11-02-2012, 10:36 PM
|
#881 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
|
Disinformation & Libelous Statements
Quote:
"Publicly and intentionally spreading half truths and/or lies about someone else, especially with intent to injure or discredit them, is immoral and illegal for a good reason. Supporting someone in the act of these dirty deeds makes one guilty by association." [...] There is a good deal of controversy and debate about John Hutchison’s work. So far I have read a substantial amount of poorly researched, negative and/or ignorant debunkers, disbelievers, and pseudo-skeptics proposing how he might have faked his videos, some ad hominem and otherwise deceptive arguing, but nobody has fully reproduced or adequately explained to me how he faked his results or perpetrated a hoax, hoaxes or fraud. I have also reviewed quite a bit of material and testimony in support of Mr. John Hutchison, although I would like to see some more evidence of individuals and scientists speaking on his behalf, witnessing his experiments, doing peer reviews and duplicating results from his experiments. [...] Scientists from places like Lockheed Martin, the US Army and NASA, among other organizations, have visited him trying to figure out what he is doing and how he is doing it. The Canadian Government seized all of his equipment in 1989 and classified it, denying the return of this equipment to John thus forcing him to start over. Boyd Bushman, a retired senior scientist from Lockheed Martin acknowledges the theft of his equipment The Japanese have invested in some of his experiments and to the best of my knowledge they have not accused him of being fraudulent. [...] I find it interesting that with roughly 40 years of John Hutchison experiments on videos not a single person, skeptic, debunker, scientist, video expert, basement troll or computer expert/analyst has found evidence of a single string or other obvious sign of a hoax in a single frame of his videos. I also find it hard to believe that with so many individuals obviously wanting to discredit John that if they had found the proof of fraud or even a shred of evidence, that some reference or link to it would appear in some of the material I have already researched. Some scientists may consider his ideas plausible or possible but stay away from him and don't openly support him in fear of ridicule and the loss of their oh so precious grant money. I propose this as a reason why there isn't a large body of accredited experts clamoring to validate his work. [...] Why do some individuals put so much effort into being a pseudo-skeptic? Is it so they can sleep better at night “knowing” that there can't possibly be anything unknown out there to be afraid of or worry about? Why do so many people seem to be terrified of what might be possible? Do they simply enjoy being ignorant and arguing just for the sake of arguing? Libel, slander and defamation of character are fun and exciting for them? It appears that some individuals and groups are threatened by him somehow. There seem to be people that don't like to have to include all the extra possibilities his reported results bring to the table in science discussions and debate. Some people simply appear to enjoy hating on him and calling him lots of colorful names. There may also be an entity or entities that have a vested interest in discrediting him. Those of you who have been supporting these proud and self proclaimed skeptics, the “piggy-back” skeptics and “fanboys” that haven't even bothered to do any investigation or research of their own, those of you who based your judgments, flames, disbelief, defamations and worse on the “ufo on a string hoax” slam campaign, those of you who openly, loudly and vehemently proclaimed your “truth,” really should be ashamed of yourselves. In my lifetime, I have born witness to some very despicable and nasty behavior, and the damage after, from people proclaiming absolute truth in support of a blatant and/or purposeful lie. Perhaps this lie has caused some amount of damage that can not be entirely reversed. Is this cool, is this funny, is this fair? Don't flame me or lash out at me for exposing you, if you are guilty of being described in this paragraph then I suggest you take some time to go rethink your misguided and ignorant actions and your life in general. Perhaps even go back and retract all unproven truth statements so boldly and assuredly posted. [...] Why am I noticing such a strong effort to discredit Mr. Hutchison recently? Does it have anything to do with Dr. Judy Wood's research and legal efforts concerning 911? Personally, I would like to see more of the scientific community, other groups and the general public spend less time, effort and thought on what 'absolutely can not be possible' and bit more time pondering what just might be possible. Examples of the past- at one time many individuals in the science community insisted that it was “impossible” to broadcast radio waves over the Atlantic and later that it was “impossible” to break the sound barrier because the results would somehow violate the “laws” of science that they “knew” at the time. A leading marionette of James H. Fetzer is Chucky Boldwyn who supplements his retirement income by making libelous statements against the research of Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. and John Hutchison. What credentials does Mr. Boldwyn have to be a professional disinformation figure? Is it because his resume includes erratic, unstable, and violent behavior that resulted in repeated and serious breaches of ethical requirements and professionalism as well as a low credit score?  http://911scholars.ning.com/main/sea...2+Hutchison%22 Miami Herald - October 26, 1998 - 1B Local LESSON NEEDED IN SELF-CONTROL http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MH&s_site=miami&p_multi=MH&p_th eme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_top doc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB4DB709494FFCE&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date  &s_tra ckval=GooglePMDISMISSAL OF EMPLOYEE CHARLES J. BOLDWYN - TEACHER PALMETTO MIDDLE SCHOOL RECOMMENDED: That effective August 21, 2002, at the close of the workday, the School Board suspend and initiate dismissal proceedings against Mr. Charles J. Boldwyn, Teacher at Palmetto Middle School, pending the outcome of a hearing, if requested. CHARLES J. BOLDWYN DISMISSAL PROCEEDINGS JUNE 2003 Details for Case No: 02-003446 Summary: Teacher terminated for repeated, serious breaches of ethical requirements and professionalism. State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings In 2003 Charles J Boldwyn's 1996 Manufactured Home was repossessed by Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. File Number 2003 R 214034001 Default Judgement of $10,351.50 from South Florida Educational Federal Credit Union filed against Charles J Boldwyn filed 2/24/04. File Number 2004 R 220763656 Miami-Dade County Recorder's Official Record Search |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 05:23 PM
|
#882 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
|
Who's Got The Tar?
 Maybe it's because my father was born in 1903 and my mother was born in 1905 and I was raised with a different set of ethical standards that I find it very sad to see people arguing opinions of speculations of theories of speculations when the evidence in WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. is overwhelming and indisputable. Plus the price for this 540 page full color hardcover textbook is a real bargain. I can't even fill up my gas tank for $39.95!!! What do you think we should do with those who have been proved to be involved with planning 9/11 or covering it up such as Fetzer, Gage, Jones, Harritt, Jenkins, Ryan, Chandler, Barrett, et al.? What is their motivation for denigrating or muddling up Dr. Judy Wood’s research and the evidence she has collected? "9/11 Truthers" say they want to spread the truth about 9/11. If this is correct, then why aren’t they telling the public about Dr. Wood’s textbook? The truth is knowable. What goal do they expect to achieve by being so obsessed with covering it up? Should we just tar and feather those who have been proved to be involved with planning 9/11 or covering it up or would justice be served by putting them in prison and throwing away the key?  |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 06:45 PM
|
#883 |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
.
Jolly good show, amanda. I see this thread has gone quiet now, I guess those who disagree are sorting their options...  Without thorough investigation myself, the evidence I am aware of tells me Ms Wood has done some pioneering research into what is very likely the source of the means of destruction of the twin towers & #7. Many folks are skeptical of things not in the public domain. We need to understand that the elite controllers have been doing research in secret for many decades, and that their programs are well advanced. It seems to me that DEWs are rather simple affairs for them by now, but they're not able to completely cover up the evidence as Ms Wood has shown. |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 08:42 PM
|
#884 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 10:07 PM
|
#885 | |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
Dream on. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 10:15 PM
|
#886 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:00 PM
|
#887 | |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
 And no pancake business either - what a load. It's like you can't trust the evidence of your senses - you prefer to believe what the authorities tell you rather than your own perception. Last edited by indolering; 12-02-2012 at 11:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:01 PM
|
#888 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,397
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
or No planes,video fakery and a technology presumeably using huge ammounts of energy from somewhere in the ether it's a close call but my money's on the former |
|||
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:07 PM
|
#889 | ||||
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:09 PM
|
#890 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:14 PM
|
#891 | |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:17 PM
|
#892 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:30 PM
|
#893 | |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
That's what I mean - you don't trust the evidence before your eyes. Those buildings came straight down with no resistance - experts have opined it appeared to be a controlled demolition. A building brought down by fire simply doesn't collapse like that - never has and never will. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:39 PM
|
#894 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,397
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:40 PM
|
#895 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:47 PM
|
#896 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:52 PM
|
#897 | |
|
Premier Subscribers
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: on a cliff in the Himalayas
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2012, 11:56 PM
|
#898 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-02-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#899 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
|
Advanced Space Programs Development
Quote:
 "But it wasn't until September 11, 2006 that bells and whistles started going off for me. For it was on that day I met Dr. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds at a 9-11 "Truth" event in Washington, DC, along with “patriot” Colonel Robert Bowman (Ronald Reagan's Space Wars directed energy weapons guy). I introduced myself to Reynolds and Wood, but not without caution. I had read all over the Internet they were "dis-info" agents, so I approached them with reservation, curious to find out for myself why they had resigned from Scholars. After hearing how their research has been undermined, however, what I had been absorbing as Gospel Truth all suddenly started collapsing in rapid free-fall style. After the meeting, I learned more in a few months than I had in years spent following the coat tails of the positioned "controlled demolition" experts. After examining more WTC pictures and those of controlled demolitions of other buildings, one thing became clear as the blue skies that September, 2001 morning: New York's majestic skyscrapers clearly did not merely explode a la controlled demolition, but rather, were somehow otherwise pulverized into a voluminous quantity of fine dust powder... quite unlike any known conventional demolition event that preceded it. It soon became apparent that whoever was being attacked most "energetically" for the crime of possessing views other than 9-11 "group think" were the very researchers worth listening to. " [...] "Getting to this place of waking up and smelling the stench of controlled opposition was not easy. It is difficult when we not only have to face head on the horrors of the perpetrators, but, too, the deceit of many in the opposition groups who posed as friends. Developing bonds with these characters can be painful when the truth behind their real mission eventually comes out. There are indeed a few such charlatans I let into my world, only to learn afterwards their concern about me was anything but benign. Luckily, my antennae that tracks phonies finally sounded when two such "pals" were reluctant to share details about their families and lives, as friends typically do. And when one of them actually asked me outright for a written list of all my projects (so he could "get to know me better") my inner alarm started to sound. These betrayals were perhaps even more difficult to bear than learning that the POTUS and his shadowy backers had carried out the whole deal in order to manufacture justification ad garner support from Americans for the illegal invasion, destruction, radioactive poisoning, and theft of resources - and poppy income in the Middle East. Admittedly, this inner work is not easy. Discovery of such horror is likely to put even the most chipper spirits in a mighty dark state of funk. And what was nearly impossible to come to terms with was trying to figure out what kind of monsters would commit the mass murder of thousands of their very own? And then I remembered my college courses in psychopathology." http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publis...le_61147.shtml *SDI was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983.1 It is thought that SDI may have been first dubbed "Star Wars" by opponent Dr. Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun. However, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article published March 24, 1983, the day after the Star Wars speech, which quoted Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy describing the proposal as "reckless Star Wars schemes." Before it was named the "Star Wars Program (SDI) in 1983, it was the Advanced Space Programs Development initially headed by USAF Lieutenant Colonel Robert M. Bowman, Ph.D. who is one of the disinformation agents actively covering-up how the World Trade Center Complex was "dustified". "The way the buildings fell was a classic controlled demolition he pointed out." - Dr. Robert M. Bowman March, 2008 http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=585521 "...All would, if they worked, be more effective as part of a first strike than against one." - Dr. Robert M. Bowman December 1983 comment about space based weapons. (And three decades later does the "dustification" of the World Trade Center complex prove him correct? Fox - Hen House? Who's got the tar?) http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...elopment&hl=en |
|
|
|
|
|
13-02-2012, 10:48 PM
|
#900 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
|
Nano Termites
NANO TERMITES  Your posse better keep up with the latest disinformation. It wasn’t super-duper-mini-micro-nano-thermite that “dustified” the World Trade Center complex. It was nano-termites. The WTC towers were infested with them. That’s why the only buildings to suffer such utter destruction had a WTC prefix. Buildings that were just across the street such as the U.S. Post Office and Verizon were protected with regular extermination. Larry Silverstein cancelled the Terminix contract when he took over ownership. This is why the foundation that kept out the Hudson River water (the bathtub) wasn’t damaged by the crashing of two 500,000 ton quarter mile high buildings upon it. If the nano-termites hadn’t consumed the buildings in mid-air the foundation would have been severely damaged and the 7 lower basement levels would have flooded as well as the New York City subway system that was connected to it. EVIDENCE OF NANO TERMITES "DUSTIFING" STEEL  |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
