The Hezerkhani video!! WATCH!

thedame · 07-08-2007, 10:11 AM

Hey guys.. has anyone researched the Hezerkhani connection? He's the guy who apparently video'd the second plane 'hitting' the 2nd Tower. The first video has the close-ups where you see the plane 'vanishing' into the building. The second video is a short investigation into who Hezerhkanis. Pretty disturbing, if you can get over the gravelly -movie-trailer type talkover. (who IS that guy?) Hopefully these links will work..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOeNUax-gaw

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpyBtOT1l2k

if they don't just copy the URL into the address bar.. it's good info...

damex

narcolepticwatchman · 08-08-2007, 11:03 PM

Interesting to hear John Whites view on this as well. Heseems to dissappear when strong arguments in favour of npt emerge......

geewhizz · 09-08-2007, 09:41 AM

Hi

The guy researching the Hezerhkanis footage says the underwing 'Pod' on the aircraft cannot be seen until the plane just about hits the tower. If you look at this closely that statement is wrong, it can be seen all the time but gets more noticable when the sun reflects......

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

irie_dave · 09-08-2007, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geewhizz

Hi

The guy researching the Hezerhkanis footage says the underwing 'Pod' on the aircraft cannot be seen until the plane just about hits the tower. If you look at this closely that statement is wrong, it can be seen all the time but gets more noticable when the sun reflects......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCVwu...elated&search=

Light reflection & stuff are the reasons for this no-plane shit, I think the actual planes were there. It is interesting though that this guy who filmed the impact is not allowed to say where he was. That says to me not that the planes were faked necessarily but that there were camera people pre-set up to film the impact.

thedame · 10-08-2007, 05:42 PM

Personally I think the 'pod' idea is a non-starter aswell. I don't think light reflection and stuff is a viable reason for the plane to have vanished into the building like that. Something that big and solid would have caused some sort of physical reaction to the metal and glass of the building.

Regardless, I am more of the persuasion that a plane did hit the building...

geewhizz · 10-08-2007, 06:20 PM

Hi

Dame, I agree we are all entitled to our opinions but I just dont buy the fake plane scenario. I really think that aircraft hit the towers, look at military footage of missile hitting 6inch thick steel warships, a projectile at speed would do as it is seen in the video.

911 conspiracy is a diversion from personal evolution, dont get bogged down in all this stuff.

hagbard_celine · 12-08-2007, 04:48 PM

I don't deny that it's possible to carry out this attack and fake images of the planes, both in the air, using holgrpahic Imax-type projectors, and on the footage using animation. But wouldn't it be simpler just to use real planes? Wouldn't it make the conspiracy less to-heavy, more likely to come off and more believable?

hagbard_celine · 12-08-2007, 04:55 PM

I noticed that the trees in Battery Park in the 2007 shot were taller than in the 9/11 shot. Can they grow that fast in 6 years or was Hezarkhani standing somewhere else?

narcolepticwatchman · 13-08-2007, 12:57 PM

There is a whole debate going on about the angle of the shot, thats why they called Hezerkani in the first instance.

I think this is also the video that Dean Warwick talks about in his interview with Dave Starbuck below

http://www.revelationaudiovisual.com...rwick%2001.wma

The more you think about this, the more it looks suspicious. I mean, did he really die because he was going to reveal the Anti Christ? or could his no plane theory have had anything to do with it? I mean, at the time of his death, NPT was not discussed.

Then there was the death of the student of Dr Judy Wood who was, surprisingly, researching the use of unconventional weapons on the towers.

I dunno bout everybody else, but to me, when there is a trail of blood, the truth isn't very far behind.

graflok · 13-08-2007, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedame

Hey guys.. has anyone researched the Hezerkhani connection? He's the guy who apparently video'd the second plane 'hitting' the 2nd Tower. The first video has the close-ups where you see the plane 'vanishing' into the building. The second video is a short investigation into who Hezerhkanis. Pretty disturbing, if you can get over the gravelly -movie-trailer type talkover. (who IS that guy?) Hopefully these links will work..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOeNUax-gaw

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpyBtOT1l2k

if they don't just copy the URL into the address bar.. it's good info...

damex

This is interesting. I especially like the the way the building face "heals" itself.

narcolepticwatchman · 13-08-2007, 06:02 PM

what has the pod got to do with anything? If the video is faked then there is no plane and no pod............?

john white · 14-08-2007, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by narcolepticwatchman

Interesting to hear John Whites view on this as well. Heseems to dissappear when strong arguments in favour of npt emerge......

Is it? Do I? What do you think I am, an omnipotent force?

This whole ho-ha is just the usual "9/11 researchers" smear campaign against anyone whos a threat to their "dogma". I dearly remember Fred trying to prove this footage fake by using a fake photograph!

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/vi...age+impossible

Isnt it "interesting?" that my analysis never recieved ANY counter?

And BTW: No Planes Theory blown into shreds:

http://www.911disinformation.com/nop...rEvidence.html

What people beleive is up to them: but when it comes to 9/11, its vitally important IMHO to check out the form of the person making the claims

john white · 14-08-2007, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedame

Hey guys.. has anyone researched the Hezerkhani connection? He's the guy who apparently video'd the second plane 'hitting' the 2nd Tower. The first video has the close-ups where you see the plane 'vanishing' into the building. The second video is a short investigation into who Hezerhkanis. Pretty disturbing, if you can get over the gravelly -movie-trailer type talkover. (who IS that guy?) Hopefully these links will work..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOeNUax-gaw

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpyBtOT1l2k

if they don't just copy the URL into the address bar.. it's good info...

damex

Re the second link:

Smearing evidence sources or REAL 9/11 researchers who don't support NPT as "terrorists" and "members of Al-queda" is now a key tactic from fred/aka BS registration

Its interesting that people who apparently claim 9/11 was an inside job are also playing on the fear and manipulation of the war on terror to discredit those they have set their sights on to attack

narcolepticwatchman · 14-08-2007, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john white

Re the second link:

Smearing evidence sources or REAL 9/11 researchers who don't support NPT as "terrorists" and "members of Al-queda" is now a key tactic from fred/aka BS registration

Its interesting that people who apparently claim 9/11 was an inside job are also playing on the fear and manipulation of the war on terror to discredit those they have set their sights on to attack

You used the same smear tactic on another thread. Ok, you never said they were terrorists, but you did use the smear tactic when you accused NP theorists of faking videos and having debatable pasts.

john white · 14-08-2007, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by narcolepticwatchman

You used the same smear tactic on another thread. Ok, you never said they were terrorists, but you did use the smear tactic when you accused NP theorists of faking videos and having debatable pasts.

Nah mate, thats just true!

Ask Miss "strip out 75% of the frames, stretch some bits delete others, then drastically reduce the resolution: oh-look-instant "anomoly"" Grable, with the background of 3 years backing "pod theory" then switiching to "but i knew there were no planes all the time!"

And of course: still no counter to my proving Fred has used faked up images to make his case

Basic suckers game, which you havnt yet got over yourself enough to realise

john white · 14-08-2007, 01:00 PM

But nice admission that Fred uses smear tactics, and this little drama is another example!

narcolepticwatchman · 14-08-2007, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john white

Is it? Do I? What do you think I am, an omnipotent force?

This whole ho-ha is just the usual "9/11 researchers" smear campaign against anyone whos a threat to their "dogma". I dearly remember Fred trying to prove this footage fake by using a fake photograph!

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/vi...age+impossible

Isnt it "interesting?" that my analysis never recieved ANY counter?

And BTW: No Planes Theory blown into shreds:

http://www.911disinformation.com/nop...rEvidence.html

What people beleive is up to them: but when it comes to 9/11, its vitally important IMHO to check out the form of the person making the claims

A bit like my analysis on your engine exit theory on the September clues thread then? No-one has brought up fred or the photo you claim is faked......that photo has nothing to do with his photo in this video.......or are you saying that the comparison in this clip is faked as well?

I like how the site you link to only focusses on the NPT and Star Wars weapons.......looks like that has been set up specifically to debunk to me. There are a million other pieces of 'disinformation' on 9/11.......why only pick these 3? Oh and there is at least one photo linked in that site which is fake......can you tell me which one it is? I'll give you the opportunity to respond before I totally ruin what little credibility you have left on this issue.

C'mon now John, for the super researcher that you make yourself out to be, you seem to be nailing your colours to a very shaky mast by using that site as your basis for 'blowing the official version to shreds'

narcolepticwatchman · 14-08-2007, 01:03 PM

Just did a whois lookup on that site you linked to John........the registrant is denoted as 'private' . Why would they do that? What are THEY hiding?

narcolepticwatchman · 14-08-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john white

But nice admission that Fred uses smear tactics, and this little drama is another example!

Sorry, I didn't admit that mate, I don't even know the guy apart from seeing 1 or 2 of his vids. For all I know he may use the tactic, he may not.......why twist my words? What can you possibly gain from that apart from making yourself out to be a total tosser?

john white · 14-08-2007, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by narcolepticwatchman

Just did a whois lookup on that site you linked to John........the registrant is denoted as 'private' . Why would they do that? What are THEY hiding?

Gee maybe there not keen to have Fred call the FBI alledging they are members of Al-Queda like he did with Albanese?

12-08-2007, 04:48 PM	#7
hagbard_celine Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Oxford Posts: 4,351	I don't deny that it's possible to carry out this attack and fake images of the planes, both in the air, using holgrpahic Imax-type projectors, and on the footage using animation. But wouldn't it be simpler just to use real planes? Wouldn't it make the conspiracy less to-heavy, more likely to come off and more believable? __________________ "Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?" Doctor Who- Bad Wolf. "Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable." from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin

12-08-2007, 04:55 PM	#8
hagbard_celine Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Oxford Posts: 4,351	I noticed that the trees in Battery Park in the 2007 shot were taller than in the 9/11 shot. Can they grow that fast in 6 years or was Hezarkhani standing somewhere else? __________________ "Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?" Doctor Who- Bad Wolf. "Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable." from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin

14-08-2007, 01:00 PM	#16
john white Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 6,232	But nice admission that Fred uses smear tactics, and this little drama is another example! __________________ Free your Self and Free the World

08-08-2007, 11:03 PM	#2
narcolepticwatchman Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 513	Interesting to hear John Whites view on this as well. Heseems to dissappear when strong arguments in favour of npt emerge......

10-08-2007, 05:42 PM	#5
thedame Premier Subscribers Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 190	Personally I think the 'pod' idea is a non-starter aswell. I don't think light reflection and stuff is a viable reason for the plane to have vanished into the building like that. Something that big and solid would have caused some sort of physical reaction to the metal and glass of the building. Regardless, I am more of the persuasion that a plane did hit the building...

10-08-2007, 06:20 PM	#6
geewhizz Inactive Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,772	Hi Dame, I agree we are all entitled to our opinions but I just dont buy the fake plane scenario. I really think that aircraft hit the towers, look at military footage of missile hitting 6inch thick steel warships, a projectile at speed would do as it is seen in the video. 911 conspiracy is a diversion from personal evolution, dont get bogged down in all this stuff.

13-08-2007, 12:57 PM	#9
narcolepticwatchman Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 513	There is a whole debate going on about the angle of the shot, thats why they called Hezerkani in the first instance. I think this is also the video that Dean Warwick talks about in his interview with Dave Starbuck below http://www.revelationaudiovisual.com...rwick%2001.wma The more you think about this, the more it looks suspicious. I mean, did he really die because he was going to reveal the Anti Christ? or could his no plane theory have had anything to do with it? I mean, at the time of his death, NPT was not discussed. Then there was the death of the student of Dr Judy Wood who was, surprisingly, researching the use of unconventional weapons on the towers. I dunno bout everybody else, but to me, when there is a trail of blood, the truth isn't very far behind.

13-08-2007, 06:02 PM	#11
narcolepticwatchman Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 513	what has the pod got to do with anything? If the video is faked then there is no plane and no pod............?

14-08-2007, 01:03 PM	#18
narcolepticwatchman Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 513	Just did a whois lookup on that site you linked to John........the registrant is denoted as 'private' . Why would they do that? What are THEY hiding?