Dimensions

[rodin]

Originally Posted by shinigami

So how many dimensions are there? And if there are parallel universes, do they have other dimensions inside?

3 dimensions and fuck all parallel universes.

[kaito]

Originally Posted by jon galt

Current theory would suggest that light is niether a particle nor a wave but has properties of both. A concept that our present model can not comprehend. The laws of nature at a subatomic level are incompatable with the laws of nature for the large every day world.

The CORRECT laws of Physics will apply at all levels of scale be it sub-atomic or galactic. Logic is not dependant on scale.

[edelweiss pirate]

Originally Posted by rodin

3 dimensions and fuck all parallel universes.

There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.


Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.

[lyricusmagna]

Parallel universe exist, no matter how much you fuck them Rodin.

[jon galt]

Originally Posted by rodin

No

Every single wave/particle experiment is fatally flawed. Lies are everywhere.

Here's what really is. IMO

Light and all EM radiation is a disturbance of the aether, as sound is a disturbance of the air. It is as massless as sound.

Electron 'waves' are really em fields created by a particle moving though the aether. (Magnetism is the aether's response to charge motion)

Aether is a dead horse if you want to flog it please show one instance of it being detected, or explain how it can exist in a vacume. Explain how light passes through a vacume, if all it is is a disturbance in aether. What does light 'disturbe in a vacume?

[edit]

English http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intact

[edit] Pronunciation

intact


Rhymes: -ækt

[edit] Adjective

intact
1.Untouched

tact~

Pronunciation
Rhymes: -ækt

[edit] Noun

tact (plural tacts)
1.The sense of touch; feeling.  [quotations ▼]


2.(music) The stroke in beating time.
3.Sensitive mental touch; peculiar skill or faculty; nice perception or discernment; ready power of appreciating and doing what is required by circumstances.  [quotations ▼]


4.the ability to deal with embarrassing situation carefully and without doing or saying anything that will annoy or upset other people, Careful consideration in dealing with others to avoid giving offense, the ability to say right thing. By the use of tact, she was able to calm her jealous husband. I used tact when I told my fat uncle that his extra weight made him look better.

French: tact m

from wiki tact/takt/act http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...kt&redirect=no


Takt time, derived from the German word Taktzeit which translates to cycle time, sets the pace for industrial manufacturing lines.

Tact is a term that B.F. Skinner used to describe a verbal operant in which a certain response is evoked (or at least strengthened) by a particular object or event, or property of an object or event.[1] More generally, the tact is verbal contact with the physical world.


Akt, also known as Protein Kinase B (PKB), is a serine/threonine-specific protein kinase that plays a key role in multiple cellular processes such as glucose metabolism, apoptosis, cell proliferation, transcription and cell migration.
Regulation
Akt[1] is involved in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and other signaling pathways.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/act

Rhymes: -ækt

[edit] Noun

act (countable and uncountable; plural acts)
1.(countable) Something done, a deed. An act of good will.

[edit]

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.


Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.

Three-act structure


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...etesseract.png

Dimension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dimension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dimension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Three-Act Structure is a model used in writing and evaluating modern storytelling which divides a screenplay into a three parts called the Setup, the Confrontation and the Resolution.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-act_structure




Contents
[hide] 1 Structure
2 Interpretations
3 See also
4 References
5 External links


[edit] Structure

The first act is usually used for exposition, to establish the main characters, their relationships and the world they live in. Earlier in the first act, a dynamic, on-screen incident occurs that confronts the main character (the protagonist), whose attempts to deal with this incident leads to a second and more dramatic situation, known as the first turning point, which (a) signals the end of the first act, (b) ensures life will never be the same again for the protagonist and (c) raises a dramatic question that will be answered in the climax of the film. The dramatic question should be framed in terms of the protagonist's call to action, (Will X recover the diamond?, Will Y get the girl? Will Z capture the killer?).[1] This is known as the inciting incident, or catalyst.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rcular.svg.png

Three-act structure

Main article: Three-act structure

Most screenplays have a three-act structure, following an organization that dates back to Aristotle's Poetics. The three acts are setup (of the location and characters), confrontation (with an obstacle), and resolution (culminating in a climax and a dénouement). In a two-hour film, the first and third acts both typically last around 30 minutes, with the middle act lasting roughly an hour.

In Writing Drama, French writer and director Yves Lavandier shows a slightly different approach.[11] As most theorists, he maintains that every human action, whether fictitious or real, contains three logical parts: before the action, during the action, and after the action. But since the climax is part of the action, Yves Lavandier considers the second act must include the climax, which makes for a much shorter third act than is found in most screenwriting theories.

Besides the three act structure, it is also common to utilize a four or five act structure in a screenplay, though certain screenplays may include as many as twenty separate acts.

[edit] The Hero's Journey

The hero's journey, also referred to as the monomyth, is an idea formulated by noted mythologist Joseph Campbell. The central concept of the monomyth is that a pattern can be seen in stories and myths across history. Campbell defined and explained that pattern in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949).

Campbell's insight was that important myths from around the world which have survived for thousands of years, all share a fundamental structure. This fundamental structure contains a number of stages, which includes


1.a call to adventure, which the hero has to accept or decline,
2.a road of trials, regarding which the hero succeeds or fails,
3.achieving the goal or ("boon"), which often results in important self-knowledge,
4.a return to the ordinary world, as to which, again, the hero can succeed or fail, and
5.application of the boon, in which what the hero has gained can be used to improve the world.


Later, screenwriter Christopher Vogler refined and expanded the Hero's Journey for the screenplay form in his book, The Writer's Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers (1993).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenw...-act_structure

Ancient Greek literature - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ancient Greek literature - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ancient Greek literature - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sanskrit drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sanskrit drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sanskrit drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Drama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical...ble#Four_parts
Screenwriting is the art and craft of writing scripts for mass media such as feature films, television productions or video games. It is frequently a freelance profession.

[edit]

[jon galt]

Originally Posted by kaito

The CORRECT laws of Physics will apply at all levels of scale be it sub-atomic or galactic. Logic is not dependant on scale.

true, but our perception seems to be, or at least our perception is severely limited. what they have found with quantum mechanics is that it goes against our current logic. i feel that we are missing part of the picture essential to our understanding of how the universe works, we may never get a unified theory.

[jon galt]

there a theory that some what explains why our universe is ''fine tuned'' to support life ect. ie if the force of gravity was any different stars would not form.
that our universe is one of an infinite number, kinda like bubble forming on boiling water,each have different properties and different laws of physics, some expand too fast and burst, others don't expand fast enough and collapse, and a small fraction expand at the right speed,with the right laws of physics to support stars ect, ie our 'bubble'.

string theory proposes that there is 11 dimentions, but this was more a solution to infinites in answers to exations.

Einsteins relativity says that at a fundamental reality space and time are the same force, ie space-time

i think its Bohr (need to check) who also talks of a fundamental aspect of reality where all objects are connected, ie no space between them, which also implies there is no objects, and all matter, all the universe is a manifestation of the same underling ,'some-thing'.

this some what explains why quantum mechanics is counter intuitive, like were are getting a peek of this fundamental reality, which goes against our experience

even if you dont believe in other universes or dimensions some of the theories are pretty cool

@edit, some nice info thanks for the links

[rodin]

Originally Posted by jon galt

true, but our perception seems to be, or at least our perception is severely limited. what they have found with quantum mechanics is that it goes against our current logic. i feel that we are missing part of the picture essential to our understanding of how the universe works, we may never get a unified theory.

Not while Pharisee Money-Changers are running academia we won't - save for a fraudulent one

[rodin]

Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate

There's at least five dimensions.

The fifth dimension accounts for the anomaly of quantum entanglement.


Things which seem separate from each other actually occupy the same location in a higher dimension.

We are all one etc.

Quantum Physics is a hoax.

http://scienceforums.com/topic/11645.../page__st__210

There are only 3 spatial dimensions.

There is, however, what you might call overlapping 'dimensions' - actually organisations of matter/energy/consciousness - all occupying the same infinity of 3 dimensional space but to a large extent unable to communicate with one another - so one does not normally see another lying at a smaller scale.

[twilight_sparkle]

AAAAHHH The JEWS!! Save me from the Jews and their lies!!!! Help!!!!

[edelweiss pirate]

Originally Posted by rodin

Quantum Physics is a hoax.

You don't even know what quantum physics is.

Nothing personal. But you just don't.


Quantum physics is where the spiritual dimension overlaps into materialistic science.


It boils down to a universe where the most powerful force over matter is consciousness (the observer who can actually CHANGE THE STATE of the material universe)

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by rodin

Quantum Physics is a hoax.

No it isn't. Theoretical physics has just as much credence as anything until it is disproven. Bare assertion doesn't make it so.

I find the subject hard to get my head around, but to say it is a hoax is just nutty. If you want to say you think it is wrong, fine, but hoax implies a whole branch of physicists intending to deceive.

[the nine]

Originally Posted by rodin

3 dimensions and fuck all parallel universes.

If one considers that the whole realm we call 'reality' is driven by the collective mind.
a fracturing/splitting model of change is inevitable..imho.

(see double slit experiment for irregularities in perception and general scientific knowledge.)

The self generating nature of the collective ego, is to validate this separatist realm and perpetuate its existence.
when each individual ego encounters a big choice of life changing proportions, the collective ego mind fractures time and space and creates two paths..The chosen path by the individual is countered by the individual and the physical realm separating and taking the other choice in a parallel universe.
All outcomes are played out, we only see the choices we perceive to be making.

This happens exponentially throughout the generated realm we call reality.

the truth is, all of these dimensions are projections of the mind..nothing is real!

[rodin]

Re Quantum physics.

You are all being fooled by language. What is a quantum? It is an indivisible state. A discrete.. something. It can be an 'energy level' or a 'spin' (whatever that is). You all think quanta are something magical. Let me disabuse you.

Notes on a piano are quantised frequencies that form a harmonic scale. Each note has a discrete value, The frequencies are determined by harmonic relationships.

Take a single string. There are harmonics, and you can find them by simply damping the string in the correct place. Plenty guitarists here know that. These harmonics are 'quantised' too.

Take charge. Charge is quantised into positive and negative, depending on whether an ion (say) has a surfiet or deficit of electrons.

Quantum is everywhere - the number of apples on a tree is quantized.

As for the weird stuff - that's all Jewish bullshit

[tinyint]

Originally Posted by rodin

Quantum is everywhere - the number of apples on a tree is quantized.

It reduces to the fibonacci sequence and Phi, the golden mean.
Everything is harmonically scaled in nature, its a gigantic symphony..
Mathematics can describe the great construction plan, no matter if on micro or macro level.

Now, I get back to Heisenberg. Clearly he was a clever dude with the right ideas in my view.
He postulated something interesting, the uncertainty principle.
In short, particles will not always have a measurable impulse and location.
Hence, wave forms, I conclude.

Huygens, btw, already expected in 1650 light to be wave forms. The counter particle theory goes back to Newton and his "geometric optic". Einstein was also a particle believer.

[tnt1]

Originally Posted by kaito

The CORRECT laws of Physics will apply at all levels of scale be it sub-atomic or galactic. Logic is not dependant on scale.

Slowly, very slowly science is catching on but they still stubbornly cling to this matter as the substance of the universe theory. The body, just like universe is a delicate and plastic instrument readily molding and shaping to become that which intention directs and dictates. Gravity, like all the evil, good, bad, up, down and all other matter related creations are all just that. Creations of consciousness that were first thought or looked for by consciousness, universe created and became what was looked for and sought by consciousness and here we are. Still looking into the looking glass of self and not recognizing self when we see it. When science finally gets to the same level as many of the great spiritual teachers and recognizes that consciousness is the substance of the universe and that all things are created by this then we'll actually start moving forward at a much faster pace as critical mass will have been achieved and consciousness will expand and grow once again to start the new cycle as we evolve further to eventually remember that we are the all the waking consciousness of god. Inseparable from the one that is the only all there is. Pure consciousness all encompassing, reflecting back to us as the looking glass of life.

[jon galt]

Originally Posted by rodin

As for the weird stuff - that's all Jewish bullshit

including Heisenberg?