Witch hunts - What is really the cause?

[exu156]

Originally Posted by bendoon

Loool, your double standards never cease to amaze me, you are a gold star hypocrite.



Caught with pants down again.




When we say so and so is not a Christian just because they claim to be, you are adamant they are because it suits your agenda.

But when so and so says they are a Freemason you say they aren't even though they say they are.

Hypocrite of the ultimate order.

hahahahaha next you'll be defending our intrepid explorer Pirate.

But really you should try a little harder when you call someone a hypocrite. A reminder from the thread on Hitler being a Christian. My thoughts concerning Hitler:

Originally Posted by exu156

He was indeed an amazing magician (albeit a depraved and disgusting one). But a magician can belong to any faith, even Christianity:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26972493.../#.T87PxVKHNxg

and although you may not agree with his brand of Christianity that makes him no less a Christian (just like the billions of Catholics you claim are not Christian).

I can give you a personal example. I have never liked Blavatsky and I have always thought Theosophy was a typical 19th century babble and sham. But Blavatsky was an occultists just as Crowley was an occultist. I would not claim she was not an occultist just because I don't like the woman. I may not agree with the woman but she was what she was.

So when people really are what they claim to be I have no problem stating it as is. When they are not I equally don't have a problem stating it's nonsense.

Good luck with your efforts but next time do try a little harder.

[bendoon]

wriggle wriggle

[exu156]

Originally Posted by bendoon

Loool, your double standards never cease to amaze me, you are a gold star hypocrite.



Caught with pants down again.




When we say so and so is not a Christian just because they claim to be, you are adamant they are because it suits your agenda.

But when so and so says they are a Freemason you say they aren't even though they say they are.

Hypocrite of the ultimate order.

Furthermore in future, when you try to insult people do try to at least quote the post in context. Here is the original post:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...&postcount=141

I was responding to a post by Pirate which makes blanket claims against someone he met (yet again). There is nothing in that post which shows even a fragmentary inkling of what Masonry is and regarding his 'Mason mentor' we are forced to take the word of someone who is a blatant fantasist. Who is this 'Mason mentor'? Does this Mason mentor' even exist? Can you prove this 'Mason mentor' exists? What Masonic credentials does this 'Mason mentor' have? Can we see those credentials? No! Instead we have to take the word of a fantasist as true.

Good luck with your attempt at supporting the claims of fantasists. Considering your previous posts on this forum I can't say it exactly surprises me.

[bendoon]

You said

Originally Posted by exu156

Just because someone CLAIMS to be something, doesn't make it so! I can claim to be Italian - but I'm not. I can claim to be a Doctor of Engineering - but I'm not.

But if I said the Pope wasn't a Christian just because he says he is you would be adamant that he is, because you have an agenda, I repeat, you are a hypocrite of the first degree.

You set rules that suit your own thinking but disallow other people to use those same rules.

Furthermore in future, when you try to insult people do try to at least quote the post in context. Here is the original post:

Not trying to insult you, just pointing out your dubious debating techniques, its not the first time I have caught you out either.

[exu156]

Originally Posted by bendoon

You said



But if I said the Pope wasn't a Christian just because he says he is you would be adamant that he is, because you have an agenda, I repeat, you are a hypocrite of the first degree.

You set rules that suit your own thinking but disallow other people to use those same rules.

Bullshit! Because you see when we are talking about the Pope then we are talking about a real person. This is a person who any of us can check. You might not agree he is a Christian because he does not conform to your idea of what Christianity is. That's fine. I think he is a Christian (just as a I think Blavatsky is an occultists even though I don't like the woman) and the roughly 2 billion plus Catholics would agree with this. He is not your type of Christian but that does not make him any less a Christian. Blavatsky is not my type of occultists but that does not make her any less an occultist.

Originally Posted by bendoon

Not trying to insult you, just pointing out your dubious debating techniques, its not the first time I have caught you out either.

I have never claimed to be perfect, I certainly have and will make mistakes. Sometimes I am right and sometimes I am wrong. That's the peril of being human. But I certainly will not make up personal fantastic stories to push an agenda. I certainly will not post stories that I have met this person or that person and therefore I know (from personal experience) more than you do. You think I have dubious debating techniques but I have never seen you voice any criticism regarding our intrepid explorer Pirate and his debating technique (you know the disgusting allegations against people he has never met, the name calling and all the other nonsense that makes this poster so entertaining). What was that about being a hypocrite? Can I then ask you to answer honestly if you believe the stories Pirate tells on this forum?

You claim to have caught me out in the past, can you show me an example? I am very curious.