Physicist Nassim Haramein-

[catfood]

Originally Posted by yopp

Exactly! He is not a "real" physicist. 30 seconds of looking at his bio on his website and anyone can see he has never claimed to be "a physicist".
.[/SIZE][/COLOR]

Thank you for clearing that up. So he is a seeker not a physicist. Sorry for my misunderstanding, i had concluded from the title of this thread that he was claiming to be a physicist, then he said something that i know a physicist would not say. Sure you can understand why alarm bells went off.

[jayelowell]

The alarm should go off!
Physics have been re-written!!!

[jayelowell]

...I've also come to realize that Nassim was not the first to come up with this conclusion. Torsion physics is actually pretty old.

[jayelowell]

...more on SDO.
There are some really cool graphix in this video! check it out!

http://<div style="display: none;" i...</div> </div>

[branjo]

Originally Posted by jayelowell

...more on SDO.
There are some really cool graphix in this video! check it out!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BthDupBQXpQ

Just tidy the link up for ya there dude

[jesta_g]

Originally Posted by jayelowell

...I've also come to realize that Nassim was not the first to come up with this conclusion. Torsion physics is actually pretty old.

Indeed it is my good man, this book mentioned a while back in the thread delves into the Egyptian's knowledge of Torsion physics amongst other "new" science. I think its now fairly safe to say the Egyptian's got it from their predecessors and so on back to Atlantis/Lemuria.

If Torsion Unified Field Theory is one of the great keys to understanding all in the universe then its likely to have been known since the dawn of "Time" and "Space".

Originally Posted by jesta_g

In relation to Dan Winter's research specifically the science of language im currently reading "sacred symbols of the dogon", i highly suggest looking into the authors work Laird Scranton -






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wqHMSktXUk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw6nivI5RTM

http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0&oq=laird+sc#


very interesting stuff, the ancients knew knowledge we are only beginning to re-discover.... lol tell us something we didnt know?

seriously im only half way in this one book of his and it simply adds more light to our "vision".

[pedsi]

Adios Amigos!

Good Luck

pedsi

[yopp]

Originally Posted by catfood

Thank you for clearing that up. So he is a seeker not a physicist. Sorry for my misunderstanding, i had concluded from the title of this thread that he was claiming to be a physicist, then he said something that i know a physicist would not say. Sure you can understand why alarm bells went off.

Yea I see what you mean.
Sorry I came down a bit harsh on you for that.
You know I have not really paid much attention to the tittle of this thread. It is very misleading.

Nassim has a very expansive vision and in trying to condense it into a language that everyone could use and that can be shared with the rest of the world. So he has been trying to find the expression of his ideas in the language of physics. Problem is within his theory is the basic notion that some of the basic fundamentals of contemporary physics are incorrect. It needs to be rewritten in parts in order to conceptualize the nature of reality as he is describing it. Wrong or right that is what he thinks. So he is going back to the beginning in some ways and stating over.

I think its extremely bold of him really. I certainly would never try to do that myself. To describe the way I experience the universe to work I would rather remain in the language of mystics and the ancient study of subtle energy and consciousness.
I too have been a long time seeker and comparative researcher. Walking down many roads of discovery to find myself here.
If I had a plaque with a title to hang on my office wall mine would say something like Shamanic/Taoist. My education background includes over 17 years of deeply immersed study in shamanic Native American medicinal practices and about 7 years of study in Traditional Chinese Medicine schools. That and a San Francisco art school for a couple of years is the extent of my education. That's it except for my constant self education efforts that is. I've never had any formal university study at all. Never wanted any either. Not knocking it, just was not the path for me.

I came to this forum though a Google search of Nassim Haramein. I then joined the forum just to be able to participate in this particular thread. I only briefly looked around the rest of this forum actually. I like listening to David Icke but I've not gravitated toward or resonated with any of the other discussions. This has been a fantastic discussion and has been very interesting and thought provoking to read.

Sorry if I was rude in any way with my last post. I was responding in frustration mostly because I have read to many empty critiques of Nassim's work. I have no problem with honest critiques and everyone here is trying to rap our collective heads around these really deep and intriguing concepts.

I went over to this science forum:
http://www.sciencefile.org/cgi-bin/y...m=1251881447/0

For a look at what "real" scientists would say about Nassim's ideas. I didn't find any good definitive critiques there either. Mostly they say in elaborate terms why they think he is probably wrong. Never ever really clearly stating what they found that was wrong about it. I think if they could really tear it apart they would. Like they tore apart the poor lady that called herself FractalWoman. A group dismemberment of her theory is what went on there.


Anyway I personally think that fundamentally Nassim is really on to something radically big here. For me it is its many correlations to ancient knowledge, mystery schools and ancient texts. That he has been able to find really deep and intricate connections especially through the geometry to practically all the major works of ancient knowledge. I find that really convincing. There is also the deep resonance I feel within my own understanding and experience that tells me he is really on the right track.



I also think that his attempt to explain it, in terms of the pure science of physics, is a nobble quest. Though I think it will be a long and hard road till it will be able to be definitively stated that it is The Grand Unified Field Theory. If that is even possible.

Or maybe it will be that years from now some incredibly brilliant young physicist will do just that and when asked how he did it he might say that it was only because of the work of Nassim Haramein that he was able find the solution.

[plainsight]

Packing Tetrahedrons, and Closing In on a Perfect Fit

[skywalker9]

Energy from the Vacuum! This guy speaks of event horizon equilibriums and explains the Vacuum based MEG 'Motionless Electrodynamic Generator'. I think it's all relative to Nassims work. It's actually pretty full on technology, this guy is on to it. The youtube comments show the positive reactions people are posting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wypYFe3JXdE&feature=PlayList&p=BE1D8511DE642CA4&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wypYFe3JXdE&feature=PlayList&p=BE1D8511DE642CA4&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=15

(If your interested the youtube videos sometimes have trouble firing up, if this happens copy the video title, re-search it in the youtube bar and you will find all 8 parts)

And his article on Permissible Over-Unity. (out of time, there are slide links at the bottom of the article)

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...a%3DN%26um%3D1

-

[sadukan]

Originally Posted by jesta_g

Indeed it is my good man, this book mentioned a while back in the thread delves into the Egyptian's knowledge of Torsion physics amongst other "new" science. I think its now fairly safe to say the Egyptian's got it from their predecessors and so on back to Atlantis/Lemuria.

If Torsion Unified Field Theory is one of the great keys to understanding all in the universe then its likely to have been known since the dawn of "Time" and "Space".

Thanks for bringing this topic up again...
I thought I had already posted a further series of videos about this earlier on - it seems I didn't.

Here is a 5 part series going into more detailed comparisons of Dogon/Egyptian and Modern Scientific Cosmology:

"The Dogon Code" (from 2003, before Scranton re-published his book)

part1

part1

part2

part2

part3

part3

part4

part4

part5

part5

I can tell you now that if you manage to crack Dogon Metaphysics then you don't need to read my paper (which is going rather slowly, but surely).

sadukan.

PS The most important part of "Sacred Symbols of the Dogon" is chapter 12, pages 174-177 in particular (Guide Signs, Master Signs, World Signs).

PPS Here's some more info which was posted on the Rodin thread a while ago about the Dogon - synopsis of Scranton's "The Science of the Dogon", PDF of a paper detailing some more aspects about numbers and symbols of the Dogon.

"over it is 19"[74:30]
(DiYu - 18 Levels of Hell)
Philip LeMarchand

Go (game) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Go (game) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Go (game) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[motokeiru]

I really enjoy listening to that guy.

[jayelowell]

Earth and Mars are converging for a close encounter. On Jan. 27th, the Red Planet will be only 99 million kilometers (0.66 AU) away, appearing bigger through a telescope (14.1 arcseconds) than anytime from 2008 until 2012

I figured you guys would be intrested since on MARS we can find our kind of style physics!!!

...need I say more??

[jayelowell]

IT'S MARS! In a coincidence of celestial proportions, the Moon and Mars are having close encounters with Earth at the same time. Moreover, the two will spend Friday night gliding across the sky side-by-side. It's a must-see event: sky map.

I would think this stuff would be of intrest on this forum but I haven't seen any thread on the topic.

[branjo]

I just got back from shopping 30 mins ago and the moon was very low in a crystal clear sky and I swear it looked twice the damn size as normal.

[jayelowell]

Originally Posted by branjo

I just got back from shopping 30 mins ago and the moon was very low in a crystal clear sky and I swear it looked twice the damn size as normal.

BIGGEST FULL MOON OF THE YEAR: If you think tonight's Moon looks unusually big, you're right. It's the biggest full Moon of 2010. Astronomers call it a "perigee Moon," some 14% wider and 30% brighter than lesser full Moons of the year. (continued below)

Image credit and copyright: Anthony Ayiomamitis: details.

[branjo]

That explains that then

[whatistruth]

Another crackpot without a real science degree of any type.

[jayelowell]

^You should tweet about it sometime! lol

[skywalker9]

Originally Posted by whatistruth

Another crackpot without a real science degree of any type.

You will miss many things in life if you only look at the work of people that have obtained degrees. You should try not to be so closed minded, you might miss the whole point.