Nuclear bombs are a hoax

[sniper13x]

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

now you are an expert in physics, too?
wow...your wonders never cease.

There are no experts in physics, that is an impossibility. There are a bunch of idiots who have learned to regurgitate the status quo regardless of whether it makes any sense or not. Any theories that can be proven to be the right ones get thrown out through the idiocy of a system of "peer review", another jewish creation since they are masters of deception. Having 99 out of 100 people agreeing on one thing, as has been proven by the clowns who still buy in to the holohoax, doesn't mean it is correct.

The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics

YouTube (Short URL)

YouTube (Short URL)

For several years now, far from the spotlight of mainstream media, a controversy has been brewing over the mathematical foundations of black hole theory and other widely accepted cosmological theories. Mathematician Stephen J. Crothers has offered the proofs that he says refutes the very existence of black holes, and also the Big Bang cosmology and Einstein’s “gravitational waves.” In this discussion – far and away the most challenging, technical presentation to date on these pages – Stephen presents a summary of his evidence on black hole theory, in the clearest language possible. Our hope is that Stephen’s summary will serve as a timeless resource and a subject of much debate amongst mathematical specialists for years to come.

http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/

[sniper13x]

Astronomers continue to ignore electricity in space, opting for outdated ideas about gravity and heat.

Recently, astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announced that our own Milky Way galaxy is expelling enormous jets of gamma rays from a putative supermassive black hole residing in its nucleus. In 2010, twin funnels of gamma ray emissions were detected above and below the galactic plane, measuring 65,000 light-years in diameter.

According to conventional cosmological theories, black holes are formed when a star with a mass approximately five times that of our Sun uses up its thermonuclear fuel and collapses under the force of its own gravity. Because the equations that describe gravity can be manipulated in irrational ways, some solutions imply that such a large star can contract into a zero volume containing nearly infinite inertial mass. Astrophysicists have contended for years that black holes are real and that their effects can be observed, although they are invisible to detection.

As the theories suggest, black holes possess a gravitational attraction of such intensity that not even electromagnetic radiation can escape the event horizon. Thus, no direct evidence of a black hole’s existence can be measured, only the hypothetical effects of the extreme gravity. Such effects are said to be gamma rays, X-rays and extreme ultraviolet radiation from the gases and dust as they are compressed into smaller and smaller spaces before being drawn down into oblivion.

Explaining the jets of ionized particles often seen erupting from various galaxies and quasars ranks as one of the most difficult tasks facing modern astronomers. What force can create highly energetic particle emissions that span distances measured in light-years? What confines them into narrow beams?The prevailing theory of “compacted gravitational point sources” exciting gas and dust as they orbit does not address the existence of collimated jets. There is only one force that can hold such a matter stream together over those distances: magnetism.

The only way to generate that magnetic confinement is through electricity flowing through space.

In the past, astronomers observed coherent filaments from galaxies like M87, which extend for thousands of light-years. Charged particles within the filaments are thought to exceed velocities of 500 kilometers per second.

Galaxies are nodes in cosmic electrical circuits. Electromagnetic energy could be stored in the equatorial current sheets surrounding them until some trigger event causes them to switch into a polar discharge. The electric jet could receive its energy from a natural particle-accelerator, a “plasma double layer” with a strong electric field. Toroidal magnetic fields would form because of the polar plasma discharge, confining it into a narrow channel.

Axial electric currents should be flowing along the jet’s entire length. Only electric fields can accelerate charged particles across space.

In previous Picture of the Day articles, we have taken issue with the very idea of black holes and the indirect “evidence” for them that has been presented by the scientific community. Any substance hot enough to emit gamma rays is not a gas but is ionized plasma. What the Harvard-Smithsonian scientists fail to realize is that the gamma rays they are seeing are synchrotron radiation and not the incandescent glow of hot gas. The gamma rays, as well as X-rays and ultraviolet light, are due to electrons spiraling along helical magnetic fields.

The black holes whose effects are supposed to be influencing time and space throughout the Universe are convenient ways to explain away the amazing forces of electric currents permeating space.

Stephen Smith

http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2013...jet-streams-2/

[bikerdruid]

Originally Posted by sniper13x

Any theories that can be proven to be the right ones get thrown out through the idiocy of a system of "peer review", another jewish creation since they are masters of deception. ]

your hatred has blinded you.
you obviously know nothing of scientific method.
a great pity, really.

[sniper13x]

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

your hatred has blinded you.
you obviously know nothing of scientific method.
a great pity, really.

My eyes are wide awake to your "zionist" tribe, make no mistake. There is nothing scientific about the peer review process, it is at best politics and at worst downright fraud on humanity. Of course your tribe knows this, they are fully aware of the crap they peddle as science to the stupid goy who would rather preach fraud and keep their tenure than to go outside the system and fail. Or you can be inside the system and ruffle some feathers, like Paul M. Brown who got suicided by car crash, when his theories might actually make too much sense and wake up his fellow goy. Its a quaint little setup they have going.

[bikerdruid]

Originally Posted by sniper13x

My eyes are wide awake to your "zionist" tribe, make no mistake.

really...
MY zionist tribe?
wow.

dude....in case you have missed it, i feel that zionism is one of the most evil things in the world.
you're hilarious.

[iq_145]

Are nuclear bombs a hoax?

I think that some videos are hoaxed, to impress upon the public a sense of fear, and that calling these devices 'bombs' is perhaps not strictly correct, but I have no doubts that very destructive devices do exist and have been used.

A nuclear reactor certainly works, and all a nuclear weapon does is use far more highly unstable material and instigate a chain reaction within it in an uncontrolled fashion, thus releasing vast amounts of energy in a very short time. This energy will dissipate itself primarily in the form of heat and molecular disassociation. In my opinion, such weapons have been used in Iraq and at the WTC, both times by the United States government.

[sniper13x]

Originally Posted by iq_145

Are nuclear bombs a hoax?

I think that some videos are hoaxed, to impress upon the public a sense of fear, and that calling these devices 'bombs' is perhaps not strictly correct, but I have no doubts that very destructive devices do exist and have been used.

A nuclear reactor certainly works, and all a nuclear weapon does is use far more highly unstable material and instigate a chain reaction within it in an uncontrolled fashion, thus releasing vast amounts of energy in a very short time. This energy will dissipate itself primarily in the form of heat and molecular disassociation. In my opinion, such weapons have been used in Iraq and at the WTC, both times by the United States government.

Great points. I'm still torn on the idea. They could very easily have just used dirty bombs in Japan and claimed it was nuclear weapons. One thing is for sure, some of these official videos are pure garbage and don't hold up to modern scrutiny, its purely propaganda.

[saint_frankenstein]

Originally Posted by omegatau

to which extent are you going to go; soon jews will be the creators of black holes. Incase an asteroid is headed for earth, it'll be a jew riding a rock.

lol

[cinder_darkskys]

Originally Posted by sniper13x

There are no experts in physics, that is an impossibility. There are a bunch of idiots who have learned to regurgitate the status quo regardless of whether it makes any sense or not. Any theories that can be proven to be the right ones get thrown out through the idiocy of a system of "peer review", another jewish creation since they are masters of deception. Having 99 out of 100 people agreeing on one thing, as has been proven by the clowns who still buy in to the holohoax, doesn't mean it is correct.

The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics

http://youtu.be/fsWKlNfQwJU



http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/

Ha after watching that video boy I'm thankful for those monkeys in there white lab coats. uh a brain twister. Well they hammer it all out. Really is a time of new great idea's.

Very much we reshape what we know, every day. This is what the offering of 70's technology can do. How dose a teacher a teacher theory; only as a theory. Because that's all it is. till you show your peers an prove it them. That its not.

I don't really think its in the Jewish peoples best interests to hold back or deceive any one. I mean base on the video I poster. I mean did you see those Russian missile shooting out there bunkers to try an hit that meteor. What about those fighters shooting at that falling rocks. any call for shelter what so ever. I guest this is another sci-fi blow's away reality. hehehe I really wanted to add to this but I felt it would defeat the per-poss of other words. < this is not knocking or hit at the government. they don't have that equipment in that place. Russia is a big place. If Assets an training are not in place you can not defend. But what if there a deference all ready in place.

Now the only objects could not of been tracked from a long range. is if it came behind the moon. they would only had 3 day notice.

For an object to come from behind the moon an stay there for its whole trip here. Dose not seem mathematically right to me. considering how many eye's are on the sky

That kind of the thing with new idea's. It'll take time to trickle down. I would not want my children which i have kids. Learning some higgle piggle theory. when I could then learn what the greater whole think is true. then I can formulate something, maybe something new.

In the US there was time when every youth an youth adult. believed the US won every war it was in.this was less then 10 years ago it was worst the more back in history you go. But history shows The US has NEVER won a WAR. even the race war still going on. So feeding children facts that don't quite fit the whole real deal. make them look dumb. progressive changes from president as far back a JFK excluding Linden Johnston who coo the US. in the JFK administration. so there was a afford to change these thing. JFK wanted = for all proceeding governments would adjust. so the changed Racial imbalance sexual imbalance. to a place of some balance..

It is in our best interests to prove or dis-prove new idea's. But Walking up to a black hole is probably not going to be fun. every galaxy got one an its weight is = to the mass of the galaxy I would think. Our galaxy is brighter or white because of a compression.

The compression effect the physical Galaxy there for Physicals might not be the same as another galaxy. same muilty colored one notice the galaxy's coloring is there are line or bands of red or blue

A lot what happen with sciences to day is or seem like the dark ages to us because we can relate to these new things. But if they used whats round them there models would be so complex that could not understand them.

Just calculating the speed in which Andromia is falling at us. The gravity of a Galaxy is huge let alone 2 in the same spot interacting or in such close contact. Could someone from the 50's or the 1800 's understand this. not hardly but they might be able to grasp's the basic's. Could they understand the gravity interaction even at these ranges

Think just the force between the galaxy out in Non Galactic space The space between us The tidal forces of the 2 at play. Could they would they thought of that would they known. could of they or this man ever of added that to his math. That all the best math in the world basically is the sun revolving around the world.

If a math problum is wrong from the start. It mean that everything after that is wrong. like a house of cards pulling a card or 2 out the rest falls. same for anything flawed.

Skys

[wakeup2nwo]

Have you got anything to compare your findings to? scientific evidence?

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by sniper13x

Funny thing you mention black holes since they did invent it. Black holes are zionist (jewish) pseudo-science crap to keep the goyim stupid. There is 0 evidence for black holes, it is all math and THEORY. The Electric Universe model destroy the bullshitvik nonsense of black holes.

Yep, the only proven black hole is the financial black hole of NASA, or Wall Street or London gambling casino.

[solarclarity]

Japan finds rare photo of Hiroshima bomb mushroom? cloud:-

A rare photograph has been discovered in the Japanese city of Hiroshima showing the mushroom cloud from the US atomic bombing of the city in two distinct parts.
A curator at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum said on Wednesday that the black-and-white picture was found among articles related to the nuclear bombing of the city during the World War II, which were owned by Hiroshima’s Honkawa Elementary School, AFP reported.

"A shot showing the mushroom cloud split into two like this is very rare," she added.

http://presstv.com/detail/2013/01/10...ma-bomb-photo/



KIYOYOSHI Gorō
One hour after the explosion: From a hill on the outskirts, we looked out over the city engulfed in flames.
Year of Birth: 1897 \ Age at time of blast: 48 \ Age when image created: 76
Date of image depicted: 1945/8/6
Distance from hypocenter in meters: 1600
Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum
The following is unaltered text from the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum database:

"From a hill on the outskirts, we looked out over the city engulfed in flames. / 1,600m from the hypocenter/Futabanosato Around 9:15 a.m. on August 6, 1945 / Goro Kiyoyoshi / (48 at the time of the bombing, 76 when he drew this picture)

Explanation in picture: From Futabayama Hill, we looked down on the Second Army Headquarters and Nigitsu Shrine. In front of us the city was rising in flames around Hiroshima Castle and Shukkeien Garden. Lines of people fled from the Hakushima area to the Eastern Drill Ground. Many had fallen in the river and were caught in the current; others lay naked on the ground. This is what the city looked like one hour after the bombing from the hill behind our house."





The ones the USAF didn't finish of in the FIRE BOMBING they attempted to finish off when the civilians were evacuated:-

HARA Yoshimi
Transferring the wounded to Otake by boat. Not enough care was provided, and nothing could be done under artillery fire by enemy planes.

Year of Birth: 1919 \ Age at time of blast: 26 \ Age when image created: 55

http://www.aasc.ucla.edu/cab/200712090007.html

[bradstone]

Sorry, but you didn't provide any real information with that last post, solar.

In PSYOPs, false history and false eyewitnesses are almost always used. For example, how do we know we can trust the eyewitness and artist you mentioned?

Please try to bring real information to the table, otherwise you are just cluttering the thread with noise.

[gary29]

Originally Posted by bradstone

Sorry, but you didn't provide any real information with that last post, solar.

In PSYOPs, false history and false eyewitnesses are almost always used. For example, how do we know we can trust the eyewitness and artist you mentioned?

Please try to bring real information to the table, otherwise you are just cluttering the thread with noise.

My the same logic bradstone, how do we know you're real?

[bradstone]

Originally Posted by gary29

My the same logic bradstone, how do we know you're real?

Gary, please look back through my posts. I always try to bring real information to the table. If you want me to explain something in detail, just identify it for me, and ask. Let me explain myself here.

Other posters have raised the possibility that Hiroshima was bombed with conventional weapons, but the nuclear aspect specifically was faked. This seems a reasonable prospect.

However, solar then posted images from a public exhibition or similar institution, along with a barrage of 'data' from the same source, with no personal interpretation or any relation to the possibilities under discussion.

This is akin to going into a Holocaust thread, and just pasting in a dozen pages from Anne Frank's Diary...and nothing else. It doesn't add to the debate. It doesn't advance our inquiries in any way shape or form.

It also makes me think of Fukushima. What we really need is for a researcher from this forum to physically venture into that region with a radiation detector and actually film the journey, and the readings from the meter, before posting it up here. The same for people on the West Coast of the USA.

Do you see what I mean Gary? What we're really looking for, is further data to suggest fakery and to hint at the methodology behind the fakery. Just pasting reams of information from some art gallery or other, doesn't come close to providing that.

[rodin]

The post under discussion...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...postcount=1212

...outlined details in red to emphasise 'firestorm'... as per Tokyo etc.

Also I found interesting the fact that wounded being evacuated were under constant 'artillery' threat from enemy planes. One would have thought after a nuke the place would have been be left alone...

Plus of course the split in two so called mushroom cloud - how did we get there exactly?

[kaito]

At the following link we find some pages and photographs from a declassified "secret" Government Report, the US Strategic Bombing Survey of buildings damaged at Hiroshima. Strangely the Report has apparently been purchased for the EMuseum by two people with the 'Jewish' Surname CAPPA. I wonder if one of their relatives was a Hollywood photographic "artist"?

The site originally featured a section showing pages from the US strategic bombing survey booklet…

http://emuseum.icp.org/view/objects/asitem/1420/0/primaryMakerAlpha-asc/dateBegin-asc?t:state:flow=367f6b73-73a9-426d-8937-9e0bfe21878f

….plus a section showing a collection of approximately 750 jpegs purporting to be copies of original photographs on which the booklet was based. Also showed a few photos "supposedly" taken at the early post war A bomb tests. The second section showing images of the original photos was mysteriously "pulled" after I posted my analyses on the Nuke Lies site. Luckily I downloaded all of them before posting my analyses…….


Page 336.....Written Damage Report and Analysis of Building 57, mythical Takeya Grammar School Gym

Page 337..... featuring two photos of the same side of the building taken from slightly different positions. The photos are faked montages. Note the difference in shape and location of the 3 stanchions I highlight in the photos below

Page 338.....Scale Drawing showing Plan, Section, annotated construction notes, and form of building collapse.

BOTH PHOTOS ON PAGE 337 OF THIS US GOVERNMENT REPORT ARE FAKES!!!!

The building is a complete fabrication and probably never existed. The Scale Drawing is merely a "story board" for the artist "fakers" giving them a rough guide to the form of collapse they were required to depict in the fake photographs. See photos below annotated to highlight the fakery.


PHOTO 1


PHOTO 2 showing the same corner from a different position.
Use Ctrl+ and Ctrl- to zoom in and out of the photos.



Above we have pages 336 and 338 from the Report.(highlighting bubbles added by me) On Page 336 on the left note it emphasises main cause of damage to be "blast" which is impossible as M69 fire bomb clusters do not produce "blast"......funnily enough neither do hoax nuclear weapons.....hence the industrial scale manufacture of "fake blast" evidence for their existence....lol.

On the right we have page 338 which is the "story board" for the "faker" artist showing the kind of image required and below the plan a little arrow labelled 164 giving the direction of view required for the crude fake photo image #164. However, in doing another incompetent rendition (165) he really gave the game away. President Obama....can I please have a complete copy of the whole fake Report or do you have to ask the CAPPA's permission first?....lmao

[kaito]

100,000 views! ......

[bradstone]

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

your hatred has blinded you.
you obviously know nothing of scientific method.
a great pity, really.

It's so easy to see through you and your type.

[kaito]

More "faked" Hiroshima photographs from the US Strategic Bombing Survey on the Emuseum site.

Building 15
Ruins of Chugoku Electric Company, Transformer Repair Station, Hiroshima]
Date: October 25, 1945
Stated cause of structural damage...Blast





Above image shows Pages 184 and 185 from the report. Page 184 gives a completely false report of the damage but not in the way you may at first think. Bear in mind the following as it is important:

1) THERE IS NO STEELWORK IN THE BUILDING!
The photo has been faked. The steel trusses, stanchions, beams etc have been drawn in by an artist.

2) NO HEAVY MACHINERY OR TRANSFORMER PARTS ARE VISIBLE IN THE INTERNAL PHOTOGRAPH!




Next we have Pages 186 and 187. Page 186 shows two external shots of the building. Page 187 contains a plan and section of the building which is the "faker" artist's story board.




Next an analysis of the internal photograph of the large bay (PHOTO 1) in Autocad. The anomalies in the steelwork vanishing points (green lines) clearly indicate the steelwork is "faked". I can also use the two measurements taken to establish by ratio the correct height of the truss ridge line in the external photos.




Above we have the analysis drawing of the external view (PHOTO 2) with all of the perspective construction lines shown, and the correct profiles of the four trusses added using the height ratio extracted from the measurements in PHOTO 1.




In the image above I have removed the construction lines and parts of the truss profiles hidden by the walls.
Correction
The annotation in the bottom right hand corner of the photo above should read:
"Where are the trusses that are present in the small bay in PHOTO 3?"




The next image (PHOTO 3) shows another external view from the south west on which I've pointed out further anomalies. The dark areas at the bottom of the cylindrical transformer components suggest they are from another photo and have been pasted in. Also note the ridge member in the large bay which is not present in the internal shot (PHOTO1)

There are several other instances in the Emuseum photos where "fake" steelwork has been added by the Allied propagandists. You may ask "WHY ON EARTH WOULD THEY WISH TO DO THIS?"
If you think about it the answer is obvious. They wished to give the impression that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were relatively undamaged before they allegedly dropped the fake nuke. I am suggesting this was not the case and.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki had already been "Tokyoed" with conventional bombs and fire bombs months before.

When they sent in the photo team to provide "fake" evidence for the "fake" A bomb blast they found, to their dismay that the steelwork in the bombed out buildings had been removed months before by the Japanese for reuse in their armament industry. Steel was in short supply as Japan had become a country under seige. This is entirely credible as the same thing happened in Britain during the Blitz.

If the Allies provided photos showing no trace of roof steelwork then people would notice and start asking awkward questions so they added it in. Many of the Hiroshima & Nagasaki photos were taken within a month or so of the surrender and the fact that they show a lot of "tidying up", road clearance, trams and trains running etc suggests that the devastation happened well before the 3rd/6th of August.

Also I think it's unlikely they dropped warning leaflets before, or as they say they did, afterwards. It would have drawn the attention of people in and around Nagasaki and Hiroshima to what they knew could NOT have happened. I believe the Japanese Gov. was in contact, through the Swedes? with Stalin et al and we are told they wanted to surrender months before. I seem to recall "cactusneedle?" stating the allies imposed a 12 month clampdown on all news coming out of Japan after the surrender. The reason for this would be to fake the A bomb evidence.

IMO there are two "staged history" possibilities here …..either


1)The Japanese Royal and Freemasonic Industrial Elite were secretly given the choice of supporting the A Bomb hoax and continuing in power on penalty of facing a Japanese "Nuremburg Trial". It was mainly the Japanese Military who "took the hit" in the War Crimes trials.

or….

2)The Japanese Elite together with Hitler, in full knowledge of their role, were co-opted by the Fake "Askanazi Jewish" Bankers to participate in and LOSE WWII to further the Banker's Zionist World Government agenda.
　
　
　
　
　
100,200