Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Reptilians
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-09-2008, 04:21 PM   #1
synergy777
Senior Member
 
synergy777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,373
Default Annunaki, Nephilim, Fallen Angels & Reptillians

check this video about sumeria. modern day sumeria is iraq. the biblical city of babylon was in iraq. in babylon, we had the tower of babel, the division of mankind/migration started and the capitivity of the jews/hebrews. also then remember the city of ur, ur is in iraq.

abraham came from the city of ur. abraham is the father of jews, christians and muslims with regards to religion.

thus iraq/babylon is the start of the judeo-christianity-islamic religion, the three abrahamic religions, the people of the book eg torah/bible/quran.

then we have the vedic connections to sumeria/abraham eg braham = abraham.

braham is the supreme creator, the infinite awareness. braham has three functions, these are represented by a trinity, trimurti. this trinity is a representation of functions/aspects of the supreme. this trinity is brahma, vishnu and shiva.

also conicidently, the creation of mankind in the vedic terms and abrahamic terms is the same.

we know that the vedic religion/hinduism, comes from 4000bc etc, if not before. hindu is new term, it comes from the river indus, thus those that lived beyond the river indus, where called hindu. also there is the mountainrange called the hindu kush. kush could yet be reference to kush/cush, eg african origins. as cush is ethiopia, kemet is egypt/africa in old language. hence hindu/india being persian/europeans names. the old vedic names for india, are bharat and aryavarta. bharat is what we indians call india, eg just like names bombay and mumbai are the same place. aryavarta is what india was in old times from the western points of israel/arabia including iran/iraq to the eastern point of bangledesh and the southern point of sri lanka. aryavarta coming from the word aryan, aryan being those who seek a noble way of life eg vedic/compassionate lifestyles.

thus i will know look at the connections between vedic religions and sumerian religion. but before watch this video, its concise and clear.

The Annunaki are not the Nephilim or the Fallen Angels

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngJ-H7fjsAk

The Sumerians and the Annunaki - Part 1

__________________
http://synergy777.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/synergy777 http://www.zazzle.co.uk/synergy777

Fearlessness means faith in God: faith in His protection, His justice, His wisdom, His mercy, His Love, and His omnipresence… To be fit for Self-realization, man must be fearless.— Paramahansa Yogananda
synergy777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2008, 04:48 PM   #2
synergy777
Senior Member
 
synergy777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,373
Default

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vTu602...ine_videos.htm
__________________
http://synergy777.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/synergy777 http://www.zazzle.co.uk/synergy777

Fearlessness means faith in God: faith in His protection, His justice, His wisdom, His mercy, His Love, and His omnipresence… To be fit for Self-realization, man must be fearless.— Paramahansa Yogananda
synergy777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 12:53 AM   #3
synergy777
Senior Member
 
synergy777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,373
Default

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/su...aki/anu_14.htm

Fom: “Dr Michael Salla” <[email protected]>
Subject: [exopolitics] Anunnaki, Iraq, Stargates - Reply to Michael Sokolov
Received: 10/8/2004 12:11:14 PM

Aloha All, here is a further exchange of correspondence I’ve had with Michael Sokolov who has a fine grasp of Anunnaki history and the role of Reptilian ETs which dovetails with much of my own research. I’ve copied below a post I sent out on my prepare4contact forum and the response that Michael Sokolov sent. Michael’s response can be read by either clicking either the URL at the start, or by reading it at the end of this post.
In peace
Michael Salla, PhD
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aloha Michael apologies for not replying earlier to your response about the Anunnaki and their relationship with mainstream religion (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prepar...t/message/7789).

I find myself in agreement with much of what you say and think it is very valuable to emphasize the distinction between the Anunnaki as human looking ETs and the Reptilians as basically being locked into a historical conflict over control of humanity. I have just finished reading David Icke’s “Children of the Matrix” and think that he basically simplified human history in terms of his belief that the Reptilians are in control of everything. As you know, in his view, Reptilians, the Anunnaki are the same, and that we are locked into a Prison Planet with the same set of secret rulers - the Illuminati who are basically bloodlines associated with the Reptilians, mixed in with some Nordic DNA.

The framework you outline in your article makes much more sense and I’m happy to say that I reached the same conclusion with my own research, the Anunnaki and the Reptilians are very different and are competitors. The Illuminati are primarily associated with the Anunnaki but as you say in your response to my earlier article, there may have been significant infiltration or compromising of this organization by the Reptilians who dominate mainstream religious institutions and also in my view military institutions such as the US military.

Due to my political science background and work in the US, I like to use political metaphors and kind of see the Anunnaki as similar to Democrats and the Reptilians as a version of the Republicans. The Democrats are more progressive and see humans as having more intrinsic value, while Republicans are more law and order types that like to carry the big stick. This is some validation for your view that we need to get behind the Anunnaki who have historically tried to assist humanity as exemplified in the stories about Enki. You therefore conclude that the Anunnaki are supporting human liberation and deserve our support.

You write:

“But I don’t think that the present-day descendants of Anunnaki, if they come into contact with us, would try to control us like they did before.

The exopolitical situation now is totally different. We now have a common enemy, and defeating them is far more important than our petty differences. That is basically my main argument: we can’t compare Anunnaki and reptiles side by side and say that they are just vying for control and one is no better than the other, because they are incomparable.

Anunnaki weren’t just “a little more compassionate to us”, we ARE them basically, and although yes, they did screwed up majorly a few times, those wounds can be healed and we can move forward together, but the dark forces of Yahweh are the enemy of Life itself. To use a Tolkien analogy (Lord of the Rings), the differences between us and Anunnaki are the little differences between humans, hobbits, elves and dwarves/gnomes, but Yahweh is Sauron and USA is Mordor.”

As I said, I’m basically suspicious about Anunnaki in terms of their historical role and motivation and you’ve replied that caution is necessary but that an alliance is important. I can go along with that since these types of alliances are helpful in changing the political dynamics between different ET races and humanity. I do think though that rather than a dyadic conflict between the Reptilians and Anunnaki, as you suggest with your Lord of the Rings metaphor, that there is a third force involved here which comprises the kinds of ET groups that I referred to earlier which most regard as benevolent, e.g., Andromedans, Pleiadians, Arcturians, etc. So the competition or struggle for Earth is triadic. We have two interventionist factions, Reptilians and Anunnaki who have different approaches to how to manage the Earth, kind of like the Republican and Democrat approaches, and we have a third faction which is primarily non-interventionist and use consciousness raising.

I think that our best allies are the non-interventionists, but that alliances with ETs such as Anunnaki makes sense given the present exopolitical situation on Earth.

Now what you say about the Anunnaki in terms of the invasion of Iraq is significant and I wish to reflect a little on that. You say:

“OK, it’s time for me to drop another bombshell. Brace yourself. I believe Saddam Hussein was/is a good guy. All the bad things they say about him are reptilian propaganda. He undug some ancient Anunnaki equipment and was able to reactivate it. He reestablished contact with Anunnaki and was trying to bring them back. That’s why they wanted him out.”

Now I certainly suspected that Saddam had found something and that was why the US really went in. Most of the evidence I could find in my own paper and book chapter was circumstantial yet when all put together was pretty persuasive. Fortunately, whistleblowers such as Dan Burisch were able to confirm this so I felt pretty confident that I was on the right track. I’d like to know any sources you used to support your similar conclusion and to share this with us. Perhaps your Russian sources are more forthcoming on why Uncle Sam went into Iraq?

The key now shifts to what it was that Saddam wanted to open the Stargates for. Would it have been the Anunnaki who would have come in with the desire to physically liberate the Earth from the covert Reptilian control and thus support Saddam as a ‘righteous ruler’ or ‘good guy’ as you say; or would it have been a Draconian Reptilian invasion force that would have manipulated Saddam to basically impose overt Reptilian control of Earth.

Whichever scenario it was, one could say that that the Bush administration did the right thing with its foray into Iraq since it now effectively controlled the Stargate and prevented an overt Reptilian or Anunnaki presence coming through that would align itself with Saddam. I don’t see Saddam as a good guy since he basically started a series of wars since he came to power in 1978 that began with Iran and basically impoverished his people.

Certainly no good guy in my book but from a certain perspective he did offer an alternative to covert Reptilian control and I see that is what you are getting at. At the same time, I don’t feel we have enough information to know for sure who would have come through the activated stargates, and the consequences may well have been a more destructive regional war involving overt intervention by ETs that would have sided with Saddam.

I would appreciate any more information you have on what may have come through the Iraqi stargates and why you feel so confident it would have been the Anunnaki rather than the Draco Reptilians which is what I believe most commentators have opined.

I look forward to hearing from you.
Michael S.

-------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prepar...t/message/7789
Aloha Dr. Salla,

> Thank you for sharing your insights and reflections on the Anunnaki
> and Jehovah in your paper examining the exopolitical history of
> humanity

Thank you for the compliment!

> I also agree with you that a key historical event was the
> disappearance of the Anunnaki around 2000 BC. Now your insight here
> that this signified a take over by another group of ETs led by
> Jehovah is very insightful.

I have also been able to scavenge enough data from the ancient clues to construct a mathematical model of the orbit of Nibiru / Planet X, and guess what, in that fateful year 2024 BCE it was precisely in its aphelion, the farthest out point. Think about it, if you are an outsider seeking to attack the Anunnaki bases on Earth, when would be the best time for attack?
I will present my model of the orbit of Planet X in my book, along with the full chain of reasoning that led to it.

> This would explain why Yahweh could not be seen [...]

I have also pondered the possibility that Yahweh did not want anyone to see his physical form because he was so extremely ugly and gross. Which brings us to the following thought... does anyone remember the highly negative “disclosure briefing” John Lear gave to Art Bell last year? When he was “showing” the 18 alien species known to the shadow government, he made a comment about one of them:

“These are five-second slides of the 18 different alien species we are looking at. That one there is the most gruesome-looking. The guards at one facility are carefully indoctrinated over a period of several months being shown pictures similar to but not exactly like the alien. Only when they’d been acclimatized, so to speak, to the horrible-looking beings are they allowed to stand in security positions. Before these acclimatization were done, we had two guards die of a heart attack as the aliens came down the hallway unexpectedly.”

That made me wonder... I’m not even 100% sure of the reptilian nature, to be honest. Another candidate for this ugly monster is the praying mantis alien. Some remote viewer has seen a praying mantis when peeking back into 1930s at some folks talking in German about the atomic bomb.


Hmm, Yahwist reptilian-insectoids helping Nazis... But then we know that Hitler was in fact a Jew, an illegitimate grandson of one of the Rothschilds.

(And for those wondering, my answer to the Lear Test is an emphatic Yes.)

> It was another ET race, the Reptilians, who basically came and took
> over the Earth by gaining the allegiance of various tribes such as
> the Hebrews.

. and I believe their methods involved mental takeover, neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and Controlled Remote Influencing (CRI). I will write more about this in my book.

> Now there
> are a couple of areas where it would be useful getting some
> clarification and a disagreement over who are the best allies of
> humanity in the present exopolitical situation on Earth.

OK...

> First, the role of the Illuminati in what has been described so far
> is critical.

Yes.

> Who exactly are they? Are they remnants of the Anunnaki
> control that previously existed (my initial idea) or extensions of
> the Reptilian takeover (Icke’s idea) or a combination of both?

I believe the former. Of course considering that the Yahwists’ primary modus operandi seems to be mental takeover and reprogramming, it is entirely possible and plausible that many of the Illuminati have fallen to their side.

> My
> guess is that the Illuminati are more closely aligned with the
> Anunnaki which is why there has been historic conflict between the
> Illuminati and Religious institutions such as the Catholic Church
> which presumably are bastions of Reptilian control.

Very sharp, that’s exactly my reasoning.

> E.g, the Knight
> Templars and their destruction by the Catholic Church, here the
> Anunnaki elite are destroyed by the Jehoavah/Yahweh based elite.

Yes, and think about what got the Templars in trouble in the first place: they undug something in the ruins of Jerusalem, which we know from Sitchin is the site of Anunnaki’s Command Centre. Now think about these two questions:

1. What is the most restricted and most secure place on Earth today?
It is not the White House. It is not the Pentagon. It is not Kremlin. It is the Dome on the Rock in Jerusalem. Or Area 51. One of those two.


Or rather they are probably about equal. Now what does it tell you, the mere fact that those two can be listed side by side like this? They are fundamentally of the same nature, major ET sites on Earth.


2. What is the never-ending conflict between Israel and Palestine all about?

It’s about Jerusalem. Even more specifically, about who ought to own that Sacred Spot. It is the apple of the dispute.

Now why is it so special? Why is it worth risking World War III over? We know why it was so important in the past - it was the Anunnaki Command Centre. But why is it so important now? Merely because of its ancient history? I doubt that. What if there is some interplanetary communication equipment still operating there TODAY?

And one more point. We’ve all heard of government mind control and programming. They are putting programs in us. But think about it: where are the programs coming from? I’m a computer programmer by profession and know very well that programs need to be written by programmers, distributed, etc. What if the programs being beamed into our minds by the shadow government are being DOWNLOADED to Earth (from Alpha Draconis?) through the interplanetary radio link at Mt. Moriah in Jerusalem and then distributed further?

I have a lot more to say about that Sacred Spot on Mt. Moriah, but I will save the rest for my book. Stay tuned.

> In your analysis, if the Illuminati are associated with the
> Anunnaki, they are the good guys.

Yes. I know this will be a great shocker to this whole community which generally sees the Illuminati as the root of all evil. This is one of the hardest to swallow bits of my research. That’s why I don’t like just dropping this on people, I want to ease it on through point-by-point reasoning and evidence in my book. But you sort of prodded it out of me.

> The conflict in Iraq has
> echoes of this ancient conflict between the Anunnaki and the Jehovah
> based religionists who are secretly a front for the Reptilians. I’d
> be interested in hearing your thoughts on this.

I fully agree with you that the war in Iraq is an exopolitical conflict.

We independently reached the same conclusions. When the whole saber-rattling about Iraq was just starting, I realized from the get-go what was going on: “oh great, invasion of Sumer”.

I was also very delighted to see your exopolitical comment about the downing of Space Shuttle Columbia on the eve of the invasion of Eden, accompanied by the Eye of Horus around the Sun. When I first heard about Columbia going down, I was quite delighted that the Anunnaki got at least some small revenge for the desecration and stomping of their holy land by the Yankees. That was my immediate reaction, seeing your exopolitical comment was a pleasant confirmation later. You and I are probably the only two people on the planet who have made the connection between the downing of Columbia and the war in Iraq. And then also Columbia carried the first Israeli into space... Anunnaki weren’t very pleased, and I understand them.

OK, it’s time for me to drop another bombshell. Brace yourself. I believe Saddam Hussein was/is a good guy. All the bad things they say about him are reptilian propaganda. He undug some ancient Anunnaki equipment and was able to reactivate it. He reestablished contact with Anunnaki and was trying to bring them back. That’s why they wanted him out.

And just recently I heard on Coast to Coast that Saddam’s lawyer argues for his client having a right to run in the Iraqi elections, and some poll showing that 42% of Iraqis want him back. Wouldn’t it be great if the Iraqis elect him democratically? That would be a powerful message to the reptoids, we don’t want Yahwists, Yankees and their lies here, we want our true gods and goddesses, the Anunnaki, and our legitimate President Saddam Hussein!

> The problem
> then shifts from Reptilians per se, to hybrid human-Reptilians that
> comprises the Enki faction of the Anunnaki.

“Problem”? Enki is not a “problem”, he was a hero and a saint in my book! This is probably the area where I disagree with you and a number of other people who think of Anunnaki as controlling and manipulative.
It is true that Anu was very authoritarian, and his son Enlil (whose mother was Anu’s wife and half-sister Antu, i.e., pure Anu race) was the same way. Enki was very different. His mother was one of Anu’s concubines, who I believe was a Sirian queen or princess.

So Enki was only half Anu race, the other half Sirian. His exopolitics was also totally different from Anu’s. While the Enlilites indeed established an aristocratic social order in the civilizations under their control, and I have to agree that they were too controlling and undemocratic, I do not see a single shred of evidence of any such controlling behavior on Enki’s part. Enki managed the ancient Egypt, and note that all of celestial alignments in the pyramids point to Sirius and the belt stars of Orion, NOT to Rigel which is where I believe the planet of Anu came from (I’ll explain this in my book).

Enki was NEVER interested in any manipulation and control of humans, and he was always interested in giving humans as much as possible in the way of civilization, wisdom and spirituality. And his son Marduk even wanted to teach humans how to build rockets and go to space in 3500 BCE! (I’m talking about the Bab-Ili rocket launch tower of course.) After the nuclear holocaust of 2024 BCE Enki, risking his own life, went around in the radioactive fields of Shumer trying to use his scientific/magical tricks to clean up the place as much as possible and to make plants grow again.

> Now the final point I wish to make and where I feel we disagree is
> with the idea that the Anunnaki are our allies in freeing the earth
> from the Reptilians who use Jehovah/Yahweh/Allah as covers for their
> secret domination of Earth. As I see it, there are two ET factions
> who have historically competed for control of Earth. By choosing one
> faction over the other, presumably because it is genetically more
> human and has shown evidence or being more compassionate than the
> other, doesn’t appear to be very transformative to me.

Yes, we disagree a little here. I don’t believe that the Enki faction ever had any intent of domination and control, and therefore they ought to perfectly qualify as our true allies. As for the rest of the Anu clan, i.e., the Enlilites, they indeed had a few undesirable qualities, and I agree with you that we need to be careful with them. But I’m not saying that we should revert totally to the old ways and just bow down to them. We should welcome them as friends, but on new terms: as friends and not as overlords.

But I don’t think that the present-day descendants of Anunnaki, if they come into contact with us, would try to control us like they did before.

The exopolitical situation now is totally different. We now have a common enemy, and defeating them is far more important than our petty differences. That is basically my main argument: we can’t compare Anunnaki and reptiles side by side and say that they are just vying for control and one is no better than the other, because they are incomparable.

Anunnaki weren’t just “a little more compassionate to us”, we ARE them basically, and although yes, they did screwed up majorly a few times, those wounds can be healed and we can move forward together, but the dark forces of Yahweh are the enemy of Life itself. To use a Tolkien analogy (Lord of the Rings), the differences between us and Anunnaki are the little differences between humans, hobbits, elves and dwarves/gnomes, but Yahweh is Sauron and USA is Mordor.

(Speaking of Tolkien... I can’t help but notice a striking similarity between his description of the elves and Altairans... But of course like everything else, it’s just a coincidence... grin)

> I think we can look beyond these two factions for a solution and
> find the answer in other ET races that are not associated with
> either faction that are used to running the Earth. A number of
> contactees have spoken of ET races from Andromeda, Arcturus, Sirius
> A., Pleiades, etc., who are also here trying to assist humanity in
> its evolution.

Which brings us to my favorite slogan: Proletarians of all planets, unite!

(It is of course derived from Karl Marx’ famous “Proletarians of all counties, unite!”, and yes, I am a Communist and I’ll reveal some startling Soviet-Anunnaki connections in my book.)

> However, I believe
> that even the Anunnaki cannot be fully trusted due to ingrained
> habits of control and elitism that would soon result in new
> institutions of power and control that would enslave/limit portions
> of humanity.

Yes, and I certainly don’t suggest that we blindly entrust them with everything, but again I believe in giving them a second chance as friends rather than controllers, and I really believe that they have learned a lesson and will now know that it’s much better to cooperate rather than control, and that in open cooperation we will be much stronger together and much more effective in fighting the forces of darkness.

Love & light and Blessed Be,
Michael Sokolov
Engineer / Researcher / Truth seeker / Freedom fighter
__________________
http://synergy777.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/synergy777 http://www.zazzle.co.uk/synergy777

Fearlessness means faith in God: faith in His protection, His justice, His wisdom, His mercy, His Love, and His omnipresence… To be fit for Self-realization, man must be fearless.— Paramahansa Yogananda
synergy777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.