'Truth Tellers Deserve an Apology' - Page 6

bryan · 31-08-2012, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by throatyogurt

Yes, he has some that are his core members. I should have placed quotations are the word real since I would not get in a plane with Balsamo at the controls. - or if any pilots that agree with his math.

Make sure you stay away from buildings designed by Richard Gage or all the other architects who agrees with him that a steel framed building can't totally collapse at freefall just because the sprinkler system fails.

throatyogurt · 31-08-2012, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave52

One of the stills that the Pentagon released.

Okay... and someone, by looking at that incredibly grainy picture determined that the plane was supposed to follow that black line?

Wow that is some serious investigative journalism right there!

throatyogurt · 31-08-2012, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bryan

Make sure you stay away from buildings designed by Richard Gage or all the other architects who agrees with him that a steel framed building can't totally collapse at freefall just because the sprinkler system fails.

Thank you for the tip... And Bryan...if you are ever in a building that was hit by a plane or hit by a collapsing skyscraper...and they are on fire... without an operational sprinkler system, please go about your daily routine. You'll have nothing to fear.

My Question to Truthers: Why is it required to install fireproofing on steel?

dave52 · 31-08-2012, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by throatyogurt

Okay... and someone, by looking at that incredibly grainy picture determined that the plane was supposed to follow that black line?

Here are the two pieces of CCTV released from the Pentagon. This one was first, you can see what may be a trail of smoke at 0:25, it is coming in straight and (impossibly) low.

Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 2 of 2 - YouTube

Here is the second clip released a lot later (2006). At the 1:27 mark you can clearly see something entering the picture from the right. It could be the nose of an aircraft. This projectile enters at an angle and would be expected to impact the lawn before hitting the building.

Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 1 of 2 - YouTube

!

Both clips are supposed to be showing the same event.

Quote:

Originally Posted by throatyogurt

My Question to Truthers: Why is it required to install fireproofing on steel?

Wrong question. You should be asking why impact / debris damage and random fires can bring down buildings symmetrically.

bully2100 · 06-09-2012, 11:00 AM

interesting debate re: planes,pilots, wtc 1/2 and the pentagon but imo THE most basic evidence for this false flag is WTC7. Not hit by anything, had fire in the building, fell at free fall speed @ 5.20pm 9/11 after firemen, and Larry both said it was gonna come down or be pulled. if thats not enuff evidence then how about the BBC reporting that it has also collapsed whilst the building can be seen in the background of the reporter, im sorry but if that alone isnt enuff, then noone can help you.

06-09-2012, 11:00 AM	#105
bully2100 Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 414	interesting debate re: planes,pilots, wtc 1/2 and the pentagon but imo THE most basic evidence for this false flag is WTC7. Not hit by anything, had fire in the building, fell at free fall speed @ 5.20pm 9/11 after firemen, and Larry both said it was gonna come down or be pulled. if thats not enuff evidence then how about the BBC reporting that it has also collapsed whilst the building can be seen in the background of the reporter, im sorry but if that alone isnt enuff, then noone can help you.