Italian Court - autism was provoked by the MMR jab

[loveisthelaw]

Originally Posted by night_gaunt

Ummm... Cancer is, yes. Not autism.

oh really, are you a biologist? 'cos modern biological science and genetic research disagrees with you.

[night_gaunt]

Originally Posted by loveisthelaw

oh really, are you a biologist? 'cos modern biological science and genetic research disagrees with you.

Oh really? Did you read my links? If modern science disagrees, why is it still used?

[loveisthelaw]

Originally Posted by night_gaunt

Oh really? Did you read my links? If modern science disagrees, why is it still used?

yes. because they are still holding on to old science!!! that is why!!! and they are founded no doubt by drug inc. selective closed minds, open pockets. just like those who think that the quantum world is not entangled and that there is no life outside of earth and that there is no such thing as E.T's, a soul, life after death or OBEs

but we lol and pat them on their little childish head

[night_gaunt]

Originally Posted by loveisthelaw

yes. because they are still holding on to old science, just like those who think that the quantum world is not entangled and that there is no life outside of earth and that there is no such thing as E.T's, a soul or OBEs.

Lol, you think old science claims there is no life outside of earth? Quite the contrary. I noticed this 'vaccinations' shiz is very outdated and has been debunked several times.

[loveisthelaw]

Originally Posted by night_gaunt

Lol, you think old science claims there is no life outside of earth? Quite the contrary. I noticed this 'vaccinations' shiz is very outdated and has been debunked several times.

ok, you have your opinion. "it is a genetic, hereditary disease."

[night_gaunt]

For ACTUAL research:
http://www.exploringautism.org/

[unicorny]

Originally Posted by night_gaunt

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...090303396.html

Originally Posted by night_gaunt

http://topnews.us/content/247453-aut...ons-discovered

Interesting reports ng thanks for posting what you need to notice though is that these mutations increase the risk of autism in some individuals this suggest that they are interacting with some external factors as some individuals with the genes are unaffected. Also in the top article debunking the vaccine link it uses a very specific set of criteria and looks for evidence of live virus in a restricted group who were available for biopsy. This does not necessarily refute the claims they make however it does reduce the validity somewhat. There is no doubt that artist runs in families but so do nut allergies rather than declare that nuts are good for everyone we accept that they have s negative reaction in some individuals. The same may be true for vaccines and there is plenty of evidence to suggest this is the case for many cases of autism