|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,980
|
Quote:
and, if you don't like how things are in your beloved england you have many options as does everyone else, two of which are to leave or vote to break up the uk and become independent. it isn't my concern what you choose to do.
Last edited by john devine; 01-04-2011 at 03:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,221
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
-3.00 Economic -2.97 Social |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dál Riata
Posts: 5,511
|
Quote:
The Barnett formula states as a UK tax payer for every £1, I pay the government £0.05 goes to Wales, £0.10 goes to Scotland and £0.85 goes to England. So my little Sassenach chum that mean we in Scotland and Wales are subsidising your English ass. If Scotland lost as much as you seem to believe we'd be out of the Union faster than you can say independence. In regards to HBOS and RBS I and every other Scottish tax payer will pay £26,000 to cover that nightmare , and guess what at the end of the day it's parliament which gets to control the shares of those banks not Holyrood. The question you should now be asking yourself is, if you're receiving more money than Scotland and Wales with the added bonus of free oil and gas, why can't your parliament offer you free prescriptions and free education? An old Scottish saying which is apt for this thread "don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining".
Last edited by firepoet; 01-04-2011 at 03:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Evidently Chickentown
Posts: 11,592
|
You seeking equality for all then grem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,221
|
Quote:
Your point on HBOS and RBS is an interesting one that i was not aware of. Do you have a link for that please. Note though that i wasn't suggesting for a minute that Scotland should pay for that banking fiasco, just that attributing huge conglomerates to Nationalities is problematic. As for your breakdown of government money, the current population of the uk stands at 84% English, 8.5% Scottish Wales 5% and NI <3% so it would appear that this subsidy you claim seems a little short changed even before we debate Barnett v Oil revenues. Your point on questioning our own government's decisions on prescriptions is absolutely correct. I think the issue though is(and we are only talking hypothetically here) If a bully took someone's dinner money to pay for their own meals you wouldnt tell them to blame their parents for not giving them enough cash! Somewhere between the English and the Scottish argument is the truth. It may well be the fault of the UK government in failing to recognise the need for an English assembly but that doesnt make the English feel any better does it!! Then when we hear those who are better off than us conplain they are unfairly treated it does tend to hit a nerve! That isn't an unfair statement is it?
__________________
Quote:
-3.00 Economic -2.97 Social |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Above kybrd
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
By aligning to their party policies so they can rule (change laws by majority) in the house of conmens without issue? Buying them off, money for votes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dál Riata
Posts: 5,511
|
Quote:
I agree, England needs it's own assembly to represent it's own people, I don't believe you're been represented fairly by Westminster or your own politicians. How the hell can a Scottish MP fairly vote on an English issue? Westminster is more interested in subsidising pointless wars than offering you free education and health. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dál Riata
Posts: 5,511
|
Quote:
Scotland, England and Wales fighting over the scraps at the table, while we are being robbed blind by the basturds at the EU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,980
|
Quote:
Last edited by john devine; 01-04-2011 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 720
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,221
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
-3.00 Economic -2.97 Social |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,603
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,603
|
Quote:
what about torys ![]() lib dems maybe they seem honest enough ![]() if your going to waste your time might aswell do it big style i suppose and follow traditional thinking ,face palm . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 10,408
|
Scotland has not introduced increased fee's for English students
![]() This was debated, on the shirt-tails of 'what happens if everyone in England now applies to Scottish Universities' and was picked up by the Daily Mail (surprise) The free prescription charge has had mixed reception. The budget for health is a fixed amount, and we have not been advised which area will see cut's to fund this expenditure. What is does say though is Scotland is serious about Education and Health and making them a priority. I agree that perhaps England should also seek it's own devolved parliament and break away from Westminster. Having a Scottish, Welsh, N.I and English parliaments may (?) make Brussels job a bit harder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,112
|
Quote:
Scots make up 40% of the British Army. The SNP is pro-EU, pro-Nato and pro-UN. You have lots of oil in the North Sea, but the SNP is part of the agenda to not allow you to have it. The SNP = regionalisation within the EU, dressed up as anti-English, fake Scottish nationalism. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|