An Irishman's home is his castle

[voynich]

Englishmen watch and weep -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUjl...ature=youtu.be

[smoke n mirrors]

Already posted in this thread http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1060626646

Constitution Halts Sheriff - YouTube

Constitution Halts Sheriff - YouTube

[rob menard]

Two different videos....

[voynich]

Originally Posted by smoke n mirrors

Already posted in this thread http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=201592

The one you refer to is an American sherrif this in the police and sherrif in Ireland trying to reposses a man's home.

[smoke n mirrors]

Originally Posted by rob menard

Two different videos....

Yes my bad I had too many tabs open and picked the wrong one link.

This is what it should have been and it's in the todays news forum so petty call.

I will change the first link to this one so people can cross reference the chat.
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1060626646

[freedom2020]

yes fantastic i dont see the trolls here i wonder why???the world is breaking free from the illusion slowly but shirley

[converted_sceptic]

Originally Posted by freedom2020

yes fantastic i dont see the trolls here i wonder why???the world is breaking free from the illusion slowly but shirley

there are a number of threads in this subforum that the trolls (brainwashed Legal Professionals) will not touch. I wonder why?

[reverendjim]

sherriff's rep: "i've been doing this job 31 years and my job has never been questioned."

lol...it is now...lol

[britishnick]

Originally Posted by voynich

Englishmen watch and weep -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUjl...ature=youtu.be

Great stuff. Nice lil exposee on the corruption that's been allowed to run rife for decades -looks like things are changing for the better then

So can someone explain a lil more about who the Sherrif is in Ireland? What organisation he works for? is it like the local council in England? and the Registrar is like the magistrates?

EDIT -
Also shows that just cos someone's been doing it this way for 30 years it doesnt mean it's right.
and it does show that just cos someone has a piece of paper to initiate Force, that it doesn't automatically have power.

[jimmi]

The way I understand what happened in the Irish vid. is, the police decided that they would be going against their constitution because of the wording.....inviolable....in that constitution.

Worth remembering for when we get to write our own constitutions when we get rid of the scam artists that are currently screwing up our courts.

[harvy]

try not say 'r u on ur oath today' or words to that effect, just accept his oath, 'ur oath of office is accepted'.. think it would have been a different outcome if it wasn't for the support of the people.. i bow to yer

[micklemus]

Originally Posted by converted_sceptic

there are a number of threads in this subforum that the trolls (brainwashed Legal Professionals) will not touch. I wonder why?

The government paymasters say they're not allowed, didn't you know?

[voynich]

But aren't they trying to get rid of common law in the UK or have I miss read something.

[bornfree]

You can sometimes learn more from that which remains unsaid. The absence of "anti-fmotl" member comments on this thread and subject is illuminating...

[smoke n mirrors]

Originally Posted by bornfree

You can sometimes learn more from that which remains unsaid. The absence of "anti-fmotl" member comments on this thread and subject is illuminating...

The wheel on their cart is creeping ever closer to the end of the axle.

.

[moobs]

If you want a skeptic to comment here, then I will. I really don't know much about Irish law, especially in regard to repossessions. It is possible that Gilroy was entirely correct and that the sheriff was acting unlawfully. However, my personal opinion is that the reason the sheriff left had less to do with what Gilroy was saying and more to do with the fact that he had about twenty supporters physically backing him up as he made it clear that he didn't consider the repossession to be lawful.

[smoke n mirrors]

Originally Posted by moobs

If you want a skeptic to comment here, then I will. I really don't know much about Irish law, especially in regard to repossessions. It is possible that Gilroy was entirely correct and that the sheriff was acting unlawfully. However, my personal opinion is that the reason the sheriff left had less to do with what Gilroy was saying and more to do with the fact that he had about twenty supporters physically backing him up as he made it clear that he didn't consider the repossession to be lawful.

Then the police could have called in support to help them enforce the law, if it was in fact enforcible.

.

[moobs]

Maybe they did, and Gilroy just isn't bothering to tell us about it. I've found that most freeman activists tend to be extremely dishonest and selective about what they choose to show on their videos. This, combined with their general ignorance of the law, often presents a very misleading picture of the events as they actually happened.

[happy sheeple]

Originally Posted by smoke n mirrors

Then the police could have called in support to help them enforce the law, if it was in fact enforcible.

.

Yes they could but they did'nt, this may be because they recognised that a valid point of law had been raised and they wanted to go back to the court to check. It could also mean that they realised that if they continued they could have been subject to violence from a far larger group.
It does however show that far from the "police state" some would have us think we live in, "the Law enforcers" were more than reasonable as it seemed they had the papers that said they could proceed but didnt.
Either way i dont see it as a sucess yet but i hope it will end up being one as this "charge" seems particually unfair.
As with other threads of a similar nature i hope the original poster will continue to post as developments arise either way and this post doesnt "dissappear" if the reposession takes place.

[abaddon_ire]

Originally Posted by happy sheeple

Yes they could but they did'nt, this may be because they recognised that a valid point of law had been raised and they wanted to go back to the court to check. It could also mean that they realised that if they continued they could have been subject to violence from a far larger group.
It does however show that far from the "police state" some would have us think we live in, "the Law enforcers" were more than reasonable as it seemed they had the papers that said they could proceed but didnt.
Either way i dont see it as a sucess yet but i hope it will end up being one as this "charge" seems particually unfair.
As with other threads of a similar nature i hope the original poster will continue to post as developments arise either way and this post doesnt "dissappear" if the reposession takes place.

The Gardai are very careful in such matters. They have jurisdiction in criminal matters, but no jurisdiction in civil matters.

Clearly, this was a civil matter, and thus they had no jurisdiction, and hence stood back, as they should.

They always do this. It is their job.

Had anyone threatened violence, or attempted violence, then they would intervene. Fair play to the dude for keeping it rational with the sherrif.