Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > UFOs / ETs / Anunnaki / Orbs / Crop Circles / Solar System / Space
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2012, 06:49 AM   #1
swoopdawg
Senior Member
 
swoopdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 403
Default Crop Formation Prediction - August 15, 2012

I am here today to make a prediction of astronomical significance to the science and religious community. As far as I know, I will be the first person to predict an authentic crop circle formation.

In 1972, the famous scientist Carl Sagan sent a message to the stars from a radio telescope.
In his message, he encoded in binary language the genetic makeup of the human race, our population size and location in the solar system.
Exactly 29 years later, to the day, in a field near a radio telescope in Crabwood England a virtually identical message was sent back as a crop formation. EXCEPT, that some key pieces of information were adjusted. A Three strand DNA, silica based life form with several more billion in their race, responded. Every piece of information that Carl Sagan sent was answered in the reply.
The method by which the formation was created had never been seen before and only made contextual sense from the sky.
Exactly one year later, to the day, on August 15, 2002, in the very same field at Crabwood, an Alien face appeared as a crop formation, holding a CD with Binary coding encrypted into it. The method by which the formation was produced was a screen technique that no one had ever seen before and once again, only made contextual sense from the sky. When deciphered it said the following:

"Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES.Much PAIN but still time.BELIEVE.There is GOOD out there.We oPpose DECEPTION.COnduit CLOSING\"

August 15, 2012 is approaching, exactly ten years after the last contact. This approaches the date of the transition to Aquarius, the end of the Mayan Calendar and the end of an earth age.

I am predicting that a significant formation will be made near a Radio telescope, near Crabwood England, on exactly August 15th 2012.
swoopdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 08:16 AM   #2
typenicknamehere
Senior Member
 
typenicknamehere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,236
Default

that date is not too far away, lets see what happens... iv seen the cd/binary one and its message has always fascinate me..if you right then I hope the next message is a bit more definitive and literal, BTW welcome

Last edited by typenicknamehere; 09-08-2012 at 08:16 AM.
typenicknamehere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 06:30 PM   #3
mrdeeks
Senior Member
 
mrdeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Paris
Posts: 138
Default

I only hope you're right. Otherwise you're going to look a right prick.
mrdeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 06:35 PM   #4
maxine
Senior Member
 
maxine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,394
Default

"We oppose deception!"

Best stay the fuck away from the Human race then!!
maxine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 08:13 PM   #5
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,357
Default

This below is the diagram of the crop formation that was the reply to Carl Sagans radio telescope message he sent to the stars.I have in another thread covered this particular crop formation in detail.What really intrigues and mystifies me about this crop formation reply is that only Sagan and those who sent this radio telescope message NEW the data that their message contained or put another way a selective few knew what data and in what formates where being transmitted.That this data was answered in the way it was in the reply is near perfection or very high in strangeness.

Now the reply this crop formation contained was not random,not guess work or even considered to be a just a coincidence , in fact it was so integrate that each theme covered in Sagans original message was answered with an intelligent and meaningful reply.As for the prediction of another crop formation on the a certain date i have no idea but i will say this that this particular crop formation has a certain air of genuine high level of strangeness.



__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.

Last edited by jamesc; 11-08-2012 at 08:17 PM.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 06:11 PM   #6
mrdeeks
Senior Member
 
mrdeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Paris
Posts: 138
Default

In view of the fact that our wheat production this year looks like being catastrophic and that bread and cereal product prices are already begining to rise, don't these jerks, after a few million light years flight through space, have anything better to do with their free time than damage our food supply with their meaningless scribble?
mrdeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 07:04 PM   #7
hobo
Senior Member
 
hobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdeeks View Post
In view of the fact that our wheat production this year looks like being catastrophic and that bread and cereal product prices are already begining to rise, don't these jerks, after a few million light years flight through space, have anything better to do with their free time than damage our food supply with their meaningless scribble?
Wheat is bad for us anyway.They´re doing us a favour.
__________________
"Its good to remember that Buddhisms´ goal is to create Buddhas not Buddhists" - Adyashanti.

"The one who dies before he dies, doesn´t die when he dies."
hobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 07:13 PM   #8
senseifil
Senior Member
 
senseifil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 184
Default

always wondered why crop circles, dont aliens have email? cant they send a msg that ppl can actually understand? why all the riddles and vagueness
__________________
End Capitalism to End the New World Order!!
senseifil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 07:33 PM   #9
blaze9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by senseifil View Post
always wondered why crop circles, dont aliens have email? cant they send a msg that ppl can actually understand? why all the riddles and vagueness
Bad aliens like to mind fuck peoples, this is their prison planet, guess why they got their so called ''law of non-intervention'' when the world is running like shit, Lol.
blaze9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 11:49 PM   #10
manxboz
Senior Member
 
manxboz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Expat....... Land of a thousand Lakes.
Posts: 6,825
Default

What will be your excuse when your prediction fails?

Big ego you have right?
__________________
Finland = FUNland


Spellbounds promise to stop posting Webbot predictions
manxboz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-08-2012, 11:56 PM   #11
jackdaw
Premier Subscribers
 
jackdaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swoopdawg View Post
I am here today to make a prediction of astronomical significance to the science and religious community. As far as I know, I will be the first person to predict an authentic crop circle formation.
They are all 'authentic'. It means nothing.

Supposing it rains on the night your club plans to create the circle?
__________________

Those who deny reason cannot be in possession of wisdom.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Carl Sagan
jackdaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 12:09 AM   #12
ashikenshin
Senior Member
 
ashikenshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackdaw View Post
They are all 'authentic'. It means nothing.

Supposing it rains on the night your club plans to create the circle?
I think it would be more impressive if they carved their message in stone, granite and put the stones in the middle of a city or some crap like that. Not easy bendable crops... weak.
ashikenshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 03:19 PM   #13
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,357
Default

While i am in no way advocating that a predicted crop formation will appear on the 15th of this month as the OP has indicated i do however feel it is necessary and important to provide a detailed analysis or the "Chilbolton Code Analysis".This particular crop formation contained information/data that indicated that it was a response to Carl Sagans radio telescope message of the 1970s that contained information of our DNA,earth, inhabitants,solar system ect in fact a lot of nesessary information that any intelligence would require to form a understanding of who and why they sent it.
************************************************** **************


The Chilbolton Code Analysis;

Introduction;


quote;
"On Sunday, August 19, 2001, a very interesting crop formation appeared (see illustration, left) within a wheat field near near Wherwell, Hampshire, England. It appeared on the grounds of the Chilbolton radio telescope facility, a site of some previous interesting formations. If the new one is not a hoax-and there are ways to definitely find out, which are underway-then its implications are profound-we are engaged in public two-way communication with nearby off-planet intelligence, and everything needs to be reassessed. This article reviews what the public should know about this crop formation and its implications."


Ground rules;

Before we launch into details, facts, and analyses, let us first set down the ground rules--what to expect from those who will participate in this debate. I am reminded of economist John Kenneth Galbraith, who once said, "When faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof." Many people have carefully constructed houses of cards that will collapse when it is accepted that we are in communication with off-planet intelligence. Overnight they would be non-experts, spokespersons for outdated, self-serving, incomplete understandings.

These people, such as those at SETI, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, are desperately working on their proofs that they don't have to deal with this issue. They have no real ability to actually find ET intelligence that doesn't come in by radio or light waves from some remote star cluster, because light-speed physics is what they understand. Like some forgotten tribe sending smoke signals to Los Angeles without an intelligent response, these limited-perspective earthlings may draw inaccurate conclusions from their lack of response.


No proof is allowed;

The established truth defenders will allow no proof that undermines their truth, so as we expose their lies, do not put too much emphasis on precision, footnotes, and logic. It will make no difference. Everything that can be presented will be debunked. No proof will be allowed. All film is doctored. All witnesses are crazy. Land a flying saucer on the White House lawn and it will be a Steven Spielberg publicity stunt. There is not enough time left to convince anyone who refuses to recognize the truth when they see it. As Einstein said, "We have to do the best we can. This is our sacred human responsibility." So we will do our best and go forward, regardless of the debunkers.

Okkam's razor;

There is a useful principle that scientists use when it serves their interests to do so. It is called Okkam's Razor, and it boils down to accepting the simplest plausible explanation-bring in no excess baggage. In practice, however, it often means accepting the alternative that requires the fewest changes in your preset opinion, which may be fundamentally flawed in many ways. In this article we will appeal to Okkam in the way he intended, viz., we will look at alternative interpretations of the Chilbolton formation and choose as our working definition of the truth the explanation that fits the available data in the cleanest, simplest way.


The SETI transmission 1974;

This story begins with Frank Drake and Carl Sagan and their jointly designed message to the stars, which was broadcast with a power of a trillion watts into the heavens November 16, 1974, from the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, where Frank Drake was Director. He authored the so-called Drake equation, exposed as a seriously limited conceptualization in the pages of Contact Forum in 1996 (see Sagan's Cosmos Revisited).

The equation tried to prove that we are in effect alone in the universe, because any life that might be out there is too far away to get here, and civilizations don't live long enough to contact each other. Careful examination of Drake's flawed assumptions showed that the model merely mirrored his a priori opinions and was not an unbiased tool for assessing the likelihood of contacting ET intelligence. It is fitting that Drake is now Chairman of the Board of the SETI Institute. It is important to know what part of the field the players are in.

The Arecibo message;

The Arecibo message can be represented as a simple graphic array consisting of 73 rows of 23 columns each. (See illustration below) Each cell in this matrix is either on (1) or off (0). Prime numbers were selected for the dimensions of the matrix, numbers which might be easily guessed by any intelligent radio-reading recipients. The ons and offs were simple shifts of the signal between two frequencies in the 2,380 MHz band. It took three minutes to send the message in a narrow beam 2 arcminutes wide, which is roughly 1/15th the diameter of the full moon.



The beam was aimed at globular star cluster M13, some 22,800 light years away and consisting of some 300,000 stars in the constellation of Hercules. Now, 27 years later, the beam is 158 trillion miles away, in an ever-expanding beam that is now 95 million miles wide. In another 22,773 years or so, it should get to its target, and if the residents there, if any, respond immediately by radio signal, we should expect the reply in the year 47574. The message in the Chilbolton field did not come from M13 by radio waves.


The content of the message provided basic information about human life on Earth-which planet we are on in our solar system, what we generally look like, how tall we are, how many of us there are, the kind of instrument we sent the message with, the basic chemical building blocks of our genetics, and the helical spiral structure of our DNA.

Mirror image of the 1974 Arecibo message (left) and its interpretation (right);


Components of the original message

As can be seen in the illustration, the Arecibo message (see illustration, below) begins with a definition of the binary number counting system, the most basic of all counting systems. To count in binary, count as you normally would, but skip over any number that is not entirely comprised of ones and zeros. Thus it's not 1,2,3,4,5.... It's 1,10,11,100,101....

The Chemical codes;

The Arecibo transmission in its original orientation included accurate codings of the binary number system along the top, followed by the atomic numbers of primary elements of life, Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Phosphorus. Next is the chemical composition of the nucleotides that make up our DNA. The number in each column counts its presence in the nucleotide. Rumors that there were errors in this section of the transmission, intended to trip up hoaxers, are unfounded.





Following this area is a representation of DNA's double-helical structure, and below it is a stick figure representing the human being's form. On the right side of the human figure is the binary number that counts the human population on Earth, and on the left side is the binary number that represents an average human's height. Below the human is a representation of our solar system, with the sun at left, and the nine planets stretched out beside it.

The third rock from the sun is elevated, indicating which one we occupy. At the bottom of the array is a representation of the Arecibo radio telescope and its diameter.


The recent events;

The recent formation at Chilbolton is only the most recent of a series of interesting patterns that have occurred there. Either the hoaxers find it a convenient pallet, or the previous patterns might be relevant to an on-going stream of information. A review of the events there is in order.


1999 Chilbolton crystal formation;


In 1999 a beautiful crystalline shape was found in the Chilbolton field. An artist's rendition of it appears at the left. Some thought is was just fractal geometry, one of a series of crop formations that have exquisitely demonstrated some of the beauties of recursive algorithms. But in light of the following discussion on Silicon, it is not outside the realm of possiblity that the pattern has something to do with crystalline structure of some form of Silicon.

2000 Chilbolton circle formation;


In 2000 a symmetric pattern of multiply interlocked circles appeared at Chilbolton. (See photograph, left.) Some thought it was merely crop grafitti, but in light of the possible interpretation of the Chilbolton Code, it may be important to observe that in the same place where the Arecibo signal had a representation of the instrument we used to broadcast the signal, the Chilbolton pattern has a simplified binary representation of something that has similar characteristics to this 2000 formation. It is possible that the received pattern may reference back to this design, which in turn may be a representation of a technology beyond our knowledge, an advanced method of communication, perhaps, or even a device for making crop formations.


Quality of the formation

Crop formation researcher Paul Vigay has visited the formation and had this to say: "The actual quality of the [Code] formation on the ground was remarkably good. However, it did appear to have been flattened in terms of a grid -- i.e., going across the formation and down the formation. The nearby 'face' formation was more elaborate in terms of the ground lay, as each individual circle appeared to have been swirled separately to the rest of the formation, indicated by a smooth swirl of crop around each circle, instead of being brushed across the formation, forming pathways between each circle.

However, both formations would represent an immense effort required in order to portray what we see in the field and from the air. To create either within the constraints of a few hours of darkness is extremely impressive irrespective of their origin; terrestrial or extra-terrestrial."


2001 Chilbolton Code formation August 19;


The Chilbolton Code formation looks very much like the one broadcast by earthlings in 1974, but there are some differences. As mentioned earlier, the image of the Arecibo Telescope has been replaced by a totally different pattern, and the human has been modified by a stick figure that, while humanoid, has a far larger head. The building block elements now include Silicon, atomic weight 14, in addition to the original elements listed.



There is now an extra strand on the right side of the DNA double-helix. and another, less obvious, change is in the binary coding of the number of nucleotides in DNA itself (in the center). Human genome has 4,293,917,614, or nearly 4.3 billion nucleotide sequences, while the mystery genome sequence has 4,294,966,190, or 1,048,576 (one million) more nucleotide sequences than human DNA.




Finally, the diagram that depicts our solar system has been replaced with another that still has nine worlds, but planets 3 through 5 are lifted, and the last is drawn larger than the others or perhaps represents multiple inhabited moons. The fact that Jupiter's moons are highlighted in a special diamond shape (see illustration, right) should actually give SETI a way out of their self-created embarassment.

They have been saying for a while now that there is water and heat on Europa, and that some of the other Jovian moons are good candidates for life. (See 12.18.09 NASA photo of water on Titan.) Perhaps they are right about this, although they may still be surprised to find something there beyond algae.




If the Code is real, and if the lifting of a planet in this series indicates inhabitation by intelligent life, and if the Code is talking about our solar system, then it may be saying that life exists on Earth, Mars, and the moons of Jupiter. Regarding the possibility of life on Mars, Hungarian scientists in September, 2001, announced that they have found evidence of living organisms on Mars, based upon analysis of 60,000 photographs taken by the Mars Global Surveyor probe.



The oceans beneath the crusty exteriors of several Jovian moons could hold the raw materials required to sustain life, according to a recent study. Observations from NASA's Galileo probe indicate that sister satellites Callisto, Ganymede and particularly Europa have subsurface oceans with more saltwater than Earth. The research is published in the June 15, 2001, issue of Science. For more information see Possible Life on Jupiter's Moons.


As the Arecibo message was sent in linear sequence, one bit after the other, there is no given rightness or wrongness to the mirror image of the transmission. The mirror image was printed in Carl Sagan's Cosmos and in many other textbooks, and yet the original orientation (right) is used in the field at Chilbolton.

Whether one interprets the code from right to left or left to right is entirely up to the receiver, and anyone who claims to know the orientation used by off-planet civilizations is clearly speculating. To the right is the Arecibo original message, in its intended orientation, with the population block to the right of the figure.




Okkam's Razor;

So how does Okkam's Razor fit into all of this? We have the Doug & Dave hypothesis, with a really big fish to swallow. And we have the covert government hypthe legitimacy of SETI's strategy , among other things. So if we want to choose the hypothesis that most easily explains the data, then we conclude that we are probably talking with off-planet intelligence. If, however, we wish to choose the hypothesis based upon which one minimizes the number of changes the establishment needs to make, then clearly it's all Doug and Dave. So decide which camp you're in, and the outcome follows.

If it's real, what might it mean?
If the Chilbolton Code is real communication with off-planet intelligence, then what do we learn from it? For one thing, the "Roger, Copy" nature of the message indicates that they speak the same mathematics as we do. That's comforting. The presence of Silicon in the list of important life-related elements is very interesting, and more research should be done on the Silicon-related phenomena around crop formations. The use of the same basic nucleotides suggests that we are related, or that there are a limited number of combinations of things that actually work well, or perhaps both.

The humanoid figure suggests that the senders of the code are not unlike what thousands of reliable persons have reported seeing. The apparent size of this being is 3'4", if one uses the same mathematics that we used in the original transmission.

This should be of comfort and solace to abductees and contactees, who have long been abused by blind experts. The population item decodes into 21.3 billion, a large population by our standards. What does it count? The population on their plnaet? The intelligent beings in our solar system? The future population of the Earth? If the code-senders are from this solar system, then we can conclude that Earth, Mars, and Jupiter's moons have intelligent life. This should make the Dunes and Hoagland fans happy.

A very interesting point Red Setter, a world expert on DNA research, has made a very interesting contribution to the discussion, an observation that he made only after intensive personal research stimulated by the odd DNA images in the Chilbolton Code formation. He notes that

"The central part of the Chilbolton pictogram shows that a DNA double helix as found on Earth, with 10 base pairs per turn, has been replaced on one side by a novel single-stranded helix with just 6 bases per turn. I had to work hard for several days, to discover that the single-stranded helix with 6 bases per turn refers to 2', 5'-linked RNA or DNA, as opposed to the normal 3', 5' variety. This is known to hardly any molecular biologist, and I found out only by making an accurate model. ...

There is no other plausible way of constructing a 6-fold helix as indicated. [published research] shows that 2', 5'-linked RNA will form double helices, but prefers to remain single stranded. [Other research] explores the use of 2', 5' RNA as an antiviral drug; it seems we have been exposed to such strange molecules in the past, and have evolved an interferon-RNAase L system against them.

"Recall that origin-of-life experiments in the 1980s by Leslie Orgel, found that RNA would often polymerize into two different forms, namely 2', 5' versus 3', 5'; and it was a mystery to chemical evolutionists why 3', 5' was favored on Earth. Note that many abductees remain ill with chronic fatigue, which generally includes a high level of RNAase L; just as if their immune systems have been activated by contact with 2', 5' RNA.

The clear implication is that 2', 5' RNA may represent an alternative system of genetic coding to 3', 5' RNA or DNA as found on Earth; and that the makers of the Chilbolton pictogram wished us to understand that fact. Whether a secret band of elite scientists could hoax such a result seems doubtful; since 2', 5' nucleic acids are mentioned rarely in the literature, and nowhere does it say that they form a single-stranded helix with 6 bases per turn. That I found only recently, by painstakingly constructing an accurate model."



So what do we make of this? We conclude that there is significant scientifically verifiable content in the Chilbolton Code formation that is unlikely to have been placed there in the dark either by pranksters or by covert government agents, because the information is new and almost unknown. Perhaps Silicon is involved in the process by which the genetic encoding choice is made. It plays a role somehwere. Clearly there is room for much more serious thought here, and it calls for much more than an off-hand dismissal by SETI and the world of traditional science.


Remembering;
Rishia O'Neill once remarked,

"We have forgotten more as a species than we have learned." Such may really be the case, if our forgotten history involves an on-going relationship with off-planet personalities and cultures. As we begin to sort out the meanings and implications of the Chilbolton Code, we may be starting a collective process of remembering, as a species, much that we have long forgotten. And as these memories begin to surface on their own, it is likely that most people will say, "Well, I knew that all along!"

Conclusion;
From the simple twisting of grass in an English field we are led to conclude that we are not alone in the universe, and that off-planet intelligence is communicating with us. This basic fact will totally revise our worldviews, and our paradigms. We need now to rebuild our knowledge base, integrating into it the missing information. We no longer know who we are, how we came here, or what our relationship is to those who are sending us codes in fields. One thing is certain:

Whatever intelligence is capable of making these communications is advanced beyond us, and we can be sure that they do not live in a throw-away competitive society on a world of terrorism, racial hatred, wars, religious discrimination, pollution and dying species. Step one for this entire world may be to get our own act together, so that we can speak as a planet, with pride, and as Earthlings, emerging into cosmic consciousness.





for a more in-depth study of the code or message in this formation click the link; http://amo.net/Contact/


p.s, i have provided the above as information only.
__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 03:31 PM   #14
ultimate_warlord
Senior Member
 
ultimate_warlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesc View Post
While i am in no way advocating that a predicted crop formation will appear on the 15th of this month as the OP has indicated i do however feel it is necessary and important to provide a detailed analysis or the "Chilbolton Code Analysis".This particular crop formation contained information/data that indicated that it was a response to Carl Sagans radio telescope message of the 1970s that contained information of our DNA,earth, inhabitants,solar system ect in fact a lot of nesessary information that any intelligence would require to form a understanding of who and why they sent it.
************************************************** **************


The Chilbolton Code Analysis;

Introduction;


quote;
"On Sunday, August 19, 2001, a very interesting crop formation appeared (see illustration, left) within a wheat field near near Wherwell, Hampshire, England. It appeared on the grounds of the Chilbolton radio telescope facility, a site of some previous interesting formations. If the new one is not a hoax-and there are ways to definitely find out, which are underway-then its implications are profound-we are engaged in public two-way communication with nearby off-planet intelligence, and everything needs to be reassessed. This article reviews what the public should know about this crop formation and its implications."


Ground rules;

Before we launch into details, facts, and analyses, let us first set down the ground rules--what to expect from those who will participate in this debate. I am reminded of economist John Kenneth Galbraith, who once said, "When faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof." Many people have carefully constructed houses of cards that will collapse when it is accepted that we are in communication with off-planet intelligence. Overnight they would be non-experts, spokespersons for outdated, self-serving, incomplete understandings.

These people, such as those at SETI, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, are desperately working on their proofs that they don't have to deal with this issue. They have no real ability to actually find ET intelligence that doesn't come in by radio or light waves from some remote star cluster, because light-speed physics is what they understand. Like some forgotten tribe sending smoke signals to Los Angeles without an intelligent response, these limited-perspective earthlings may draw inaccurate conclusions from their lack of response.


No proof is allowed;

The established truth defenders will allow no proof that undermines their truth, so as we expose their lies, do not put too much emphasis on precision, footnotes, and logic. It will make no difference. Everything that can be presented will be debunked. No proof will be allowed. All film is doctored. All witnesses are crazy. Land a flying saucer on the White House lawn and it will be a Steven Spielberg publicity stunt. There is not enough time left to convince anyone who refuses to recognize the truth when they see it. As Einstein said, "We have to do the best we can. This is our sacred human responsibility." So we will do our best and go forward, regardless of the debunkers.

Okkam's razor;

There is a useful principle that scientists use when it serves their interests to do so. It is called Okkam's Razor, and it boils down to accepting the simplest plausible explanation-bring in no excess baggage. In practice, however, it often means accepting the alternative that requires the fewest changes in your preset opinion, which may be fundamentally flawed in many ways. In this article we will appeal to Okkam in the way he intended, viz., we will look at alternative interpretations of the Chilbolton formation and choose as our working definition of the truth the explanation that fits the available data in the cleanest, simplest way.


The SETI transmission 1974;

This story begins with Frank Drake and Carl Sagan and their jointly designed message to the stars, which was broadcast with a power of a trillion watts into the heavens November 16, 1974, from the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, where Frank Drake was Director. He authored the so-called Drake equation, exposed as a seriously limited conceptualization in the pages of Contact Forum in 1996 (see Sagan's Cosmos Revisited).

The equation tried to prove that we are in effect alone in the universe, because any life that might be out there is too far away to get here, and civilizations don't live long enough to contact each other. Careful examination of Drake's flawed assumptions showed that the model merely mirrored his a priori opinions and was not an unbiased tool for assessing the likelihood of contacting ET intelligence. It is fitting that Drake is now Chairman of the Board of the SETI Institute. It is important to know what part of the field the players are in.

The Arecibo message;

The Arecibo message can be represented as a simple graphic array consisting of 73 rows of 23 columns each. (See illustration below) Each cell in this matrix is either on (1) or off (0). Prime numbers were selected for the dimensions of the matrix, numbers which might be easily guessed by any intelligent radio-reading recipients. The ons and offs were simple shifts of the signal between two frequencies in the 2,380 MHz band. It took three minutes to send the message in a narrow beam 2 arcminutes wide, which is roughly 1/15th the diameter of the full moon.



The beam was aimed at globular star cluster M13, some 22,800 light years away and consisting of some 300,000 stars in the constellation of Hercules. Now, 27 years later, the beam is 158 trillion miles away, in an ever-expanding beam that is now 95 million miles wide. In another 22,773 years or so, it should get to its target, and if the residents there, if any, respond immediately by radio signal, we should expect the reply in the year 47574. The message in the Chilbolton field did not come from M13 by radio waves.


The content of the message provided basic information about human life on Earth-which planet we are on in our solar system, what we generally look like, how tall we are, how many of us there are, the kind of instrument we sent the message with, the basic chemical building blocks of our genetics, and the helical spiral structure of our DNA.

Mirror image of the 1974 Arecibo message (left) and its interpretation (right);


Components of the original message

As can be seen in the illustration, the Arecibo message (see illustration, below) begins with a definition of the binary number counting system, the most basic of all counting systems. To count in binary, count as you normally would, but skip over any number that is not entirely comprised of ones and zeros. Thus it's not 1,2,3,4,5.... It's 1,10,11,100,101....

The Chemical codes;

The Arecibo transmission in its original orientation included accurate codings of the binary number system along the top, followed by the atomic numbers of primary elements of life, Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Phosphorus. Next is the chemical composition of the nucleotides that make up our DNA. The number in each column counts its presence in the nucleotide. Rumors that there were errors in this section of the transmission, intended to trip up hoaxers, are unfounded.





Following this area is a representation of DNA's double-helical structure, and below it is a stick figure representing the human being's form. On the right side of the human figure is the binary number that counts the human population on Earth, and on the left side is the binary number that represents an average human's height. Below the human is a representation of our solar system, with the sun at left, and the nine planets stretched out beside it.

The third rock from the sun is elevated, indicating which one we occupy. At the bottom of the array is a representation of the Arecibo radio telescope and its diameter.


The recent events;

The recent formation at Chilbolton is only the most recent of a series of interesting patterns that have occurred there. Either the hoaxers find it a convenient pallet, or the previous patterns might be relevant to an on-going stream of information. A review of the events there is in order.


1999 Chilbolton crystal formation;


In 1999 a beautiful crystalline shape was found in the Chilbolton field. An artist's rendition of it appears at the left. Some thought is was just fractal geometry, one of a series of crop formations that have exquisitely demonstrated some of the beauties of recursive algorithms. But in light of the following discussion on Silicon, it is not outside the realm of possiblity that the pattern has something to do with crystalline structure of some form of Silicon.

2000 Chilbolton circle formation;


In 2000 a symmetric pattern of multiply interlocked circles appeared at Chilbolton. (See photograph, left.) Some thought it was merely crop grafitti, but in light of the possible interpretation of the Chilbolton Code, it may be important to observe that in the same place where the Arecibo signal had a representation of the instrument we used to broadcast the signal, the Chilbolton pattern has a simplified binary representation of something that has similar characteristics to this 2000 formation. It is possible that the received pattern may reference back to this design, which in turn may be a representation of a technology beyond our knowledge, an advanced method of communication, perhaps, or even a device for making crop formations.


Quality of the formation

Crop formation researcher Paul Vigay has visited the formation and had this to say: "The actual quality of the [Code] formation on the ground was remarkably good. However, it did appear to have been flattened in terms of a grid -- i.e., going across the formation and down the formation. The nearby 'face' formation was more elaborate in terms of the ground lay, as each individual circle appeared to have been swirled separately to the rest of the formation, indicated by a smooth swirl of crop around each circle, instead of being brushed across the formation, forming pathways between each circle.

However, both formations would represent an immense effort required in order to portray what we see in the field and from the air. To create either within the constraints of a few hours of darkness is extremely impressive irrespective of their origin; terrestrial or extra-terrestrial."


2001 Chilbolton Code formation August 19;


The Chilbolton Code formation looks very much like the one broadcast by earthlings in 1974, but there are some differences. As mentioned earlier, the image of the Arecibo Telescope has been replaced by a totally different pattern, and the human has been modified by a stick figure that, while humanoid, has a far larger head. The building block elements now include Silicon, atomic weight 14, in addition to the original elements listed.



There is now an extra strand on the right side of the DNA double-helix. and another, less obvious, change is in the binary coding of the number of nucleotides in DNA itself (in the center). Human genome has 4,293,917,614, or nearly 4.3 billion nucleotide sequences, while the mystery genome sequence has 4,294,966,190, or 1,048,576 (one million) more nucleotide sequences than human DNA.




Finally, the diagram that depicts our solar system has been replaced with another that still has nine worlds, but planets 3 through 5 are lifted, and the last is drawn larger than the others or perhaps represents multiple inhabited moons. The fact that Jupiter's moons are highlighted in a special diamond shape (see illustration, right) should actually give SETI a way out of their self-created embarassment.

They have been saying for a while now that there is water and heat on Europa, and that some of the other Jovian moons are good candidates for life. (See 12.18.09 NASA photo of water on Titan.) Perhaps they are right about this, although they may still be surprised to find something there beyond algae.




If the Code is real, and if the lifting of a planet in this series indicates inhabitation by intelligent life, and if the Code is talking about our solar system, then it may be saying that life exists on Earth, Mars, and the moons of Jupiter. Regarding the possibility of life on Mars, Hungarian scientists in September, 2001, announced that they have found evidence of living organisms on Mars, based upon analysis of 60,000 photographs taken by the Mars Global Surveyor probe.



The oceans beneath the crusty exteriors of several Jovian moons could hold the raw materials required to sustain life, according to a recent study. Observations from NASA's Galileo probe indicate that sister satellites Callisto, Ganymede and particularly Europa have subsurface oceans with more saltwater than Earth. The research is published in the June 15, 2001, issue of Science. For more information see Possible Life on Jupiter's Moons.


As the Arecibo message was sent in linear sequence, one bit after the other, there is no given rightness or wrongness to the mirror image of the transmission. The mirror image was printed in Carl Sagan's Cosmos and in many other textbooks, and yet the original orientation (right) is used in the field at Chilbolton.

Whether one interprets the code from right to left or left to right is entirely up to the receiver, and anyone who claims to know the orientation used by off-planet civilizations is clearly speculating. To the right is the Arecibo original message, in its intended orientation, with the population block to the right of the figure.




Okkam's Razor;

So how does Okkam's Razor fit into all of this? We have the Doug & Dave hypothesis, with a really big fish to swallow. And we have the covert government hypthe legitimacy of SETI's strategy , among other things. So if we want to choose the hypothesis that most easily explains the data, then we conclude that we are probably talking with off-planet intelligence. If, however, we wish to choose the hypothesis based upon which one minimizes the number of changes the establishment needs to make, then clearly it's all Doug and Dave. So decide which camp you're in, and the outcome follows.

If it's real, what might it mean?
If the Chilbolton Code is real communication with off-planet intelligence, then what do we learn from it? For one thing, the "Roger, Copy" nature of the message indicates that they speak the same mathematics as we do. That's comforting. The presence of Silicon in the list of important life-related elements is very interesting, and more research should be done on the Silicon-related phenomena around crop formations. The use of the same basic nucleotides suggests that we are related, or that there are a limited number of combinations of things that actually work well, or perhaps both.

The humanoid figure suggests that the senders of the code are not unlike what thousands of reliable persons have reported seeing. The apparent size of this being is 3'4", if one uses the same mathematics that we used in the original transmission.

This should be of comfort and solace to abductees and contactees, who have long been abused by blind experts. The population item decodes into 21.3 billion, a large population by our standards. What does it count? The population on their plnaet? The intelligent beings in our solar system? The future population of the Earth? If the code-senders are from this solar system, then we can conclude that Earth, Mars, and Jupiter's moons have intelligent life. This should make the Dunes and Hoagland fans happy.

A very interesting point Red Setter, a world expert on DNA research, has made a very interesting contribution to the discussion, an observation that he made only after intensive personal research stimulated by the odd DNA images in the Chilbolton Code formation. He notes that

"The central part of the Chilbolton pictogram shows that a DNA double helix as found on Earth, with 10 base pairs per turn, has been replaced on one side by a novel single-stranded helix with just 6 bases per turn. I had to work hard for several days, to discover that the single-stranded helix with 6 bases per turn refers to 2', 5'-linked RNA or DNA, as opposed to the normal 3', 5' variety. This is known to hardly any molecular biologist, and I found out only by making an accurate model. ...

There is no other plausible way of constructing a 6-fold helix as indicated. [published research] shows that 2', 5'-linked RNA will form double helices, but prefers to remain single stranded. [Other research] explores the use of 2', 5' RNA as an antiviral drug; it seems we have been exposed to such strange molecules in the past, and have evolved an interferon-RNAase L system against them.

"Recall that origin-of-life experiments in the 1980s by Leslie Orgel, found that RNA would often polymerize into two different forms, namely 2', 5' versus 3', 5'; and it was a mystery to chemical evolutionists why 3', 5' was favored on Earth. Note that many abductees remain ill with chronic fatigue, which generally includes a high level of RNAase L; just as if their immune systems have been activated by contact with 2', 5' RNA.

The clear implication is that 2', 5' RNA may represent an alternative system of genetic coding to 3', 5' RNA or DNA as found on Earth; and that the makers of the Chilbolton pictogram wished us to understand that fact. Whether a secret band of elite scientists could hoax such a result seems doubtful; since 2', 5' nucleic acids are mentioned rarely in the literature, and nowhere does it say that they form a single-stranded helix with 6 bases per turn. That I found only recently, by painstakingly constructing an accurate model."



So what do we make of this? We conclude that there is significant scientifically verifiable content in the Chilbolton Code formation that is unlikely to have been placed there in the dark either by pranksters or by covert government agents, because the information is new and almost unknown. Perhaps Silicon is involved in the process by which the genetic encoding choice is made. It plays a role somehwere. Clearly there is room for much more serious thought here, and it calls for much more than an off-hand dismissal by SETI and the world of traditional science.


Remembering;
Rishia O'Neill once remarked,

"We have forgotten more as a species than we have learned." Such may really be the case, if our forgotten history involves an on-going relationship with off-planet personalities and cultures. As we begin to sort out the meanings and implications of the Chilbolton Code, we may be starting a collective process of remembering, as a species, much that we have long forgotten. And as these memories begin to surface on their own, it is likely that most people will say, "Well, I knew that all along!"

Conclusion;
From the simple twisting of grass in an English field we are led to conclude that we are not alone in the universe, and that off-planet intelligence is communicating with us. This basic fact will totally revise our worldviews, and our paradigms. We need now to rebuild our knowledge base, integrating into it the missing information. We no longer know who we are, how we came here, or what our relationship is to those who are sending us codes in fields. One thing is certain:

Whatever intelligence is capable of making these communications is advanced beyond us, and we can be sure that they do not live in a throw-away competitive society on a world of terrorism, racial hatred, wars, religious discrimination, pollution and dying species. Step one for this entire world may be to get our own act together, so that we can speak as a planet, with pride, and as Earthlings, emerging into cosmic consciousness.





for a more in-depth study of the code or message in this formation click the link; http://amo.net/Contact/


p.s, i have provided the above as information only.
I`ve been arguing with some people on another thread about the authenticity of these crop circles. As usual debunkers always have some funny excuse to keep the blinkers on. They claim each and every circle is man-made.
This, in my tiny mind, is IMPOSSIBLE.
No human being is capable of such intelligence...Technology or not.
Prove me wrong, debunkers.
__________________
PLEASE LISTEN TO MY SIGNATURE AND GET TO KNOW ME :-

click it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8GoO...eature=related
ultimate_warlord is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 03:54 PM   #15
blazo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Makedonija
Posts: 122
Default

I see every crop circle has been deciphered . So where this intelligence came from. If we dont have the intelligence to make this complex stuff in crops , thus we would not be able to comprehend this. O i see it is an alien that have decipher it for us that is infiltrated among us.
blazo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 03:56 PM   #16
ultimate_warlord
Senior Member
 
ultimate_warlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazo View Post
I see every crop circle has been deciphered . So where this intelligence came from. If we dont have the intelligence to make this complex stuff in crops , thus we would not be able to comprehend this. O i see it is an alien that have decipher it for us that is infiltrated among us.
Ok, then who did them? WHY?
__________________
PLEASE LISTEN TO MY SIGNATURE AND GET TO KNOW ME :-

click it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8GoO...eature=related
ultimate_warlord is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 04:05 PM   #17
blazo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Makedonija
Posts: 122
Default

People did that. Why to fear people and make money out of it.
Seriously look at this, we were able to make this 100 years ago
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Titanic_3.jpg

And now we are unable to make a pattern in crops.
blazo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 04:18 PM   #18
ultimate_warlord
Senior Member
 
ultimate_warlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazo View Post
People did that. Why to fear people and make money out of it.
Seriously look at this, we were able to make this 100 years ago
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Titanic_3.jpg

And now we are unable to make a pattern in crops.
Show me how to make money out of a crop circle.
Then assemble the army of scientists, artists, mathematicians, engineers, the technology and philosophers to perform the task overnight.
Then I´ll believe what you say.
__________________
PLEASE LISTEN TO MY SIGNATURE AND GET TO KNOW ME :-

click it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8GoO...eature=related

Last edited by ultimate_warlord; 14-08-2012 at 04:19 PM.
ultimate_warlord is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 07:48 PM   #19
maxine
Senior Member
 
maxine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultimate_warlord View Post
I`ve been arguing with some people on another thread about the authenticity of these crop circles. As usual debunkers always have some funny excuse to keep the blinkers on. They claim each and every circle is man-made.
This, in my tiny mind, is IMPOSSIBLE.
No human being is capable of such intelligence...Technology or not.
Prove me wrong, debunkers.
Are you, "awake?" Do you know about entities! If you do - then you will realise that entities function for humans - and everything on this planet!

Now......back to the crop circles! Some entities don't want the Human Race to know about ET's!
So........ what would be the best way for them to cover it up? Yes - you have it!! Get a few Human Beings to create a few circles - and pass off every crop circle - as man-made!
maxine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2012, 08:03 PM   #20
jamesc
Senior Member
 
jamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazo View Post
People did that. Why to fear people and make money out of it.
Seriously look at this, we were able to make this 100 years ago
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Titanic_3.jpg

And now we are unable to make a pattern in crops.
No one is suggesting that man made formations do not exist or that humans cannot make patterns in crops, that is not the debate here. Its about the information contained in this particular crop formation that is of significance here, not whether Doug and Dave managed it with planks of wood and rope one night.

That only a few people were aware of the information sent out by Carl Sagan by radio telescope in the 70s is significant,that this crop formation DID contain the "Answers" or met the "criteria" expected for a reply to that radio telescope message ,the data contained in this formation is one hell of a fecking long shot to have actually been a reply or message to the precise data first sent out by Carl Sagan but it is just that a very ,very long shot but it is a reply that is of significance and cannot be overlooked or dismissed out of hand here.

Now you got any ideas who might have known the precise data to put in this formation and actually KNOW what to put in it never mind have the ability to lay such a precise design in a crop field at night.

Now tell me when will the above realities start either worrying you or proving that your assumptions that only relative or important fact hear is that you believe a human source did it.

This formation appeared overnight in a field on the grounds of the Chilbolton radio telescope facility, a site of some previous interesting formations. In fact this radio telescope facility has CTV and nothing or none was recorded, heard or seen on the night this formation appeared,worried yet or even a bit curious that this particular crop formation might just be the one that proves that not ALL crop formations can easily be labelled as man made, all factors need looking at on this particular formation and to ignore or dismiss the actual information and the nature of it because man built Titanic is a ridiculous assumption and a very weak one at that.
__________________
"What if the alien encounter phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may manifest in the physical world but derives from a source which by its very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? What if we were to acknowledge that the phenomenon is beyond our present framework of knowledge?"- Dr John Mack.

Last edited by jamesc; 14-08-2012 at 08:07 PM.
jamesc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2012, circle, crabwood, crop, england

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 PM.