Outrage as Tesco backs gay festival.. - Page 12

bigscotsman · 15-11-2011, 02:02 AM

i hope you wore a shirt or maybe that explains why they didnt want ye at the till?

andyh · 15-11-2011, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oioioi

Maybe, just maybe, Tesco only care about the $£... where's my euro symbol?

ctrl+alt+4 on a PC iirc.
alt+2 on a mac

stevie0013 · 15-11-2011, 02:13 AM

It's because Tecos is a whore. Why the fuck does the gay community need the "support" of some self serving capitalise scum fuck organisation to feel validation. They don't need Tescos. Wow im so cleaver i could die

bigscotsman · 15-11-2011, 02:13 AM

lol

nice mellow chap

oioioi · 15-11-2011, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

ctrl+alt+4 on a PC iirc.
alt+2 on a mac

€

Cheers Andy!

uberstate · 15-11-2011, 09:05 AM

I noticed my question has not been answered 'still', I'm quite surprised as there seems to be so many 'staunch' pro gay posters, so I'll ask again.

We know that the age of homosexual activity was lowered to 16 but why? and who stood to benefit from it? and how did they benefit?

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uberstate

I noticed my question has not been answered 'still', I'm quite surprised as there seems to be so many 'staunch' pro gay posters, so I'll ask again.

We know that the age of homosexual activity was lowered to 16 but why? and who stood to benefit from it? and how did they benefit?

I wouldn't say 'pro' gay as much as not giving a damn.
You know...freedom and all that. You'd think people would have got the message by now.

As for who benefited, no-one really. Its not as if straight teenagers don't end up in the sack before 16.

knightofthegrail · 15-11-2011, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

I wouldn't say 'pro' gay as much as not giving a damn.
You know...freedom and all that. You'd think people would have got the message by now.

So pro-

Permissive society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Permissive society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

?

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightofthegrail

So pro-permissive-society?

So pro-police state

Police state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Police state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

?

knightofthegrail · 15-11-2011, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

So pro-police state http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_state ?

Do you actually find it impossible to engage in polite and honest discussion?

It's not a trap question.

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightofthegrail

Do you actually find it impossible to engage in polite and honest discussion?

It's not a trap question.

Its a stupid question.
You want freedom? It comes with the price of responsibility.
The govt have obviously not got a clue about responsibility so I fail to see how its worth bothering with it.

knightofthegrail · 15-11-2011, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

Its a stupid question.

How is it a stupid question? If you are promoting greater freedom you are promoting a permissive society are you not?

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightofthegrail

How is it a stupid question? If you are promoting greater freedom you are promoting a permissive society are you not?

If you are promoting less freedom then you are promoting a police state are you not?

knightofthegrail · 15-11-2011, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

If you are promoting less freedom then you are promoting a police state are you not?

No.

A police state is a very specific form of what you would call "authoritarian". A permissive society is a general concept of "a society where social norms are becoming increasingly liberal. This usually accompanies a change in what is considered deviant" (to quote from the wiki-link that I posted).

uberstate · 15-11-2011, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

Its not as if straight teenagers don't end up in the sack before 16.

I don't think anyone can argue with that.

But we are not talking about just heterosexual sex, it can, and has raised some concerns such as references to the bible and other scriptures so say references on homosexuals, its hard not to bring religion in to certain issues.

As for the message, some people dont want or need the message.

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightofthegrail

No.

A police state is a very specific form of what you would call "authoritarian".

Which is what we have right now.

Quote:

A permissive society is a general concept of "a society where social norms are becoming increasingly liberal. This usually accompanies a change in what is considered deviant" (to quote from the wiki-link that I posted).

You mean like jizzing over babies? lol.
Its arguable that muslim society is permissive when it comes to quite a few sexual practises that we would consider abhorrent, yet they lop body parts off in the market square on friday or beat you to a pulp if you don't make it to the mosque in time.

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uberstate

As for the message, some people dont want or need the message.

Seeing as religion hasn't got a leg to stand on when it comes to morality I'm not surprised quite a few people don't want or need 'the message'.

uberstate · 15-11-2011, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

Seeing as religion hasn't got a leg to stand on when it comes to morality I'm not surprised quite a few people don't want or need 'the message'.

knightofthegrail · 15-11-2011, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyh

You mean like jizzing over babies? lol.

No, that was an example of how something found disgusting, but which does not harm the 'victim', can be considered a crime....and thus that it is reasonable for societies to criminalise that which they consider disgusting even if such causes no harm to any 'victim'. The fact that you dont even have either the ability to realise that, or that you have chosen to misconstrue it for the sake of yet more childish trolling, speaks volumes about what you are really about.

Quote:

Its arguable that muslim society is permissive when it comes to quite a few sexual practises that we would consider abhorrent, yet they lop body parts off in the market square on friday or beat you to a pulp if you don't make it to the mosque in time.

Whch is nothing to do with a "Permissive Society". There is no way on earth a muslim society could be called "permissive". Read the link and engage in reasonable discussion instead of "yellow posting" and posturing....or not, if you cannot be arsed, and then I'll know that you are nothing but another waste of space on the internet.

andyh · 15-11-2011, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightofthegrail

No, that was an example of how something found disgusting, but which does not harm the 'victim', can be considered a crime....and thus that it is reasonable for societies to criminalise that which they consider disgusting even if such causes no harm to any 'victim'. The fact that you dont even have either the ability to realise that, or that you have chosen to misconstrue it for the sake of yet more childish trolling, speaks volumes about what you are really about.

Its speaks volumes about the desperate lengths you will go to in order to get a suitable dilemma that would probably only apply to the sort of people who belong in a nuthouse.

Quote:

Whch is nothing to do with a "Permissive Society". There is no way on earth a muslim society could be called "permissive". Read the link and engage in reasonable discussion instead of "yellow posting" and posturing....or not, if you cannot be arsed, and then I'll know that you are nothing but another waste of space on the internet.

Oh rly?

Ever heard of thighing?
Certain acts with cattle?
How its OK to have sex with kids? Child brides?

In some respects they are far more permissive sexually than the west, I'm afraid thats a done deal and backed up by plenty of posters in here such as ES and Bendoon and I agree with them on those points. The evidence is there for anyone to see.

15-11-2011, 02:13 AM	#223
stevie0013 Banned Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,571	It's because Tecos is a whore. Why the fuck does the gay community need the "support" of some self serving capitalise scum fuck organisation to feel validation. They don't need Tescos. Wow im so cleaver i could die Last edited by stevie0013; 15-11-2011 at 02:13 AM.

15-11-2011, 02:02 AM	#221
bigscotsman Inactive Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,814	i hope you wore a shirt or maybe that explains why they didnt want ye at the till?

15-11-2011, 02:13 AM	#224
bigscotsman Inactive Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,814	lol nice mellow chap

15-11-2011, 09:05 AM	#226
uberstate Inactive Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,604	I noticed my question has not been answered 'still', I'm quite surprised as there seems to be so many 'staunch' pro gay posters, so I'll ask again. We know that the age of homosexual activity was lowered to 16 but why? and who stood to benefit from it? and how did they benefit?