Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Hidden Science / Advanced Technology / Top Secret
Register FAQ Chat Social Groups Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2012, 07:08 PM   #421
edelweiss pirate
Senior Member
 
edelweiss pirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Africa.
Posts: 17,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post
3 dimensions and fuck all parallel universes.

There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.


Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.
__________________
The meaning of existence is to preserve unspoiled, undisturbed and undistorted the image of eternity with which each person is born. Like a silver moon in a calm, still pond. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

NEW!...My NEW blog..... visit the all new brand-new, new Truthatron .... It's NEW!

Or visit the old one....Illuminati analysis, music and belly fluff! INSIDER INFO

Last edited by edelweiss pirate; 03-05-2012 at 07:09 PM.
edelweiss pirate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 07:40 PM   #422
lyricusmagna
Senior Member
 
lyricusmagna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In a problematic world.
Posts: 1,750
Default

Parallel universe exist, no matter how much you fuck them Rodin.
__________________
My ET Contact Experiences
lyricusmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 11:42 PM   #423
jon galt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OZ
Posts: 3,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post
No

Every single wave/particle experiment is fatally flawed. Lies are everywhere.

Here's what really is. IMO

Light and all EM radiation is a disturbance of the aether, as sound is a disturbance of the air. It is as massless as sound.

Electron 'waves' are really em fields created by a particle moving though the aether. (Magnetism is the aether's response to charge motion)

Aether is a dead horse if you want to flog it please show one instance of it being detected, or explain how it can exist in a vacume. Explain how light passes through a vacume, if all it is is a disturbance in aether. What does light 'disturbe in a vacume?
jon galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 01:17 AM   #424
edit
Senior Member
 
edit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,303
Default di-men-s-ion' in-tact t-akt akt

English http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intact

[edit] Pronunciation

intact


Rhymes: -Škt

[edit] Adjective

intact
1.Untouched

tact~

Pronunciation
Rhymes: -Škt

[edit] Noun

tact (plural tacts)
1.The sense of touch; feeling.  [quotations ▼]


2.(music) The stroke in beating time.
3.Sensitive mental touch; peculiar skill or faculty; nice perception or discernment; ready power of appreciating and doing what is required by circumstances.  [quotations ▼]


4.the ability to deal with embarrassing situation carefully and without doing or saying anything that will annoy or upset other people, Careful consideration in dealing with others to avoid giving offense, the ability to say right thing. By the use of tact, she was able to calm her jealous husband. I used tact when I told my fat uncle that his extra weight made him look better.

French: tact m

from wiki tact/takt/act http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...kt&redirect=no


Takt time, derived from the German word Taktzeit which translates to cycle time, sets the pace for industrial manufacturing lines.

Tact is a term that B.F. Skinner used to describe a verbal operant in which a certain response is evoked (or at least strengthened) by a particular object or event, or property of an object or event.[1] More generally, the tact is verbal contact with the physical world.


Akt, also known as Protein Kinase B (PKB), is a serine/threonine-specific protein kinase that plays a key role in multiple cellular processes such as glucose metabolism, apoptosis, cell proliferation, transcription and cell migration.
Regulation
Akt[1] is involved in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and other signaling pathways.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/act

Rhymes: -Škt

[edit] Noun

act (countable and uncountable; plural acts)
1.(countable) Something done, a deed. An act of good will.

Last edited by edit; 04-05-2012 at 01:18 AM.
edit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 01:43 AM   #425
edit
Senior Member
 
edit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,303
Default act

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.



Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.


Three-act structure


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...etesseract.png



The Three-Act Structure is a model used in writing and evaluating modern storytelling which divides a screenplay into a three parts called the Setup, the Confrontation and the Resolution.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-act_structure




Contents
[hide] 1 Structure
2 Interpretations
3 See also
4 References
5 External links


[edit] Structure

The first act is usually used for exposition, to establish the main characters, their relationships and the world they live in. Earlier in the first act, a dynamic, on-screen incident occurs that confronts the main character (the protagonist), whose attempts to deal with this incident leads to a second and more dramatic situation, known as the first turning point, which (a) signals the end of the first act, (b) ensures life will never be the same again for the protagonist and (c) raises a dramatic question that will be answered in the climax of the film. The dramatic question should be framed in terms of the protagonist's call to action, (Will X recover the diamond?, Will Y get the girl? Will Z capture the killer?).[1] This is known as the inciting incident, or catalyst.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rcular.svg.png

Three-act structure

Main article: Three-act structure

Most screenplays have a three-act structure, following an organization that dates back to Aristotle's Poetics. The three acts are setup (of the location and characters), confrontation (with an obstacle), and resolution (culminating in a climax and a dÚnouement). In a two-hour film, the first and third acts both typically last around 30 minutes, with the middle act lasting roughly an hour.

In Writing Drama, French writer and director Yves Lavandier shows a slightly different approach.[11] As most theorists, he maintains that every human action, whether fictitious or real, contains three logical parts: before the action, during the action, and after the action. But since the climax is part of the action, Yves Lavandier considers the second act must include the climax, which makes for a much shorter third act than is found in most screenwriting theories.

Besides the three act structure, it is also common to utilize a four or five act structure in a screenplay, though certain screenplays may include as many as twenty separate acts.

[edit] The Hero's Journey

The hero's journey, also referred to as the monomyth, is an idea formulated by noted mythologist Joseph Campbell. The central concept of the monomyth is that a pattern can be seen in stories and myths across history. Campbell defined and explained that pattern in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949).

Campbell's insight was that important myths from around the world which have survived for thousands of years, all share a fundamental structure. This fundamental structure contains a number of stages, which includes


1.a call to adventure, which the hero has to accept or decline,
2.a road of trials, regarding which the hero succeeds or fails,
3.achieving the goal or ("boon"), which often results in important self-knowledge,
4.a return to the ordinary world, as to which, again, the hero can succeed or fail, and
5.application of the boon, in which what the hero has gained can be used to improve the world
.



Later, screenwriter Christopher Vogler refined and expanded the Hero's Journey for the screenplay form in his book, The Writer's Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers (1993).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenw...-act_structure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical...ble#Four_parts
Screenwriting is the art and craft of writing scripts for mass media such as feature films, television productions or video games. It is frequently a freelance profession.

Last edited by edit; 04-05-2012 at 01:58 AM.
edit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 02:05 AM   #426
edit
Senior Member
 
edit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,303
Default





edit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 10:39 AM   #427
jon galt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OZ
Posts: 3,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaito View Post
The CORRECT laws of Physics will apply at all levels of scale be it sub-atomic or galactic. Logic is not dependant on scale.
true, but our perception seems to be, or at least our perception is severely limited. what they have found with quantum mechanics is that it goes against our current logic. i feel that we are missing part of the picture essential to our understanding of how the universe works, we may never get a unified theory.

Last edited by jon galt; 04-05-2012 at 10:56 AM.
jon galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 10:55 AM   #428
jon galt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OZ
Posts: 3,179
Default

there a theory that some what explains why our universe is ''fine tuned'' to support life ect. ie if the force of gravity was any different stars would not form.
that our universe is one of an infinite number, kinda like bubble forming on boiling water,each have different properties and different laws of physics, some expand too fast and burst, others don't expand fast enough and collapse, and a small fraction expand at the right speed,with the right laws of physics to support stars ect, ie our 'bubble'.

string theory proposes that there is 11 dimentions, but this was more a solution to infinites in answers to exations.

Einsteins relativity says that at a fundamental reality space and time are the same force, ie space-time

i think its Bohr (need to check) who also talks of a fundamental aspect of reality where all objects are connected, ie no space between them, which also implies there is no objects, and all matter, all the universe is a manifestation of the same underling ,'some-thing'.

this some what explains why quantum mechanics is counter intuitive, like were are getting a peek of this fundamental reality, which goes against our experience

even if you dont believe in other universes or dimensions some of the theories are pretty cool

@edit, some nice info thanks for the links

Last edited by jon galt; 04-05-2012 at 10:58 AM.
jon galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 10:16 PM   #429
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jon galt View Post
true, but our perception seems to be, or at least our perception is severely limited. what they have found with quantum mechanics is that it goes against our current logic. i feel that we are missing part of the picture essential to our understanding of how the universe works, we may never get a unified theory.
Not while Pharisee Money-Changers are running academia we won't - save for a fraudulent one
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 10:20 PM   #430
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.


Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.
Quantum Physics is a hoax.

http://scienceforums.com/topic/11645.../page__st__210

There are only 3 spatial dimensions.

There is, however, what you might call overlapping 'dimensions' - actually organisations of matter/energy/consciousness - all occupying the same infinity of 3 dimensional space but to a large extent unable to communicate with one another - so one does not normally see another lying at a smaller scale.

Last edited by rodin; 04-05-2012 at 10:21 PM.
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 11:53 PM   #431
twilight_sparkle
Senior Member
 
twilight_sparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,840
Default

AAAAHHH The JEWS!! Save me from the Jews and their lies!!!! Help!!!!
twilight_sparkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 02:34 PM   #432
edelweiss pirate
Senior Member
 
edelweiss pirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Africa.
Posts: 17,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post
Quantum Physics is a hoax.
You don't even know what quantum physics is.

Nothing personal. But you just don't.


Quantum physics is where the spiritual dimension overlaps into materialistic science.


It boils down to a universe where the most powerful force over matter is consciousness (the observer who can actually CHANGE THE STATE of the material universe)
__________________
The meaning of existence is to preserve unspoiled, undisturbed and undistorted the image of eternity with which each person is born. Like a silver moon in a calm, still pond. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

NEW!...My NEW blog..... visit the all new brand-new, new Truthatron .... It's NEW!

Or visit the old one....Illuminati analysis, music and belly fluff! INSIDER INFO

Last edited by edelweiss pirate; 05-05-2012 at 02:36 PM.
edelweiss pirate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 07:20 PM   #433
truegroup
Senior Member
 
truegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post
Quantum Physics is a hoax.
No it isn't. Theoretical physics has just as much credence as anything until it is disproven. Bare assertion doesn't make it so.

I find the subject hard to get my head around, but to say it is a hoax is just nutty. If you want to say you think it is wrong, fine, but hoax implies a whole branch of physicists intending to deceive.
truegroup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2012, 02:47 PM   #434
the nine
Senior Member
 
the nine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post
3 dimensions and fuck all parallel universes.
If one considers that the whole realm we call 'reality' is driven by the collective mind.
a fracturing/splitting model of change is inevitable..imho.

(see double slit experiment for irregularities in perception and general scientific knowledge.)

The self generating nature of the collective ego, is to validate this separatist realm and perpetuate its existence.
when each individual ego encounters a big choice of life changing proportions, the collective ego mind fractures time and space and creates two paths..The chosen path by the individual is countered by the individual and the physical realm separating and taking the other choice in a parallel universe.
All outcomes are played out, we only see the choices we perceive to be making.

This happens exponentially throughout the generated realm we call reality.

the truth is, all of these dimensions are projections of the mind..nothing is real!
__________________
"Uranus took an almighty bang early on" Garry Hunt Astronomer of the Imperial College, London.
The way to get a small fortune on Wall st is..to start with a large fortune.
the nine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 08:17 AM   #435
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,072
Default

Re Quantum physics.

You are all being fooled by language. What is a quantum? It is an indivisible state. A discrete.. something. It can be an 'energy level' or a 'spin' (whatever that is). You all think quanta are something magical. Let me disabuse you.

Notes on a piano are quantised frequencies that form a harmonic scale. Each note has a discrete value, The frequencies are determined by harmonic relationships.

Take a single string. There are harmonics, and you can find them by simply damping the string in the correct place. Plenty guitarists here know that. These harmonics are 'quantised' too.

Take charge. Charge is quantised into positive and negative, depending on whether an ion (say) has a surfiet or deficit of electrons.

Quantum is everywhere - the number of apples on a tree is quantized.

As for the weird stuff - that's all Jewish bullshit
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 11:48 AM   #436
tinyint
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Meerkat Manor
Posts: 20,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post

Quantum is everywhere - the number of apples on a tree is quantized.
It reduces to the fibonacci sequence and Phi, the golden mean.
Everything is harmonically scaled in nature, its a gigantic symphony..
Mathematics can describe the great construction plan, no matter if on micro or macro level.

Now, I get back to Heisenberg. Clearly he was a clever dude with the right ideas in my view.
He postulated something interesting, the uncertainty principle.
In short, particles will not always have a measurable impulse and location.
Hence, wave forms, I conclude.

Huygens, btw, already expected in 1650 light to be wave forms. The counter particle theory goes back to Newton and his "geometric optic". Einstein was also a particle believer.
tinyint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 02:24 PM   #437
tnt1
Senior Member
 
tnt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The birth place of wind and water
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaito View Post
The CORRECT laws of Physics will apply at all levels of scale be it sub-atomic or galactic. Logic is not dependant on scale.
Slowly, very slowly science is catching on but they still stubbornly cling to this matter as the substance of the universe theory. The body, just like universe is a delicate and plastic instrument readily molding and shaping to become that which intention directs and dictates. Gravity, like all the evil, good, bad, up, down and all other matter related creations are all just that. Creations of consciousness that were first thought or looked for by consciousness, universe created and became what was looked for and sought by consciousness and here we are. Still looking into the looking glass of self and not recognizing self when we see it. When science finally gets to the same level as many of the great spiritual teachers and recognizes that consciousness is the substance of the universe and that all things are created by this then we'll actually start moving forward at a much faster pace as critical mass will have been achieved and consciousness will expand and grow once again to start the new cycle as we evolve further to eventually remember that we are the all the waking consciousness of god. Inseparable from the one that is the only all there is. Pure consciousness all encompassing, reflecting back to us as the looking glass of life.
__________________
rabbit hole here
tnt1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 03:02 PM   #438
jon galt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OZ
Posts: 3,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodin View Post

As for the weird stuff - that's all Jewish bullshit

including Heisenberg?
jon galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM   #439
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jon galt View Post
including Heisenberg?
The Uncertainty Principle is another hoax. What we really have is a resolution problem no different from that (in principle) we experience with digital sampling (many audiophiles here I think - plus also applies to pixel density etc.)

Due to observation method we are limited in accuracy with the position/momentum pair of parameters (which are obviously related). If we had a finer probe we could elicit much more detail.
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 07:40 PM   #440
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 17,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinyint View Post
It reduces to the fibonacci sequence and Phi, the golden mean.
Everything is harmonically scaled in nature, its a gigantic symphony..
Mathematics can describe the great construction plan, no matter if on micro or macro level.

Now, I get back to Heisenberg. Clearly he was a clever dude with the right ideas in my view.
He postulated something interesting, the uncertainty principle.
In short, particles will not always have a measurable impulse and location.
Hence, wave forms, I conclude.

Huygens, btw, already expected in 1650 light to be wave forms. The counter particle theory goes back to Newton and his "geometric optic". Einstein was also a particle believer.
What if...

light was always a wave, never a particle. makes sense no? since it HAS NO MASS. It can have momentum, or apparently so, BECAUSE IT EXCITES AND MOVES AETHER. Just as sound is always a wave, but can have momentum (apparently). Put your hand in front of a bass speaker...

It imparts energy to the medium, and thus the medium has momentum.

Once again I refer you to the Ancel Gray evidence that PROVES the photoelectric effect, for which One Stone got his Nobel War Prize, was yet ANOTHER hoax.
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM.