Were the Towers built to be destroyed?

camreeno · 04-10-2010, 07:52 AM

Sorry, you can't cram enough into the title. Were the Twin Towers built and designed from the start to eventually destroy them? I've been thinking about this for so long I don't know where to begin. Let me lay out a few points.

the Twin Towers were built at the heart of the New York financial district, which if the world's most famous financial area (as well as being close to the UN headquarters)
the Towers were the tallest buildings in the world at the time of completion
the Towers have a uniform grey design with very little details when seen from a distance
if something happened to crash into buildings of such a design it would be readily noticeable, compared to shorter buildings with lots of ornamentation and darker colors
the fact that there are TWO of the tallest buildings in the world, it allows a would-be false flag terrorist attack to be captured on video from all possible angles after the first plane hit - thus creating maximum terror created from the great anticipation of the second building being hit
the fact that the World Trade Center complex ended up having little to do with World Trade, making me think that was just a name tacked on to cover it's planned use
since World Trade Center 7 has so many FBI, CIA, and other offices linked with he Federal Government, with the building being a secretive mystery all in itself, doesn't it make sense that at least since 1987 (when it was built) that the building was used to plan and orchestrate the coming false flag?
no other building complex in the country has such a setup with a secretive Federal building nearby

So with all these points considered, does it start to make sense that they were originally designed to be used for a future false flag attack?

What are your thoughts?

betweentwoislands · 04-10-2010, 07:57 AM

In other words, would they plan 50 years in advance?

Probably.

ultima1 · 04-10-2010, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betweentwoislands

In other words, would they plan 50 years in advance?

Probably.

NO, i do not think they were planned to be brought down. But the documented evidnece that there was no fire fighting operation and that firemen were out of the building before the call to Silverstein states that the fire commander could have only been talking about the building when he stated PULL IT.

armoured_amazon · 04-10-2010, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betweentwoislands

In other words, would they plan 50 years in advance?

Probably.

+1

Ritual is very important to them.

camreeno · 06-10-2010, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betweentwoislands

In other words, would they plan 50 years in advance?

Probably.

50 years? It was just 30 years since their completion when they were destroyed (the Towers specifically). Unless they took 20 years to design them, which seems doubtful, making 50 years since the blueprints to the destruction.

unlockthepower · 06-10-2010, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by armoured_amazon

+1

Ritual is very important to them.

Yes. 2 towers, 2 pillars. Dome and Pyramid nearby. Semeramis (Statue of liberty) looking on etc etc

pound · 06-10-2010, 12:26 AM

Judging from the overwhelming amount of predictive programming depicted in many films going back to the late 70's concerning the destruction of the WTC and the recurrence of the dates and numbers 911..2001 etc..I'd say yes it was totally planned. I'm convinced it was rigged with explosives from day one if not soon after it's completion. David Rockefeller (the so called 'King maker') was behind the initial planning for the WTC complex, so right away things stink.

ellis_deatrip · 06-10-2010, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camreeno

..... Unless they took 20 years to design them, which seems doubtful, making 50 years since the blueprints to the destruction.

You have heard of the Boule branch of Freemasonry, right?
Jay-Z's Album ,"The Blueprint 1" was released on Tuesday, Sept. 11,2001.

C'mon.Forbes? with Warren Buffet, ffs!
seriously, Look at who came up, Look at every single person or party that has since gained from 9-11.

camreeno · 07-10-2010, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ellis_deatrip

You have heard of the Boule branch of Freemasonry, right?
Jay-Z's Album ,"The Blueprint 1" was released on Tuesday, Sept. 11,2001.

C'mon.Forbes? with Warren Buffet, ffs!
seriously, Look at who came up, Look at every single person or party that has since gained from 9-11.

I don't get what Jay Z has to do with my question, but I guess that's interesting. What's also a coincidence (or not) is how on September 11, 1973, the US assassinated Chilaen president Salvador Allende and put in Pinochet.

04-10-2010, 07:52 AM	#1
camreeno Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: California Posts: 3,144	Were the Towers built to be destroyed? Sorry, you can't cram enough into the title. Were the Twin Towers built and designed from the start to eventually destroy them? I've been thinking about this for so long I don't know where to begin. Let me lay out a few points. the Twin Towers were built at the heart of the New York financial district, which if the world's most famous financial area (as well as being close to the UN headquarters) the Towers were the tallest buildings in the world at the time of completion the Towers have a uniform grey design with very little details when seen from a distance if something happened to crash into buildings of such a design it would be readily noticeable, compared to shorter buildings with lots of ornamentation and darker colors the fact that there are TWO of the tallest buildings in the world, it allows a would-be false flag terrorist attack to be captured on video from all possible angles after the first plane hit - thus creating maximum terror created from the great anticipation of the second building being hit the fact that the World Trade Center complex ended up having little to do with World Trade, making me think that was just a name tacked on to cover it's planned use since World Trade Center 7 has so many FBI, CIA, and other offices linked with he Federal Government, with the building being a secretive mystery all in itself, doesn't it make sense that at least since 1987 (when it was built) that the building was used to plan and orchestrate the coming false flag? no other building complex in the country has such a setup with a secretive Federal building nearby So with all these points considered, does it start to make sense that they were originally designed to be used for a future false flag attack? What are your thoughts? Last edited by camreeno; 04-10-2010 at 07:52 AM.

06-10-2010, 12:26 AM	#7
pound Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: USA Posts: 5,638	Judging from the overwhelming amount of predictive programming depicted in many films going back to the late 70's concerning the destruction of the WTC and the recurrence of the dates and numbers 911..2001 etc..I'd say yes it was totally planned. I'm convinced it was rigged with explosives from day one if not soon after it's completion. David Rockefeller (the so called 'King maker') was behind the initial planning for the WTC complex, so right away things stink. __________________ "Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes." -- Carl Jung "The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" -- George Simmel "Show me a true patriot, and I will show you a lover not merely of his own country, but of all mankind." -- Andrew Fletcher, 1707 Last edited by pound; 06-10-2010 at 12:34 AM.

04-10-2010, 07:57 AM	#2
betweentwoislands Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Ontario Posts: 551	In other words, would they plan 50 years in advance? Probably.