Source Field, ascension and galactic alignment.

[silentnomore]

I watched this David Wilcock video tonight:

The Source Field Investigations

In the video, he mentions the solar system crossing the galactic ecliptic. I seem to recall reading somewhere that as cross into this cross-section of our galaxy, there are fewer bodies between us and the central galactic star, meaning that we'd be exposed to the light from the galactic core directly.

At another point, he cites an experiment:

Russian scientist Dr. Peter Gariaev discovered that DNA absorbs light photons in its surrounding area, and causes the photons to spiral through the molecule itself. This spiraling effect will continue in the same spot for up to 30 days after the DNA is physically removed from that spot -- and this effect is called the 'DNA Phantom'. Bariaev also shined a gentle laser beam through a developing salamander embryo and redirected it into a developing frog embryo. This caused the frog embryo's DNA to completely re-code itself with the instructions to build a healthy adult salamander (!), even though the two embryos were in hermetically sealed containers and only the light was allowed to pass through.

So then is it not possible that the big changes that we'd start to see as of 21/12/2012 might link the two together, and the DNA of everything on the planet is re-encoded by transferring DNA data from all the biological entities on whatever body might eclipse our view of the galactic core star? Would that effectively make us a carbon-copy (careful, there's a pun there ) of another world, or would it simply be incorporated into our DNA?

[biblegirl]

Extremely interesting, thanks for sharing

[billybleach]

Great video! Just watching now. you need to fix the vid link

[undeadcreature]

Originally Posted by silentnomore

So then is it not possible that the big changes that we'd start to see as of 21/12/2012 might link the two together, and the DNA of everything on the planet is re-encoded by transferring DNA data from all the biological entities on whatever body might eclipse our view of the galactic core star? Would that effectively make us a carbon-copy (careful, there's a pun there ) of another world, or would it simply be incorporated into our DNA?

It's interesting when you think about it, given the size of the universe (and that's just the bit we can see) what are the chances that a world exists somewere that is a carbon copy of Earth and there is a David Icke Forum where "we" are having the exact same discussion.

Who's to say that Apes weren't the only creatures to evolve into this anthropomorphic form?

[reginald]

Hey Silent... yes I do believe thats what David Wilcocks was eluding to when he included that in his research of his source field investigations. Although you would have to take into account the effects of diffusion over such long distances and since we wear clothes and sunblock... I doubt we'll be mutating much.

P.s. With several Govt's. around the world Chemtrailing (Geo-Engineering), you could theorize that they already know this and are taking steps to stop it... just a thought.

[silentnomore]

Originally Posted by undeadcreature

Who's to say that Apes weren't the only creatures to evolve into this anthropomorphic form?

Originally Posted by The Terra Papers

Originally Posted by reginald

P.s. With several Govt's. around the world Chemtrailing (Geo-Engineering), you could theorize that they already know this and are taking steps to stop it... just a thought.

Yeah, but I don't think it's going to pan out. Maybe reality has recently hit that "Hundredth Monkey" thing, but I read an article recently that suggested that reality seems to have taken a turn for the better recently, and that a lot of the secret qabbalistic nefarious plans being made by TPTB seem to be failing and people's opinions appear to have become a shedload more positive lately. It was an interesting perspective.

[moezy]

It makes total sense the purpose of chemtrails is to stop this! I sure hope it doesn't work! Make/buy some organite (I don't sell it, BTW). Something is definitely happening. So many people who know nothing about this stuff are reporting odd things happening to them.

[oiram]

Lets hope it will not make the Lizards grow bigger?

Would be nice though if some radiation would make the Lizard brains pop like a overcooked egg....

But who knows all this shit none of the so called specialist could be trusted ..... they all don't know shit themselves & maybe only placing nice coloured images on the net....... well soon we will all know; once 12/12/12 & 21.12.2012 has past we all know that everything is just a grate big freaking lie from the beginning.

I keep an opened mind until the end of 2012 .... after that I will shut down totally.

Anyone keeps following this shit into 2013 if nothing happens until 21/12/2012 is a total moron. >>>> End Game my friends!!!

So its only some more month & we all freed from all this bullshit.
I say 99% is all man made anyhow & I give 1% to nature. So only a big meteor shower to wait for & the pole shift. If nothing happens the matrix game is over. They better getting there big toys out quickly for there finale; they truly running out of time.

[edelweiss pirate]

Originally Posted by moezy

It makes total sense the purpose of chemtrails is to stop this! I sure hope it doesn't work! Make/buy some organite (I don't sell it, BTW). Something is definitely happening. So many people who know nothing about this stuff are reporting odd things happening to them.

O rly?

So light from the galactic core, which has passed through 30 thousand light years of galactic space, dust, gas and radiation.... is going to be affected by a few meters of chemical sprays?


Come on guys...... you make us look like amateurs here....

This Wilcock stuff is balderdash. Most of the light from galactic centre doesn't reach us because of dense gas clouds which absorb the light.

Besides, we won't miraculously suddenly change our position relative to the galactic centre on the 21st December. We're in exactly the same position now as we will in Decemeber, and have been for hundreds of years. The changes in position are minute. Besides why would galactic light make things better on earth?

Where is the evidence to support this theory that the galactic centre will transform DNA?


Do things properly, THINK, don't just believe some new-age nutcase with a funny shaped head.

This is total crap and this thread is an embarrassment to the forum.

[night_gaunt]

Maybe that's why we look so weird

[pali_gap]

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

This is total crap and this thread is an embarrassment to the forum.

Whoa dude calm down there is no need for such attitude, people here are just exploring the possibilities.
The thread is interesting enough and has some value to me. Maybe cause I don't prescribe to bs evolution theory and think that we live in a ever changing Universe that for some reason operates in cycles and where all matter afects each other in ways we dont quite understand yet.

[edelweiss pirate]

Originally Posted by pali_gap

Whoa dude calm down there is no need for such attitude, people here are just exploring the possibilities.
The thread is interesting enough and has some value to me. Maybe cause I don't prescribe to bs evolution theory and think that we live in a ever changing Universe that for some reason operates in cycles and where all matter afects each other in ways we dont quite understand yet.

Ok, so debate the points I've raised.



I am SICK of seeing people getting conned by bullshit artists on this forum....


We've had it with the Freeman cobblers, and people have lost homes and had their lives ruined because they believed a load of bollocks.

Then we've got all these poor chumps in Bosnia, caught up in one man's dodgy con-game and thinking they're doing real archeology.



And as usual Wilcock is talking COCK!





Now you may think you are being 'the nice guy' and exploring the 'possibilities' but you're not doing anyone any favours.


People like you are allowing people to pursue their own deception and downfall.

You should not be tolerant of deception and lies.


I do not do that, that's because I care MORE for people and their welfare, than I care about my 'forum public image'.


I'm not one of those people who tells you what you want to hear so I can be Mr popular who butters every one up, and cooes and gushes all the platitudes that they already operate on.

I tell people what they NEED to hear.

And sometimes, a bit of rhetoric is vital to get the point across.


You don't like it?

Fine.

Then enjoy your abject confusion. Not knowing up from down.



You talk about 'possibilities'.

I prefer facts.

[jackdaw]

Originally Posted by silentnomore

I watched this David Wilcock video tonight.

In the video, he mentions the solar system crossing the galactic ecliptic. I seem to recall reading somewhere that as cross into this cross-section of our galaxy, there are fewer bodies between us and the central galactic star, meaning that we'd be exposed to the light from the galactic core directly.

It's wise to avoid being misled by utter nonsense like this.

Originally Posted by silentnomore

At another point, he cites an experiment:

So then is it not possible that the big changes that we'd start to see as of 21/12/2012 might link the two together, and the DNA of everything on the planet is re-encoded by transferring DNA data from all the biological entities on whatever body might eclipse our view of the galactic core star? Would that effectively make us a carbon-copy (careful, there's a pun there ) of another world, or would it simply be incorporated into our DNA?

Ditto, even more so. Really, although there are undoubtedly energy sources beyond our comprehension, the idea of significant DNA shifts occurring on Earth due to a galactic 'core star' billions of LY distance is ludicrous. What is so different about this so-called 'core star', and why in conjunction with some dubious galactic alignment is....No, sorry. Run out of time and patience.

Being misled by nonsense 'revelations' spewed out by copyists, repeaters, attention-seekers and New Age moneymakers seems rife.

[pali_gap]

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

O rly?


Besides, we won't miraculously suddenly change our position relative to the galactic centre on the 21st December. We're in exactly the same position now as we will in Decemeber, and have been for hundreds of years. The changes in position are minute. Besides why would galactic light make things better on earth?

The Sun travelers approx 19 million of kilometers per day. The galactic core could be just a few more times thicker than that. Of Course im not astrophysicist but to me it seams somehow that Galactic center plain is not so vast in diameter. From wiki: "The radius of the central object must be significantly less than 17 light hours." OK so that's approx 18 billion kilometers... The very dense space of super massive black hole in the center of our milky way galaxy would be around (lets say if 17 light hours are even exaggerated) that would mean that the very core of galactic plane should not be greater then 1-3 billion kilometers... To me that looks like a distance that our sun could go through in a couple of months... (too lazy to use calculator :P) With the the very center point traversed in a matter of days...

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

I am SICK of seeing people getting conned by bullshit artists on this forum....



And as usual Wilcock is talking COCK!


I'm not one of those people who tells you what you want to hear so I can be Mr popular who butters every one up, and cooes and gushes all the platitudes that they already operate on.

I tell people what they NEED to hear.

And sometimes, a bit of rhetoric is vital to get the point across.


You don't like it?

Fine.

Then enjoy your abject confusion. Not knowing up from down.

I don't particularly like this Wilcock guy, and yes I have also reached a conclusion that the guy's for the most part a con. But he also may have some valid points - only I don't exactly agree with his conclusions on what will happen come 21.12.2012. I believe something is happening already to us, to this planet and our DNA. What that change represents, now its a matter of what one's personal agenda is... I don't have any agendas I just want the truth so I may conclude that 21.12.2012 event has a significance but it won't be some miraculous event, rather Universal science at work. An Evolution by Galactic standards... Something very common and something very strange at the same time going by our perception, and just because we have been misled by ptb who made us pitiful in every possible way so we can't progress as nature intended for us, instead we have been corrupted and used for someone's own goals (aliens?) Anyway that's my take on this... See I don't have to shout on other members to make my claims.

[silentnomore]

Originally Posted by moezy

It makes total sense the purpose of chemtrails is to stop this! I sure hope it doesn't work! Make/buy some organite (I don't sell it, BTW). Something is definitely happening. So many people who know nothing about this stuff are reporting odd things happening to them.

My friend, I kid you not - I literally have a shoebox by my bed half-full of orgonite pieces that I started making a while ago and am about to get back into making again very shortly.

Originally Posted by oiram

I keep an opened mind until the end of 2012 .... after that I will shut down totally.

Anyone keeps following this shit into 2013 if nothing happens until 21/12/2012 is a total moron.

Really? Is that what you believe? Because many people including Icke have said that 2012 is just a tipping point or a beginning in the whole transformation in human consciousness and physical reality, rather than the be-all and end-all.

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

O rly?

So light from the galactic core, which has passed through 30 thousand light years of galactic space, dust, gas and radiation.... is going to be affected by a few meters of chemical sprays?

Agreed - I don't think this part of the concept pans out, in fairness.

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

This Wilcock stuff is balderdash. Most of the light from galactic centre doesn't reach us because of dense gas clouds which absorb the light.

Granted. But what if it doesn't take all of the light reaching us to effect the change?

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

Besides, we won't miraculously suddenly change our position relative to the galactic centre on the 21st December. We're in exactly the same position now as we will in Decemeber, and have been for hundreds of years. The changes in position are minute.

Relative to what? Bear in mind the speeds at which we are orbiting our sun, which itself is orbiting the galactic core, which in turn is orbiting.... something else, most likely. Add them all together, and we are physically hurtling through space at a hell of a speed! (unless you subscribe to the Hollow Earth theory, but that's a whole other sack of monkeys)

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

Besides why would galactic light make things better on earth?

Where is the evidence to support this theory that the galactic centre will transform DNA?

Where's yours to say it won't? How about this -

From: http://wakeup-world.com/2011/08/26/w...nvestigations/

"Korean scientist Dr. Dzang Kangeng got patent #N1828665 for a device that used microwaves to transfer the DNA-wave information of a duck into a pregnant mother hen. Roughly 80 percent of her eggs hatched as half-duck, half-chicken hybrids."

So DNA that has been sufficiently excited by certain types / frequencies of energy can alter DNA. There's also this one from the same site:

Dr. Peter Gariaev zapped salamander eggs with a low-level laser and redirected the beam into frog eggs. The frog eggs experienced a complete metamorphosis, and grew into healthy adult salamanders.

Admittedly, radiated energy from the galactic core is not going to have the same level of directly-impacting energy as a laser or microwave energy, but you still have to think outside the box and start to consider options we've never even thought of before, because when all's said and done, every single day, our planet heads into another part of space that we may not have experienced in 26,000 years, according to many people, including Wilcock.

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

Do things properly, THINK, don't just believe some new-age nutcase with a funny shaped head.

Granted, he does have a really weird-shaped head. Whenever I see him, I keep thinking he's wearing a prosthetic forehead - it just doesn't seem to fit the rest of his body....

edelweiss pirate - I respect the fact that you prefer facts to speculation, and I totally understand, but when you look at how little we actually know about our very existence, how our universe works and consider how - I want to say "primitive" but it's not the right word - "naive" we still are as a species, and how we're all still in-fighting instead of working together towards a common goal of reaching towards the stars.... I personally feel that I had to grasp for some speculation and theoretical stuff to give me hope for the future. Otherwise nothing is worth carrying on with if we simply sit here and focus on what we already know, instead of exploring what we don't. Please don't take this as my being critical or patronising, because it's really completely the opposite of what I was hoping to achieve. Besides, look at it this way - "up" and "down" are subjective. What I consider to be "up" here in the UK may well be "left" to a (hypothetical) passing spacecraft.

pali_gap.... Well said. I'm not a complete believer in everything Wilcock has to say, and I must admit that whilst watching his Source Field Investigations videos, I felt really uncomfortable when he started on about being the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce.... Yes, there are certainly similarities between the two, both physically and in terms of goals / interests, but that's something that I think he should perhaps have kept to himself, because it just didn't seem right. But as you said, he does raise some very interesting (and factual, science-based) points that are verifiable, and are certainly something worth conducting your own research into. Particularly on the Source Field side of things - check out "The Field" by Lynn McTaggart. She goes into some of the things Wilcock touches on in more detail and portrays a more factual and in-depth argument for it that Wilcock has time to go into.

Jackdaw - We've spoken in the past, and I don't think you and I are ever truly going to see "eye to eye" on a lot of things, so I'm just going to say that I don't agree with you, and you're entitled to think what you choose.

[rapunzel]

As most scientists accept that there is a super massive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy, what type of light are people expecting to arrive on Earth?

[shrouded]

This is a tough subject and as always, the reality will almost never live up to the hype.

The light travelling from the 'galactic centre' wont start once we arrive it has been travelling continually since formation. So we would be essentially travelling into a stream of light/energy not waiting for it once we arrived.

Secondly black holes dish out as much as they put in. Hawkins radiation is the most famous but also gamma radiation has been found to be pumped out of these areas.

We must also remember that the 'black hole' at the centre of our galaxy has not been observed and is still albeit likely 'just a theory'.

It is very possible that we will enter a type of gulf stream if and when we do cross this galactic centre. It is also possible we will not. however and whatever happens, no-one will know until the time comes and even then it may not be so apparent.

People may not understand or be able to comprehend energy working in this way. Imagine going back in time and explaining any of the many types of radiation. You would be considered crazy.

Lets also not presume the intensity of this light/energy. The sun is 1 AU away and yet the moment your part of the earth enters its light you can appreciate its power compared to when you are facing away from it.