|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 63
|
i seen a few shows on them.
They are a very interesting subject, that will all ways be fighting about them. Most people will say that some one made it? or that it is just the waves rolling over the stones and parts of it are falling off to get to the shape? There is a VERY LARGE block of stone in a place that has gone from my mind. The stone is not from that area so it has been moved there. But what makes the same as the one's in Japan is that it looks the same and is well any other stone block in wieght. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ultima Thule
Posts: 6,573
|
I've been obsessed with Yonagunijima ever since I heard of it.
But you know, they're "natural formations". Absolutely nothing at all hinting to an ancient advanced civilization. Some more info: http://www.crystalinks.com/pyrunderwater.html
__________________
"What lies within always has a form without and that which is without takes a shape within. Put another way, we sometimes say that which is visible must always have an invisible aspect, just as everything invisible must be represented by the visible." - Oone the dreamthief Peruse through Bad Poetry of Pain and Hurt Or wrack your brain with Concordia ab Chao and Your Life is a Lie |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,353
|
Wow the pictures in that link ARE FASCINATING!!!!!!
They cant be naturally made!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 3,017
|
Ironically, the 'natural formation' mainstream concensus is attributed to Robert M. Schoch who dived upon the site and determined that it was a natural formation which was carved and modified by man
In other words, like similar pyramid-like structures and even the Egyptian Sphinx, this complex was carved BY MAN out of the natural stone. It's ironic because his statement is taken OUT OF CONTEXT to claim the structure is completely natural. He NEVER said that. He admit it was 'artificial' in a sense that man carved it out of a natural rock. The junk science group thinking manipulators took the 'natural' statement out of context to 'debunk' it as natural instead of man made. So here is a question: WHY THE FUCK DO THEY EVEN CARE?! What difference does it make if it is a remnant of an ancient culture underwater? Like that sunken Egyptian city. Who cares? I'll tell you why. Because Easter Island's Polynesian population were not the people who made the moai. And the nearest Polynesian island was farther away than Portugal was to where 'Columbus' landed, yet they were Polynesian and made it there in canoes or something. Even though South America was closer. What does this have to do with Yonaguni? Peru and Ecuador have similar carved structures and similar ancient housing styles and pottery to Yonaguni. Yonaguni has above-water artifacts reminiscent of an ancient culture like the one below. So what am I saying? Why does science go to great lengths to reject the fucking obvious? Because, this is part of the veil of the Pacific Ocean. The big lie. The origin of psychopathy and the root of all evil. Plato's Atlantis and the reason why were are fucking stuck here in this creation. Do you think I'm crazy? Maybe I am. But Asia and North America were connected at one point in ancient human history until something fucking big caused a huge scar in the Earth that became the Pacfic. Hence the big lie, because they know the truth. Who are they? The pigs. And it is time my friends to take the pigs to the slaughter. It is long over due Last edited by believenothing; 01-06-2012 at 04:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a Billion Galaxies
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
One point made in the review is: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|