|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,088
|
I will openly admit upfront, that I have NO CLUE what any of this means. Feel free to tear it apart or do your homework. Looks pretty legit though. Last edited by ar20; 16-08-2012 at 06:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 12,338
|
Here is just a short section fro9m the 32 page document.
Served Upon the Following Entities and their Executives: Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS) Bank for International Settlements (BIS) ORDER TO CEASE & DESIST CRIMINAL ACTS Under penalty of enforcement of the lawful rights, powers and authorities detailed in this Order, enforceable on national and international law enforcement and national and international security levels of all countries involved, on the basis of applicable laws as applied to the facts supported by evidence, you are hereby formally served this legal and binding Order to Cease & Desist certain highly illegal and criminal activities. Official criminal complaints to numerous agencies on various high levels in multiple countries are already being actively prepared by qualified legal counsel with veteran law enforcement and national security consultants, to be filed imminently. In the event of your failure or refusal to deliver to us convincing formal written assurance and binding commitment to comply with this Order, by reply within 3 banking days, then such criminal complaints will be filed. Although specific laws of the United States are referenced here as having effect and jurisdiction in this matter, you are hereby WARNED that similar and analogous criminal laws of all related countries based upon the same fundamental legal doctrines also apply, and are equally enforceable. Immediate Demand Under Force of Law Based upon information obtained from credible and reliable confidential sources, we have reason to believe that your organization, its responsible executives and also employees, have begun preparation and/or implementation of certain highly criminal actions that are the subject of this Order. We hereby lawfully demand that you immediately CEASE & DESIST from any and all of the following acts, courses of action, and planning or preparation for acts of misconduct that are in clear, direct, flagrant and indefensible violation of established and enforceable criminal laws: Any efforts to alter, conceal, modify, replace or otherwise change legal access to and control over assets (gold deposits and derivative rights arising therefrom) of private ownership deriving from President Soekarno of Indonesia, in breach of documented fiduciary obligations of UBS as bound to secure and protect such private ownership, and in violation of UBS obligations under international treaties established in 1960 and 1961, and reaffirmed in 1963 and 1966. Any efforts to utilize, leverage, borrow against, devalue, re-assign, rename, or otherwise change any accounts or account numbers, access codes, verification codes, or control of any or all of the private assets deriving from President Soekarno of Indonesia, for the benefit of any unauthorized third parties. Any efforts to in any way diminish or undermine the legal and binding exclusive authority of Keith F. Scott and Neil F. Keenan, on behalf of the true beneficial owners of the accounts and lawful owners of the assets and rights thereto contained therein, as the duly appointed Settlors of the Soekarno Trust by legal power of attorney from the direct original heirs of the Trust. Legal Basis for Demand Order The above-listed actions, which you are hereby demanded to Cease & Desist, presently do and/or would constitute severe violations of the following US criminal laws (and also their corresponding equivalent laws of Switzerland and other countries): Abusing any apparent legal authority or “color of law” to deprive any person of any rights under a sovereign Constitution or any other laws (18 USC 242). Conspiring to violate or interfere with any rights under the Constitution or other laws, by injury (including property loss), oppression, threat or intimidation (18 USC 241). “Racketeering” (organized crime) as interference with commerce under color of official authority (18 USC 1951(a), 1951(b)(2), (Chapter 95)), or conspiring for racketeering (18 USC 1951(a)). “Racketeering”, by patterns of bribery or extortion, or related to financial institutions (18 USC 1961(1)(a)). Retaliation against a victim or witness (18 USC 1513(e)(1)), or conspiring for retaliation (18 USC 1513(e)(2)). Tampering with victims or witnesses by intimidation or misleading conduct, to interfere with reporting crimes to law enforcement (18 USC 1512(b)). Bribe taking as official conflict of interest for anything of value including indirect or promised future benefits (18 USC 201(b)(2)). Fraud by exceeding authorized access to any computer to obtain anything of value (18 USC 1030(a)(4)), or trafficking in any password or access code for a computer that affects interstate or foreign commerce (18 USC 1030(a)(6)(b)), and with any computer used by or for a financial institution, “including a computer located outside the US that… affects interstate or foreign commerce of the US”. (18 USC 1030(e)(2)).
__________________
When you know who you're not allowed to criticize, you know who is in control! Points taken!
Last edited by dolores1; 18-08-2012 at 08:02 PM. Reason: separated for ease of reading |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 586
|
I'm afraid it's all nonsensical. A cease demand tallied with a load of bullion deposit certificates that are false. All very strange. Who is Keenan and why would he be the signatory for indonesian gold.
I've seen a lot of false documentation, and this sits quite low amongst them. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|