Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Health / Nutrition / Diet / Alternative Therapies / Healing
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25-09-2007, 10:26 AM   #1
notaslave
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: in a tree near you.
Posts: 666
Default thyroid cancer

Quote:
Radiation Exposure Is Only Known Cause For Thyroid Cancer
Quote:

posted by jody brackman on 11 Sept 2006 at 6:52 pm Having survived a very agressive variant of papillary thyroid cancer ( tall cell ) that had invaded my trachea, and caused me to have a total thyroidectomy, tracheal resection, internal RAI in a large dose, and 6 weeks of external beam radiation to my whole neck and mediastinum by IMRT, I have become quite eductated in this area. First of all, there are thousands of us who probably got our cancer as children when the US govt and its contractors conducted above ground nuclear testing which got into the high atmosphere, and traveled the globe with prevailing winds. There are numerous well researched articles that show where radioactive debris fell ALL OVER the US and there are NIH charts that show numbers of rads various people were exposed to from fallout, as well as from drinking milk in the 50s and early 60s that was produced in areas that had lots of fallout on the grass the cows ate, who produced the milk we drank.

There is also a Radiation Esposure Compensation Act which compensates victims of certain cancers, Thyroid being the most definitely related, and that Act of congress started just in Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico, first with Miners, then nearby victims, and has been continually amended to include victims further away. The science seems to indicate that the thyroids of folks born between 51 and 63 were more likely to take up dangerous doses of I-131 due to our young age at the time, and the fact that we were all exhorted to drink milk. ( which I always hated!).

The younger group of new diagnoses seems exactly on target with the Chernobyl disaster which put even more radiation into the atmosphere, in Belarus, In UK, in US.

When i was diagnosed at MSKCC in NYC, in 2002, there was a link to the NIH study showing numbers of rads per American depending on date of birth, state and county of residence, etc. That site was quickly removed, and no one seems to remember it was there. I did see it however, due to the lucky conincidence that I was diagnosed in 12/02 when it was a link to the hospital site.

I have also read numbers of books previously printed on the subject, some of which show exactly how many tests were conducted (100s) and where the path of the fallout went. I , for instance, was in the direct path of fallout at least 10 times during my childhood. But i also got sick ( not diagnosed for 18 years) twoo weeks after Chernobyl. No one could figure out what was wrong, but i freaked out one day, and the doctor checked my thyroid, first thing, found no evidence of abnormal TSH, and let it go at that. 18 years later, so far advanced that i lost a vocal cord, 1/2" of my windpipe, and suffered serious and permanent damage to my neck from radiation. But I am alive, and hopefully healthy. There is so much info out there that everyone ignores. Especially the govt. I spoke to a lawyer who got the US govt off on tort claims act for these tests that made so many of us sick, but there are still theories that may be viable--the coontractor's knew that the extent of the explosions would go high enuf to damage all americans alive at that time when they set them off.

By the way, I am not a nut. Just a lawyer who can't give up the ghost. Someday I will figure out a way to prove that I, as well as thousands of others should, at the very least, be included in that RECA compensation fund for getting ill as a result of above ground nuclear testing. or from Russia's negligence in letting Chrernoble blow sky high.

There will be more and more of this in the years to come. Its becoming an epidemic. My onco nurse said its the fastest rising new diagnosis in women. More than breast cancer. It isn't just the ability to detect with ultrasound, it's the fact that we are all coming of age to show these tumors that have beeen percolating for 18 or 45 years.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/your...pinionid=11469
notaslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-09-2007, 10:32 AM   #2
notaslave
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: in a tree near you.
Posts: 666
Default

Table B
Radiation-Induced Cases of Hypo-Thyroidism:
Risks per Individual and per Million People.
Col. A Col. B Col. C Col.D
Full 14 years Later: Risk of
Radiation Dose Cumulative Cases of Percent of Radiation-Induced
to Thyroid Radiation-Induced Exposed with Hypo-Thyroidism
from Iodine-131 Hypo-Thyroidism per with Hypo for an
(rems) Million Exposed Thyroidism Exposed Individual

10 616 0.06% 1 chance in 1623
25 1540 0.15% 1 chance in 649
50 3080 0.31% 1 chance in 325
75 4620 0.46% 1 chance in 216
100 6160 0.62% 1 chance in 162
200 12320 1.23% 1 chance in 81
300 18480 1.85% 1 chance in 54
400 24640 2.46% 1 chance in 41
500 30800 3.08% 1 chance in 32
600 36960 3.70% 1 chance in 27
700 43120 4.31% 1 chance in 23
800 49280 4.93% 1 chance in 20
900 55400 5.54% 1 chance in 18
1000 61600 6.16% 1 chance in 16
2000 123200 12.32% 1 chance in 8
3000 184800 18.48% 1 chance in 5
Table B uses the value from Maxon 1977 of 4.4 cases per million exposed, per rem, per year of follow-up (see our text). Column B is (Col.A) x (4.4) x (14), because we are arbitrarily showing a 14-year follow-up period. Readers can also adapt Col. B for fewer years. We do not know if new cases stop appearing after 14 years, or what the appropriate value would be per year after 14 years.
Note: hypo-thyroidism can develop so gradually that it often goes unrecognized for years after it is truly present.

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR...ern.html#Part3
notaslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-09-2007, 11:01 AM   #3
gorgeousbutterfly
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 811
Default

OH NO. my mom passed away from thyroid cancer . I really have to take care of myself.
gorgeousbutterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-09-2007, 11:41 AM   #4
notaslave
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: in a tree near you.
Posts: 666
Default

I'm sorry to hear that. I am sure you will be fine though.

Do you know if prior to your mother being diagnosed she suffered any sensitivity to iodine or had allergies to seafood perhaps? I ask because the person I know with underactive thyroid was previously sensitive to iodine.

Last edited by notaslave; 25-09-2007 at 11:49 AM.
notaslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-09-2007, 07:27 AM   #5
gorgeousbutterfly
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 811
Default

yes i think she has an issue with iodine. and the problem was that she ate alot of seafood, as i do. maybe i need to get it checked out.
gorgeousbutterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-09-2007, 04:44 PM   #6
notaslave
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: in a tree near you.
Posts: 666
Default

You get weight gain, feel tired all the time and stuff like that. But any sudden weight gain or loss should always be checked out.
notaslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 AM.