NY plane crash - Page 3

anahata · 16-01-2009, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by croatiancoffee

Bloody women drivers are the worst!

Glad to hear everyone is safe and well.

1971 · 16-01-2009, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neworderhorizon

If birds can cause that much damage, why don't they put wire covers over the engines?

This is exactly what I said to OH this morning....

bigred · 16-01-2009, 10:49 AM

A plane just happens to crash land in the hudson river on the day israeli troops bomb another U.N. shelter without any justification whatsoever. Fucking bullshit! I wonder how difficult it would be for an experienced pilot to bring a plane down safely on water like that? Probably a lot less difficult than they would have us believe.

orwell101 · 16-01-2009, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigred

A plane just happens to crash land in the hudson river on the day israeli troops bomb another U.N. shelter without any justification whatsoever. Fucking bullshit! I wonder how difficult it would be for an experienced pilot to bring a plane down safely on water like that? Probably a lot less difficult than they would have us believe.

My thoughts exactly. OK, so the Gaza conflict may have generated 10,000 hours of news over the last few weeks, but that plane crash got at least 10 minutes on the news last night and now everyone will have forgotten everything that happened in Israel and the NWO has won again. How on Earth can we beat them?

As bigred points out, landing a plane on water is easy. All the pilots of the world are part of the NWO order too. Fact.

3stepsahead · 16-01-2009, 01:51 PM

I cant help but think this is a confirmation ad for the planecrash in wtcs.
it sounds cartoonish taht a plane can actually land in the water like that , without a scratch or budge.
it didnt even sink before evryone was evacuated (on camera).

incredibly weird story but seeing more and more people question the wtc plane crash it may as well be just another psy op, just like any other news story these days.

ayomide · 16-01-2009, 01:57 PM

Bird strikes are common and can bring down a plane but not likely as the jet engine is now made to withstand such impact. I would be more concerned for fire on an aircraft than any other emergency.

As for the one who wrote bloddy women can't drive - please grow up!

Anyway the crash was a rather successful ditching if I must say.

horus13 · 16-01-2009, 03:08 PM

well it's remarkable timing but some of you are just plain paranoid. the plane flew into a flock of geese and a few of them went through both engines which is very rare and very unlucky. just one bird going through one engine would have been enough to force an emergency landing. the plane was apparently pitching and shaking violently and the engines had flamed out so this was no routine/staged splash down, it would have been like being on a rollercoaster and you'd have been kissing your ass goodbye. the pilot tried for an emergency landing at a smaller provincial airport but he pretty much knew he wasn't going to make it so he did the next best option. whoever said it isn't difficult obviously knows nothing about flying commerical jets. i'd imagine it's a pretty difficult thing to land a craft full of fuel and passengers that size at 150mph on a moving river but he did it and everyone on board lived. be happy about that. also, this might be of interest to the conspiracy nuts...did you see all the jewish medics at the scene too? that obviously had nothing to do with there being the big interfaith medical center nearby.

bigred · 16-01-2009, 03:49 PM

At last the fighting in gaza has stopped, hasn't it? I turn on the news and all i see are images of the plane crash in new york. The mindless bloodshead must have stopped otherwise it would be the top story on every news channel, wouldn't it???

cookie_dude · 16-01-2009, 06:17 PM

These engines are designed to with stand bird attacks take a look here.
It could of been a failed false flag op, the bird story is just a cover.

landing on water is not an easy thing to do.

scatlond · 16-01-2009, 06:29 PM

Its the Birds i feel for, happily going about their business, then.................

16-01-2009, 01:57 PM	#26
ayomide Inactive Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Southern Afrique Posts: 352	Bird strikes are common and can bring down a plane but not likely as the jet engine is now made to withstand such impact. I would be more concerned for fire on an aircraft than any other emergency. As for the one who wrote bloddy women can't drive - please grow up! Anyway the crash was a rather successful ditching if I must say. Last edited by ayomide; 16-01-2009 at 02:00 PM.

16-01-2009, 03:08 PM	#27
horus13 Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 249	well it's remarkable timing but some of you are just plain paranoid. the plane flew into a flock of geese and a few of them went through both engines which is very rare and very unlucky. just one bird going through one engine would have been enough to force an emergency landing. the plane was apparently pitching and shaking violently and the engines had flamed out so this was no routine/staged splash down, it would have been like being on a rollercoaster and you'd have been kissing your ass goodbye. the pilot tried for an emergency landing at a smaller provincial airport but he pretty much knew he wasn't going to make it so he did the next best option. whoever said it isn't difficult obviously knows nothing about flying commerical jets. i'd imagine it's a pretty difficult thing to land a craft full of fuel and passengers that size at 150mph on a moving river but he did it and everyone on board lived. be happy about that. also, this might be of interest to the conspiracy nuts...did you see all the jewish medics at the scene too? that obviously had nothing to do with there being the big interfaith medical center nearby. Last edited by horus13; 16-01-2009 at 03:50 PM.

16-01-2009, 10:49 AM	#23
bigred Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 84	A plane just happens to crash land in the hudson river on the day israeli troops bomb another U.N. shelter without any justification whatsoever. Fucking bullshit! I wonder how difficult it would be for an experienced pilot to bring a plane down safely on water like that? Probably a lot less difficult than they would have us believe.

16-01-2009, 01:51 PM	#25
3stepsahead Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: in the bushes Posts: 763	I cant help but think this is a confirmation ad for the planecrash in wtcs. it sounds cartoonish taht a plane can actually land in the water like that , without a scratch or budge. it didnt even sink before evryone was evacuated (on camera). incredibly weird story but seeing more and more people question the wtc plane crash it may as well be just another psy op, just like any other news story these days.

16-01-2009, 03:49 PM	#28
bigred Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 84	At last the fighting in gaza has stopped, hasn't it? I turn on the news and all i see are images of the plane crash in new york. The mindless bloodshead must have stopped otherwise it would be the top story on every news channel, wouldn't it???

16-01-2009, 06:17 PM	#29
cookie_dude Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 245	These engines are designed to with stand bird attacks take a look here. It could of been a failed false flag op, the bird story is just a cover. landing on water is not an easy thing to do.

16-01-2009, 06:29 PM	#30
scatlond Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Glasgow Scotland Posts: 1,491	Its the Birds i feel for, happily going about their business, then.................