Moon Landing A Fake or Fact - expose - Page 54

frenat · 13-09-2009, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exuberant1

And that is how I know you didn't read the relevant posts before replying.

It is a sure giveaway when you ask a question that has already been answered.

The idea of using a different camera when the Hasselblads were so readily available and their format would be recognized, fake or not, is absurd, especially as internal reflection is so much more likely given the placement and "pointing" of the double overlay so I ignored it.

What kind of process of adding an overlay after the fact would create the double image and then only in the vicinity of the bright light source? Once it did happen why wouldn't it be done over?

elton · 13-09-2009, 08:53 PM

You can see some of the fakery in the landing videos. Look at the fake dust. lol.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...&postcount=341

francis · 13-09-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exuberant1

Ah yes, let us rely on the images that NASA has manipulated - Sort of like only relying on evidence provided by the suspect under investigation. Idiot.

Here is an example of NASA being caught lying about their 'original' images:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMuTi...13BC&index=125

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCxRi...13BC&index=126

What im saying is that if people are going to rip the NASA photographs apart lets just all try and play on a level playing field and make sure they are NASA originals and not ones that have been manipulated to create the anomaly's people have claimed to have found in them.

francis · 13-09-2009, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elton

You can see some of the fakery in the landing videos. Look at the fake dust. lol.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...&postcount=341

Explain how the dust should look and why, then it will be a piece of cake to explain why the dust you see is fake.

hunkahunka · 27-10-2009, 11:52 AM

anyone up on the moon landing hoax should not miss
this new article by David McGowan , called Wagging
the Moon Doggie:

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html

not sure if it has been posted here already, but
if you have not read it, it definitely is worth the
time. He thoroughly discusses the complete
hoax, including such things as the impossibly
EXTREME temperature swings that the astronauts would have
had to deal with while in space and while on the moon
in that pathetic little tin foil craft.

graflok · 28-10-2009, 02:27 AM

^ Another great article by McGowan, one of my favorite writers.

raphael · 28-10-2009, 03:05 PM

ASTROSPIES
great video exposes what we know to be a fact.
that secrets can be kept for a long time.

Astrospies - YouTube

I asked the folks at BAUT to watch this video and discuss the ability of the US military, in the 1960s - 70s, to magnify and focus on an area 3 inches square, with cameras perched 100 miles above in space, in orbit.
Wondering why LCROSS was sending back such shitty images from space 40 years later.

What is also interesting is how the unknown Astrospies who received no glory for their efforts, because they were top secret, ROSE to positions of power and influence after the program was 'shut down'.
Unlike the many astroNOTs who went to the Moon, who retired soon after attaining their glory.

The discussion on the BAUT forum was muted by the mods and the thread closed.

namaste

onourwayto2012 · 28-10-2009, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graflok

^ Another great article by McGowan, one of my favorite writers.

I agree! I really enjoy his style of writing and am always disappointed when his articles end. This is right up there with his amazing Laurel Canyon series.

raphael · 29-10-2009, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raphael

ASTROSPIES
great video exposes what we know to be a fact.
that secrets can be kept for a long time.

Astrospies - YouTube

I forgot to provide a link for this video....

namaste

altbau · 30-10-2009, 06:34 PM

The clearest evidence, for me, is perhaps in this video (among others):

Apollo 15 Digging a trench - YouTube

The way the dust behaves throughout the video is a very clear sign of no atmosphere and lower gravity. Whether you look at the regolith the guy is moving with his shovel or the stuff they kick up as they move around, it follows a ballistic course and does not billow. Very simple.

And in case you haven't seen the many thousands of photographs available from the missions, just head on over to history.nasa.gov and visit the "image library" for each Apollo mission, which is one of the elements of each mission's surface journal. It's all there, and in very high quality, for the whole world to enjoy and scrutinise.

Enjoy!

altbau · 30-10-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raphael

ASTROSPIES
great video exposes what we know to be a fact.
that secrets can be kept for a long time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2K6HHUbUe0

I asked the folks at BAUT to watch this video and discuss the ability of the US military, in the 1960s - 70s, to magnify and focus on an area 3 inches square, with cameras perched 100 miles above in space, in orbit.
Wondering why LCROSS was sending back such shitty images from space 40 years later.

What is also interesting is how the unknown Astrospies who received no glory for their efforts, because they were top secret, ROSE to positions of power and influence after the program was 'shut down'.
Unlike the many astroNOTs who went to the Moon, who retired soon after attaining their glory.

The discussion on the BAUT forum was muted by the mods and the thread closed.

namaste

Could you link to the closed thread?

raphael · 30-10-2009, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altbau

Could you link to the closed thread?

Not until the ban is lifted and I am allowed re-entry to the forum.

Until then search the site at BAUT for 'LCross'
http://www.bautforum.com/

namaste

skiver · 30-10-2009, 08:16 PM

''Moon Landing A Fake or Fact''

FAKE

alexis1111 · 30-10-2009, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altbau

The clearest evidence, for me, is perhaps in this video (among others):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk5GiF_mX5w

The way the dust behaves throughout the video is a very clear sign of no atmosphere and lower gravity. Whether you look at the regolith the guy is moving with his shovel or the stuff they kick up as they move around, it follows a ballistic course and does not billow. Very simple.

And in case you haven't seen the many thousands of photographs available from the missions, just head on over to history.nasa.gov and visit the "image library" for each Apollo mission, which is one of the elements of each mission's surface journal. It's all there, and in very high quality, for the whole world to enjoy and scrutinise.

Enjoy!

Do you have any idea how many laws of physics you must forget or bend to make a claim to video productions on the lunar surface? You need to be in a full state of denial with regards to the energy given off by the sun.

All these questions have been completely explained in the Pravda Apollo thread. A 300+ page blockbuster thread that buried NASA's claims from near the start.

They were so effective at debunking the moonlanding claims that one shill in the thread shifted over from skeptic to believer to try and confuse the readers.

hagbard_celine · 31-10-2009, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunkahunka

anyone up on the moon landing hoax should not miss
this new article by David McGowan , called Wagging
the Moon Doggie:

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html

not sure if it has been posted here already, but
if you have not read it, it definitely is worth the
time. He thoroughly discusses the complete
hoax, including such things as the impossibly
EXTREME temperature swings that the astronauts would have
had to deal with while in space and while on the moon
in that pathetic little tin foil craft.

Thanks, HH.

I'll have a read.

hagbard_celine · 31-10-2009, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altbau

The clearest evidence, for me, is perhaps in this video (among others):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk5GiF_mX5w

The way the dust behaves throughout the video is a very clear sign of no atmosphere and lower gravity. Whether you look at the regolith the guy is moving with his shovel or the stuff they kick up as they move around, it follows a ballistic course and does not billow. Very simple.

You say that it's "dust". Are you sure?

It looks more like coarse sand or gravel to me that would rise and fall in a ballistic manner anyway, even on Earth in an atmosphere.

I know in some of the lunar shots you can see that the ground is covered by much finer material, but we can't use the effects employed in one scene to prove the reality of apparent effects in another separate scene.

raphael · 31-10-2009, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexis1111

Do you have any idea how many laws of physics you must forget or bend to make a claim to video productions on the lunar surface? You need to be in a full state of denial with regards to the energy given off by the sun.

All these questions have been completely explained in the Pravda Apollo thread. A 300+ page blockbuster thread that buried NASA's claims from near the start.

They were so effective at debunking the moonlanding claims that one shill in the thread shifted over from skeptic to believer to try and confuse the readers.

300 pages

highlights are on pages?

namaste

corruptus in extremis · 01-11-2009, 06:33 AM

It has probably been mentioned before but in this video at around the 3:50 mark i actually see an aliens face rather than the earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fHAISw6bZ4&feature=player_embedded#

noewhan · 03-12-2010, 02:20 AM

This may have been posted before...

Mythbusters Moon Landing Hoax 1 HQ

Mythbusters Moon Landing Hoax 1 HQ - YouTube

Heh, Mythbusters. Probably not the best source for info... But pretty interesting. I believe they busted the shadow directions topic.

lizard_monkey · 03-12-2010, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by king

hoax conspiracy's.

Hoax is a cool word

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/origin.html

28-10-2009, 02:27 AM	#1066
graflok Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 4,108	^ Another great article by McGowan, one of my favorite writers. __________________

13-09-2009, 08:53 PM	#1062
elton Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,426	You can see some of the fakery in the landing videos. Look at the fake dust. lol. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...&postcount=341

27-10-2009, 11:52 AM	#1065
hunkahunka Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,350	anyone up on the moon landing hoax should not miss this new article by David McGowan , called Wagging the Moon Doggie: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html not sure if it has been posted here already, but if you have not read it, it definitely is worth the time. He thoroughly discusses the complete hoax, including such things as the impossibly EXTREME temperature swings that the astronauts would have had to deal with while in space and while on the moon in that pathetic little tin foil craft.

30-10-2009, 08:16 PM	#1073
skiver Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: I live in a place where the nuts eat the squirrels. Posts: 168	''Moon Landing A Fake or Fact'' FAKE