armada on the move

[cleft_asunder]

*Is still waiting for official sources.*

[romas]

Originally Posted by cleft_asunder

Oh come on! That's all the "confirmation" you guys can bring up? The only guy saying there was a massive armada move was the author of the original article! You guys jumped on the bandwagon way too soon. Where's the real confirmation??

There will never be one :P

Look how quickly Russia got their tanks inside Georgia, it's called pre-planned conflict. Same as it was with Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11 they were already on the way with planned coarse of actions.

[Anders Lindman]

[cleft_asunder]

Originally Posted by romas

There will never be one :P

Look how quickly Russia got their tanks inside Georgia, it's called pre-planned conflict. Same as it was with Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11 they were already on the way with planned coarse of actions.

Okay, so what makes you think this isn't a hoax?

[romas]

Originally Posted by cleft_asunder

Okay, so what makes you think this isn't a hoax?

Logic and intuition.
(Way to sleepy to go into this now, cya tomorrow!)

[cleft_asunder]

Originally Posted by romas

Logic and intuition.
(Way to sleepy to go into this now, cya tomorrow!)

I recall many instances of intuition being nothing more than personal desire for a particular outcome. And many instances of their 'intuition" turning out wrong. Intuition must provide correct answers 100% of the time, or it's not intuition.

[deany]

Originally Posted by goldenratio

saw this
http://www.metimes.com/International..._in_gulf/7724/

Leading the pack is the nuclear-powered carrier, the USS Theodore Roosevelt and its Carrier Strike Group Two; besides its 80-plus combat planes the Roosevelt normally transports, it is carrying an additional load of French Naval Rafale fighter jets from the French carrier Charles de Gaulle, currently in dry dock.

it made me think back to this which was posted at beginning of July,

Originally Posted by deany
a friend has recently been telling me about sightings of brand new French looking military vehicles being spotted in the Emirate off Fujairah , UAE.
He told me there were missiles on these vehicles with the words "La Rafelle" written down the side.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...french+missile


coincidence?

yeah it seems to me like all this is not a coincidence. I will confirm that the above story I posted about Fujeirah was correct and from one of my closest friends. I don't spread disinformation and nobody will find any evidence of this from me.

[manx angel]

Not exactly a hoax.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=9817

But there is a hoax type article by Sorcha Faal going about entitled 'Russia orders destruction of US Naval Armada in Persian Gulf'.

[manx angel]

I have been researching this all afternoon.

It seems there has been a greatly exaggerated report put about on the net by someone called Timothy Alexander who calls himself Lord Stirling. It contains a huge list of US,French and British ships, also submarines.

Some further links:

http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/iran-6/

http:http://www.iranvajahan.net/cgi-bin/n...&m=08&d=14&a=3



The fact remains that a naval blockade constitutes and act of war and that a resolution was put before the US House of Representatives earlier this year in favour of a naval blockade against Iran. Whether that passed or not I have not so far been able to confirm. I suspect it did.

Operation Brimstone, which has just ended, was an exercise to practice a naval blockade against Iran.

[manx angel]

Here is the bill that was put before the US House of Representatives:

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/hc362_ih.xml

It seems that so far it has not passed due to strong protest against the naval blockade aspect:

http://countercurrents.org/glunts020808.htm

But the pro Israeli elements in the US wish to see this bill passed, and it would seem that the Israeli prime minister would be perfectly happy to have the US blockade Iran, and via that action declare war on it. Russia beings Iran's ally, that could lead anywhere.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N21431390.htm

[cleft_asunder]

Originally Posted by manx angel

I have been researching this all afternoon.

It seems there has been a greatly exaggerated report put about on the net by someone called Timothy Alexander who calls himself Lord Stirling. It contains a huge list of US,French and British ships, also submarines.

Some further links:

http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/iran-6/

http:http://www.iranvajahan.net/cgi-bin/n...&m=08&d=14&a=3



The fact remains that a naval blockade constitutes and act of war and that a resolution was put before the US House of Representatives earlier this year in favour of a naval blockade against Iran. Whether that passed or not I have not so far been able to confirm. I suspect it did.

Operation Brimstone, which has just ended, was an exercise to practice a naval blockade against Iran.

That is the article in question. It's almost total bullshit it seems. Thanks for your hard work, I will have to read the links later, too tired now.