Dr. Judy Wood's Book: Where Did The Towers Go? - Page 53

7forever · 24-02-2012, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by labouysse

Have you any video even more out of focus?

Have you any video of a real boeing 767 that's not a fake image?

dontdrinkurmilk · 24-02-2012, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

Have you any video of a real boeing 767 that's not a fake image?

Clear Video of UA 175 - YouTube

Multiple camera angles:

United Airlines Flight 175 Impact - YouTube

Have a look at this and please comment:

9/11 - United 175 CGI Plane Theory Debunked - YouTube

amandareckonwith · 24-02-2012, 02:51 PM

I was in a bookstore yesterday and noticed they were selling the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph. D.

(To obscure the truth about how the WTC complex was turned into microscopic dust particles without evidence of high heat and Dr. Judy Wood's research which substantiates this by the evidence she presents in her textbook, the "Fakery Fakers" have taken over this thread with their Simple Simon nonsense.)

7forever · 24-02-2012, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

As far as I was aware:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175

United Airlines Flight 175 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United Airlines Flight 175 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Empire State Building was northwest of the towers. The official flight path has 175 crossing into NJ near the northwest tip and never flew over Newark or was north of the towers, in its final minutes of flight, officially.

At 09:01, two minutes before impact as United Airlines Flight 175 continued its descent into Lower Manhattan, the New York Center alerted another nearby Air Traffic Facility responsible for low-flying aircraft, which was able to monitor the aircraft's path over New Jersey, and then over Staten Island and New York Harbor in its final moments.[13] (Flight 175 came in from the southwest, apparently heading for the Empire State Building, but turned right, then left into the South Tower.)

According to this fantastic fiction, fake 175 would have circled the towers twice.

The final approach on Wiki is consistent with the drone, leaving the official flight path, failed fiction. The Empire State Building is circled on the left. This simple analysis confirms that both drones were north of the towers in their final seconds before their respective targets exploded.

7forever · 24-02-2012, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Clear Video of UA 175 - YouTube

Multiple camera angles:

[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e97WCFq2iB4&feature=related"]United Airlines Flight 175 Impact

Have a look at this and please comment:

9/11 - United 175 CGI Plane Theory DTube

4 broadcasts filmed the drone coming from the west, three of which were aired live. No plane for the south tower really showed up.

Four flying bombs were captured on film and survived without alteration. The only inconsistency is chopper 4 disappears behind the top of tower 1, while the other three are lower but at the same level. Here they are in this order; NY1, WB11, CBS, and Chopper 4, aka WNBC. Only the CBS bogey did not air live. The Today Show aired the orb but changed camera angles before it could complete its path to explosion.

The final 14 seconds of approach by nist was south to north, not west to east. The drone/orb cannot visually be a chopper or plane and its float path would have crashed into the west side of T2, not southeast corner. The drone literally circled the towers just like Matt Lauer said after he saw it.

dontdrinkurmilk · 24-02-2012, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

4 broadcasts filmed the drone coming from the west, three of which were aired live. No plane for the south tower really showed up.

Four flying bombs were captured on film and survived without alteration. The only inconsistency is chopper 4 disappears behind the top of tower 1, while the other three are lower but at the same level. Here they are in this order; NY1, WB11, CBS, and Chopper 4, aka WNBC. Only the CBS bogey did not air live. The Today Show aired the orb but changed camera angles before it could complete its path to explosion.

The final 14 seconds of approach by nist was south to north, not west to east. The drone/orb cannot visually be a chopper or plane and its float path would have crashed into the west side of T2, not southeast corner. The drone literally circled the towers just like Matt Lauer said after he saw it.

Not one genuine clip, actually shows Flight 175 travelling anything other than the flight path it actually flew, they are all consistent.

7forever · 24-02-2012, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Not one genuine clip, actually shows Flight 175 travelling anything other than the flight path it actually flew, they are all consistent.

They are totally inconsistent and irreconcilable. Did fake 175 circle the towers twice? Wiki said it was north of towers in its final seconds, meaning that it had to circle twice unless the official flight path is wrong. Is the official flight path wrong or was the drone the thing that came from the north?

dontdrinkurmilk · 24-02-2012, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

They are totally inconsistent and irreconcilable. Did fake 175 circle the towers twice? Wiki said it was north of towers in its final seconds, meaning that it had to circle twice unless the official flight path is wrong. Is the official flight path wrong or was the drone the thing that came from the north?

Flight 175 & Flight 11 Official RADES Radar FlightPath - YouTube

Here you go nice and simple for you to understand I hope?

7forever · 24-02-2012, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Flight 175 & Flight 11 Official RADES Radar FlightPath - YouTube

Here you go nice and simple for you to understand I hope?

You can't explain, so you point me to some video.LOL You posted a link that puts fake 175 north of the towers and fail to explain how that can be, when the official path has it nowhere near the empire building. Are you simply lying, or have no idea what you're talking about? You posted the official flight path, which has it south of the towers, nowhere near flying south of the empire or newark.LOL Are you hoping I won't call you out on your ignorance and/or lies?

dontdrinkurmilk · 24-02-2012, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

You can't explain, so you point me to some video.LOL You posted a link that puts fake 175 north of the towers and fail to explain how that can be, when the official path has it nowhere near the empire building. Are you simply lying, or have no idea what you're talking about? You posted the official flight path, which has it south of the towers, nowhere near flying south of the empire or newark.LOL Are you hoping I won't call you out on your ignorance and/or lies?

You should read this short report:

http://www.911myths.com/images/b/b6/...tudy_UA175.pdf

I am quite shocked, that you cannot understand the radar data and 10's of videos, have been used to reconstruct the flight path of UA 175 but you just cannot accept it.

labouysse · 25-02-2012, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amandareckonwith

I was in a bookstore yesterday and noticed they were selling the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph. D.

(To obscure the truth about how the WTC complex was turned into microscopic dust particles without evidence of high heat and Dr. Judy Wood's research which substantiates this by the evidence she presents in her textbook, the "Fakery Fakers" have taken over this thread with their Simple Simon nonsense.)

But the WTC complex wasn't turned to microscopic dust particles.

Look at this;

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...shattered2.jpg

Note the steel girders etc.

7forever · 25-02-2012, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

You should read this short report:

http://www.911myths.com/images/b/b6/...tudy_UA175.pdf

I am quite shocked, that you cannot understand the radar data and 10's of videos, have been used to reconstruct the flight path of UA 175 but you just cannot accept it.

That link is incomplete. Why would you accept something that's totally inconsistent with news footage showing numerous different approaches? Sept clues destroyed the flight myth years ago...it's not even debatable.

dontdrinkurmilk · 25-02-2012, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

That link is incomplete. Why would you accept something that's totally inconsistent with news footage showing numerous different approaches? Sept clues destroyed the flight myth years ago...it's not even debatable.

Even from that short few pages you can see the Facts, see this RE SC which is complete rubbish, do you not understand that different cameras looking at the same event from different positions, angles, heights etc are going to show different views? Simple stuff.

http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf

7forever · 25-02-2012, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Even from that short few pages you can see the Facts, see this RE SC which is complete rubbish, do you not understand that different cameras looking at the same event from different positions, angles, heights etc are going to show different views? Simple stuff.

http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf

Prove it.LOL You couldn't prove any of those angles are the same if your life depended on it. Don't send me links...prove it's rubbish.

7forever · 25-02-2012, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Flight 175 & Flight 11 Official RADES Radar FlightPath - YouTube

Here you go nice and simple for you to understand I hope?

Here you go...a drone from the west that circled the south tower before causing its explosion.

7forever · 25-02-2012, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Even from that short few pages you can see the Facts, see this RE SC which is complete rubbish, do you not understand that different cameras looking at the same event from different positions, angles, heights etc are going to show different views? Simple stuff.

http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf

Are you that pompous ass, Anthony Lawson?

dontdrinkurmilk · 25-02-2012, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

Prove it.LOL You couldn't prove any of those angles are the same if your life depended on it. Don't send me links...prove it's rubbish.

Look, it is so legible, the flight path is the same, the many cameras filming the incoming plane are from different positions, what is wrong with you? You can't be that stupid surely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

Here you go...a drone from the west that circled the south tower before causing its explosion.

Define ''drone''.

Also that is not a clear enough image alone to establish if that is a plane, but given the other evidence, eye witness accounts, multiple other camera's with clearer images, we can conclude it is a plane, oh not to mention radar also.

[/QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

Are you that pompous ass, Anthony Lawson?

7forever · 25-02-2012, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontdrinkurmilk

Look, it is so legible, the flight path is the same, the many cameras filming the incoming plane are from different positions, what is wrong with you? You can't be that stupid surely.

Define ''drone''.

[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/bcl_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/][/QUOTE]

It's not the same flight path. It's coming from the west and had to circle the south tower, which any size plane could never do. NY1 shows the same type of drone that cbs, nbc, and wb11 show from the same direction, west.

7forever · 25-02-2012, 03:47 PM

The truth is the lie, and the lie is the truth. No commercial airliner impacted either tower on 911, but small remote controlled drones were used to trigger bombs planted inside the towers. Very obvious fake imagery was aired on TV which the average person had no knowledge or reference with which to understand what they were seeing was failed computer generated imagery that didn't produce a single image that came close to depicting a real boeing 767.

dontdrinkurmilk · 25-02-2012, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

[IMG]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/bcl_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/]

Quote:

It's not the same flight path. It's coming from the west and had to circle the south tower, which any size plane could never do. NY1 shows the same type of drone that cbs, nbc, and wb11 show from the same direction, west.

It is the same flight path, FACT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

The truth is the lie, and the lie is the truth. No commercial airliner impacted either tower on 911, but small remote controlled drones were used to trigger bombs planted inside the towers. Very obvious fake imagery was aired on TV which the average person had no knowledge or reference with which to understand what they were seeing was failed computer generated imagery that didn't produce a single image that came close to depicting a real boeing 767.

What makes me laugh here is, you're using a still from a video camera which is obviously not very clear due to the performance if the camera. You then show a close up image of a 767 from a camera picture, presumably a high pixel camera looking at the quality of the image, are you saying the former picture you cite should be looking like the latter?

24-02-2012, 02:51 PM	#1043
amandareckonwith Inactive Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 144	Bookstore Sales I was in a bookstore yesterday and noticed they were selling the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph. D. (To obscure the truth about how the WTC complex was turned into microscopic dust particles without evidence of high heat and Dr. Judy Wood's research which substantiates this by the evidence she presents in her textbook, the "Fakery Fakers" have taken over this thread with their Simple Simon nonsense.)

25-02-2012, 03:47 PM	#1059
7forever Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 2,182	The truth is the lie, and the lie is the truth. No commercial airliner impacted either tower on 911, but small remote controlled drones were used to trigger bombs planted inside the towers. Very obvious fake imagery was aired on TV which the average person had no knowledge or reference with which to understand what they were seeing was failed computer generated imagery that didn't produce a single image that came close to depicting a real boeing 767.