Mr Pixies Posts on 9/11

mr_pixie · 06-08-2007, 07:13 PM

Ooooooo SHIT!!!!!!! Does anyone see a problem here!

What Hit the WTC?

Check out the video clip

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...31064718412242

Stephen

hagbard_celine · 07-08-2007, 08:33 AM

Yes, it's strange. The plane is kind of "swallowed up" by the building. The walls of the WTC are very strong; unlike most skyscrapers, a good proportion of the supporting structure is in the walls rather than in internal pilars. A plane, however, is very flimsy for its size. It's built like a kite for minimum weight.

mr_pixie · 07-08-2007, 12:09 PM

This is serious stuff!

Please read these aticles below, it will explain more.

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...d=28&Itemid=60

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/AJ/touchhand.html

Judys Wood website www.drjudywood.com

We won't get fooled again!

Thanks

Stephen.

irie_dave · 09-08-2007, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hagbard_celine

Yes, it's strange. The plane is kind of "swallowed up" by the building. The walls of the WTC are very strong; unlike most skyscrapers, a good proportion of the supporting structure is in the walls rather than in internal pilars. A plane, however, is very flimsy for its size. It's built like a kite for minimum weight.

The designers of the building said though that a plane hitting the tower would be like shoving a pencil through a screen netting, it would do little to the netting. I personally think this is a disinfo trail. It kind of sucks that this no plane hit the WTC stuff is getting so much traction lately.

368jrn · 09-08-2007, 03:08 PM

2 identical buildings WTC 1 and 2, 2 almost identical planes, 2 very different explosions. WTC 1 expoldes as soon a the "plane" hits it, but the fireball is not a hydrocarbon explosion, its sort of grey white smoke, very similar to thermite byproduct of aluminium oxide, whereas the "plane" that hits WTC2 manages to get completely inside the building with no sniff of an explosion! The explosion at the point of entry on WTC2 is very similar to the grey white smoke of aluminium oxide from a thermite reaction.

Also in the video in this original post does anyone notice that the left hand wing manages to disappear behind one of the buildings in the background ,about 11 secs in.

WTC1 was not hit by a plane, anyone who watches that video can clearly see that for themselves. And to believe that WTC2 swallowed up a jet liner without any sign of wing collapse or immediate explosion is a joke, its amazing what can be done with computers these days, like editing almost live footage i bet!

bigus_dickus · 09-08-2007, 04:11 PM

the explosions look identical to me.. we have grey smoke first, black later. but in the first video you can see the black smoke for a very short while emerging from the back of the side of the only camera angle getting covered by the grey smoke facing the camera. the second impact is sideways, so we can see the black smoke right away coming from the side.

about the disappearing wing, that's because of the video's low resolution and because it matches in many ways the objects in the background.

snoopsnuffleopagus · 09-08-2007, 04:27 PM

Ladies & Gentlemen:

THE definitive book concerning construction of the World Trade Centre Towers 1&2 has been written by Karl Koch lll. He is the owner of the Steel Erection Company(Da Bronx, NYC) that built the Towers. Very informative. Personally, I disagree with his conclusion as to the collapse.

Search Engine: men of steel karl koch

Kind Regards! Snoopsnuffleopagus

lucifershammer · 20-08-2007, 05:49 AM

that video has the weakest arguement of any i have seen yet as to the deliberate destruction of the WTC.

it only compares the WTC boeing crash to a completely different plane crashing into a completely different surface.

and it backs it up with no data whatsoever, just a few still frames.

an analogy that comes to mind. throwing a molotov cocktail.

its like comparing throwing it at a brick wall and having it explode on impact. and throwing it at a glass window, and having it break through hte window and blow up inside the building. of course the results are different. the conditions are completely different.

mr_pixie · 25-10-2007, 07:59 PM

Prof Morgan Reynolds - Jim Fetzer - NIST and Newton Part 2 - Dynamic Duo 23 Oct 2007.mp3 (8 MB) (Modified: Oct 24 2007 07:40:01 PM)
Prof Morgan Reynolds and Jim Fetzer - NIST and Newtons Laws - Dynamic Duo - 18 Oct 2007.mp3 (7.9 MB) (Modified: Oct 18 2007 09:20:18 AM)
Or top 2 links from here:

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audi...ate&order=desc

mr_pixie · 25-10-2007, 09:27 PM

Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 1
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+1

Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 2
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+2

Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 3
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+3

Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 4
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+4

mr_pixie · 25-10-2007, 10:03 PM

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...11662480560988

serpentoffire · 25-10-2007, 10:32 PM

They are using two new kind of weapons:

Tesla LEM scalar cannon that is able to make an esplosion in a precise point of the space through a triangulation of two antennas.

http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

bombs bases on heavy metal nano-particles inside conventional explosive, that are able to cut a body in two, like a sword. NWO have tested it in Palestine during Israeli's air attack.

helloperator · 29-10-2007, 08:04 AM

I lost that link a while ago...nice to have it back. Plenty of new mp3s since I was there last.

mr_pixie · 30-10-2007, 09:51 AM

Jimi Hendrix Quote:

Gimmicks, here we go again, gimmicks man, I'm tired of people saying we're.... gimmicks, what is this? The world is nothing but a big gimmick, isn't it? Wars, napalm bombs, all that, people getting burned up on tv and it's nothing but a stunt. Gimmick. Yes we do.

helloperator · 30-10-2007, 02:41 PM

Yeah...but I can't find the youtube link for that quote...it's there somewhere

mr_pixie · 06-11-2007, 12:30 PM

Hello all,

David Icke will be appearing on the James Whale radio programme this Wednesday night from 10 PM to 1AM on Talk Sport Radio.http://www2.talksport.net/shows/show...&showId=100199

I don't like James Whale anymore but it's worth a listen if Mr David is going to be on

mr_pixie · 06-11-2007, 12:42 PM

I don't know why I've put this post on the 9/11 section? I ment to put it on general.

eternal_spirit · 06-11-2007, 12:55 PM

Coolio

Was my fav show before |Internet

space lizard · 06-11-2007, 01:22 PM

James Whale, is he the idiot that cuts people off all the time?

I havent seen or heard of him in years, homefully he's come up with a new shtick.

pop the link when its available please. I'm down under.

sidlittle · 06-11-2007, 06:44 PM

James whale supports the micro chipping of children. It would be interesting if someone brings this up tomorrow with icke around.

06-08-2007, 07:13 PM	#1
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	Mr Pixies Posts on 9/11 Ooooooo SHIT!!!!!!! Does anyone see a problem here! What Hit the WTC? Check out the video clip http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...31064718412242 Stephen

07-08-2007, 08:33 AM	#2
hagbard_celine Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Oxford Posts: 4,351	Yes, it's strange. The plane is kind of "swallowed up" by the building. The walls of the WTC are very strong; unlike most skyscrapers, a good proportion of the supporting structure is in the walls rather than in internal pilars. A plane, however, is very flimsy for its size. It's built like a kite for minimum weight. __________________ "Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?" Doctor Who- Bad Wolf. "Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable." from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin

07-08-2007, 12:09 PM	#3
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	This is serious stuff! Please read these aticles below, it will explain more. http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...d=28&Itemid=60 http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/AJ/touchhand.html Judys Wood website www.drjudywood.com We won't get fooled again! Thanks Stephen. Last edited by qasrose; 27-07-2008 at 02:03 PM.

20-08-2007, 05:49 AM	#8
lucifershammer Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Missouri USA Posts: 192	that video has the weakest arguement of any i have seen yet as to the deliberate destruction of the WTC. it only compares the WTC boeing crash to a completely different plane crashing into a completely different surface. and it backs it up with no data whatsoever, just a few still frames. an analogy that comes to mind. throwing a molotov cocktail. its like comparing throwing it at a brick wall and having it explode on impact. and throwing it at a glass window, and having it break through hte window and blow up inside the building. of course the results are different. the conditions are completely different. __________________ "The truth is permanent, and then everything else will fall by the wayside" -Dave Chappelle-

25-10-2007, 07:59 PM	#9
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	Radio interveiws: Jim Fetzer and Morgon Reynolds Prof Morgan Reynolds - Jim Fetzer - NIST and Newton Part 2 - Dynamic Duo 23 Oct 2007.mp3 (8 MB) (Modified: Oct 24 2007 07:40:01 PM) Prof Morgan Reynolds and Jim Fetzer - NIST and Newtons Laws - Dynamic Duo - 18 Oct 2007.mp3 (7.9 MB) (Modified: Oct 18 2007 09:20:18 AM) Or top 2 links from here: http://www.checktheevidence.com/audi...ate&order=desc

09-08-2007, 03:08 PM	#5
368jrn Premier Subscribers Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 109	2 identical buildings WTC 1 and 2, 2 almost identical planes, 2 very different explosions. WTC 1 expoldes as soon a the "plane" hits it, but the fireball is not a hydrocarbon explosion, its sort of grey white smoke, very similar to thermite byproduct of aluminium oxide, whereas the "plane" that hits WTC2 manages to get completely inside the building with no sniff of an explosion! The explosion at the point of entry on WTC2 is very similar to the grey white smoke of aluminium oxide from a thermite reaction. Also in the video in this original post does anyone notice that the left hand wing manages to disappear behind one of the buildings in the background ,about 11 secs in. WTC1 was not hit by a plane, anyone who watches that video can clearly see that for themselves. And to believe that WTC2 swallowed up a jet liner without any sign of wing collapse or immediate explosion is a joke, its amazing what can be done with computers these days, like editing almost live footage i bet!

09-08-2007, 04:11 PM	#6
bigus_dickus Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: :noitacoL Posts: 2,386	the explosions look identical to me.. we have grey smoke first, black later. but in the first video you can see the black smoke for a very short while emerging from the back of the side of the only camera angle getting covered by the grey smoke facing the camera. the second impact is sideways, so we can see the black smoke right away coming from the side. about the disappearing wing, that's because of the video's low resolution and because it matches in many ways the objects in the background.

09-08-2007, 04:27 PM	#7
snoopsnuffleopagus Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Alkashic Cocktail Lounge & Piano Bar Posts: 4,448	Ladies & Gentlemen: THE definitive book concerning construction of the World Trade Centre Towers 1&2 has been written by Karl Koch lll. He is the owner of the Steel Erection Company(Da Bronx, NYC) that built the Towers. Very informative. Personally, I disagree with his conclusion as to the collapse. Search Engine: men of steel karl koch Kind Regards! Snoopsnuffleopagus

25-10-2007, 09:27 PM	#10
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 4 Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 1 http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+1 Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 2 http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+2 Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 3 http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+3 Prof Judy Wood - WTC Destruction Part 4 http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...ruction+Part+4 Last edited by mr_pixie; 25-10-2007 at 10:34 PM. Reason: Missake

25-10-2007, 10:03 PM	#11
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	Star Wars In Iraq; Video http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...11662480560988

25-10-2007, 10:32 PM	#12
serpentoffire Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My spirit is everywhere, my soul in every time, my body in the space-time Posts: 1,335	New weapons They are using two new kind of weapons: Tesla LEM scalar cannon that is able to make an esplosion in a precise point of the space through a triangulation of two antennas. http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm bombs bases on heavy metal nano-particles inside conventional explosive, that are able to cut a body in two, like a sword. NWO have tested it in Palestine during Israeli's air attack. __________________ .'. Serpent of Fire .'. http://serpentf.bebo.com *"TRIA SUNT MIRABILIA DEUS ET HOMO MATER ET VIRGO TRINUS ET UNUS"*

29-10-2007, 08:04 AM	#13
helloperator Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: The creamy middle Posts: 2,471	I lost that link a while ago...nice to have it back. Plenty of new mp3s since I was there last.

30-10-2007, 09:51 AM	#14
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	Jimi Hendrix Quote: Gimmicks, here we go again, gimmicks man, I'm tired of people saying we're.... gimmicks, what is this? The world is nothing but a big gimmick, isn't it? Wars, napalm bombs, all that, people getting burned up on tv and it's nothing but a stunt. Gimmick. Yes we do.

30-10-2007, 02:41 PM	#15
helloperator Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: The creamy middle Posts: 2,471	Yeah...but I can't find the youtube link for that quote...it's there somewhere

06-11-2007, 12:30 PM	#16
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	David Icke on The James Whale Show Hello all, David Icke will be appearing on the James Whale radio programme this Wednesday night from 10 PM to 1AM on Talk Sport Radio.http://www2.talksport.net/shows/show...&showId=100199 I don't like James Whale anymore but it's worth a listen if Mr David is going to be on

06-11-2007, 12:42 PM	#17
mr_pixie Inactive Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 1,823	I don't know why I've put this post on the 9/11 section? I ment to put it on general.

06-11-2007, 12:55 PM	#18
eternal_spirit Inactive Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 31,347	Coolio Was my fav show before \|Internet

06-11-2007, 01:22 PM	#19
space lizard Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 576	James Whale, is he the idiot that cuts people off all the time? I havent seen or heard of him in years, homefully he's come up with a new shtick. pop the link when its available please. I'm down under. __________________ Kick Out The Jams

06-11-2007, 06:44 PM	#20
sidlittle Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 650	James whale supports the micro chipping of children. It would be interesting if someone brings this up tomorrow with icke around.