BBC Question Time email to David Icke - & petition

[stevie0013]

Originally Posted by crystal310

Ok, Ive listened to it again and he did make the comment, my apologies. But why would you choose to omit the fact that he also said if he were invited on to the Question time show, he would accept. The petition was actually posted on the headline page a few hours after it was started so that tells us that he's up for going on the show.

I omitted that one part just because it suited my argument lol
I was only kidding about the apology bit but that was really nice of you
I think were both a little bit right & a little bit wrong, just difrent sides of the arugment but you're right he did say he would be up for going on the show!

[crystal310]

[QUOTE=stevie0013;1060897613]I omitted that one part just because it suited my argument lol
I was only kidding about the apology bit but that was really nice of you
I think were both a little bit right & a little bit wrong, just difrent sides of the arugment but you're right he did say he would be up for going on the show![/QUOTE

Yeah, I can see how it suited your argument now. Its funny how i missed him saying that but these things happen i suppose.

I do get what your trying to say .I know the producer doesnt want him on the show for obvious reasons, but the whole point of complaining is to make them sit up and take note. At least he got some air time on wm and another hour on saturday, i dare say it wouldnt have happened if we hadnt kicked up a fuss.

I personally think the petition is a good idea. If you go on to the Question Time website they ask for peoples feedback and comments. Well there gonna get some! So its an experiment really. It will be interesting to see what response they give.

[zerogov]

The BBC is crucial to coercing the masses into conforming with corporate society & social engineering. corporate society is, by definition & in reality, anti-life. Don't let them fool you into thinking that the 'big society' is your community, it isn't.

[tinyint]

Ammunition for Mr Icke.

Reporting conflict in Syria

Some months ago, I reflected on the difficulties of reporting from Syria. The deaths of Marie Colvin and a dozen other journalists in the country so far this year has given us cause to think long and hard about the very real dangers there. But so too does the complexity of the situation on the ground in Syria, and the need to try to separate fact from fiction.

Damascus prides itself on being the oldest, continually inhabited city in the world. It also has the longest history of rumours passing for fact.

I spent three days in Syria earlier this week, talking to all sides involved in the current conflict. Waking up on my first morning, social media was alive with reports that the mobile phone network was down. True enough, I could access the hotel wi-fi but not place a call. On Twitter and Facebook, people claimed the phones had been turned off as the precursor to a major military assault. The truth it seems was more prosaic. It's the high school exam season in Syria - diplomats claimed the real reason was the phone network had been turned off to prevent students cheating. Even in a conflict zone, good grades count for a lot.

In the aftermath of the massacre at Houla last month, initial reports said some of the 49 children and 34 women killed had their throats cut. In Damascus, Western officials told me the subsequent investigation revealed none of those found dead had been killed in such a brutal manner. Moreover, while Syrian forces had shelled the area shortly before the massacre, the details of exactly who carried out the attacks, how and why were still unclear. Whatever the cause, officials fear the attack marks the beginning of the sectarian aspect of the conflict.

In such circumstances, it's more important than ever that we report what we don't know, not merely what we do. In Houla, and now in Qubair, the finger has been pointed at the shabiha, pro-government militia. But tragic death toll aside, the facts are few: it's not clear who ordered the killings - or why.

Given the difficulties of reporting inside Syria, video filed by the opposition on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube may provide some insight into the story on the ground. But stories are never black and white - often shades of grey. Those opposed to President Assad have an agenda. One senior Western official went as far as to describe their YouTube communications strategy as "brilliant". But he also likened it to so-called "psy-ops", brainwashing techniques used by the US and other military to convince people of things that may not necessarily be true.

A healthy scepticism is one of the essential qualities of any journalist - never more so than in reporting conflict. The stakes are high - all may not always be as it seems.

Jon Williams is the BBC World News editor.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditor..._in_syria.html

[largejack]

Originally Posted by zerogov

The BBC is crucial to coercing the masses into conforming with corporate society & social engineering. corporate society is, by definition & in reality, anti-life. Don't let them fool you into thinking that the 'big society' is your community, it isn't.

It never fooled me one bit. No working for government and corporation schemes on a huge voluntary basis is ever going to be good for society. It's just Cameron's attempt to copy the Socialist Obama schemes in the US.

[farrago]

check out the application form for applying for tickets to be part of the question time studio audience... (forewarned is forearmed and all that).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...me/1858613.stm

[stevie0013]

[quote=crystal310;1060898801]

Originally Posted by stevie0013

I omitted that one part just because it suited my argument lol
I was only kidding about the apology bit but that was really nice of you
I think were both a little bit right & a little bit wrong, just difrent sides of the arugment but you're right he did say he would be up for going on the show![/QUOTE

Yeah, I can see how it suited your argument now. Its funny how i missed him saying that but these things happen i suppose.

I do get what your trying to say .I know the producer doesnt want him on the show for obvious reasons, but the whole point of complaining is to make them sit up and take note. At least he got some air time on wm and another hour on saturday, i dare say it wouldnt have happened if we hadnt kicked up a fuss.

I personally think the petition is a good idea. If you go on to the Question Time website they ask for peoples feedback and comments. Well there gonna get some! So its an experiment really. It will be interesting to see what response they give.

It's really nice when two people can debate like adults and have a civil discussion & agree to dis agree politly, that does'nt happen much around here so i'm gonna appreciate this one lol.
I kinda agree & kinda disagree but you make a good argument.
By the way i think you're quite new so welocme to the forum

[zerogov]

If you don't mind me asking, what do you mean by 'society'?

[crystal310]

[quote=stevie0013;1060899692]

Originally Posted by crystal310

It's really nice when two people can debate like adults and have a civil discussion & agree to dis agree politly, that does'nt happen much around here so i'm gonna appreciate this one lol.
I kinda agree & kinda disagree but you make a good argument.
By the way i think you're quite new so welocme to the forum

Thanks for the welcome. Yes, Im fairly new and still getting used to working out how to use the control pannel. Im glad to see people are still signing the petition, 4090 now and rising. Keep signing everyone!

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petition...-question-time

[walsingham]

IF they won't allow elected MEP's on Question Time such as Brons and Griffin then what hope is there for our Dave?

[zephirop]

Originally Posted by walsingham

IF they won't allow elected MEP's on Question Time such as Brons and Griffin then what hope is there for our Dave?

Pretty sure if you are talking about Nick Griffin, he was on last year.

The shifty eyed plant was laughed out of the building though...

[walsingham]

Originally Posted by zephirop

Pretty sure if you are talking about Nick Griffin, he was on last year.

The shifty eyed plant was laughed out of the building though...

Last year, try nearly 3 years ago.

The BBC have shown their bias against the BNP time after time, the QT show you are talking about wasn't about current affairs and everything to do with the liberal elite ganging up and bullying nick griffin.

an while the scummy lefties pour scorn on the bnp, i don't see anyone on their side of the argument talking about the new world order, the jewish domination of our nation, the divide and rule of mass immigration, the secret bilderberg meetings.... no, it's ever so quiet when it comes to the left talking about real issues...the occupy movement, the socialist workers party, the uaf, hope not hate, bunch of gate keeping wankers the lot of them.

[drhemp]

I stopped watching programmes like Question Time years ago; the guests are pretty much always as dull as dishwater.

I did get a ticket to be in the audience last year, although it was quite an interesting experience, the panel were awful and had nothing of note to say.

[toodles]

David needed to see my latest post (its in what's new")...sean pls get it for him so he can broadcast it...thx

Can I ask a Question of everyone? I am suggesting that we all especially those who are attending the Olympics at any point in time,,,,pls pls pls hug one of our law enforcement people to show your appreciation for their being...we do it for everyone but them...its time and just to get the ball rolling, I am going to hug our newly appt'd Police Chief in our town today!!!

We've welcomed our protectors/svcmen home we've talked it to death ... written it to death.....now its time to ACT it

a HUG AND A SMILE GOES A LOOOOOOONNNNNGGGGG WAAAAAYYYYYYYY

u r all so cool

toodles,

lorinda lou

[zephirop]

Originally Posted by walsingham

Last year, try nearly 3 years ago.

The BBC have shown their bias against the BNP time after time, the QT show you are talking about wasn't about current affairs and everything to do with the liberal elite ganging up and bullying nick griffin.

an while the scummy lefties pour scorn on the bnp, i don't see anyone on their side of the argument talking about the new world order, the jewish domination of our nation, the divide and rule of mass immigration, the secret bilderberg meetings.... no, it's ever so quiet when it comes to the left talking about real issues...the occupy movement, the socialist workers party, the uaf, hope not hate, bunch of gate keeping wankers the lot of them.

Oh right, time and me have got a very informal relationship, especially about stuff I couldn't care less about.