Is Paul really dead?

[truthseeker49]

For comparison:

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul, 1967

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul 1968

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul, 1968

[humito]

Originally Posted by orbandsceptre27

Humito you make me laugh - same shite, different day!

ditto

[humito]

pick any icon from the sixties who is alive and in the public eye today and perform the same scrutiny of pics ,vids voices etc and you will find the same "proof" that that they have been "replaced" that you find with mc cartney........especially the women stars.........you could see the vain sod at the grammys performing saw her standing there .........well botoxed up with his replaced hair all mop toppy...is sad really that he (like all celebrities)is so vain.......( was that song by carly simon about him?)............................................i reckon a better question would be is george harrison cloned??.........lol

[humito]

Originally Posted by truthseeker49

For comparison:

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul, 1967

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul 1968

^Paul, 1966 vs. Faul, 1968

on the last 2 pics of these comparisons the sepia toned one on the left really reminds me of paul post 66 on the butcher cover

[faulconandsnowjob]

Why is this such a difficult concept? We're not talking about comparing Paul from 1966 to 2009. We're talking about a big difference in appearance in the span of a few months - from Aug 1966 to Dec 1966. Maybe he had plastic surgery b/c he didn't want to be "the cute one" anymore. Yeah, that's the ticket


Paul Aug 19, 1966 v. Faul Dec. 1966


Paul Aug 19, 1966 v. Faul 1967

[humito]

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...%3Den%26sa%3DX


and this comparison shows how quickly he can change these days with even better cosmetic procedure..........

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Yeah, Faul has prob been under the knife quite a lot over the last 40 yrs

[orbandsceptre27]

Originally Posted by humito

pick any icon from the sixties who is alive and in the public eye today and perform the same scrutiny of pics ,vids voices etc and you will find the same "proof" that that they have been "replaced" that you find with mc cartney........especially the women stars.........you could see the vain sod at the grammys performing saw her standing there .........well botoxed up with his replaced hair all mop toppy...is sad really that he (like all celebrities)is so vain.......( was that song by carly simon about him?)............................................i reckon a better question would be is george harrison cloned??.........lol

So what you`re implying...... is that Paul McCartney, a good looking chap with the Beatles - at 23/24 years of age received botox injections, a hair transplant, elongated his skull, physically grew three inches, completely changed his eye colour, totally altered his mannerisms and personality, dumped his fiance, lost his talent (......... and a partridge in a pair tree)..........

......and this all happened in six months -

You`d want to watch what conspiracy theories you`re believing in Humito.

[faulconandsnowjob]

was that song by carly simon about him [Paul]?

I always heard it was about Warren Beatty.

So what you`re implying...... is that Paul McCartney, a good looking chap with the Beatles - at 23/24 years of age received botox injections, a hair transplant, elongated his skull, physically grew three inches, completely changed his eye colour, totally altered his mannerisms and personality, dumped his fiance, lost his talent

That is much more plausible than thinking Paul got replaced - lol ( Never mind Occam's Razor )

[humito]

Originally Posted by orbandsceptre27

So what you`re implying...... is that Paul McCartney, a good looking chap with the Beatles - at 23/24 years of age received botox injections, a hair transplant, elongated his skull, physically grew three inches, completely changed his eye colour, totally altered his mannerisms and personality, dumped his fiance, lost his talent (......... and a partridge in a pair tree)..........

......and this all happened in six months -

You`d want to watch what conspiracy theories you`re believing in Humito.

dont start getting personal because i have a difference of opinion,thats a bit childish.
all those things you list are just your opinions not proven facts.
i was implying that if you do the same sort of comparisons on other celebs that you will find similar photographic anomilies because of the countless reasons already stated in this thread.........as for mc cartney ....i think that during this period he changed his hair style,wore ( a probably fake ) moustache and induldged in copious amounts of chemicals........( you can always tell when he is on drugs)........there is no real proof of a height difference and the eye colour anomilies in my mind are easily explained.
As for the elongation of his skull !!! lol that is a funny one..........in his notorious lsd interview and in the interview outside abby road where both the above pics are from ,it is obvious to me that he had been in the studio for hours on all sorts of drugs for a long time ........to me this would account for the loss of facial fat and gaunt look......coupled with a new barnet and tash ,the effect is that his face looks longer ,especially when compared to a closer view of his chubby gurning face taken the year before.The only other evidence i have seen pput forward of skull elongation is the sgt pepper pics .however these are stretched versions to fit cds.........I think its debatable he lost his talent during this period,it was probably his peak of creativity........and who can blame him for getting turned on and dumping stuffy old prim jane asher??? I would agree his personality changed from the cartoon mop top manufactured beatle to being more himself and more arrogant.again drug use does this as does causing peaks and troughs in creativity in his later career....he still has many of his mannerisms pre 66 as well as nuance in his playing and singing.