Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2008, 03:38 PM   #1
darkovic
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 224
Default The wing scars were there from flight 93 in 1994!

A USGS photograph from 1994 showing the flight 93 crash site, with the wing marks in the ground already! In 1994!

http://www.trust-us.ch/cryptome/01-C...nk-eyeball.htm



You've all been waiting for something like this, so do something about it. Tell the fucking WORLD! Email every single news outlet on EARTH! And if nothing happens STILL then that is proof of a huge effort to bury it among the establishment media and will be useable to wake people to the reality they face.

I'm doing it now. You should too.

This is the original:

http://terraserver-usa.com/image.asp...94&Y=22177&W=2

Last edited by darkovic; 02-05-2008 at 03:48 PM.
darkovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 04:02 PM   #2
shodan
Premier Subscribers
 
shodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Transparent Globalization
Posts: 5,958
Default

Hi, this is a great find, I'm going to look into this when I've got more time after work. cheers.
__________________
The Internet is allergic to the truth

I heard through the baseline
shodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 05:17 PM   #3
darkovic
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 224
Default

I emailed the USGS (US Geological Survey) to check the authenticity of the photograph and terraserver. They confim it is genuine.

Their reply:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for contacting USGS.

Ed, the aerial photography on terraserver are genuine. Some are flown at a higher altitude than others and some with higher resolution. Usually some of the urban areas are flown with sharper resolution. The same photography can also be viewed at the site below.

http://nationalmap.gov/

I hope this information is useful. Please feel free to contact the USGS again if you need additional assistance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I chose not to mention 9/11 or flight 93 or Shanksville or any reason at all for asking the question and they just answered me.

Cheers USGS!
darkovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 05:36 PM   #4
darkovic
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 224
Default

I can't seem to save the email from hotmail. (Anyone know how?) I tried doing save page as but it failed.

Here's a screencap of the email though with my email blacked out:

darkovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 07:22 PM   #5
psychick
Senior Member
 
psychick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Out beyond ideas of wrong doing and right doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
Posts: 268
Default

Hi all,

This is my 1st post on this forum and l chose the 9/11 thread as it is a subject which is of great interest to me. I have researched that day in depth and l can honestly say, hand on heart that a missile hit the Pentagon and that flight 93 probably didn't even exist (or went down over the ocean).

I am also doubtful or passenger planes hitting the WTC's seeing as all the footage points to military planes with no windows and missiles strapped to their undercarriages.

Cool findings!

"Pass the remote control"
psychick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 05:28 PM   #6
hagbard_celine
Senior Member
 
hagbard_celine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 4,371
Default

Good find, Darkovic!

That would explain a lot. If you wanted to fake a plane crash site, where would you fake it?... Somewhere that already looks like a plane hit the ground of course!
__________________
"Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?"
Doctor Who- Bad Wolf.

"Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable."
from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin
hagbard_celine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 05:28 PM   #7
hagbard_celine
Senior Member
 
hagbard_celine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 4,371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychick View Post
Hi all,

This is my 1st post on this forum and l chose the 9/11 thread as it is a subject which is of great interest to me. I have researched that day in depth and l can honestly say, hand on heart that a missile hit the Pentagon and that flight 93 probably didn't even exist (or went down over the ocean).

I am also doubtful or passenger planes hitting the WTC's seeing as all the footage points to military planes with no windows and missiles strapped to their undercarriages.

Cool findings!

"Pass the remote control"
Welcome, Psychick.
__________________
"Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?"
Doctor Who- Bad Wolf.

"Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable."
from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin
hagbard_celine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 05:45 PM   #8
dmessick
Senior Member
 
dmessick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 249
Default

All I can say is WOW!
__________________
Helping To End The Illuminati Since 2008: www.EndTheIlluminatiConspiracy.Wordpress.com

To Order David Icke Books Straight From The Source Visit: David Ickes Book Store
dmessick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008, 12:07 AM   #9
psychick
Senior Member
 
psychick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Out beyond ideas of wrong doing and right doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hagbard_celine View Post
Welcome, Psychick.

Thank you Hagbard_celine
psychick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2008, 08:12 PM   #10
killtown
Senior Member
 
killtown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,084
Default

(Saw there is another thread about this, so I'll repost.)


The '94 scar is not the same, however I do believe represents part of how the 9/11 crater was made. The 9/11 crater sat at the base of a slop where a drainage ditch could have easily formed:

Quote:
"The apparent point of impact was a dark gash, not more than 30 feet wide, at the base of a gentle slope just before a line of trees." - post-gazette.com
And this quote describes the "wing scars" as a drainage ditch:

Quote:
"Other photos taken at the scene by Miller show a small furrow, like a hand-dug drainage ditch, running back from the crater. This was the mark left by a wing." - theage.com.au
If a "wing scar shaped" drainage ditch formed back before '94, why not 7 years later before 9/11 a few yards away?

So the 9/11 was a drainage ditch where they just had to drop a bomb in the middle of it and viola'! A "plane crash" crater.
__________________
killtown.blogspot.com
killtown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 11:19 AM   #11
mynameis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,552
Default



__________________
I can no longer have fair and intelligent conversation with people here, without them resorting to the use of personal attacks. I have been targeted as a scapegoat for my defensive actions. I cannot discuss new topics and stop the rampant amounts of misinformation when it happens, where it applies. If it can happen to me it can happen to you.
mynameis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2008, 04:02 PM   #12
ronisron
Senior Member
 
ronisron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,669
Default

The video is on youtube, and you can link to it from the headlines page. It shows the obvious first, no bodies, no wreckage from 9/11, and ends off with that aerial shot from USGS, taken in '94. VERY effective. It's STILL not enough for some people. I think the best analogy is seeing a stage hypnotist who can only get certain members to respond to suggestion, while others are not affected. Those that are easily hypnotized.... well, they'll cluck like a chicken until they're told to do something else. Good luck to them.
__________________
It's only a matter of time....and the time is NOW
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2008, 04:37 PM   #13
pilgrim
Senior Member
 
pilgrim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,388
Arrow Flight 93 Fraud (Video)


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27911
__________________
We are not these temporary material bodies.
We are eternal spirit souls, part and parcel of the Supreme Spirit Soul (Krishna)
Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare. / Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare

http://www.krishnapath.org/free-eboo...la-prabhupada/
http://www.prabhupadavani.org/

Last edited by pilgrim; 17-06-2008 at 04:39 PM.
pilgrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 02:28 PM   #14
phaid
Registered User
 
phaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Multiverse
Posts: 700
Default

I find it quite amazing that more attention is not given to Flight 93 and the 'crash' site that never was.

It seems that people are far happier arguing about the details of the WTC collapse and to a lesser extent what hit the Pentagon, when Flight 93 seems to be the real 'smoking gun' of 911.

To promote the official version, we've had two feature films 'Flight 93' and 'United 93' to bolster the unlikely heroic 'fight back' passenger story and the Beamer, Bingham, Glick phone call myths - the WTC has never had similar direct fictional coverage of the alleged happenings on board the planes.

So why has Holly Wood devoted much time to erecting a smokescreen about 93? Almost certainly the human interest 'fightback' scenario, so easy to get the emotions going in uneducated 911 BS believers and to promote some loathsome flag-waving response, a new 'Alamo'. Once you've seen 'United 93' on the widescreen, you can file it away and never have to think about it seriously again or how you might have been fooled.

I'd like to see the BBC do a 'Conspiracy Files' special on Flight 93 now, but I suspect that they'll go nowhere near it, too dangerous, too tenuous to defend now with all the contrary evidence that keeps emerging.

Good luck to those researchers who haven't given up on this - keep plugging away, folks.
phaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 03:54 AM   #15
goldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 485
Default

Good stuff.







goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 04:10 AM   #16
goldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 485
Default

But, why does ANSWERS.com say:

Aerial photo taken 27 April, 2004 of the area of the crash of United Airlines Flight 93 in Shanksville, PA (USGS)

http://www.answers.com/topic/usgs-shanksville-jpg-1

Scroll way down:

http://www.answers.com/topic/september-11-attacks

What's up with that?
goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 03:47 PM   #17
seercirra
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkovic View Post
A USGS photograph from 1994 showing the flight 93 crash site, with the wing marks in the ground already! In 1994!

http://www.trust-us.ch/cryptome/01-C...nk-eyeball.htm



You've all been waiting for something like this, so do something about it. Tell the fucking WORLD! Email every single news outlet on EARTH! And if nothing happens STILL then that is proof of a huge effort to bury it among the establishment media and will be useable to wake people to the reality they face.

I'm doing it now. You should too.

This is the original:

http://terraserver-usa.com/image.asp...94&Y=22177&W=2
good evidence but totally unneccessary.
all the evidence that you need is in the fact that flight 93 was found in peices over something like 8 squared miles.
that doesnt happen when something crash lands.
it does happen when something is blown up in mid air though.
seercirra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2008, 02:31 PM   #18
tjohn
Senior Member
 
tjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth (I think!)
Posts: 3,297
Default Flight 93, where?




Sorry, it's a red herring, the marks in those pictures do not match up at all. However, where on earth is there evidence of a plane crash without parts being strewn all over the 'crash' site?

Did the earth swallow up the entire plane somehow?



Seeing as there's no wreckage on the surface, perhaps they should go digging for a completely buried airliner! No of course they won't be doing that and they must think that we are all stupid!
__________________
I don't believe in freedom of Religion - I believe in freedom of thought. Think about it ...
If we don't remember the past, we can't fix the future.
I know the truth but I also know that I'm merely a shadow of something far greater.
The Universe is a conscious entity. Reality is and our own minds are just a tiny part of the whole but together, we can make more positive changes. Let's get together!


Last edited by tjohn; 28-10-2008 at 03:08 PM.
tjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2008, 02:35 PM   #19
tracker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkovic View Post
A USGS photograph from 1994 showing the flight 93 crash site, with the wing marks in the ground already! In 1994!

http://www.trust-us.ch/cryptome/01-C...nk-eyeball.htm



You've all been waiting for something like this, so do something about it. Tell the fucking WORLD! Email every single news outlet on EARTH! And if nothing happens STILL then that is proof of a huge effort to bury it among the establishment media and will be useable to wake people to the reality they face.

I'm doing it now. You should too.

This is the original:

http://terraserver-usa.com/image.asp...94&Y=22177&W=2
whats this stuff then

Last edited by tracker; 28-10-2008 at 02:36 PM.
tracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2008, 10:52 PM   #20
tjohn
Senior Member
 
tjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somewhere on planet Earth (I think!)
Posts: 3,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tracker View Post
whats this stuff then
If you are referring to the mark on that B&W satellite picture, I don't know caused it (possibly was caused by spring water) but it does not match the mark in the top picture which is dry and has a somewhat triangle shape.
__________________
I don't believe in freedom of Religion - I believe in freedom of thought. Think about it ...
If we don't remember the past, we can't fix the future.
I know the truth but I also know that I'm merely a shadow of something far greater.
The Universe is a conscious entity. Reality is and our own minds are just a tiny part of the whole but together, we can make more positive changes. Let's get together!

tjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 AM.