Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Political Manipulation / Cover-Ups / False Flags
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2009, 05:29 PM   #1
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default Huge List of Moon Landing Hoax Evidence

An Apollo Hoax analysis by Eric Dubay of AtlanteanConspiracy.com

Photo Evidence: (All this photo evidence is well-documented at www.aulis.com and all available from NASA photo directories)

-There are dozens of photos showing shadows of astronauts, flags, rocks and other objects falling in different directions up to 90 degrees apart; this is impossible without secondary lighting which was not brought to the moon, the only light is the sun coming from one direction which casts all shadows in one direction, not two







-In consecutive Apollo 17 photos (AS17-135-20588 and 89) the rock’s shadows change almost 180 degrees as if they switched studio-lights between shots

-In one shot (AS14-64-9089) studio-lighting representing the sun is seen reflecting off a black background, a photographic effect that couldn’t happen in the blackness of space, and could only reflect off a background



-In one Apollo 17 shot (AS17-140-21370) the moon rover is shown still packed up, not yet unloaded, but there are clear wheel tracks going across the foreground of the entire photo



-There is one Apollo 12 shot that shows the reflection of what can only be an overhead studio light, and another (AS12-49-7278) which shows two lens flares from overhead lighting





-There is one shot (15-86-11670) which clearly shows a sneaker-print partially covered by an astronaut boot-print (there were no sneakers on the moon, the astronaut’s boot-prints are otherwise all uniform)

-Many consecutive photos supposedly from astronaut’s hand-held cameras are exactly the same, completely unmoved, to a degree only achieved by a tripod

-Consecutive photos AS11-40-5862 and 63 show the lunar lander with different colored windows, different lettering on the United States sign, and a mysterious disappearing component



-Buzz Aldrin in consecutive Apollo 11 photos changes from white gloves, to dark gray gloves, back to white gloves, and back to dark gray gloves

-There is never a burn print under the lunar lander, nor is there any dust/dirt on the landing pod feet, as if it was just set down gently onto a stage

-There are many pictures which show moon rovers with no wheel tracks in front or behind them (as though they were set down into place) even though there are many footprints all around

-There are pictures of astronauts shown with footprints all around them, but no prints leading to or from where they are, as if they were lowered into place by wire

-There are shots that appear out of sequence in the timetable given

-There are shots which show camera cross-hairs being overlayed onto the original

-Photo AS11-40-5922 close-up of the Apollo 11 Eagle is classic, looks uncannily like cardboard, construction paper, scotch tape and wires



-The video from the Data Acquisition Camera mounted on the Apollo 11 starboard window and the Tripod Mounted TV Camera mounted outside both pan, tilt, reframe, and zoom supposedly while unmanned

-In the 6 moon missions the total time on the moon amounted to 4834 minutes and the total number of photographs taken was 5771; this means they were taking an average of one photo every 50 seconds, covering vast distances, all while supposedly doing many other tasks, collecting rocks, planting flags, making repairs, driving moon rovers etc. Is this even feasible?


General Evidence:


-NASA made all networks record their feed for TV broadcast, so that’s why we only ever see the grainy recording of a recording on TV, and now NASA says they lost the original high-definition video and data telemetry tapes so they can never be verified

-Blueprints and designs of certain machines are missing from both NASA and the companies which supposedly constructed them such as the Apollo Lunar Module and rover

-Van Allen Belt, Russians could never get beyond because of intense radiation that recquires 4 feet of lead shielding too heavy to rocket into orbit; and in 1969-70 the Van Allen Belt was at it’s 11 year cycle peak radiation yet somehow American astronauts and their film was able to survive this without shielding

-There are no stars in any of the moon pictures/video, just complete darkness; they couldn’t make a perfect model in a studio, even a planetarium layout can only be seen in absolute darkness, spotlighting from the “sun” would block out the “star” lighting; so they cover this by saying the sun is SO bright on the moon that the astronauts couldn’t remember seeing stars either

-The moon walk is in half-speed slow-mo; if you speed it up x2 the astronauts are clearly in Earth gravity walking normally with long strides

-The flag in many photos and videos is shown flapping in the wind on the supposedly atmosphere-less moon

-Werner Von Braun took a NASA team to Antarctica in 1967 and was purported to be collecting “moon rocks.” Later Bill Kaysing (author of “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle”) hired his private investigator friend Paul Jacobs to check with the head of the US Department of Geology in Washington and ask, “did you examine the Moon rocks, and did they come from the Moon?” The geologist simply laughed and insinuated that people high in the US government knew all about the cover-up.

-11 Apollo astronauts were mysteriously killed before making their missions, 3 had oxygen pumped into their test capsule until it exploded, 7 died in 6 separate plane crashes, and 1 died in a car crash, highly unlikely coincidence, points towards a cover-up

-The astronauts rarely give public interviews or take questions at speaking events and were very unconvincing on their first interview back from the moon

-Buzz Aldrin punched Bart Sibrel who called him out on the hoax after he wouldn’t place his hand on the Bible and say he went to the moon

-Buzz Aldrin Jr. (Apollo 11), Gordon Cooper Jr., (Mercury 9, Gemini 5), Donn Eisele (Apollo 7), John Glenn Jr., (Mercury 6), Virgil Grissom (Apollo 1&15, Mercury 5, Gemini 3), James Irwin (Apollo 15), Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14), Walter Schirra Jr. (Apollo 7, Sigma 7, Gemini 6, Mercury 8), Thomas Stafford (Apollo 10&18, Gemini 7&9), and Paul Weitz (Skylab 2, Challenger), all these astronauts are Masons

-The first director of NASA was Werner Von Braun one of hundreds of NAZI rocket scientists brought into America through the OSS Project Paperclip

-Nazis and Masons are not the most historically trustworthy folks

-Why didn’t NASA make some sort of light/flare display from the moon that people could see without their TVs to prove they were there?

-Why no color video on Apollo 11 when we know the astronauts had a color camera with them?

Peace,
~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
www.ericdubay.blogspot.com
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 05:43 PM   #2
Anders Lindman
Senior Member
 
Anders Lindman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,209
Default



Good research! The different directions of shadows have been explained as caused by curvature in the moon landscape, but in the above image the shadows point in VERY different directions. Could that really be an effect of surface topology?

Last edited by Anders Lindman; 08-08-2009 at 05:44 PM.
Anders Lindman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 05:26 AM   #3
hoffy
Senior Member
 
hoffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 127
Default

This is something I have followed for a while and it is interesting that there is so much 'evidence' on the moon landings being fake.

Don't know if you guys have seen Jay Weidner's article on Stanley Kubricks alleged involvement either? REALLY interesting...!

However for me, the jury is still out. I watched an Alex Jones interview with an astronaut who said ' for them to pull off that conspiracy they would have had to fool 450,000 Americans cause that's how many were involved in the mission'. Also someone who spends his time researching NASA, co-author of Dark Mission Mike Bara does not believe the moon landings were faked - listening to an interview with him on red ice creations he said he could easily refute any of the fake moon landing 'evidence'.

Personally, I am still open to both possibilities but think realistically it wasn't faked.

Isn't it more likely that the fake landing story has been intentionally launched to divert attention away from other things like what actually is on the moon...and NASA's activities in general?
__________________
Challenging You - Challenging everything you think you know...
hoffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 11:14 AM   #4
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

If you're still on the fence about the Apollo Hoax, take a look at this 45 minute documentary: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
www.ericdubay.blogspot.com
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2009, 04:34 PM   #5
ibaster
Senior Member
 
ibaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,455
Default

My personal theory is that much of the footage was faked. That is not to say that there wasn`t perhaps a mission to the moon. Just that perhaps they did not show that mission in case things went wrong. So they had perhaps a real mission and a fake mission. Of course that is just my theory. I have seen convincing evidence that talks about the radiation etc and it made me wonder but I am not a scientist or anything so it is hard for me to say.
__________________
I attribute the little I know to my not having been ashamed to ask for information, and to my rule of conversing with all descriptions of men on those topics that form their own peculiar professions and pursuits.
John Locke
ibaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2009, 05:37 PM   #6
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,058
Default

OP your 'evidence' is strawman

You are out of your depth

See the shadows? You claim 2 light sources? Where are the second shadows, that would be created with two light sources?

I have been trying to prove one way or another if a hoax. I suspect it is, but if so it was a good one.
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2009, 01:04 AM   #7
hunkahunka
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 933
Default



NASA's moon plan too ambitious, Obama panel says

A panel reviewing NASA's current plans for human space flight will report that there is no realistic way to return to the moon by 2020 -- or even 2028.

BY JOEL ACHENBACH
Washington Post Service

WASHINGTON -- NASA doesn't have nearly enough money to meet its goal of putting astronauts back on the moon by 2020 -- and it might be the wrong place to go, anyway. That's one of the harsh messages emerging from a sweeping review of NASA's human space flight program.

The Human Space Flight Plans Committee, appointed by President Barack Obama and headed by retired aerospace executive Norman Augustine, has been trying to stitch together some kind of plausible strategy for America's manned space program. The panel has struggled to find options that stay under the current budget and include missions worthy of the cost and effort.

The committee members will meet with administration officials Friday and will report that there is no realistic way to get Americans back on the moon by the target date of 2020, which has been the agency's goal since President George W. Bush signed off on the ``Vision for Space Exploration'' in 2004. Landing on the moon by 2020 would require such drastic budgetary maneuvers as de-orbiting the International Space Station -- crashing it into the South Pacific -- in 2016............

continued

complete story linked here:

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nati...ents_Container

***********
btw, going to the moon should be cheap, we purportedly did it several times forty years ago, so what is the big deal?
Why is twenty years not enough time to get back?

Last edited by hunkahunka; 17-08-2009 at 01:06 AM.
hunkahunka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 04:54 PM   #8
e7304
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 624
Default

Its quite obvious there are "local" light sources. The best examples are the video footage where the astronauts , whose shadows look similar, then they move apart and one astronaust gets his shadow to become at least twice of his mate. I wont post again the clips because I am sick and tired of idiots who believe the "apollo" shots were real.

Apollo was a fake. Period.

That does not mean we didnt go with "actual" ships that could make it. A David Oates reversal on 2 NASA scientists years ago on the "face of Mars" really exposed this. They talked about the face on MARS, and dismissed it. But their reversals clearly stated "we are involved in Cydonia" or somat like that. Well , as Cydonia wasnt mentioned forward but happens to be where the face is, this WAS revealing.

So we have been on Mars, as many researchers have said.

But for Apollo....So we have not been able to replicate an era of transistors, a lunar module that seems to be made out of alfoil (gold plated) with an instruction manual that was half the size of my maintenance manual for my ford escort 1978. I mean, if you cant SEE A PROBLEM HERE well I dont know what to say.
e7304 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 07:57 AM   #9
misterethoughts
Senior Member
 
misterethoughts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 216
Default

Bumpin'
__________________
I Write-
misterethoughts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 10:41 AM   #10
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default Fake Moon Rock



It's not green cheese, but it might as well be. The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.


Read the Yahoo News article

Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood. Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation, said the museum would continue to keep the stone as a curiosity.

Read the London Telegraph article

Last edited by ericdubay; 15-09-2009 at 10:43 AM.
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 10:45 AM   #11
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default Astronauts on Wires

These astronauts are clearly being hoisted on wires: Astronauts on Wires

~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com

Last edited by ericdubay; 15-09-2009 at 10:46 AM.
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 11:25 AM   #12
francis
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 194
Default

Erics last question
Quote:
Why no color video on Apollo 11 when we know the astronauts had a color camera with them?
clearly shows his knowledge of Apollo 11 and its systems is appalling.
francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 12:47 PM   #13
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default

Care to elaborate on that for us? They took color video inside the ship, but on the moon they took only black and white. Why?
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 01:24 PM   #14
francis
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 194
Default

www.clavius.org/tvqual.html

Although the question on that page is why NASA did not provide a direct video feed of Apollo 11's lunar surface activities to television stations (even though they did) it will still answer your question of why no colour TV on 11.

As you can see the answer is quite simple.
francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2009, 01:38 PM   #15
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default

Thanks.
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-09-2009, 04:16 PM   #16
bigcadaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffy View Post
I watched an Alex Jones interview with an astronaut who said ' for them to pull off that conspiracy they would have had to fool 450,000 Americans cause that's how many were involved in the mission'.
The jury is still out for me but this quote from that astronaut is crap. Just because that many people were involved in the program doesn't mean they would all have been involved in the consiracy. These projects are so compartmentalized that the only people needing to be involved in the conspiracy would be the astronauts, the very top echelon of NASA and the very top echelon of the US government and whoever would be involved in the filming....a few hundred people at most. Everyone else would actually think they are going to the moon and since no one would have known what that looks like...they would have been easily wooed into believing something they wanted to believe so badly since they worked so hard on it.
bigcadaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2009, 09:15 AM   #17
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

I agree. In A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon they address this point among many others very well.
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2009, 10:11 AM   #18
francis
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 194
Default

So NASA spends billions of dollars getting outside contractors to build them equipment and we have thousands of people working on the LM for example and no one noticed it couldnt fly and was made of toilet roll tubes and sticky back plastic lol. And lets face it if all the gear did work as the thousands of people who made it must have thought it would why fake it? Oh yeah now we go on to they faked it in case something went wrong. Well explain the Apollo 1 fire in that context. Hold on someone on here did and explained there never was a fire and 3 guys faked their own deaths. Madness just fucked up madness the shit a HB will go to to keep this bullshit idea that Apollo was faked going.

I mean look at the shit HB's have come up with below



Ignorance to the max. Oh look it comes from Aulis lol. Did you know Aulis use fake evidence on their site and they know they do? Now why would they have to lie, to sell a video and the book that goes with it could be a reason. Many people have reported to Aulis that photographs they are using have been tampered with and only 2 people that i know of got a response. 1 persons mail was changed so it read like he was praising the site and they posted it up on the web page another was simply told to fuck off. Nice bloke that David Percy.

Aulis actually had a forum but as soon as their little money spinner was up and most on the forum had realised David Percy is full of shit they closed it down to try and ensure they should just a few more books and bullshit videos.
francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2009, 10:29 AM   #19
francis
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericdubay View Post
I agree. In A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon they address this point among many others very well.
You seem to be a way behind other hoax believers Eric. The word going round is Bart Winfield Sibrel who made that pice of shit video you linked too is actually a government agent. Funny that he says exactly the same stuff as Percy, Kaysing and Ralph Rene.

Sibrel is a liar and a fraud and its easy to prove just watch this


lol easy as pie when you know what you are looking at and listening to. The unfortunate bit is Sibrel like Collier before him have fooled many people with that shit. Sibrel stole it from Collier who was the inventor of that hoax along with Rene and claimed it as his own hoax, sorry work.

Did you see in Sibrels shitty video "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" he claims hes showing you unseen pictures of Apollo astronauts faking TV? He says NASA sent him the tape by mistake and until now its never been seen. Bullshit most of it was broadcast live on TV and you have been able to buy it on video and DVD long before sibrel ever got hold of it.

No wonder HB's are distancing themselves from Sibrel hes a fucking fool, but out of all the money makers i can give you similar examples for all of them.

Last edited by francis; 18-09-2009 at 10:37 AM.
francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2009, 12:33 PM   #20
ericdubay
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default Ignorance is Bliss

Quote:
Originally Posted by francis View Post
S



Ignorance to the max.

I'll tell you ignorance to the max: Looking at that mass of construction paper, gold tape, and pipes, then saying with a straight face that that image was taken on the moon.

Nice try with the typical "debunking" response: "Oh, Sibrel and Percy make up evidence to sell their books." I've heard that response to literally every single conspiracy researcher out there. Alex Jones, David Icke, Alan Watt, Michael Tsarion, Jim Marrs, Anthony Hilder, they're all just making shit up to sell their material. Dan Brown makes shit up like the Da Vinci Code or Angels and Demons and sells better than all of them combined... if they're all making this stuff up for the money, they're in the wrong business.

~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
www.ericdubay.blogspot.com
ericdubay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
apollo mission, moon hoax

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM.