BBC 9/11 truth campaign....

[frase]

Right this is a unique opportunity......we need to grab it and get involved....

http://webteamdev.ae911truth.org/en/...-outreach.html


BBC the press and Media Outreach
News - Action Alerts
Written by Mark Graham   
Friday, 25 May 2012 12:34
Dear Friends of AE911Truth,

We are writing to ask you to support a campaign regarding the BBC by three AE911Truth petition signers in the UK.
Two sample letters for you to send and the recipients' email addresses are provided for you below.
By sending a short email to the BBC Trust and MP Tom Watson you will help to persuade the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) to provide impartial and accurate reporting on the World Trade Center attacks in keeping with its Charter and Editorial Values.
Background - Why the BBC and why now?
BBC is part of the worldwide media cover up of 9/11
We have a unique and potentially powerful opportunity with this Action Alert. The corporate media across the western world is not allowing the full facts about 9/11 to be shown to the public. This is a major reason why the 9/11 truth movement has not yet been successful in creating sufficiently widespread knowledge and political pressure to force the new and independent investigation that we are all seeking.
BBC has a legal obligation to accurate and impartial news
We have a unique opportunity here to try to break this media blockade through one of the largest and most publicly trusted mainstream media outlets in the western world, namely the BBC in Britain. Unlike all the other large corporate media outlets in the western world, the BBC is largely publicly owned and publicly funded by the people of Britain. Because of this, the BBC has a responsibility to the public and operates according to a legal ‘Royal Charter’ that requires the BBC to provide information to the public in a fair, accurate, impartial, and independent manner.
The BBC’s Editorial Values promise truth, accuracy, impartiality, editorial integrity and independence, fairness, transparency and accountability. The Editorial Values also require the BBC to “ask searching questions of those who hold public office and others who are accountable, and provide a comprehensive forum for public debate,” and to “be rigorous in establishing the truth of the story and well informed when explaining it.”
Complaints and appeals allowed
If the public ever feels that the BBC does not meet these criteria on something then there is a formal complaints process for the public which the BBC Trust must adhere to. Through the complaints process, if it can be proven that the BBC has not met the required criteria of its Royal Charter then it must take suitable action to address this. It only takes one major media network to crack a little on 9/11 and the global ripple effect could be huge.
BBC coverage of 9/11 has been very biased
Over the past few years the BBC has aired numerous documentaries about 9/11 conspiracy theories.  Last year the BBC aired two documentaries about 9/11 to coincide with the tenth anniversary, namely ‘Conspiracy Files: 9/11 ten years on’, and ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’.
These documentaries have mentioned some of the issues raised by the 9/11 truth movement but they have very much been biased towards supporting the official story of 9/11 and they have withheld or misrepresented crucial facts and information that challenges the official story.
Three AE911Truth petition signers have filed a complaint and are asking for our help
As a result of these two documentaries, three individuals in the UK, including UK Civil Rights lawyer, Paul Warburton, lodged three separate and formal complaints with the BBC over these two documentaries citing the numerous breaches of the BBC’s Royal Charter to be fair, accurate, impartial, and independent. These complaints have also had some support from several Members of Parliament. These three complaints have now reached the top level of the BBC complaints and investigation process and the three complainants are now requesting a face to face hearing with the BBC Trustees as is their right through the formal complaints process.
What can you do to support this campaign?
If there is significant additional pressure applied to the BBC from others requesting that these three individuals be granted this hearing, then the BBC Trust will be under increased pressure to grant it.  So we are asking you to send an e-mail to the BBC Trust and to MP Tom Watson.
Sample letter to the BBC Trust
Send your message to the following e-mail address:
E-mail: trust.editorial { at } bbc.co.uk
For both emails send a bcc to BBC_action { at } AE911Truth.org

[date]

"BBC Trust Unit,

"The BBC is in breach of its Royal Charter and Editorial values by withholding from the public vital facts and evidence about 9/11 and by providing coverage of 9/11 in a very biased manner which supports the official story despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. As such I support the complaints that have been lodged with the BBC Trust by Paul Warburton, Adrian Mallett, and Peter Drew and support their request to be able to meet with the BBC Trust to discuss this issue and some possible remedies.
"Will you reply so that I know you received this letter?
Cordially,"
[Your name]
[Your city, state and country if you feel comfortable providing it]
[Your email address]
Sample letter to MP Tom Watson
And just as useful, or possibly even more useful, would be to send a similar e-mail to Tom Watson (House Media Committee for Parliament). In his position with the House Media Committee, Tom Watson is in a position to have significant influence on the BBC. He has been asked to support the request for a hearing made to the BBC Trust, so any additional e-mails to Mr Watson supporting this request would be extremely useful to the cause.
E-mail: tom.watson.mp{ at }parliament.uk
For both emails send a bcc to BBC_action{ at }AE911Truth.org
[date]

"Dear Mr. Watson,
I write this to you as a petition signer with the organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) which is composed of 1,700 technical and building professionals and 14,000 other individuals who have signed their names in support of the request for a new and truly independent investigation, with subpoena power, into the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on September 11, 2001 (9/11). This request is based on the extensive scientific and forensic evidence that has been gathered since the world-changing events of that day.
You have stated that it is your desire to help clean up the ethical standards of the media in the wake of the phone hacking scandal in the UK, and you have stated that you now regret supporting the call for the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  These are very noble sentiments and you should be applauded for your courage on these two points.  However, nothing is more strongly related to these two issues of media ethics and the invasion of Iraq than the ongoing cover-up of the facts and evidence of 9/11 by the mainstream media and the official US investigation agencies such as NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology).
Through a process of meticulous scientific and forensic investigation by numerous professional architects, engineers, scientists, and others, the official version of events of 9/11 has been proven to be absolutely impossible. These scientific and forensic facts have been presented to many thousands of people around the world through dozens of conferences, they have been presented to millions of people world wide through the internet, and they have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Some of the most damning evidence has even been admitted by NIST themselves – such as the fact that the upper section of WTC Building 7 descended at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds or approximately 105 feet.  However, despite the massive amount of evidence proving that the official story of 9/11 is impossible, and despite this information being shared across the world through various avenues, the mainstream media have withheld much of this evidence and continued to maintain their support for the official story.  This withholding of key facts and evidence by the media and other forms of public support for the official story have significantly strengthened the political case for the US' and Britain’s ongoing wars with Afghanistan and Iraq on the basis of a story that has been proven to be impossible, and which has resulted in the deaths of over one million innocent people which still continues today.
One of the largest of these mainstream media outlets, the BBC, has a legal requirement to honor its Royal Charter and Agreement and Editorial Values to provide fair, accurate, and impartial information about important world events.  By withholding a huge amount of scientific and forensic evidence that has been gathered, and by portraying their coverage of news and documentaries about 9/11 in a manner which has clearly been shown to be extremely biased support for the official story of 9/11, the BBC is in serious breach of its Royal Charter and Agreement and Editorial Values. This is a matter of the utmost importance and should most certainly be a major focus of any process or investigation that is looking into cleaning up the ethics of the media.  If the BBC is deliberately withholding evidence that proves that Britain has been taken into two wars on the basis of substantially false information, then surely that is an issue of extremely high importance for the issue of media ethics, and for the maintenance of freedom and democracy.
ln October of last year, you received correspondence from UK lawyer Paul Warburton outlining his concerns about 9/11 as the pretext for going to war with Iraq and summarizing the evidence suggesting that the official story of 9/11 is not correct. Mr. Warburton also expressed concerns about the role that the mainstream media, and in particular the BBC, is playing to prevent this evidence from reaching the general public in a fair, accurate and impartial way.  Mr. Warburton and three other individuals have lodged detailed complaints with the BBC over this issue.  The complaints point out that the BBC appears to be in violation of its Royal Charter, Agreement and Editorial Values. Specifically, it appears that the BBC is withholding and misrepresenting key scientific evidence that undermines the official story of 9/11.
The complaints lodged by Mr. Warburton and the others have worked their way through the BBC complaints process to the top level of the BBC Complaints Department. The issues and questions raised in these complaints are not being addressed adequately by the BBC despite the fact that several British MPs have urged the BBC to address the various points raised.
The complainants are therefore seeking a meeting directly with the BBC Trust to discuss these issues and consider some reasonable solutions.  The technical professionals at AE911Truth have produced documentary programs discussing the abundant scientific and forensic evidence which supports the complainants' positions and which could easily be used by the BBC to provide a much more accurate and complete presentation of many of the facts and evidence about 9/11 that has so far been withheld.  Showing one or more of AE911Truth’s programs would be an appropriate remedy within the context of the BBC’s Royal Charter, Agreement and Editorial Values and its complaint process.
I therefore strongly support the request of Mr. Warburton and the other complainants to meet with the BBC Trust to discuss this matter further.  The public deserves the opportunity to evaluate the scientific evidence and consider what really did occur on September 11, 2001.  As I am sure you are aware, without being able to hold the media in each of our countries to account, our freedoms and democracy are greatly diminished.
As your stated desire is to help clean up the ethics of the media, will you please encourage the BBC to meet with the complainants and honor their legal obligation to present this issue fairly and objectively?
Will you reply so that I know you received this message?
Yours sincerely,
 
[Your name]
[Your city, state and country if you feel comfortable providing it]
[Your email address]

(End of sample letter to MP Tom Watson)
 
You can also join our Media Outreach Team by writing to VolunteerTeam { at } @ae911Truth.org
See also this page to read and watch a video of the Statement to the Press by Richard Gage's statement to the press that he gave at the theater in Beverly Hills.
Thank you!

AE911Truth

[uprising]

Good stuff, thanks for posting.
I'm in.

[frase]

Originally Posted by uprising

Good stuff, thanks for posting.
I'm in.

Spread word....mods...can we keep this bumped?

[stevie0013]

TBH i don't really give a fuck, it was obviously an inside job, & if you haven’t realised that over ten years later you're never going to, if you haven’t realised that by now you must be a dumb sheeple anyways & i couldn’t care less for those types.

I'm done trying to help the species & do good, people are fucking morons & they don't deserve the privilege of others having to take responsibility for them like there five year olds, fuck them there un appreciative, if they want to be blissfully ignorant let them, I’m done trying to wake people up or help people, cause most of them don't deserve it anyways, fuck ‘em.
Also who care’s about the BBC, let them do what they want who care’s, what happened happened & they can extort as much propaganda & bullshit as they like but what happened happened so let them get on with it

[frase]

Originally Posted by stevie0013

TBH i don't really give a fuck, it was obviously an inside job, & if you haven’t realised that over ten years later you're never going to, if you haven’t realised that by now you must be a dumb sheeple anyways & i couldn’t care less for those types.

I'm done trying to help the species & do good, people are fucking morons & they don't deserve the privilege of others having to take responsibility for them like there five year olds, fuck them there un appreciative, if they want to be blissfully ignorant let them, I’m done trying to wake people up or help people, cause most of them don't deserve it anyways, fuck ‘em.
Also who care’s about the BBC, let them do what they want who care’s, what happened happened & they can extort as much propaganda & bullshit as they like but what happened happened so let them get on with it

Matters to me...I want the truth validated.

[dolores1]

Let our voices cry out for truth and justice!

I'm in.

[sean]

I'll stick this thread for a little while, see how it goes!

[niltox]

Yes, this is good. There are still many people in the UK (and elsewhere) who believe that the BBC is that great, old, honest, very British institution, even if they doubt some of the 'official' verdict on 9/11 they will find it very hard to believe that the BBC had anything to do with the events, so anything that breaks that down goes some way to opening up their minds to the full picture.

[majorlee]

a lynch pin that needs taking down, i'm all up for supporting and doing what i can to either clean up or shut it down


after all what the BBC has done in the past decade could it be rescued is a good question?

[dolores1]

Originally Posted by niltox

Yes, this is good. There are still many people in the UK (and elsewhere) who believe that the BBC is that great, old, honest, very British institution, even if they doubt some of the 'official' verdict on 9/11 they will find it very hard to believe that the BBC had anything to do with the events, so anything that breaks that down goes some way to opening up their minds to the full picture.

Yes indeed, especially reporting that building 7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it did!


Hmm, I wonder who told the BBC?

[stevie0013]

Originally Posted by frase

Matters to me...I want the truth validated.

I know, that's 'cause you're awesome, that's 'cause you're a better person then me.
I'm just done caring but it won't last forever,i'll start again soon

[frase]

Originally Posted by stevie0013

I know, that's 'cause you're awesome, that's 'cause you're a better person then me.
I'm just done caring but it won't last forever,i'll start again soon

Good man

[seaspray15]

I will write and send tomorrow

[ruddd]

That 9/11 Road Trip was the most hilarious thing to watch on TV in recent years. I mean throwing toy planes with paint in a effort to disprove the Flight 93 'theories.' Charlie Veitch being won-over by LEGO, and everyone in that pre-selected group arguing amongst themselves.

[majorlee]

no replies so far

[majorlee]

Originally Posted by ruddd

That 9/11 Road Trip was the most hilarious thing to watch on TV in recent years. I mean throwing toy planes with paint in a effort to disprove the Flight 93 'theories.' Charlie Veitch being won-over by LEGO, and everyone in that pre-selected group arguing amongst themselves.

i think everyone should carry a piece of lego just incase they bump into chuck! lol sorry for O/T

[seaspray15]

why is no one doing this?

[janiebird]

I've sent off the two letters. It doesn't take much bother. Let's have many more, please: The BBC are such liars, they need to be held to account, and this is a marvellous opportunity not to be wasted.

[uprising]

Done.

Perhaps we should withhold our licence fees until they start doing their job properly also.

[unity808]

here's the one that gets em...

10-10-01

mossad agents caught with bombs/fake pakistani passports--in the act of attempting to destroy the mexican national parliament building

covered up by all pro agenda 21 media---in order to advance anti american/global agenda
---
this was reported all over the world before the media heads had a chance to stop it---for a full day
000
it is also all over the mexican national media
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

911 was a cfr/un agenda 21 operation---an act of war against all peoples of the world
----------

the "mossad" were pro cfr infiltrators..not "israel"
---
if the bbc is sincere----this is the bulletproof smoking gun that brings down the whole house of cards

good luck england!!!