Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > General
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2009, 12:44 AM   #21
thaumaturge
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Default

Who thinks the Bilderberg group doesn't exist????? It's been discussed in the House of Commons and the European Parliament. The following people have admitted attending on public record:
Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Ken Clarke, Ed Balls, George Osborne, Dennis Healey, George Robertson.
__________________
Disinformation Agent
thaumaturge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 12:48 AM   #22
celtic isis
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327
Default

An extract here of the transcript, it makes interesting reading even if i do say so myself lol

Quote:
Z: Question « conspirationist » conspiracy question.

D: Ah! « Conspirationist! » Well that’s part of..

Z: Le Trilateral…(Trilateral Commission)

D: Yes the Trilateral…

Z: Le Bilderberg…

D: Yes le Bilderberg…(laughing) I don’t know if 10 percent of people know about it but I will tell you what it is.

Z: Ah well on internet everyone knows what it is.

D: Yes, well that is part of the fantasies of the extreme left…

Z: And even « Skull and Bones » for you, do you know what that is?

D: Eh what? That I don’t know about.

Z: Skull and Bones, you don’t know? You pretend not to know.

D: No but, it's never too late to learn new things, I’d be happy to learn about it after...

Z: Go ahead (in explaining the reason for Bilderberg).

D: They (Bilderberg) are conferences, international, in which we talk, about the big problems in the world, volią, there you go. It’s true that I participated…

Z: Between people of what « kind of company » ?

D: Between people, who eventually (in the end) have something to say on the subjects treated. So I went, to Canada, at (that's true)…

What did we talk about, we talked about the War in Iraq, with the people, who come from all over the world….(200 « people » made up of the world elite, Royals, monarchy, politicians, world bankers the lot) about what are the solutions…What other subjects, we talked about the problems of the « proche orient » the Middle East countries… We talked about the conflicts « dans les banlieues » (which means the conflicts in rough housing suburbs in France, as if this local subject applies to the Bilderberg meeting!).

We talked about a certain number of problems « monnaietaire » currency/financial problems…we talked about the entry of Turkey into the European Union…There you go, they are conferences, the debates, that are organised with people who are selected, pardon for the pretention, at least on some of the subjects treated, not on all, but that they are people who are meant to have certain special knowledge and experience…so it’s this the the big « complot » international plot, who come together in those places, those conferences.

Z: And that is democratic for you you think, to do that?

D: Why?

Z: For these people to manage or control or who are in positions of great control in different domaines such as politics, finance, banking to come together like that and lead and direct…

D: They don’t lead or direct nothing at all, they don’t direct anything at all.

Z: Don’t listen to the feelings of the people like us, the ordinary people, the « pleb » people…we’re not included.

D: No now wait! You are in the middle of making a big debate on the freedom of expression and you are looking to prevent « these people » from coming together in privacy to talk about the problems of the world? We are in a crazy house here aren‘t we!

« « « bastard, turning his own subject around against Zero himself and in Devedjian‘s favour! » » »

Z: It (freedom of expression) depends, it depends on what people, and why they unite/ come together.

D: They come together to talk. To listen to the contradictory views, contradictory, on the problems of the world.

Z: Bizarrely « as it is about world problems affecting us » though it’s not filmed, it’s not talked about in the media…

D: No, It’s because…

Z: Why is it so secret?

D: No, it’s not secret, they want for there to be a true freedom of expression, and that people therefore, even if they hold positions of responsibility very important, that they want to be able to say/discuss freely what they think…

Z: But between them.

D: No, able to freely say what they think without giving a rise for exploitation, a « characature » of the person, « public perception of the leader if he or she were to say certain things » that stops them from speaking freely (truthfully more like).

In Bilderberg they tell the truth, they lie the rest of the time.

Z: And that serves for what, behind this « work » it gives what « to be able to speak in total privacy »?

D: Nothing.

Z: You talk and it serves for what, are there decisions that are taken?

D: No, none. None «acune » .

Z: We mustn’t see the trace of the hidden hand, it‘s there to be seen.

D: It’s for everyone to form their opinion, voilą, that’s it. That’s absolutely it.

Z: It’s a club of friends simply.

D: They are the people, who talk and who exchange their experience, that’s all, I mean you can’t make that forbidden can you, in your ideal society?

Z: My society of « spectacle » (show) is that what you want to say?

D: Ah it’s that, your ideal society?

Z: Yes.

D: It’s only the « spectacle », it’s only the show for you?

Z: It's the one we live in (the society spectacle).

D: Well, fortunately there are other things as well, not just the « spectacle », but it’s important the « spectacle » …

Z: Don’t crush the spectacle. You live by it. You live by it.

D: Oh no I don’t knock it, I like the spectacle, I go to the shows, I love the opera so…for the show there isn’t better. (dumbing the question down).

Z: You’re the one who makes the show also. And that’s it.

D: Well, modestly. But I think…

Z: …With real talent certainly (you make the show).

D: But I think there is time for the spectacle, and there’s time for reflecting…There’s time for everything…

Z: With your friends in Bilderberg. And the Trilateral as well, is that the same?

D: Well it’s exactly the same thing.

Z: Ah it’s the same! Well tell me you’re part of many clubs then?

D: Well (stuttering!!!!!!) it’s not that I participated, that I’m not a member of enough clubs, I was invited and I went with pleasure and I learned a lot.

« End of clip »
Imagine if Tony Blair had of done an interview like this, it would never happen, British tv would never get a journalist asking confronting someone like Devedjian so cheekily.

French tv is the koolest. such a shame the people won't revolt lol they don't care, too busy caring about their own backyard.

Last edited by celtic isis; 05-05-2009 at 12:49 AM.
celtic isis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 12:49 AM   #23
celtic isis
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaumaturge View Post
Who thinks the Bilderberg group doesn't exist????? It's been discussed in the House of Commons and the European Parliament. The following people have admitted attending on public record:
Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Ken Clarke, Ed Balls, George Osborne, Dennis Healey, George Robertson.
um pretty much everyone i have come into contact with has never even heard of it.

i'm sorry to inform you lol

but in my experience, no one knows about it.
celtic isis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 12:58 AM   #24
thaumaturge
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Default

Ah, it's certainly true that most people haven't heard of it. I would be surprised if someone had heard of Bilderberg but then claimed it didn't actually exist.
__________________
Disinformation Agent
thaumaturge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 01:00 AM   #25
hawk
Senior Member
 
hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In Hell, where else?
Posts: 1,639
Default

Too bad we can't find out what building they're going to be meeting in,then bomb the building just like the did the Twin Towers. Its the least they deserve.
hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 01:02 AM   #26
celtic isis
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaumaturge View Post
Ah, it's certainly true that most people haven't heard of it. I would be surprised if someone had heard of Bilderberg but then claimed it didn't actually exist.
haha oh yeah now i see what you meant!

actually they still deny it, i mean, they can hear about it from me, and then deny it after even though i have in the past emailed "news" items on Bilderberg...they can still label it a "paranoid conspiracy theory" and that's it.

that's what i mean about our furry friends, they will always have the excuse!
celtic isis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 01:08 AM   #27
thaumaturge
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Default

Well, most of what is written about Bilderberg is sensationalist. However, I think everyone would agree that it's a 'privately organised international gathering' as Margaret thatcher says here in response to a question in the House of Commons:
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/w...9860501_CWA_71

Hard to doubt the existence of Bilderberg if the British Prime Minister says she went to a meeting.
__________________
Disinformation Agent

Last edited by thaumaturge; 05-05-2009 at 01:09 AM.
thaumaturge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 09:16 AM   #28
sukyspook
Senior Member
 
sukyspook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,795
Default

I'll call Ken Clarke's office again like I did last year - I pretended I wanted to make an appointment to see him then asked if he was going to Chantilly....the woman on the end of the phone spluttered a bit then said I "obviously knew he was going so why bother to ask"!!

I told her I just wanted to let her know that WE KNOW what they're up to - then preceeded to ask her if she knew what Bilderberg really was....she politely had to go rather quickly!
sukyspook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 09:31 AM   #29
bowtiedaddy
Senior Member
 
bowtiedaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington - United State of Nazi Germany
Posts: 1,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thaumaturge View Post
They were going to meet in the 'Illuminati' hotel on 'Shapeshifting reptile street'. But apparently decided that was too subtle.
lol
bowtiedaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 09:35 AM   #30
avaruus
Senior Member
 
avaruus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,490
Default

berlusconi is going to dry hump them all.
__________________
avaruus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 10:22 AM   #31
darkovic
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avaruus View Post
berlusconi is going to dry hump them all.
... might actually rape a few of them. His missus left him.
darkovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 10:52 AM   #32
avaruus
Senior Member
 
avaruus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,490
Default

i really hope he will not get his hands on any staff.
__________________
avaruus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 11:09 AM   #33
thaumaturge
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sukyspook View Post
I'll call Ken Clarke's office again like I did last year - I pretended I wanted to make an appointment to see him then asked if he was going to Chantilly....the woman on the end of the phone spluttered a bit then said I "obviously knew he was going so why bother to ask"!!

I told her I just wanted to let her know that WE KNOW what they're up to - then preceeded to ask her if she knew what Bilderberg really was....she politely had to go rather quickly!
No big secret. Ken Clarke registered his visit to the Chantilly Bilderberg meeting 2008 in the register of member's interests. Also 2006 and 2007.
__________________
Disinformation Agent

Last edited by thaumaturge; 05-05-2009 at 11:02 PM.
thaumaturge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 02:32 PM   #34
real6
Senior Member
 
real6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: From The Rotten Apple. Now Scandinavia
Posts: 9,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic isis View Post
thanks for posting real6

Thought i'd stick this thread i did before here in case anyone needs some proof that the Bilderberg actually exists, as more often then not if people don't just plain ignore they say "oh it doesn't exist"...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32348

An interview on French tv with a government minister (Devedjian, right hand man of President Sarkozy) admitting his attendance of Bilderberg and what they talk about at the meetings...

just so no one can turn and say to you "it does not exist" ever again.


I did post about the Bilderberg meeting recently and no one was bothered. I just can't believe how the sheep are so intranced, it's like the hand is up in front of their eyes, and it's just "talk to the hand"...grrrrrrr

BTW : it's translated fully on the second page, as i made some errors on the first lol

Anytime isis
__________________
"My father may not approve, but I am no longer his disciple, I am a master now, an idea transcended into life. And so this is my new path, which is a lot like the old one - only mine. To stay on that path I need to work harder, explore new rituals, evolve. Am I evil? Am I good? I'm done asking those questions, I dont have the answers - does anyone?"

-Dexter Morgan
real6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 06:59 AM   #35
herode
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 274
Default

Bump!
herode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:23 AM   #36
ritchs
Senior Member
 
ritchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Divided States of America
Posts: 4,131
Default

Just adding this for a time perspective, last year

Last year Bilderberger June 5 -8th
Bohemian Grove July 11 -26th


Democratic Convention Aug 25 Aug 29th Denver
Republican Convention Sept 1 to 4th St. Paul
ritchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 11:36 AM   #37
halftheworldaway
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 174
Default

I asked my local MP twice, by email and face-to-face, about the continuing mainstream media blackout of anything relating to last year's Bilderberg Conference.

I supplied him with a small mountain of evidence that it was one conspiracy that no-one could doubt. I invited him to check for himself.

After he agreed that, if true, it couldn't possibly be some giant coincidence that every editor and producer didn't believe the gathering was remotely newsworthy, I asked what he intended to do to expose the BBC (especially) and the rest for conspiring to ignore it.

Three months, several emails and two registered letters later, he remains as silent as they are.

Ditto for Benn, Galloway and quite a few others that I've contacted.

I'd be interested to know if anyone else here has taken the same route... is there any politician out there who cares about a free MSM, or are they all either spineless or corrupt?
halftheworldaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 12:24 PM   #38
thaumaturge
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Default

You could try John Bercow, MP for Buckingham. He has asked questions in the house about Bilderberg, albeit in 1999-2000. In the European Parliament there is the Irish Green former-MEP Patricia McKenna.
__________________
Disinformation Agent
thaumaturge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 06:53 PM   #39
ritchs
Senior Member
 
ritchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Divided States of America
Posts: 4,131
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by halftheworldaway View Post
I asked my local MP twice, by email and face-to-face, about the continuing mainstream media blackout of anything relating to last year's Bilderberg Conference.

I supplied him with a small mountain of evidence that it was one conspiracy that no-one could doubt. I invited him to check for himself.

After he agreed that, if true, it couldn't possibly be some giant coincidence that every editor and producer didn't believe the gathering was remotely newsworthy, I asked what he intended to do to expose the BBC (especially) and the rest for conspiring to ignore it.

Three months, several emails and two registered letters later, he remains as silent as they are.

Ditto for Benn, Galloway and quite a few others that I've contacted.

I'd be interested to know if anyone else here has taken the same route... is there any politician out there who cares about a free MSM, or are they all either spineless or corrupt?

You are to be applauded for your efforts. But in the end, they stonewall you.
Either they're part of the problem, or contribute to the problem by not wanting to confront an obvious problem and thus, jeopardize their careers. (or lives even!)
At the very least you have spread light into the darkness, planted a seed, or sent a shiver up the backs of the criminally insane Cabal that realizes the masses are awakening.
ritchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.