|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,968
|
The inside escaped with only light damage. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...76_964x663.jpg Last edited by wispy; 22-07-2012 at 11:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 666
|
So is it not directly comparable to WTC7?
__________________
And one by one, the dissenting voices are silenced. Submission or suppression. Censorship is alive and well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
|
As in, it wasn't a random fire that caused a symmetrical collapse...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
|
Are there any examples of fires that did cause collapses...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,737
|
Some people seem to think that practicing good science involves proving that a phenomenon has no precedent, is impossible to replicate, and is unrelated to all other phenomena.
__________________
'The use of "professional actors" to depict victims is especially telling, given that many Americans believe the government has used professional actors in events like Sandy Hook and the Boston marathon.' - David Icke |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,968
|
So what is not 'good science' about assessing the difference in charactestics between the fires and structures involved at the Polat and those in 911?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|