Ground Zero - The 'Smoking Gun' Photograph

[ugo_da_lugo]

Originally Posted by eustacekidd

You seem very highly strung, a calm rational mind is needed in the pursuit of truth.

Your lame answer is rather typical of a person who has nothing to contribute but feels that he must say something in order to overcome and compensate for his sense of smallness and/or unworthiness. Are you a short person by any chance?

I am sorry for you and even somewhat embarrased to have been in the same 'room' with you. Your lack of a proper response serves as a good reminder to me of the fact of something I had already come to a conclusion about - I chose the wrong place for an intelligent discussion of the topic at hand !!!

[eustacekidd]

Originally Posted by ugo_da_lugo

Inane rant

Lovely.

[secondsun]

...ALERT!...ALERT!... another fake Truther!

...the A.C.M.E Disinfo Pig Factory are churning them out like VW Beetles!


...all these Photography Professionals and Brain Surgeons that come on here and suggest everything is fake, and they of course should know best,but they dont have enough cranial capacity to even count!

...and then accuse `real` truthers of being the very same thing which they are themselves!... amazing!

Originally Posted by ugo_da_lugo

......My very distinct impression is that all five figures have been "TRANSPLANTED" into the scene from a place foreign to the one they now inhabit.

As for your disbelief of the notion that the image has been Photo-Shopped - Please re-examine the photo with an open mind. Perhaps you might consider relaxing first as though you were preparing for a period of silent meditation - clear your mind of all pre-judgments and biased opinions OK?

As for my personal understanding of the image I speak as an artist and as an experienced photographer in the field - I am absolutely positive its a 'shopped' image!
FWIW I have advanced degrees in the field and have taught photography so its not merely an educated guess - I have the experience and education to back it up.

btw...........THE LINKS ARE DEAD............

..ok fake truther i suggest YOU re-examine the pic` with an open mind, not that you have one, and learn how to count!... one...two..three..four..five...SIX!



...yes!...SIX people in the f*cking picture!... dimwit!... the one you missed hiding behind all that rusty steel wire!... i`ve enlarged it for you!... and `i am absolutely positive your a `shopped` truther!`... and in my self educated experience i deduce... you need a f*cking pair of glasses!

...go and play with Donald the Duck or something!?

[stannrodd]

Sometimes they are "quite" pathetic secondsun .. and convincing, .. but only in that they are pathetic. We can be sympathetic and supportive though I guess!! Offer some guidance to knowledge.

@ Kooskoets

Originally Posted by Kooskoets

And you didn't comment on my answer.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...8&postcount=80

This thread isn't the place to answer a question posed in another thread. I also don't have to respond .. especially to something which is a promotion of a theory not too dissimilar to Christophera's concrete core shit.

Stann

[kooskoets]

This thread isn't the place to answer a question posed in another thread. I also don't have to respond .. especially to something which is a promotion of a theory not too dissimilar to Christophera's concrete core shit.

Stann

Originally Posted by stannrodd

Tabea .. you didn't comment on my version of the plane impact scenario.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...2&postcount=62

I was disappointed but not surprised .. maybe you missed it. That thread is basically a NPT attack venue.

Stann

Well well...

[stannrodd]

Originally Posted by kooskoets

Well well...

Touche' .. both guilty .. heh heh !!

Good to see you are awake !

Stann

[citroen999]

the photo proves nothing...

no date stamp... who knows when that was took and what work had been done to that area..

as much as i want it to be proof of controlled demolition evidence, it cant be proved.

take a step back, deep breath, and work it out..

could be or might not..

[air_bn]

In the interest of fairness it needs pointing out the earlier image did look fake,
regardless of secondsun's more realistic recent blow-up.

As others have stated, all the shill type accusations do nothing to further
anyones case,and as citroen999 rightly states this proves nothing in itself as the photographer wasn't professional enough to date the image

[secondsun]

Originally Posted by citroen999

the photo proves nothing...

..but the lack of any response by the OP might prove something!?

as much as i want it to be proof of controlled demolition evidence, it cant be proved

...dont be daft!... what do want... `Official` proof?

...dont hold your breath!

[angrysoba]

This picture gives a good idea of the size of the perimeter columns still standing with the people in the crane doing something to cause lots of sparks to fly. Maybe they're setting off the hitherto unreacted therm*te?

More of those pictures are here:

http://s63.photobucket.com/albums/h1.../WTC%20Attack/

It's worth looking though to get an idea of what the rubble looked like after the collapse of the towers. (i.e not like it had been blown up with thermite).

And this one as well, seems to show the beams being cut at an angle even if the OP says it would be too much bother to do so.



http://layscience.net/?q=node/124

[ugo_da_lugo]

Makes no difference if there were 5 figures or six in this photo - its a monumental fake - its been photoshopped and all of the figures - regardless of how many there are - have been inserted into the image - contrary to the crudely worded slimeball comments (above)
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...5&postcount=23
that were made by 2ndSun worshipper............<------queer

[labouysse]

Sure shows that the metal from the towers wasn't "dustified" or whatever some people claim.