Is Paul really dead?

[januspolanski]

yep...... Looks like an ear from a mr. Potato head

lol

[faulconandsnowjob]

And Faul's changing nose tip:

[truthseeker49]

A very active member of my forum posted this showing how "fake" Faul's ears can look:

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Faul's ear lobe is dangling...
For comparison...
Paul

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon, great post concerning Faul's nose tips !

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I think his eyebrows have wandered a bit, too. Can post on that later :-P

[toty1994]

Wow, so many posts since I was last here! Just saw the ones a few pages back re Phil Ackrill...

Originally Posted by lostworld

I wanted to stay out of this theory cause it absolutely makes no sense to me,
BUT now it bothers me so I have to ask:

(I've seen pics of Viv so I know who she is btw)


phil akrill


phil akrill is who 60if says was paul

How can Phil Akrill be Faul and at the same time himself, as both younger and older? There is absolutely no resemblance between him and Faul what so ever so what about the plastic surgery he must had done...?
How could he then also be himself as older...?
I just don't get it...

In fact, today Ackrill is an accountant in the entertainment industry. He currently works for the re-formed Move (60's band that once featured fellow Brummies Roy Wood and Jeff Lynne). If you want to see what he looks like now he's even on facebook! I found all this out a while back and posted it on one of the pid forums when one of the posters on there kept insisting Ackrill was McCartney.

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon, that last comparison is GREAT ! The difference in the ears is astounding !
Toty, can you please post some Akrill photos ? I would LOVE to see them. I was left in the dust when that theory first came out. I still don't understand where that idea came from.

[astrochicken]

Originally Posted by truthseeker49

Faulcon, that last comparison is GREAT ! The difference in the ears is astounding !
Toty, can you please post some Akrill photos ? I would LOVE to see them. I was left in the dust when that theory first came out. I still don't understand where that idea came from.

Phil Akrill in the 60's

Faul McCartney's son james


Phil Akrill in his old band



NOTE THE NAME of the band and sing along - "Denny Laine is in my ears and in my eyes....."

[karol2020]

Originally Posted by faulconandsnowjob

Maybe Paul had a sudden growth-spurt in his 20's? Ok, I'm being sarcastic, but it seems like PIA'ers are able to rationalize away every inconsistency!

this one is very good.... clearly we can see that faul seems to be taller!

[astrochicken]

This occult-looking album cover gives me the creeps (the left part)


"The McCartney Years"

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Yeah, the occult & intelligence agencies seem to be connected...

Anyway, I just ran across something that supports my contention that there are disinfo agents on this forum (and others) & also about how much TPTB control the mainstream media.

The Pentagon’s War on the Internet
By Mike Whitney

02/13/06 "ICH' -- -- The Pentagon has developed a comprehensive strategy for taking over the internet and controlling the free flow of information. The plan appears in a recently declassified document, “The Information Operations Roadmap”, which was provided under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) and revealed in an article by the BBC.

The Pentagon sees the internet in terms of a military adversary that poses a vital threat to its stated mission of global domination. This explains the confrontational language in the document which speaks of “fighting the net”; implying that the internet is the equivalent of “an enemy weapons system."

The Defense Dept. places a high-value on controlling information. The new program illustrates their determination to establish the parameters of free speech.

The Pentagon sees information as essential in manipulating public perceptions and, thus, a crucial tool in eliciting support for unpopular policies. The recent revelations of the military placing propaganda in the foreign press demonstrate the importance that is given to co-opting public opinion.

Information-warfare is used to create an impenetrable cloud around the activities of government so that decisions can be made without dissent. The smokescreen of deception that encompasses the Bush administration has less to do with prevaricating politicians than it does with a clearly articulated policy of obfuscation. “The Information Operations Roadmap” is solely intended to undermine the principle of an informed citizenry.

The Pentagon’s focus on the internet tells us a great deal about the mainstream media and its connection to the political establishment.

Why, for example, would the Pentagon see the internet as a greater threat than the mainstream media, where an estimated 75% of Americans get their news?

The reason is clear; because the MSM is already a fully-integrated part of the corporate-system providing a 24 hour per day streaming of business-friendly news. Today’s MSM operates as a de-facto franchise of the Pentagon, a reliable and sophisticated propagandist for Washington’s wars of aggression and political subterfuge.

The internet, on the other hand, is the last bastion of American democracy; a virtual world where reliable information moves instantly from person to person without passing through the corporate filter. Online visitors can get a clear picture of their governments’ depredations with a click of the mouse. This is the liberalization of the news, an open source of mind-expanding information that elevates citizen awareness of complex issues and threatens the status quo.

The Pentagon program is just one facet of a broader culture of deception; a pervasive ethos of dishonesty that envelopes all aspects of the Bush White House. The “Strategic Intelligence” Dept is a division of the Defense establishment that is entirely devoted to concealing, distorting, omitting and manipulating the truth.

In what way is “strategic intelligence” different from plain intelligence?

It is information that is shaped in a way that meets the needs of a particular group. In other words, it is not the truth at all, but a fabrication, a fiction, a lie.

Strategic intelligence is an oxymoron; a tidy bit of Orwellian doublespeak that reflects the deeply rooted cynicism of its authors.

The internet is a logical target for the Pentagon’s electronic warfare. Already the Downing Street memos, Bush’s bombing-threats against Al Jazeera, the fraudulent 2004 elections, and the leveling of Falluja, have disrupted the smooth execution of Bush’s wars. It is understandable that Rumsfeld and Co. would seek to transform this potential enemy into an ally, much as it has done with the MSM.

The Pentagon’s plans for engaging in “virtual warfare” are impressive. As BBC notes: “The operations described in the document include a surprising range of military activities: public affairs officers who brief journalists, psychological operations troops who try to manipulate the thoughts and beliefs of an enemy, computer network attack specialists who seek to destroy enemy networks.” (BBC)

The enemy, of course, is you, dear reader, or anyone who refuses to accept their role as a witless-cog in new world order. Seizing the internet is a prudent way of controlling every piece of information that one experiences from cradle to grave; all necessary for an orderly police-state.

The Information Operations Roadmap (IOR) recommends that psychological operations (Psyops) “should consider a range of technologies to disseminate propaganda in enemy territory: unmanned aerial vehicles, "miniaturized, scatterable public address systems", wireless devices, cellular phones and the internet.” No idea is too costly or too far-fetched that it escapes the serious consideration of the Pentagon chieftains.

The War Dept. is planning to insert itself into every area of the internet from blogs to chat rooms, from leftist web sites to editorial commentary. The objective is to challenge any tidbit of information that appears on the web that may counter the official narrative; the fairytale of benign American intervention to promote democracy and human rights across the planet.

The IOR aspires to "provide maximum control of the entire electromagnetic spectrum" and develop the capability to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum of globally emerging communications systems, sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the electromagnetic spectrum". (BBC)

Full spectrum dominance.

The ultimate goal of the Pentagon is to create an internet-paradigm that corresponds to the corporate mainstream model, devoid of imagination or divergent points of view. They envision an internet that is increasingly restricted by the gluttonous influence of industry and its vast “tapestry of lies”.

The internet is the modern-day marketplace of ideas, an invaluable resource for human curiosity and organized resistance. It provides a direct link between the explosive power of ideas and engaged citizen involvement. (aka; participatory democracy)

The Pentagon is laying the groundwork for privatizing the internet so the information-revolution can be transformed into an information-tyranny, extending to all areas of communications and serving the exclusive interests of a few well-heeled American plutocrats.

http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle11901.htm

[toty1994]

Originally Posted by truthseeker49

Toty, can you please post some Akrill photos ? I would LOVE to see them. I was left in the dust when that theory first came out. I still don't understand where that idea came from.

Phil Ackrill early 60's and some other geezer.



Phil Ackrill as he looks now



http://www.themovelive.com/contact.html
This is the page from The Move's website with Ackrill named as their accountant. It adds up that it's the Phil Ackrill for various reasons, eg his connection to the geographical area and band members, the fact that he became an accountant after his time in Denny Laine and the Diplomats etc.

The poster I was questioning on a pid forum was certain there were no known photos of Ackrill post 1971, that in fact he virtually disappeared off the face of the earth. The reason? Because he apparently replaced Paul McCartney. Well, it only took a few minutes googling to find the above.

I wonder if Mr Ackrill is aware of his minor fame in the pid world? Well, for those who would like to find out it would seem he's easily contactable, either via the above link or on facebook!

[lostworld]

Originally Posted by toty1994

The poster I was questioning on a pid forum was certain there were no known photos of Ackrill post 1971, that in fact he virtually disappeared off the face of the earth. The reason? Because he apparently replaced Paul McCartney.

I swore I wasn't gonna go into this again, yet it comes back to haunt me, LOL!

I had no idea the theory said that there should be no pics of Ackrill after 1971. That makes more sense then.

However, when are these photo's below supposed to be taken?
Cause he looks so much older in this one:

phil akrill

than he does in this one:

phil akrill is who 60if says was paul

Is the first photo, where he has longer hair, a beard and looking really old supposed to be before 1971 then? Cause that must be a lot of aging in not so many years apart...

Oh, I still don't get this...!

[faulconandsnowjob]

Illuminati Musicians - YouTube

Illuminati Musicians - YouTube

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

[toty1994]

Originally Posted by lostworld

I swore I wasn't gonna go into this again, yet it comes back to haunt me, LOL!

I had no idea the theory said that there should be no pics of Ackrill after 1971. That makes more sense then.

However, when are these photo's below supposed to be taken?
Cause he looks so much older in this one:

phil akrill

than he does in this one:

phil akrill is who 60if says was paul

Is the first photo, where he has longer hair, a beard and looking really old supposed to be before 1971 then? Cause that must be a lot of aging in not so many years apart...

Oh, I still don't get this...!

Those two photos are of Vivian Stanshall, not Ackrill, so I don't get it either!

It may have been only the person I was questioning claiming there are no post '71 pics of Ackrill, I don't know, but he is still being put forward as a replacement. Even if there were no photos of the guy on the internet other than those 60's pics, it wouldn't be an issue - he's really no more famous than you or I, so why would there be?

[truthseeker49]

Toty, that 1960's photo of Phil Akrill is key. The first thing that struck me are his ears. He has some big ears, eh ? If he is the Faul replacement, why then did Faul have smaller ears which were close to his head during the MMT shoot ??? Phil appears to have ears which would've been fairly easy to surgically adjust to better resemble Paul's.
That does NOT make any sense to me.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Personally, I don't think Phil Akrill had anything to do w/ Paul's replacement.

[lostworld]

Originally Posted by faulconandsnowjob

Personally, I don't think Phil Akrill had anything to do w/ Paul's replacement.

Thank you!
Neither do I - mostly cause this STILL makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever!

Thanks Toty for your response.

[theweetoon]

After reading this thread "Is Paul really dead?", comparing images and listening to his voice again. I have come to the conclusion that Faul is not Paul. FACT.
Thanks faulconandsnowjob

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Your comment is much appreciated Theweetoon!

Faulcon has done a tremendous job here highlighting the many differences between Paul and his replacement - long may it continue!