Qualified in LAW ?

[aulus agerius]

Originally Posted by reverendjim

no...i got it alright...just another bunch with another theory. otherwise they would be social contract factualists which they are not. they have a theory and thats it. and yes...i find it rather boring compared to things much more entertaining. their theories suck. i find it interesting though when some people blindly except a theory based on phylosophy as fact. now that is interesting...

the real world is plenty interesting...someone's fastasies about why its that way...well i'm not interested in their fantasies.

Do you really not see a difference between a theory which attempts to explain why know facts are true and a theory which claims that known facts are true?