Nuclear bombs are a hoax

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by kaito

The first two paragraphs of Chapter 3, THE LEVITES AND THE LAW from Douglas Reed's book THE CONTROVERSY OF ZION:

During the hundred years that followed the Assyrian conquest of Israel, the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC they produced Deuteronomy and read it to the people in the temple at Jerusalem.


This was the birth of "the Mosaic law", which Moses, if he ever lived, never knew. It is called the Mosaic law because it is attributed to him, but the authorities agree that it was the product of the Levites, who then and later repeatedly made Moses (and for that matter, Jehovah) say what suited them. Its correct description would be "the Levitical law" or "the Judaic law".

My bold and I don't necessarily agree with the chronology.....

This principal has, over centuries, at an accelerating pace, been covertly applied to National and International Law.

Also to Physics....

Interesting, I came yesterday across the legal reason why they crucified Jesus(whoever that was). I came across the charges, among them:

heresy
denial of the cult
denial/rejection of the law
denial of the sabbat(he healed people on sunday)
and so on...

so the charges were based on judaic law.

We have in German an idiom, "...die Leviten lesen"

[illuminumnuts]

Originally Posted by ranb

An airliner is not a lawn dart. It is for the most part an aluminum tube with wings, engines and lot of fuel/cargo. None of the flights had a crew which was trying to bring the plane down as gently as possible like any other flight crew would in an emergency. Instead they used high speed to cause maximum damage to the buildings they ran into and in the case of flight 93 it was in a high speed dive prior to hitting the ground.

Well, that would explain the 'tidiness' perfectly then.

Originally Posted by ranb

Tidy is one word I never heard or saw used by anyone who was at the crash sites shortly after they occurred. Why are you the only one using that word? Most of the other truthers on the net are complaining that things were too untidy; they wanted a more intact plane like they see in lower speed crashes and "road runner" type cartoon outlines in the buildings and ground the planes ran into.

Well, I wasn't at the crash site shortly after it occurred. You were there in advance waiting to do interviews or something? Anyhow, complaining about 'untidiness' because there wasn't an intact plane is in fact exactly the same thing as claiming 'tidiness' because there wasn't much to see of any plane. Why don't you just think for a few seconds before you open that dumb mouth of yours any further? Rodin is trying to get some intelligent debate going on this thread and you are, indeed, doing him a great disservice. The level of your arrogance is absolutely incredible.

[rodin]

Originally Posted by ranb

The reality is that passage of the silencer ... (yada yada yada)
Ranb

Silencers have really nothing to do with this thread. Any more silencer posts and you will get a rare treat from me - reported to moderators. Actually I have never exercised this option before in all the time I have spent on this forum.

Now folks regarding the OT - guess how it 'prophecies Christ'? What would be the logical explanantion?

[ranb]

Originally Posted by rodin

Any more silencer posts and you will get a rare treat from me - reported to moderators.

Pop your report cherry yet? What did they say?

Ranb

[illuminumnuts]

Originally Posted by tinyint

Interesting, I came yesterday across the legal reason why they crucified Jesus(whoever that was). I came across the charges, among them:

heresy
denial of the cult
denial/rejection of the law
denial of the sabbat(he healed people on sunday)
and so on...

so the charges were based on judaic law.

In a nutshell, he didn't get with the programme. Just as with Socrates, they decided he had to go. The trumped up charges were an afterthought.

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by illuminumnuts

In a nutshell, he didn't get with the programme. Just as with Socrates, they decided he had to go. The trumped up charges were an afterthought.

You wouldn't believe how difficult it is to find he legal charges according to which they convicted the person "jesus".
It was a footnote in a book by a German cleric expert on this stuff and the legal proceedings of the Romans. So the Romans convicted him according to the Pharisaic laws.

[rodin]

Bob Henderson is an 80 year old retired electrical engineer who thinks “Albert Einstein was a dunce.” So convinced is he of this that he has written a third book on the subject: Einstein and The-Emperor’s-New-Clothes Syndrome: The Exposé of a Charlatan.

http://blog.jmlynch.org/2006/11/19/e...n_was_a_dunce/

Anyone read this? Tiny?

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by rodin

http://blog.jmlynch.org/2006/11/19/e...n_was_a_dunce/

Anyone read this? Tiny?

Didn't know him, but interesting.

I think I already said it on a different thread.
Einstein plagiarized other people's work, and even wrongly, when he had access at patent office at Zürich.
Lorentz and Maxwell for example.
In my view, the Maxwell equations have been altered. They simply nulled the right hand side of the equation, so to speak.
eg it not the original Maxwell equations which are taught, to fit Einstein

You may find this one interesting...

The Kohler coil(Magnetstromapparat), by Hans Kohler...

http://www.rexresearch.com/coler/coler2.htm

Magnetstromapparat devised by German naval engineer and inventor, Hans Coler (or Kohler). Entitled "The Invention of Hans Coler, Relating to an Alleged New Source of Power," B.I.O.S. Final Report no 1043, Item No. 31, Summer 1946, this report consisted of tests and findings on two strange circuits conducted at the University of Berlin between the World Wars under the auspices of none other than Dr. Winfried Otto Schumann, discoverer of the Schumann resonance of the earth.
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Project.../HansColer.htm

I don't have good english sources at hand on this little secret treasure.
It is tightly connected to the so called "Schumann SM-Levitator"

According to conventional physics and electric engineering, it should not work, but it does.

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by rodin

Look at the date



Liquid crystal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aether theory implications.

Since light is a shear wave the Aether was predicted to be solid. However, MMX showed that in fact that Aether is entrained. The two contradict each other - unless the Aether behaves like a liquid crystal...

...if you get my drift....

Do you remember when I said to you the ether is in my opinion more a liquid than a solid?
Wirbelaether... Vortexaether.

Like a swirl in water.

It is the reason what makes everything of matter spin, I think.
Hence, a vortex scales form micro to macro level.

[rodin]

Something I already suggested

What is now needed is a rerun of the Michelson-Morley experiment, with
the Beckmann theory put to the test. The famous experiment was repeated
by physicists at the University of Colorado in 1979, on a rotating table
and using laser light. Unexpected perturbations were detected, but
attributed to other causes. One of the experimenters, Dr. John L. Hall
of the Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, a leading expert on
speed-of-light experiments, says that Beckmann "has made a serious
effort to reduce relativity thinking to an objective environment, in
which measurements can be made and his theory put to the test." He has
suggested that Michelson-Morley should be repeated on an orbiting
satellite.

The experiment would be crucial because, if Beckmann is correct, the
much greater velocity with which a satellite passes through the Earth's
gravitational field (a satellite's day" is ninety minutes) would
increase by a factor of four hundred the fringe shift that Beckmann
would expect to find. "Such an experiment would not prove that Beckmann
is right," Hall added, but it sure could prove that he is wrong." By the
same token, it could also prove that Einstein is wrong. Let's hope that
Hall gets the opportunity to do the experiment.

* NB: Those who would like to try to collect the $2,000 reward can reach
Beckmann at: P.O. Box 251, Boulder, Colo. 80306; and Hayden at: Physics
Department, Storrs, Conn. 06269. Incidentally, Beckmann publishes
Galileian Electrodynamics, a bi-monthly journal on the topics raised
herein.

http://www.zoklet.net/totse/en/fring...y/cheinie.html

...interesting article

[sniper13x]

Originally Posted by rodin

Something I already suggested



http://www.zoklet.net/totse/en/fring...y/cheinie.html

...interesting article

You seem to grasp this stuff, so I would suggest you take a look at Aspden's lask book, "Creation, the Physical Truth." A bit over my head, but maybe it will resonate with you.

If you are really interested in suppressed science, have you ever seen the work by Tom Bearden?

www.cheniere.org

I love listening to the guy speak, it just resonates and I can barely understand what he is saying. The one that I highly recommend is Tom Talks Tesla. Its hard to find his stuff on youtube because it usually gets taken down on bogus copyright claims. I know they are bogus because I had a channel shut down for posting his stuff and was told by his staff that they didn't request it.

He has pretty interesting stuff on Scalar Waves also on youtube. You can find some of his stuff on torrents.

Applied Scalar Wave Technology - Tom Bearden interview 1of8 - YouTube

Applied Scalar Wave Technology - Tom Bearden interview 1of8 - YouTube

This interview was with a group of guys selling something they called H3O water. Their product got banned and their company disappeared. They had examples of fruits that would last weeks without spoiling once they had that water poured on it. It was definitely weird stuff but seemed legit. They openly asked people to disprove their stuff, which probably got them too much attention from the PTB.

[sniper13x]

Originally Posted by tinyint

Didn't know him, but interesting.

I think I already said it on a different thread.
Einstein plagiarized other people's work, and even wrongly, when he had access at patent office at Zürich.
Lorentz and Maxwell for example.
In my view, the Maxwell equations have been altered. They simply nulled the right hand side of the equation, so to speak.
eg it not the original Maxwell equations which are taught, to fit Einstein

You may find this one interesting...

The Kohler coil(Magnetstromapparat), by Hans Kohler...

http://www.rexresearch.com/coler/coler2.htm



I don't have good english sources at hand on this little secret treasure.
It is tightly connected to the so called "Schumann SM-Levitator"

According to conventional physics and electric engineering, it should not work, but it does.

http://cheniere.org/correspondence/030110.htm

Does this make sense to you?

Dear New Scientist:

Yes, there are some subjects I would very much like to see you include and discuss in New Scientist in the future. E.g., in the energy field, you are way behind and way off-track. As an example, consider the standard electrical engineering, which handles and develops most all our electrical power systems.

In 1892, there were no electrical engineers at all, because it (electrical engineering) had not been born yet -- but technical engineers were now needed to design, build, work on, and maintain the new AC power systems etc. given us by Nikola Tesla. Maxwell was already dead (he died in 1879), and everyone hated quaternions. There were only about three dozen PHYSICISTS on earth who understood something of electrodynamics, and that was it. To provide the new Tesla AC power technology, which was to be taught in our universities and called "electrical engineering", Lorentz was preparing the equations for the mathematical model to be used. He was using Heaviside's original vector equations, which were still ASYMMETRIC and thus included asymmetric Maxwellian systems.

Tesla had discovered in the late 1880s and early 1890s how to build ASYMMETRIC systems which could take and use all the EM energy one wished, from the "active medium" (Tesla's term) and without consuming fuel. And Tesla was briefing technical societies to that effect. (See rigorous proof that Tesla could have given us free EM energy from the seething active medium: See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett rigorously shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and dissipation of the energy in those regions desired. The quaternion electrodynamics also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis using the symmetrized Heaviside-Lorentz vector equations cannot reveal. Barrett shows that Tesla's patented circuits did exactly this]

We also strongly note that Barrett is a very noted (though quiet) electrodynamicist and one of the cofounders of ultrawideband radar, along with Harmuth.

All this was known to the ruthless financier J. P. Morgan, still angry and smarting at his own backing of Edison and DC power systems being soundly defeated by Tesla's much more practical AC power systems. So he was already setting up the total suppression of Tesla, by first breaking his backer Westinghouse (which he did) and then deliberately breaking Tesla (which he did also).

Morgan had already had his technical advisors check the work of Tesla, and they found that Tesla's confounded "energy freely from the active medium" systems (asymmetric systems) were for real.

As a result, Morgan's tech advisors did a group analysis on the Heaviside equations and showed that the Heaviside equations were still ASYMMETRICAL -- and thus they still contained some of those confounded Tesla "free excess energy from the active medium" (i.e., asymmetric) systems. At Morgan's bidding, Lorentz was then elicited to eliminate those "free energy from the active medium" systems from this new-fangled electrical engineering that was being formed.

Lorentz was a great scientist, but he was also noted for stealing and publishing other scientists' work and taking credit for it. [For an expose, see J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Jackson and Okun discuss roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the 't') first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the 't') as being first. This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit for it. Lorentz stole work by Lorenz (without the "t") and published it as his own, and thereby ARBITRARILY SYMMETRIZED the resulting EE model and theory using the "Heaviside-Lorentz" modified SYMMETRICAL equations.

Hence before the very birth of EE, the model and subject were already deliberately mutilated and crippled to prevent free energy from the vacuum systems -- i.e., such systems as now have been rigorously developed and demonstrated by Klimov et al. and validated by both the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the National Recoverable Energy Laboratory. The work of Klimov et al. is rigorously published in leading physics and nanocrystalline journals, and it is now accepted in both fields -- and INDEPENDENTLY verified by those two great national labs.

Therefore we never have to "prove" it again, as it has been scientifically and experimentally proven for all time.

But from its very birth, the severely crippled electrical engineering model has allowed only SELF-SYMMETRIZING EM systems to be conceived, built, deployed, and used by our electrical engineers.

This odd fact (this deliberate mutilation of energy "science and technology" in our standard electrical engineering, from its very birth) is totally responsible for the present world energy crisis! The very first requirement for total, quick, clean, cheap solving of the world energy crisis is the direct and intentional violation of standard electrical engineering!

Meanwhile, there are already very good and much better systems of electrodynamics available in physics, such as quaternion electrodynamics etc. -- and these allow conceiving, building, deploying and using ASYMMETRIC electrical power systems. In short, these FAR BETTER electromagnetic models do indeed allow "free energy from the seething virtual state vacuum", speaking in modern quantum terms. And rigorous proof has been shown by (1) Barrett, (2) Klimov et al., and (3) Nobelists Lee and Yang in their epochal discovery and proof of broken symmetry and its requirement that "something previously virtual becomes observable".

Any dipole -- the common dipole! -- is a proven broken symmetry, and hence it continually converts something previously virtual into something observable (which is part of the nature of a broken symmetry). Any dipole continually absorbs virtual photons from the vacuum, additively exciting above the quantum threshold, and then decaying its excitation by re-emitting real observable photons at a steady rate. Indeed, the so-called "static EM field" in electrical engineering -- and associated with every charge and dipole -- is actually a proven steady FREE emission of real, usable EM energy-from-the-vacuum, which continually creates and sustains the so-called "static" EM field. The field is not "static" at all, but is rather like a steady-state waterfall, seemingly fixed in form and intensity at each "point", but comprised of internal components in steady and continual motion.

In addition to the beautiful work of Klimov et al., it is simple to "power an electrical load" without "furnishing the power" by the source dipole (in the generator or battery). All one need furnish is the ENERGY, and then the interaction between energy and moving charge provides the "power".

Here's how to do it (power loads and systems by "static voltage" only). Simply let the source dipolarity momentarily provide "STATIC" VOLTAGE and no current at all, to the external circuit attached to its terminals. Do this while temporarily "pinning" the free electrons in the conductors of the external circuit, so that (momentarily) they cannot flow as current. The "static" voltage, however, will flow down the external circuit at nearly light speed, and will "potentialize" the temporarily pinned free electrons. (There are known ways to do this pinning for up to a millisecond; switching in a microsecond is easily done). The product of the voltage potentializing the external circuit, multiplied by the number of coulombs of interacting "potentialized pinned electrons", gives the number of joules of EM energy now FREELY collected in the external circuit, without "drawing power" from the dipolar voltage source.

Then, with the external pinned circuit now potentialized, switch away the dipolar source furnishing the potentializing "static" voltage (electrostatic scalar potential). Note that NO POWER HAS BEEN DRAWN FROM THE ORIGINAL DIPOLAR VOLTAGE SOURCE, BUT LOTS OF EM ENERGY HAS BEEN RATHER FREELY DRAWN FROM IT. So the dipolar source itself is not depleted at all. All that is required so far is a tiny bit of "switching power" to operate the efficient switching.

Then with the external potentialized circuit still pinned, one "switches in" a resistor load in series with a diode, connecting across the "gap" in the ends of the external circuit, so that a NEW and COMPLETELY SEPARATE symmetrical system -- ALREADY POTENTIALIZED ALMOST TOTALLY FREELY -- results.

And then let the pinning expire in this now-completed potentialized system, so that the NEW symmetrical system THEN splits its freely collected potential energy in half, using half in the FORWARD EMF region to dissipate in the loads and losses when current moves, and thus powering the loads. The other half of the stored potential energy is dissipated in the BACK EMF region (across the series load resistor and diode) to destroy the system's dipolarization.

Then switch back to original configuration with external circuit again pinned. Re-potentialize again while pinning still exists, switch away the potentializing source dipole again, switch back in the resistive load and the dipole, and repeat the cycle again and again and again.

In short, potentialize the load circuit "statically", and "dissipate" the potential energy dynamically to power the loads, without the original dipolar source being in the "discharging/depotentializing" circuit during its "powering" operation.

In this way one can easily "power" a large load with a "voltage source" only, while obeying all the laws of physics and of nature and requiring the operator furnish only a tiny bit of "switching" energy. Even this can be made "free" by making the "switching unit" part of the overall load system in the original external circuit.

So we have used a deliberately ASYMMETRICAL system to freely potentialize the pinned electrons in the external circuit, in total violation to standard electrical engineering SYMMETRIC-ONLY usage. And then we have switched away the very small VOLTAGE source dipole, by reconstituting the open external circuit into a closed-circuit system that then DISSIPATES the collected energy to (1) power the loads and losses, and (2) kill its own dipolarity.

Any competent EE department or physics department can readily build and demonstrate this system, if they but put their minds to it.

And it means that, by MERELY CHANGING AND UPGRADING THE HORRIBLY MUTILATED AND ANTIQUE OLD SELF-SYMMETRIZING HEAVISIDE-LORENTZ SYMMETRIZED MODEL, TO A MUCH MORE MODERN DELIBERATELY-ASYMMETRIC OVERALL SYSTEM USAGE, one can solve the world energy crisis easily and forever. One easily cleans up the biosphere now, because there need be no coal burning, diesel fuel burning, etc. Our cars can be electric and powered by very small VOLTAGE sources ("batteries"), that need hardly furnish any CURRENT at all.



Incredibly, the "world energy crisis" is due totally to the continued usage of a horribly crippled and deliberately mutilated archaic old electrical engineering technology and model. It is readily solved by first adopting a much better (higher group symmetry) EE model, and upgrading for over a century of scientific ignorance on a scale that boggles the human imagination. And by deliberately building and operating "ASYMMETRIC" Maxwellian power systems.

Klimov et al. have already rigorously proven that real physical systems can be built that receive extra energy from the seething virtual state interaction, and output it as real, observable EM energy used to help power our circuits and systems and loads, with COP>1.0. No "second law of equilibrium thermodynamics" is violated, because the described systems are NONEQUILIBRIUM systems with respect to their ongoing interaction with the virtual state vacuum. Maxwell, you see, was also a thermodynamicist of some note at his time, and he already knew that the hoary old second law of EQUILIBRIUM thermodynamics was readily violated.

E.g., quoting Maxwell: "The truth of the second law is ' a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules' Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." [J. C. Maxwell, 'Tait's Thermodynamics II,' Nature 17, 278'280 (7 February 1878)].

These "free energy from the vacuum" systems do not violate the situation re "perpetual motion" because NEWTON'S FIRST LAW OF MOTION IS ACTUALLY THE LAW OF UNIVERSAL PERPETUAL MOTION! Simply read it and think. If I place an object into a state of motion or at rest, it will remain (perpetually and continually) in that state of motion indefinitely (forever), unless and until an external force comes along and interacts on the state of motion or rest, changing it.

Sadly, we have not even "understood" Newton's law of perpetual motion (his first law of motion) all these years since he advanced it!

So I would strongly challenge and urge New Scientist that what is urgently needed is the following:

(1) Realization that the world energy crisis is directly due to the terrible deficiencies in the standard EE model.
(2) Therefore, the SOLUTION is a PHYSICS problem, requiring the use of much better and more complete electrodynamics (such as quaternion electrodynamics, very close to Maxwell's original theory), and requiring the development and usage of ASYMMETRIC Maxwellian/Tesla power systems.
(3) If we wish to be honest and scientific, then we MUST CHANGE that horribly mutilated and crippled old Heaviside-Lorentz EE model, and recover those Tesla ASYMMETRIC systems that were casually eliminated by eliciting Lorentz to do the dirty work.
(4) Revise all electrical engineering texts, labs, and practices to incorporate the new higher group symmetry EM model to be used.
(5) Get some bright new youngsters and grad students trained and graduated with Doctorates in a NEW and MODERN electrical engineering that incorporates both (1) SYMMETRIC old standard self-destructive electrical power systems and (2) ASYMMETRIC new Maxwellian power systems that then can and will rapidly be built.

Very best wishes,

Thomas E. Bearden, U.S. Army (Retired)
MS, Nuclear Engineering
BS Mathematics with minor in electronic engineering
Graduate of the U.S. Army's MOS 1181 Staff Officer's Missile Engineering course (equivalent to MS in missile science).

In addendum:
And if you REALLY wish to jump physics forward a thousand years into the future, see the subject I call "precursor engineering" (on my website www.cheniere.org). This subject was discovered and known to P.A.M. Dirac by 1930, and results from the use of Dirac Sea vacuum tickling of any physical object or objects, or any physical process. In short, physics also was deliberately mutilated by arbitrarily tearing negative energy out of Dirac's theory in 1934, only a year after Dirac and Schrodinger were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize. Their astounding work made possible modern quantum physics.

By proper understanding of Dirac sea tickling of the vacuum processes creating and sustaining any physical object or process, one can very simply and easily (once the science is developed) directly change physical reality as one wishes. We explain the DIRAC PHYSICS mechanism that the little jellyfish Turritopsis nutricula started using circa 1990 to become immortal against death by ageing, as proven in leading world biology labs by direct observation. The adaptation started in the Caribbean, and the little immortal-against-death-by-ageing jellyfish has now spread through all the oceans of the world. Professor Kanzius (now deceased) also developed a brilliant watergas technology that also could fuel the world with H2 and O2 gas mix generated in a small container of Dirac-sea-vacuum-tickled water, then piping the mix out of the "tickled vacuum" area into the combustion chamber of an combustion engine, to cleanly burn and power the engine and its load. The only exhaust is pure water vapor, and this can be done for all our autos, trains, ships, aircraft, etc. if we but do it. Kanzius, however, did not know the actual PHYSICS mechanism he was using, but merely found how to apply it so that statistically the OH bond in the "tickled water" started "unhappening", freeing H and O to form H2 and O2 gas bubbles. The mix is not very explosive in the tickled water container, since there the OH bond can be achieved now only with great difficulty!

The same Kanzius tickling process, applied to cancer, is being used to cure cancer. It is being developed by a known and recognized cancer research institute. Phase One animal tests were spectacular! With terminal tumors implanted in the lab animals, all were cured by just "unhappening" the cancer by adding negative energy judiciously in that tickled cancer area. Again, biologists are desperately seeking some kind of cellular mechanism in cellular biology, but it is actually a PHYSICS process torn out of physics by the tearing out of negative energy from Dirac's theory in 1934, and changing all the textbooks accordingly.

Today, a strong team of physicists lead by Dan Solomon and his colleagues is moving rigorously to get negative energy added back into physics. Dan Solomon is Engineering Manager at Rauland-Borg Corporation. He and his colleagues have published very rigorous papers in leading physics journals showing that the arbitrary removal of negative energy from Dirac's theory was not by the use of the scientific method at all, but by the total violation of it.

So there are some remarkable physics, medical, and energy scientific works out there that greatly need your attention and discussion and investigation, in the name of science and to make it honest again.

And incidentally, to solve the present world energy crisis by rapid development of ASYMMETRIC electrodynamics electrical engineering systems, and also solve the world medical crisis by direct usage of Dirac sea vacuum pulsing/tickling to "unhappen" any disease or back physical condition, including old age itself. The Russians have long worked out lots of precursor engineering, but kept it rigidly confined to their deep black operations of their superweapon systems. However, some years ago they released the Scenar, a little automated handheld electrical gadget that actually uses Dirac Sea Vacuum Tickling to alleviate pain etc. and do a small amount of healing. Then about a year ago, they released the Scenar-Cosmodic, which also contains a SECOND Dirac sea vacuum tickling system that automatically detects and cures disease conditions as well.

These have now been released into standard medical practice by Soviet doctors, who are treating their patients with it and having very good curative results. A few European doctors have also obtained Scenar-Cosmodic units and are successfully treating medical patients with it.

Very best wishes,
Tom Bearden

[rodin]

Maxwell's equations describe the effects of moving charge and magnetism. But they do not explain the causes. I mean, WHY should the magnetic and electric wave components of light be orthogonal? And how can such a wave traverse a vacuum?

Waves are vibrations in a medium. The idea of a 'wave packet' to describe wave-particle duality is suspect. Check out this masterful debunking of the so called 'photon'....

http://scienceforums.com/topic/11645.../page__st__195

[rodin]

Non-Euclidian space does not exist. Reimann spaces etc are really just ways of modelling surfaces in 3D, not enclosing volumes. The notion of more than 3 real space dimensions is another huge hoax, mathematical constructs with no real meaning.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=73423

[rodin]

Deanna Spingola interviewed some guy in Japan about Fukishima. I picked up this story from her about a personal friend and 'downwinder' in Utah.

He was a kid on a farm who woke up one day to find all the sheep dead from radiation.

Now can someone explain how radiation can kill sheep so quickly, yet not affect at all humans (albeit they would have some shielding from their homestead)?

http://www.spingola.com/RWilcox_2012-06-30_19-00-32.mp3

Deanna is a great researcher, heart and head in right place, but IMO is not au fait with science sufficiently to properly interrogate the likes of Judy Wood and the guy in this mp3.

[rodin]

Nuclear test photographs unearthed on Tyneside

they were told to stand in a circle with their backs to the site of the explosion.

“And then after the siren sounded they could turn around and see this frightening sight of the mushroom cloud....

experts have estimated that one in three of those who were involved in the tests have developed cancer or a range of other health problems.

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north...2703-27062327/

More than one in three people in the UK will develop some form of cancer during their lifetime.

http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/can...eloping-cancer

I will have more to say about this discovery

[rodin]

More on the above

Here is the shot sequence taken by one John Alfred Milsom. Remember he had his back to the blast, then turned around and filmed the aftermath.







The third photo in the sequence is not taken from the same camera angle. It is probably not even the same blast. Look at the trails in the background (these are made by rockets ostensibly to show the shock wave)

So there's the first problem. Secondly, how could he have turned around fast enough, settled his camera, and photographed the initial blast stage of the first photo?

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north...2703-27062327/

[lizzy]

Originally Posted by rodin

Deanna Spingola interviewed some guy in Japan about Fukishima. I picked up this story from her about a personal friend and 'downwinder' in Utah.

He was a kid on a farm who woke up one day to find all the sheep dead from radiation.

Now can someone explain how radiation can kill sheep so quickly, yet not affect at all humans (albeit they would have some shielding from their homestead)?

http://www.spingola.com/RWilcox_2012-06-30_19-00-32.mp3

Deanna is a great researcher, heart and head in right place, but IMO is not au fait with science sufficiently to properly interrogate the likes of Judy Wood and the guy in this mp3.

yes, I listened to this recently.
..glancing back through this thread , some interesting topics have been brought up, esp. DEW's with Dr Judy Wood...her talks have a been interesting. I need to read back some more.....

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima.html
this is still one of my fav's for fukishima.

[lizzy]

Originally Posted by rodin

This is news to me. My post was written from deduced logic



http://firstlightforum.wordpress.com...s-final-phase/

hi rodin,
you have a knack for finding websites, thanks again.
https://firstlightforum.wordpress.co...s-final-phase/

[ranb]

Originally Posted by rodin

Here is the shot sequence taken by one John Alfred Milsom. Remember he had his back to the blast, then turned around and filmed the aftermath.

The third photo in the sequence is not taken from the same camera angle. It is probably not even the same blast. Look at the trails in the background (these are made by rockets ostensibly to show the shock wave)

So there's the first problem. Secondly, how could he have turned around fast enough, settled his camera, and photographed the initial blast stage of the first photo?

So what is it about the third photo's trails that make you think it is not the same blast?

How long did it take for the blast to appear as it did and for the photographer to turn around and take the photo? What do you mean by "settled his camera"?

Ranb