Michael Tsarion - Age of Manipulation, 70 parts!

[wwu777]

Have any of you seen Michael Tsarion's new 70 part lecture "Age of Manipulation"? It's very long and takes a while to go through, and it's fascinating and mind blowing.

But at some point, he seems to go overboard in finding Illuminati/Occult symbols everywhere, even implying that people who wear necklaces with pendants on them are wearing Illuminati symbols are are members of the Illuminati.

Not sure if he was claiming that or not, but he sure finds occult symbols on everything. He could probably find them on every single item in the supermarket. lol

I'm not sure if he's claiming that everyone in the entertainment industry is part of the Illuminati or not, but often it sounds like he is saying that. Hard to say.

Here is part 1 of 70 if you want to see it:

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

[lavista4u]

Im at 45 part now...its spectacular...some of the parts are his one of the best research ever....im still looking for a complete part on one file...if you have that...please post...cos for 70 parts it takes a very long time thanks

[wwu777]

Originally Posted by lavista4u

Im at 45 part now...its spectacular...some of the parts are his one of the best research ever....im still looking for a complete part on one file...if you have that...please post...cos for 70 parts it takes a very long time thanks

Which part are you looking for? You mean one is missing? Which one? Just enter it in the search box to try to find it.

Do you think he goes overboard with all the symbolism, which he finds everywhere?

[twilighterheart]

There is a lot of things about himself he will never reveal for personal reasons, but they would make for a good storyline.

[disorder2k8]

Torrents are a good source of info

http://www.torrentz.com/search?q=michael+tsarion

[wakeuptime]

Thanks, I'll mark this to watch later.

[rodin]

Originally Posted by twilighterheart

There is a lot of things about himself he will never reveal for personal reasons, but they would make for a good storyline.

Tell us then. I don't trust him @ all

[thedefender]

I still haven't watched every vid from the Irish Origins of Civilization. Oh boy.....

Nice biker jacket Michael...I remember hearing his reference Kreator in an interview...guess he like metal.

Thanks for posting!

[scaltura]

Originally Posted by twilighterheart

there is a lot of things about himself he will never reveal for personal reasons, but they would make for a good storyline.:d

please elaborate

[scaltura]

Originally Posted by rodin

tell us then. I don't trust him @ all

hey rodin , what is it that you don't trust ?

[filterfunker]

this series is great! thanks for posting

[thedefender]

Tsarion has done his homework. He discusses a wide arrange of topics and ties it all into one comprehensive piece. However...the pieces are nearly 70 parts or 700 minutes long. Still worth a view IMO. Why watch the junk on your regular TV set when you can check this out. Atleast you know you won't be given trash to perceive as real like the MSM wold have you believe.

[twilighterheart]

Originally Posted by thedefender

Tsarion has done his homework. He discusses a wide arrange of topics and ties it all into one comprehensive piece. However...the pieces are nearly 70 parts or 700 minutes long. Still worth a view IMO. Why watch the junk on your regular TV set when you can check this out. Atleast you know you won't be given trash to perceive as real like the MSM wold have you believe.

He does get somethings wrong about the Medes and their priest. I wish he would stick to 'one' subject and go deeply into it, instead of just jumping around so much like he did.

I enjoy his personal opinions and the psychology aspect to his work. At least he gives credit, due where it belongs too.

[luciferhorus]

Originally Posted by twilighterheart

He does get somethings wrong about the Medes and their priest. I wish he would stick to 'one' subject and go deeply into it, instead of just jumping around so much like he did.

I enjoy his personal opinions and the psychology aspect to his work. At least he gives credit, due where it belongs too.

I greatly admire Michael Tsarion. I think I have listened to "all" of his video lectures at some time or other, and I have read the entirety of one of his books which is stored somewhere on my PC and rather "lost" at the moment.

It is entirely healthy to subject such individuals to criticism over minor points, and with Tsarion and Icke especially over epistemology (which asks the question of how they can know for certain what they claim is true).

I think that that Icke, Tsarion and Sitchin all make claims that certain events occurred in ancient history, where they should say "this may have happened" but they rather say "this did happen," when there is no certainty; they both all guilty of epistemic fallacies, but if they merely changed their language, it would be more acceptable; I have often been guilty of this myself and have had to concede points to other historians in debate and amend my language.

If a scholar, journalist or researcher writes a "Great Work" it is perfectly fair to criticise passages from that work and to avoid personality cultism and the suspension of critical thinking; however it does not follow that such criticisms amount to a general attack on the basic thesis (idea) of the writer.

Perhaps the great intellectual advantage that Tsarion has over David Icke is that Tsarion does actually debate and discuss his writings on his discussion board and presents himself as open to such criticisms, and responds to them; this is quite healthy philosophically and intellectually. David on the other hand seems to be rather distant from his critics and generally just dismisses them.

On this forum one can discuss the works of David Icke, but David is not here to defend himself and to engage others in debate and discussion. Indeed in a recent TV interview he seemed to be rather negative about those who constantly debate and discuss such issues on the Interent. Michael Tsarion on the other hand seems to be constantly on his discussion board on http://michaeltsarion.com/mtsarforum/viewforum.php?f=2 which is the Michael Tsarion equivalent of what this board represents to those who either admire or despise David Icke.

I have to place myself in the category of one who has a great deal of respect for David and who agrees with much of what he writes, but I am unable to suspend critical thinking and simply agree with "everything" he writes, some of which is just too bizarre for me. That there is a global conspiracy by malevolent Capitalists and religious cultists to create an International Capitalist Dictatorship and to enslave humanity is a perspective I presuppose, but the Moon being a spacecraft and Masons shape shifting into reptiles is a bridge too far for me.

Addendum

Actually I have not really been on Tsarion's forum on http://michaeltsarion.com/mtsarforum/viewforum.php?f=2 for a while, but I just looked at it and it seems that Michael is the only person posting there now. Shame really. It was once a discussion forum, but it seems to be no longer the case.

Lux

[wwu777]

Michael Tsarion's forum isn't just empty with his own posts. But there's no way to register on it too. There is no registration link. What happened? Did he get sick of people posting on it? If so, what is the point of a forum if people can't register then?

[triad]

Heh... the non-forum by Tsarion is just great.

RODIN, I'd like to be 'enlightened' about your perception on Tsarion.

[decim]

Michael the Tsar of Sion seems like a propaganda mill for 'isrealism'..

Anyone have any info on his views toward the zionist state?

[triad]

'Michael the Tsar of Sion' is a nice pun, really. Well' he doesn't talk about Zionism directly. He just put Nethaniahu and Kissinger into the same cauldron of thre other members of the global Cabal.

He does chatted about the Bauers/Rothschilds. But I think he just avoided a direct J'Accuse because his studies go to other fields of knowledge from politics.

I really enjoyed what I read from this occult heavy-metal fan, Tsarion, so-far.

[decim]

If you have ever done 'Hash club' running where two Hares set a trail for the pack to follow usually the day before the run, every now and then as you follow their trail, indicated by toilet paper tied to bushes, trees etc there will be a chalked 'C' indicating a checkpoint & two or more possible paths; the pack then explore the various routes; Only one will be the correct route, the others, so far along will be marked with a chalked 'T' indicating a false trail, once the correct route is ascertained there will be shouts of 'On On' & the pack will continue..

Mr Star orion is definitely a 'C'..

Do you know his real name?

Originally Posted by triad

'Michael the Tsar of Sion' is a nice pun, really. Well' he doesn't talk about Zionism directly. He just put Nethaniahu and Kissinger into the same cauldron of thre other members of the global Cabal.

He does chatted about the Bauers/Rothschilds. But I think he just avoided a direct J'Accuse because his studies go to other fields of knowledge from politics.

I really enjoyed what I read from this occult heavy-metal fan, Tsarion, so-far.

[triad]

No.