Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Today's News
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14-10-2009, 09:06 AM   #1
fedora
Senior Member
 
fedora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 268
Default Queen Elizabeth may soon abdicate her throne

From Benjamin Fulford's blog. Post dated 10/14/2009

Queen Elizabeth may soon abdicate her throne

A source in the UK royal family says that Parliamentary debate is closed to the public for the first time since 1688 because they are debating removing the House of Windsor from the Throne of England. The Windsors are actually German and changed their name from Battenberg a century ago in order to appear more English. The Earl of Wales is the leading contender to be the new King of England. However, the debate is still under way and nothing has been finally decided.

http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/
fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:07 AM   #2
mark1963
Premier Subscribers
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: England
Posts: 4,599
Default

The queen give up her power over the peons, I don't think so.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:11 AM   #3
amaralsright
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Varies in quest for more Sooty
Posts: 12,319
Default

I never voted for her anyway.

When is the election of the new regent?

Can't wait.
amaralsright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:13 AM   #4
fedora
Senior Member
 
fedora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark1963 View Post
The queen give up her power over the peons, I don't think so.
Apparently the replacement is rumored to be the Earl of Whales. I find it particularly interesting that we have another thread covering the Guardian being gagged from reporting on parliament and this post mentions that very thing with this topic as the reason. Could be nonsense. Could have some truth. We'll see.
fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:13 AM   #5
pureheart
Senior Member
 
pureheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,162
Default

Who is the Earl of Wales?
__________________
** Be the change you want to see in the world **
pureheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:18 AM   #6
mrmoney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 605
Default

Benjamin fulford.... is.... full... of.... shit....
__________________
7/7 Ripple Effect
mrmoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:25 AM   #7
gilly
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Preston, Lanc's, UK
Posts: 9,455
Default

She already handed her 'power' over, along with agreeing the signing of the Lisbon Treaty.
gilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:26 AM   #8
fedora
Senior Member
 
fedora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pureheart View Post
Who is the Earl of Wales?
I looked that up earlier and couldn't find anything. Being that Benjamin speaks Japanese most of the time I notice he makes mistakes in translation sometimes. He might of fudged on the title for replacement. I was mostly intrigued by the correlations of events between that and the thread referring to the gag order on the Guardian involving parliament.
fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:28 AM   #9
keystone
Senior Member
 
keystone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fedora View Post
From Benjamin Fulford's blog. Post dated 10/14/2009

Queen Elizabeth may soon abdicate her throne

A source in the UK royal family says that Parliamentary debate is closed to the public for the first time since 1688 because they are debating removing the House of Windsor from the Throne of England. The Windsors are actually German and changed their name from Battenberg a century ago in order to appear more English. The Earl of Wales is the leading contender to be the new King of England. However, the debate is still under way and nothing has been finally decided.

http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/
Oh yeah and Fulford said it so it must be true. I wouldn't trust him to run a bath - he's full of it IMO.

Cheers
__________________
Why was WTC 7 not mentioned in the 911 Commission Report?

Communications on an internet forum should be implicitly and demonstrably informed by respect - each esteeming the other no less than we esteem ourselves.
keystone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:28 AM   #10
keystone
Senior Member
 
keystone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pureheart View Post
Who is the Earl of Wales?
Bob Jones!

Cheers
__________________
Why was WTC 7 not mentioned in the 911 Commission Report?

Communications on an internet forum should be implicitly and demonstrably informed by respect - each esteeming the other no less than we esteem ourselves.
keystone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:30 AM   #11
keystone
Senior Member
 
keystone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gilly View Post
She already handed her 'power' over, along with agreeing the signing of the Lisbon Treaty.
Indeed - but that was a very long time ago. Long before QEII ascended the throne. She has no choice but to "agree" to legislation laid before her for approval by the Government.

Cheers
__________________
Why was WTC 7 not mentioned in the 911 Commission Report?

Communications on an internet forum should be implicitly and demonstrably informed by respect - each esteeming the other no less than we esteem ourselves.
keystone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:32 AM   #12
anthony65
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keystone View Post
Bob Jones!

Cheers
That's what I was thinking! Time to update the Bob thread!

** They weren't the Battenberg's either. They were from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha changed to Windsor.
anthony65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:34 AM   #13
redpill41
Senior Member
 
redpill41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 229
Default

i very very much doubt that would ever happen!
redpill41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 09:35 AM   #14
zyphus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keystone View Post
Bob Jones!

Cheers
zyphus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:19 AM   #15
astrochicken
Senior Member
 
astrochicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: here and now
Posts: 2,148
Default

Bob would be cool.
__________________
My music and I
My Youtube Videos www.youtube.com/hooragood
Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.
Spike Milligan - "A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree."
Robert Burns - "The fear o' hell's a hangman's whip,To haud the wretch in order"
astrochicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:25 AM   #16
wobbler
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 371
Default

Descendants of Harold Godwinson would be even better.
wobbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:29 AM   #17
merlincove
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amaralsright View Post
I never voted for her anyway.

When is the election of the new regent?

Can't wait.

'Oh, King eh? Very nice! And how did you get that then?'
merlincove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:30 AM   #18
rodin
Temporarily suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,088
Default

Quote:
Recently I was contacted by a lawyer who said he represents an Asian “dragon” fund and also works for the Queen of England. He is directly involved in the arrest in Italy recently of two Japanese who were carrying $134.5 billion in gold backed bonds. He said the bonds were owned by good guys who wanted to develop free energy technology and end poverty and do other good stuff. In relation to this incident,
etc etc

Ful of it ford
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:31 AM   #19
cornilouse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 897
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keystone View Post
Indeed - but that was a very long time ago. Long before QEII ascended the throne. She has no choice but to "agree" to legislation laid before her for approval by the Government.

Cheers

That is not true, the queen can pass special "laws" that bypass parliment, with only the signature of the prime minister, for more information see "diego garcia"

In my opionion, it is a ruse, that the royals have limited power, i beleive when it comes down to it, they still have more power than parliment, as without the monarchy, the government could never be formed.




As for the queen abdicating, not going to happen.
cornilouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2009, 10:33 AM   #20
freethinker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 387
Default

it makes me wonder if Charles doe not have sufficient reptillian Genes to allow them to take control of him
freethinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 PM.