto the inernet about RH negs. It really is stunning. David Icke in The Biggest Secret actually claims that RH negs are `REPTILIAN HYBRIDS WHO CAME FROM THE DRACO CAVERN IN THE CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS'.

Is Icke preping us for a witch hunt?

BTW there is no `Draco Cavern' in the Carpathians.

And yes, I have noticed a high degree of good health and longevity on both sides of my family (both parents are RH negs.)

[drakul]

Originally Posted by firetown

Cash rewards have been offered for years of up to 10,000 USD for one case and nobody has come forward yet.

I have yet to see any indication of any awards at all. Can you provide any links for these claims?

[anput]

Originally Posted by drakul

Thank you for mentioning all the mis information being pushed onto the inernet about RH negs. It really is stunning. David Icke in The Biggest Secret actually claims that RH negs are `REPTILIAN HYBRIDS WHO CAME FROM THE DRACO CAVERN IN THE CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS'.

Is Icke preping us for a witch hunt?

BTW there is no `Draco Cavern' in the Carpathians.

And yes, I have noticed a high degree of good health and longevity on both sides of my family (both parents are RH negs.)

I was trying to figure out where those were myself, and no maps have "Draco" or "DRACO" on them when searching the Carpathian mountains. If you google it, you just get that same meme about the reptilians and how the balck haired, dark eyed RH negs are evil reppies (I am so lucky to be a black haired dark eyed neg). It is this sort of thing that makes the information seem like nonsense. I also noted that there were a lot of sites that claimed that most babies born to two RH negative parents do not survive. In fact, this is often run in with Icke's info and that long list of traits that make us so "special" and all that. Have you noticed that all of them say we have "physic abilities"? I need someone to explain what "physic abilities" are. I was quite good at science in school- perhaps that is what they mean LOL.

This whole thing about the blue eyes/blonde hair and green eyes/red hair stuff is furthering the agendas of racial supremacy groups. While researching RH negative information I find that half of my search engine hits come from white supremacist forums and blogs. Even among RH neg groups there are little cliques who say that their blood type are more "pure" than others. This is evident in the falsehoods published about O negs being immune to AIDS.

[sh3lly]

Well, for what it's worth, every one in my immediate family is Rh neg and we hardly ever get sick. There is no disease of any kind in our family - no cancer, diabetes, etc. High blood pressure seems to be the only health issue with age, but that is likely due to poor diet and lack of exercise.

[sh3lly]

A lot of people who are Rh neg DO happen to have non-dark brown eyes, but I have found the hair color and skin tone varies wildly. In a general way, yes, it does happen more often than not with humans of lighter eye color and skin tone, but I have seen RH negs with beautiful brown skin and hair and lighter eyes...

It shouldn't be a racial issue, but I have seen people take being RH neg to mean some kind of "specialness" and importance. We're all just souls hanging out in bodies until our time is up.

[drakul]

Originally Posted by anput

I was trying to figure out where those were myself, and no maps have "Draco" or "DRACO" on them when searching the Carpathian mountains.

David Icke draws a clear parallel betw VAMPIRES/DRACULA and RH negs. Claiming that we came slithering out of the `DRACO CAVES' (which do not exist), in the Carpathian Mtns (Romania - Dracula land) are tantamount to calling RH negs a VAMPIRE RACE.

If you google it, you just get that same meme about the reptilians and how the black haired, dark eyed RH negs are evil reppies (I am so lucky to be a black haired dark eyed neg).

My father was black-haired, brown eyed and my mother dark haired with hazel eyes - both RH neg so all 4 children born RH neg. (perfect, healthy no complications).

It is this sort of thing that makes the information seem like nonsense. I also noted that there were a lot of sites that claimed that most babies born to two RH negative parents do not survive. In fact, this is often run in with Icke's info and that long list of traits that make us so "special" and all that.

The special psychic qualities may be true - but I think its more like BAIT. Who on these sites is going to deny they have psychic powers (even if it is latent). `Oh yeah that's me alright, I am a special race born with superior powers of psychic ability'. Everyone wants to be special. I'm not saying it's not true, just that we have to be careful not to get sucked in.

As the OP says - `RH negs could be tracked'.

I really don't get WHY the internet and even the `alternate historian' book media is being flooded with these blatant LIES about RH negs by authors like David Icke and many many anonymous authors on the internet! Are they setting us up for some kind of a witch hunt?

This kind of dis-information shows how ignorant some websites are - they just mindlessly cut and paste what some other website says about RHnegs. Even David Icke parrots this in `The Biggest Secret' - that RH negs cannot breed to each other and if they do the baby will die - when exactly the opposite is true! etc etc - a simple google check would give them the medical facts. But they don't want that apparently.

It is this sort of thing that makes the information seem like nonsense. I also noted that there were a lot of sites that claimed that most babies born to two RH negative parents do not survive. In fact, this is often run in with Icke's info and that long list of traits that make us so "special" and all that. Have you noticed that all of them say we have "physic abilities"? I need someone to explain what "physic abilities" are. I was quite good at science in school- perhaps that is what they mean LOL.

This whole thing about the blue eyes/blonde hair and green eyes/red hair stuff is furthering the agendas of racial supremacy groups. While researching RH negative information I find that half of my search engine hits come from white supremacist forums and blogs. Even among RH neg groups there are little cliques who say that their blood type are more "pure" than others. This is evident in the falsehoods published about O negs being immune to AIDS.

Well the RH neg definitely feeds into some sort of supremacy. I am a green eyed blonde myself, but as I said my parents were both black-haired. My dad came from a long line of black-haired Balkan folk, so my coloring was quite a surprise to them.

Unfortunately the RH neg statistics are not available for many SE European, East European and Russian/Slavic countries. I would be especially interested in seeing RH neg statistics for the BLACK SEA areas, including all the `STANS'. My sense is that the RH neg bloodlines come from the old Scythian and Sauromatian bloodlines of the Black Sea Russian Steppes area all the way to Siberia.

Sauromatian means - the Lizard People.
Sauro - lizard - Matae - people